A cut to fuel excise duty is off the table as global supply concerns mount, with officials advising Finance Minister Nicola Willis how high petrol prices could climb and what targeted support might be needed for households most exposed to rising petrol costs.
Willis briefed journalists on Monday about the Government's fuel strategy. She had been explicitly advised reducing fuel excise “would send the wrong signal at this time, and it would not be sufficiently targeted”.
“We're conscious that the the world is in an environment where fuel supplies have been limited by the disruption on the Strait of Hormuz, potentially reducing fuel stocks by up to 20% - so in that situation, dramatically reducing prices in a way that would encourage people to use more of something would not necessarily be prudent.”
Part of the fuel strategy was anticipating; “and to the extent possible, mitigating the impact on the New Zealand economy, including what could potentially be acute cost of living pressures for some households”.
She said from the government's point of view; “we need to ensure that any support we provide to households is temporary, is targeted, and is timely”.
“In this case, my household simply won't need as much help with the cost of living as some other households."
“Very clear in my mind is the mother, potentially living in South Auckland, who has no choice but to use her car each day to get to her cleaning shift at the airport, there is not a bus available for her at that time, and who is facing acute income pressure," Willis said.
“We need to make sure that we have in mind those New Zealanders who face the most acute cost of living pressures, rather than having blanket responses…”
Asked what level prices would have to rise to to consider a targeted response, Willis said prices had not yet reached levels comparable to after Russian invaded Ukraine in 2022.
“I have asked my officials to model what price increases they think we will expect to see over the coming weeks, and to also model what impact we think that would mean for some typical households and families," Willis said.
“I also have in mind the fact that some New Zealanders will, of their own volition, choose to take public transport, to carpool, to walk, and that is not a choice that the government wants to stand in the way of.”
Asked how likely it was that fuel importers would struggle to fill their orders, officials advised Willis moving to any further mitigation measures under the national fuel plan was at least three to four weeks away.
She said they the government was working with importers, looking several weeks ahead to about May, and asking how they were securing future orders.
“Many of them already have orders in that are currently covered, but they don't have orders out into the never, never,” she said.
“And we're conscious as we look out to a world where global fuel supply is far more constrained, particularly out of the Southeast Asian nations from which we import, that there may be a real race on to get those orders fulfilled."
“In the first instance, we would expect fuel importers would compete on price. That is, they will pay more to secure those orders in future. But in the second instance, they may wish to look more broadly beyond the refineries they currently rely on to look at other sources of fuel from around the world.”
They may also ask the Government to give them more options through changes such as broadening fuel specifications.
18 Comments
So, the next few weeks - months should not be too bad in terms of supply. But Hormuz could be closed for months. When the current "ships on the water" have unloaded, what happens then? I don't see this problem going away anytime soon.
So just putting ideas put there; what are our options then to reduce domestic demand? ...
- hybrid working arrangements (work from home)?
- encourage use of motorcycles (change license or registration requirements)?
- allow petrol price to skyrocket so that consumers seriously consider alternatives to driving the car ?
there is a huge different between as much as you want at a high price
vs price is high very limited supply.
they have to make sure diesel gets to farmers business owners trucking fleets, ambulances etc and critical workers (hydro maintenance guys etc etc ) happens
this you cannot fill containers does not work for farmers with quad bikes tractors etc etc.
Korea is currently saying to countries you cannot order more then last year.. thats cool
what happens when they say only 80% of last year.
we need demand destruction, i see working from home = answer
During level 4 lockdown in AKL I can remember driving on motorway and seeing one other car per km of driving.... stopped twice and police must have got the message as no more after that.
Yeh nah, wfh mostly cuts petrol commuting. The fuel that actually matters now is diesel ie/ freight agriculture and construction. None of those can work from home, so wfh wont reduce the demand that matters, it would just hurt retail even more
i cannot see that as bullish for nz real estate?
Maybe but thats a separate property question and not really related to this topic
the success of this crappy limited economic recovery is highly dependent on fuel prices and inflation, come election 26 if Labour get back in you can kiss any chance of economic recovery on its naked ass... as it rides out on the horse it came in on!
NZ has always been exposed to global tides and wash, learn up.
No jobs = no house price rise = no economic recovery for NZ
Motorcycles are impeeded by high ACC levies in the rego.
We could have a carpooling app
Presumably if petrol gets too expensive people will reduce usage, and possibly you'd see a decline in retail activity
Depends. Farm reg is less than $40/year with minimal observable difference on your rego sticker....
The sticker is redundant....there is instant connection to the database.
Other idea: educate Kiwis about eco-friendly driving, as it has been the case in Europe for more than 15 years (well they have compulsory driving schools over there). Apparently fuel isn't expensive enough for most drivers here, going full throttle at the green light only to stop at the next red light a few hundred meters later. Speeding doesn't help either but who cares...
How the government handles this situation could be the make or break in the next election. Not moving to provide relief could turn out to be a big mistake.
Yeh but cutting fuel tax now might win a few votes, but when it gets put back later it usually pisses more people off than it helped
Act party would say "let the market do its thing" i.e as supply diminishes the price rises and consumption drops.
Making petrol cheaper by removing tax won't get us any more tankers or encourage drivers to use less. People are such lazy creatures of habit , when it comes down to it.
David Seeless would say, “Let’s just remove the tax for my constituents, they don’t need to drive far. Everyone who doesn’t live in Epsom can pay market rates.”
The 80 kph speed restriction implemented during the (previous) oil shock was deemed effective in reducing fuel requirement, so much so it remained for years, unlike carless days.
What la la land are we living in? All of the world is experiencing this oil shock, yet Labour is expecting central government to dig into taxpayers pockets to spread a security blanket over the population to maintain life as if everything in NZ is just rosy and we should not experience any discomfort.
S**t happens and each has to deal with it.
I oppose reduction in fuel excise duty, or any blanket relief measures. Everyone will feel their own pain. There is no easy way to ease the extreme pain some in society will experience.
Targeted relief yes. That will be politically fraught. But so was the covid relief. And I sincerely hope some salient lessons were learnt by our politicians. Now is a time for real spine to be demonstrated from the Beehive - across the board. Not vacillating posturing for vote catching in the coming election.
They might try to buy votes...but as per someones else comment it won't get more fuel here...hard to be glass (jerry-can) half full about this situation...the "extreme pain some in society will experience" could be quite far spread this time.
Agreed. people cannot rely on the state to cushion the blows of realty. As humans have done for ages past, we must adapt and innovate to find solutions.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.