sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Keith Woodford says stagflation is the reality with hard decisions needed now

Economy / opinion
Keith Woodford says stagflation is the reality with hard decisions needed now
hard decisions await
Image sourced from Shutterstock.com

Stagflation is a situation where the economy is stagnant, inflation is out of bounds, and unemployment is high. That sums up the reality of New Zealand.

This reality runs well ahead of the statistics. For example, as I write this on 18 April, the latest quarterly data for GDP (gross domestic product) relates to quarter four (Q4) of 2025. It will be 18 June before we receive data for Q1 of 2026.

I do not criticise this apparent tardiness. It is simply the way things are. Even then, the Q1 numbers will be provisional.

The effect of the Iran-war

The Iran war will only have a modest effect on official GDP for Q1 2026. This is because of the way GDP is measured.  Official GDP for Q1 measures the level of activity in the economy over the whole period of January, February and March, and only one month of those three was a ‘war month’.

This means that what we are experiencing right now, in the second half of April, will not be evident in quarterly GDP data until the second half of September when Q2 data becomes available. Note that GDP is always expressed after adjustment for inflation.

The simplest way to know what is happening to the economy right now is to ask people who work at the coal face. That includes tradespeople and those in service industries

Where I live in Christchurch, the house construction industry, unlike most other parts of New Zealand, remains buoyant. But tradespeople tell me that householders are not moving ahead with repairs and renovations. There is no doubt that restaurants and cafes are doing it tough. The real estate market has also gone quiet.

All of this tells us that one does not need to be an economist to know that, right now, the economy is going backwards!

Unemployment

The latest quarterly data for unemployment is for Q4 of 2025. Unemployment at that time was 5.4%. This is the highest figure for unemployment since September 2015.

The lowest unemployment level in recent years was 3.2% in December 2021.

Part of the unemployment problem is a mismatch between the skillsets of unemployed people compared to the skillsets demanded by the market. But some of the unemployment is not so easily explained.

For example, many nursing graduates in 2025 could not get employment in New Zealand, and of those who did get nursing jobs, many were only for part time positions, typically 0.6. I can only shake my head in wonder at the steady flow of nurses across the waters to Australia.

Another metric of slackness in the employment market is the national statistics for underutilisation. This metric takes into account the effect of people who have only part-time work, but would like additional hours.

The current underutilisation rate is 13%, marginally below the 13.1% reached in December 2020 during the global Covid epidemic. Prior to that, in December 2019, the underutilisation rate was only 10.1%.

Accordingly, the big message in relation to unemployment is that we do indeed have slack resources. The challenge to using these resources is how to do so without creating inflation.

Inflation

The latest official rate for the CPI (consumer price index) inflation is 3.1% for calendar 2025. The updated rate through to and including Q1 of 2026 will be available on 21 April, which is before some of my readers will have read this article.

This quarterly inflation for Q1 of 2026 may even create a reduction in annual inflation compared to the much quoted 3.1% for calendar 2025. But if so, it will be a short-term mirage.

There is general agreement that inflation is currently increasing in New Zealand. We all see it every time we stock up on groceries and fuel. The big question is how high will it go and for how long.

What we can be sure of is that most of the Iran-war inflation effects will not be picked up in the official inflation statistics until the Q2 data is released in July. Even then, the data will largely be confined to first-order effects.

Let there be no doubt: in regard to inflation we are in trouble. If inflation leads to compensating wage and salary increases then we will look back to the current inflation rate with fondness and longing.

Fighting stagflation

All of the above should be enough to convince readers that we already have stagflation baked in, with stagnant growth, high unemployment and exponentiating inflation.  

How do we find a solution that takes us back to per capita growth, low unemployment and stable prices?

The answer is that there is no simple path.

The only tools that are available are monetary and fiscal (tax) policy.

Monetary tools lie in the realm of the Reserve Bank. Fiscal policy lies in the hands of Government through the Minister of Finance.

The only tool currently in the tool-bag for inflation is to raise the OCR (official cash rate). Essentially, this is the rate that the Reserve Bank charges commercial banks for loans, and also what it pays commercial banks for their deposits.  From there, this rate works its way through the economy with commercial bank cash margins of another 2% or more added in.

This OCR is currently at 2.5% which is very low compared to historical rates over the last 26 years.

In other words, the OCR is currently set at a level which is typically regarded as stimulatory, both for inflation and economic growth. However, in our current case, we have the inflation but not the growth.

If the Reserve Bank wants to control inflation and hold it at less than 3% then there is no alternative but to raise the OCR.

This will increase interest rates across the economy and have a negative effect on GDP in the short to medium term.  It will almost certainly reduce inflation, but this will come with considerable pain to the general population.

However, allowing inflation to exponentiate further will be highly destructive for the longer-term situation. We must not go there.

This is where the Government must step in with fiscal policy.  The pain from controlling inflation must be balanced by reducing tax rates for those on modest incomes. Monetary and fiscal policy must work together.

Specific Monetary Policy

If I were the Governor of the Reserve Bank, I would raise the OCR forthwith to 3%, and state that the Reserve Bank hopes to maintain this rate without further increases being necessary at least for 2026.  

