sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Our comprehensive review of KiwiSaver growth funds to September 2017, identifying who has the best long-term returns

Our comprehensive review of KiwiSaver growth funds to September 2017, identifying who has the best long-term returns

By David Chaston

This is our third review of the long term performance of various types of KiwiSaver funds to September 2017. The first one reviewed default funds, the second one moderate funds, and this one focuses on growth funds.

Overall, we cover three categories of growth funds; balanced growth, growth, and aggressive funds.

For balanced growth type funds there is more volatility in returns as they traditionally have higher exposures to equities or property than for moderate, default or conservative funds. These types of funds include bonds with a lower credit rating which gives them a higher risk profile. Although the losses in capital may be experienced more frequently, over the long run your capital value should grow more quickly than the more conservative types.

For growth and aggressive funds larger amounts of the capital are exposed to equity markets and investors should expect to see larger volatility in their returns from month to month and year on year. But in the longer run, these funds should deliver the best returns. That's the theory at least - and you should check to see that over the longer term managers are rewarding you for the extra risk you are exposing yourself to. A track record is one way to verify that (although track records are not always indicative of future outcomes).

Growth funds shy away from the more speculative choices you can make in an aggressive mandate. Growth funds will have a higher exposure to 'alternative assets' than most other categories, but not as high as aggressive funds.

'Alternative assets' are investments in business ventures that may not have the usual liquid markets to trade them, or investments usually only suitable for very experienced investors. Alternative investments include private equity, hedge funds, managed futures, real estate, commodities and derivatives contracts. And they might include property assets via syndications, for example, or pre-IPO venture capital equity.

Aggressive funds will have a higher exposure to alternative assets than growth funds, who will lean to more property-type choices.

Growth funds are high-risk, high-reward options, but not the highest risk. They will deliver volatile returns, but over time, especially longer time frames suitable for KiwiSaver, they should greatly outperform, generating a compounding return far ahead of inflation.

But do they?

That is what this review is trying to assess, and who has the better track record in this space.

Here are the results:

Growth Funds      
(EE, ER, Govt)
+ Cum net gains
after all tax, fees
cum return
= Ending value
in your account
last 3 yr
return % p.a.
since April 2008 X Y Z
to September 2017      
% p.a.
Aon Russell LifePoints Growth G G G 29,554 16,558 9.2 46,112 9.4
Aon Russell LifePoints Balanced G B B 29,554 14,566 8.4 44,120 8.2
ANZ OneAnswer Balanced Growth G G G 29,554 13,752 8.0 43,306 7.2
ANZ Balanced Growth G G G 29,554 13,604 8.0 43,159 7.2
AMP ANZ Default Balanced Growth G B G 29,554 12,893 7.6 42,447 6.9
ANZ Default Balanced Growth G G G 29,554 12,670 7.5 42,224 7.2
Fisher Funds Two Growth G G G 29,554 12,570 7.5 42,124 7.4
Aon ANZ Default Balanced G B B 29,554 12,136 7.3 41,690 6.1
ASB Balanced G B B 29,554 11,754 7.1 41,308 7.1
Westpac Balanced G B B 29,554 11,320 6.9 40,874 6.7
Mercer Balanced G B G 29,554 10,669 6.5 40,223 6.8
AMP Growth G G G 29,554 10,442 6.4 39,996 6.0
Kiwi Wealth Balanced Fund G B B 29,554 10,175 6.3 39,729 6.1
QuayStreet Growth G G   29,554 9,666 6.0 39,220 6.6
AMP Balanced G B B 29,554 8,818 5.6 38,372 5.0
QuayStreet Balanced G B   29,554 8,526 5.4 38,080 5.8
QuayStreet Balanced SRI G B   29,554 7,442 4.8 36,996 4.5
Booster Balanced Growth G G G 24,240 6,966 6.8 31,206 6.9
BNZ Growth G G G 16,996 3,900 8.6 20,896 8.4
Generate Focused Growth G G G 16,603 3,989 8.2 20,592 8.5
QuayStreet Altum G B   11,503 1,348 7.1 12,851 ...
Mercer Growth G G G 10,332 1,202 7.9 11,535 ...
Column X is definition, column Y is Sorted's definition, column Z is Morningstar's definition

G = 'Growth', B = 'Balanced', A = 'Aggressive'

Booster was formerly Grosvenor and QuayStreet was formerly Craigs Investment Partners

What is noticeable is that none of these funds has managed an average of +10% pa over the nine years of KiwiSaver in this review.

In fact some have barely done better than the top moderate funds.

The stand-out fund in this category is Aon Russell LifePoints Growth Fund. Not only does it top the rankings in this category since inception, it is showing an improved return in the past three years.

