Government to appoint an independent ministerial adviser to help EQC settle claims more quickly

Government to appoint an independent ministerial adviser to help EQC settle claims more quickly
Minister Responsible for the EQC Megan Woods

Private insurers are welcoming the Government’s move to appoint an “independent ministerial adviser” to help the Earthquake Commission (EQC) settle its remaining Canterbury earthquake claims quickly.

The Minister Responsible for the EQC, Megan Woods, has announced the adviser will work with EQC’s board and management on “a plan to further speed up the settling of claims”.

Being a Crown entity, the EQC is currently monitored by Treasury. The appointment of a ministerial adviser will give Woods a more direct line of sight into the organisation.

Woods says she wants to receive advice on how the settlement of earthquake claims are progressing directly, “rather than through the mechanisms that you work through in terms of a Crown entity”.

“I’ve made it clear I am not satisfied with where EQC is at in respect of the Canterbury Earthquake work seven years on from the February 22nd event,” she says.

“For the around 2600 people with unresolved claims, being stuck in limbo is unacceptable.”

Woods says the unresolved claims are re-repairs.

Chairman quits

Her announcement around appointing an adviser has prompted the chair of EQC’s board, Maarten Wevers, to hand in his resignation.

“It is clear that the Minister has no confidence in the Board and staff of the Commission," Wevers says.

“As Chair, I take responsibility for that, and have stepped aside so that the Minister can appoint someone whom she assesses will be able to do a better job.”

Wevers notes the 2600 outstanding claims on EQC's books make up less than 0.6% of the 470,000 Canterbury quake claims it received.

Insurers supportive

Insurance Council of New Zealand CEO, Tim Grafton, is “supportive of any measures the Government takes to expedite settlements out of Canterbury”.

The same goes for Tower CEO, Richard Harding.

He says: "For a number of years now, Tower has said that the EQC model is fundamentally broken."

Tower’s chairman, Michael Stiassny, a year ago came out swinging against EQC, as in the year to September 2016 Tower received 297 new claims worth $22 million from the agency.

In the year to September 2017, it received 73 new over-cap claims from EQC. 

Tower is also trying to recover $65.1 million from EQC for land damage and building costs related to the Canterbury earthquakes. 

The High Court is later this year expected to decide whether or not Tower will receive a bulk of this, as along with IAG, it has filed proceedings against EQC over the way it has calculated how to settle certain types of land damage.

If EQC loses the case, interest.co.nz believes it could be made to pay private insurers tens, and possibly hundreds of millions of dollars.

"For a country that faces a significant earthquake risk, an organisation like EQC can play an important part helping communities recover from disaster and it is imperative that they operate efficiently and in the best interests of New Zealand," Harding says.

 IAG New Zealand CEO, Craig Olsen, says: “Since the Government took office, they have shown a clear commitment to speeding up the settlement of outstanding claims from the Canterbury earthquakes.

“We also believe it is time for some bold decisions, and look forward to working with the Minister on solutions that help the people of Canterbury and those who may be affected by future disasters.”

Suncorp New Zealand’s executive general manager of claims, Jimmy Higgins, says: “We have been working proactively with customers who still have unresolved EQC claims and we welcome any opportunity to see these expedited and resolved quickly. 

“We look forward to working constructively with the independent Ministerial advisor once an appointment is made.”

Claims for the Kaikoura earthquake have been settled more quickly than those for the Canterbury earthquakes, largely because a new system has been used whereby private insurers have received and settled claims on behalf of EQC.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

4 Comments

Comment Filter

Highlight new comments in the last hr(s).

Maybe this will help, maybe not. But after seven years it’s a national disgrace not only the level of outstanding claims, and within that those that have had to resort to litigation, but the thousands of homes that have been ruined by EQC repairs, and plenty too by Insurers, that are not to code and therefore unlawful. And as usual there are the weasel words from the Insurers. In our case our insurer went to extraordinary lengths to collude with EQC to keep our “repair” under cap. We found this out only through discovery. Six years down the track, on the eve of our court case, suddenly we are a rebuild. From a less than $115000.00 repair to a complete rebuild! Go figure that out. EQC & Insurance “qualified, independent & expert” assessors all of them together, could only get it that wrong if they wanted to.

Actually with the new minister forcing the resignation, long overdue in my opinion, of the EQC chair, well then, at long last there is some real bite, and with that, hope. And as well confirmation that the enquiry into the activities of EQC is being formed as we speak. What that enquiry might reveal is long awaited but if it reveals anything at all of the previous minister’s under arrangements, then that is likely to be voluminous indeed. It is interesting, another commentary reveals that a holding by the government, with tax payer’s money, now has a stake of 8% in Tower Insurance. A propping up exercise, or flogging a dead horse, take your pick. But of course the Chair of Tower is said, opinion only, to move in lofty government circles. So could that be perhaps, when you throw Southern Response & EQC into the mix, a nice little threesome. Just one little wish. Please the new government, go forward with what is just for the real citizens of our good country, and not what the big corporate cronies of the previous government helped themselves to. That National Government DID NOT stand behind its people!

Aw c'mon, surely you're exaggerating. It can't be that bad. We're living in a civilised country after all....

I'm joking, in case anyone's sarcasm meter is broken. I'm in the middle of this mess too, and you have to be, to be able to believe what is going on. Apparently NZ has just been ranked the least corrupt country in the world, God help the rest of them if it's true.

Yeah, that least corrupt thing is a joke. Obviously it doesn't include government organisations like EQC and Southern Response. Some of us know just how bad they behave, but most do not appreciate it unless it affects them or someone close.
Christchurch faces years of people either trying to sell an EQC/Fletcher "repaired" house, or people who have bought one, and then discovering how EQC systematically under-scoped and inadequately repaired homes, overlaid with the dirty tricks and incompetance from Fletchers.
And all that is separate to those still fighting to get their homes damage honestly and fairly assessed, which is essential for an appropriate repair strategy as per their insurance policy.