This would be consistent with the Reserve Bank Governor’s statement on taking up her current role some five months ago, that she was going to be “laser focused” on inflation. The Governor has already stated that she expects inflation to reach 4.2% inflation in the June quarter. This not the time for pussy-footing around!

Specific fiscal policy

Now is the time to raise the band limits for income tax.

  • I would raise the upper income limit for the 10.5% rate from $15,600 to $25,600.
  • I would raise the upper limit for the 17.5% tax rate from $53,600 to $63,600
  • I would also raise the income tax levied on incomes in excess of $250,000 from the current 39% to 45%

I would make these adjustments to come into effect as from 1 July 2026.

This would provide an extra $700 per annum in tax paid earnings for those on limited part time work and an extra $1500 of tax-paid earnings for almost all other taxpayers.

Of course nothing comes free of downsides. I estimate that this modification of tax rates would increase the Government’s operating deficit by approximately $4 billon and this would have to be covered by additional Government bonds. 

In general, I am very negatively disposed to even the current level of Government deficit. But these are special times and special action is required.

I would also make the comment that these are not the time for ‘catch-up’ wage increases based on inflation.  Any wage increases must be underpinned by increased productivity and increased skills.

Nor are they the time for ‘catch-up’ increases in prices by those in retail businesses.

And to those who don’t like what I have written here, what is your suggestion?


*Keith Woodford was Professor of Farm Management and Agribusiness at Lincoln University for 15 years through to 2015. He is now Principal Consultant at AgriFood Systems Ltd. You can contact him directly here.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

7 Comments

Yes agree. 
With an emergency OCR rise to 3% with a WARNING of higher OCR at each meeting, if pricing expectations and settings are not contained.

If they decide to "head in sand" and do nothing at the next two meetings, we could see OCR settings required to be high singles to low double digits in 2027, as inflation flares like wildfire and the 1970s gives us a call.

The 1970's are already back with NZ housing prices in serious, unabated crash mode, in nominal and more so in the most important inflation adjusted REAL terms.   
Next inline with fuel shocks, could very well be, ballooning cost of funds.  

Our ARM NZ mortgage market, is looking like a financial WMD.

Up
2

Yip I’m with you and Keith - I also would be raising rates.

They used large emergency interest rate cuts during COVID when they feared deflation so why not be consistent their approach as we now fear inflation?

Why such an imbalanced and inconsistent view on monetary policy? Ie we will happily do 75bps cuts when we ‘think’ we might experience future deflation (even if it isn’t measured yet - eg 2020) but when we are 99% certain out of band inflation/stagflation is ahead of us, the RBNZ fears even raising rates 25bps..let alone considering an emergency 75bps raise in OCR? The 1-2 year swaps would justify it - that is how far detached the OCR now is from shorter term wholesale rates. 

Why the bias always favouring OCR cuts over raises? Even after the new RBNZ leader said she would be laser focused on inflation but has allowed inflation to already drift outside the mandated band before this oil crisis emerged? Talk the talk but refuse to walk the walk. I guess time will tell. She may yet have her hand forced by wholesale markets and be a follower not a leader. 

 

Up
0

It sheets back to Covid. The impact and aftermath. The whole nation has been staggering along ever since. When you count the negative factors in the economy as the author identifies, it reveals  none of it has really got going again. There has not been a meaningful recovery and the people are still feeling the pinch. Stress withdrawal levels from Kiwi Saver illustrates that and another recession looms.

Up
0

Too truncated a window - and a tad of bias in there too, perhaps. 

This can be traced back 50+ years, not just a handful

Up
1

Well still seems a bit early to jump from “inflation risk is back” straight to “emergency OCR rise now”.

If demand was humming and the labour market was tight, yeh fair enough, different story.

But with growth soft, unemployment at 5.4%, and a lot of the latest pressure coming in via fuel/oil, I reckon hold with a hawkish tone still seems the more likely path unless it starts spreading more broadly through wages\services

Up
0

I agree that the Governor of the Reserve Bank is likely to move more slowly than what I am proposing. But raising the OCR to 3% is still only lifting it to what can be considered a neutral level. Note that I am proposing action moves within both monetary and fiscal policy.  Fiscal adjustment will provide stimulation.
KeithW

Up
0

My tongue-in-cheek suggestion is that you are thinking in terms of yesterday but need to address tomorrow. 

Wages are spent on real stuff - processed parts of the planet. 

Investments expect to be spent on real stuff - processed parts of the planet. 

Savings         "        "     "    "       "     "     "     -  processed parts of the planet. 

Debt and bonds ditto. 

Etc., etc., etc.,...

But there is ever-less planet remaining (in useful extraction/depletion terms) - and a never-more collection of demands-in-waiting, on same. 

So my real suggestion is that we need a new way of accounting; one indexed to the (real) planet. To replace the one we have, which is past is fit-for-purpose date. 

I don't suggest we will do so willingly; I suggest that in the medium terms we will be forced to go there anyway. 

 

 

Up
0