Frankly, given the state of the investment markets, most of these funds should be showing better last-three-year returns than for the full nine years since inception. A couple of others do, but not to the level of the Aon Russell LifePoints Fund.

One reason these results may look a little lower than you would expect - and a reason why our analysis will show a lower result than what the funds themselves publish - is that we judge them on an after-tax, after-all-fees basis. And fees for these types of funds will be higher here than for the more conservative options. That is because these funds all require a much more active, hands-on style of management. Sifting out the investment choices that may not pay off as originally intended is skilled work, requiring as much skill as choosing likely future winners. The fee load plays a more important role in our assessments here.

And don't forget the impact of the hedge-unhedged strategic decisions, important because many of the investment choices will involve offshore elements.

Here is where these funds are invested. Fixed income elements will be bonds with less than top credit ratings (although most will still be 'investment grade'). Equity investments are the bulk of these portfolios, although there will be more capital-gain plays than dividend-yield plays. And property funds and alternative assets get a reasonable allocation here too.

Growth Funds ------ how allocated, approx. ------
as at September 2017 Cash NZ fixed
Intl fixed
Equities Property Other
Aon Russell LifePoints Growth   5 20 75    
Aon Russell LifePoints Balanced   8 32 60    
ANZ OneAnswer Balanced Growth 10 8 17 55 10  
ANZ Balanced Growth 11 8 17 54 10  
AMP ANZ Default Balanced Growth 10 8 17 55 10  
ANZ Default Balanced Growth 10 8 17 55 10  
Fisher Funds Two Growth 12 17 4 60   7
Aon ANZ Default Balanced 5 10 25 41 10 9
ASB Balanced 5 10 25 59 1  
Westpac Balanced 8 15 19 47 5 6
Mercer Balanced 17 9 18 40 5 11
AMP Growth 13 4 4 73 5 1
Kiwi Wealth Balanced Fund 11 8 26 51   4
QuayStreet Growth 22 7 4 66 1  
AMP Balanced 16 12 12 55 4 1
QuayStreet Balanced 28 15 8 48 1  
QuayStreet Balanced SRI 30 12 12 45 1  
Booster Balanced Growth 6 12 9 65 8  
BNZ Growth 5 6 19 70    
Generate Focused Growth 10     76 14  
QuayStreet Altum 47     52 1  
Mercer Growth 8 5 10 58 6 13

At this end of the risk spectrum, historical track record is a little less important than understanding the strategy for the future. But that is hard for an individual fund participant and requires dedicated work and a background to understand what the manager is really trying to achieve. To a large extent, you are trusting the manager, and that is where the historical track record is usually fallen back on. That is an understandable reaction by fund investors even if it can't be rigorously justified.

The more risk you want to take on to get access to superior returns, the more work and knowledge you need to have to choose the right growth fund. If you don't have that sort of background, at least engage an experienced, qualified adviser you trust.


For explanations about how we calculate our 'regular savings returns' and how we classify funds, see here and here.

Across the industry there is currently no consistency on how funds are categorised. We have found that sometimes the fund name can be misleading and it is important to completely understand what drives the funds performance (asset allocation, investment philosophy etc) and be aware of how the underlying portfolio of securities is made up and where the potential variability in monthly or annual returns may come from.

To learn more about how we categorise the various funds click here.

There are wide variances in returns since April 2008, and even in the past three years, and these should cause investors to review their KiwiSaver accounts, especially if their funds are in the bottom third of the table.

The right fund type for you will depend on your tolerance for risk and importantly on your life stage. You should move only with appropriate advice and for a substantial reason.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.


Why does Simplicty get left out of the Kiwisaver funds list?


They have been going for too short a time to be compared yet. KiwiSaver is a long term proposition and we need at least five years to qualify.


Ah, that makes sense. Thanks! What's your opinion on their new 5% p/a Guaranteed Income fund?


FYI Wildcard, just got the email from Simplicity about their first full year results...

With the election results now behind us, we'd like to share some other news hot off the press: Our first year KiwiSaver returns %)

Our one year returns, until Sept.30th, are as follows:

Growth Fund +12.95%
Balanced Fund + 7.95%
Conservative Fund +2.73%

These are after fees, and before tax. You can login here and see what your personal return was. Your individual return will depend on when you joined us. ***

No affiliation other than being a recent convert to their kiwisaver plan and retail investment.


Thanks for that, Pragmatist. That's not a bad performance for the growth and balanced funds. I'm also looking to shift my KiwiSaver to them, but I'm slightly concerned as to how they only have one primary growth index for each fund.


Hi David, i have noticed that you have excluded Milford Growth kiwisaver fund from your list - they have been doing over 10%pa on average in the last 3 - 5 years
any particular reason for that?


It is in the Aggressive category. We reviewed that in June. We don't plan to review that category again this quarter. (This is a review of the Growth category.)


Thank you