sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

NZ unemployment rate falls to 6.4% in Sept qtr from 6.9% in June; lower than expected

NZ unemployment rate falls to 6.4% in Sept qtr from 6.9% in June; lower than expected

By Alex Tarrant

New Zealand’s unemployment rate fell by more than expected to 6.4% in the September quarter from an upwardly revised 6.9% in the June quarter, Statistics New Zealand said today.

Economist expectations had centred around an unemployment rate of 6.7% for the September quarter, and the bigger than expected fall saw the New Zealand dollar rise from 77.8 USc to 78.5 USc shortly after the announcement. This is its highest level since June 2008. The NZ dollar had already been boosted overnight by the QE2 announcement from the US Federal Reserve.

Longer term wholesale interest rates also rose around 5-10 basis points as some market players lifted their expectations of future rises in the Official Cash Rate by the Reserve Bank of New Zealand. Economists, however, still see the next OCR as likely to be on March 10 next year.

ASB economist Jane Turner said both the September quarter employment growth and unemployment rate suggested the economy performed better than expected during the quarter.

"Attempting to look through the volatility [in unemployment figures through the year], the trend in the labour market appears to be gradual improvement, which is to be expected given the nature of the recovery and more appropriately fits with anecdotes," Turner said.

She said ASB still expected the Reserve Bank of New Zealand to hold the Official Cash Rate at 3% until March 2011, seeing as the headline figure was still higher than the central bank's expected 6.2% unemployment rate for the quarter.

The fall in the headline figure was due to a large fall in male unemployment, which fell from 6.9% in the June quarter (originally 6.8%) to 5.7% in September, Stats NZ said.

This was offset by a rise in female unemployment, from 6.8% to 7.2% over the quarter.

The gap between the male and female unemployment rates was the biggest since the series began in 1986, Stats NZ said.

The fall in unemployment came as the labour force expanded over the quarter by 0.6%, or 13,000 people to 2.344 million, or 68.3% of the working age population of 3.43 million. The participation rate rose to 68.3% from 68.1%.

There were 1.089 million working age people not in the labour force.

The number of employed people rose 1%, or 23,000, to 2.193 million over the quarter, Stats NZ said. The rise was dominated by an increase of 13,000 in part-time employment.

The number of unemployed in the labour force fell 6.1%, or 10,000 to 150,000.

The unemployment rate of 6.4% in the September quarter was down slightly from 6.5% the same quarter a year ago.

Despite the fall in headline unemployment over the quarter, the number of people who said they were under-employed rose in September from June.

Under-employment is a measure of part-time workers who wish to work more hours, and may serve as a measure of labour under-utilisation in the economy.

Of the 503,700 people employed part time in the September 2010 quarter, 21.8% (110,000) would prefer to work more hours, Stats NZ said.

This compared to 20.6% in the June quarter, but was down from 24.4% in September 2009.

Random oscillation, recovery a slow grind

JP Morgan economist Ben Jarman said the New Zealand unemployment figures continued to oscillate in a seemingly random fashion, though the underlying signal in the data seemed to be one of gradual improvement.

"The temptation, given the recent history of the labour report, and the swathe of other recent disappointing Kiwi data, is therefore to view these numbers with a raised eyebrow. But while the magnitudes of the moves in the unemployment rate have almost surely been exaggerated, the lack of a compelling trend does seem to fit with a recovery from a deep, prolonged recession that has been repeatedly punctured by households’ efforts to delever," Jarman said.

"The implications of today’s result for the near-term policy outlook boil down to judging how fine the RBNZ’s data sieve is. Our position is that today’s data were a pleasant surprise, but that, through the noise, the trend is one of slow, gradual improvement that has always been frail. The lesson we gain from the experience of the North Atlantic economies is that it is difficult to delever in an environment of soft growth," he said.

"We therefore expect the recovery to be a slow grind, though today’s numbers show that the economy may be getting a little more traction after a prolonged period with interest rates at extremely low levels. This favours a softly, gently approach from policymakers."

Jobs market strength

Employment agency Momentum said it was seeing an underlying improvement in the jobs market

“These numbers have been reflective of what we have been experiencing in the Auckland market," said Momentum's Auckland General Manager Howard Ross.

"Contracting in the last 2 months has increased quite rapidly as organisations determine whether they need a permanent resource or just to meet a short term need," Ross said.

"From a permanent perspective we are starting to see a stronger pickup in high quality work from our clients as they realise if they don’t appoint before Xmas then their growth plans for next year will be held back," he said.

Higher OCR next year?

BNZ economist Doug Steel said the figures showed a recovery was under way. Here are his comments.

This confirms New Zealand’s labour market is clearly in recovery mode. We caution about being too precise about the magnitudes and getting too carried away with one positive quarterly figure given the bumpiness in the data, which makes it difficult to decipher any signal from noise. But looking through the ups and downs in the data, it appears that the labour market has been slowly improving, on trend, since about the start of the year.

It is in this context that it was not surprising to see some underlying rise in wages starting to filter through in Tuesday’s vast array of wage data. This will have the RBNZ on alert. But it is important to recognise no more on alert than it already is. today’s data is unlikely to materially alter the RBNZ’s forecasts.

We certainly do not think it will cause anything like the major RBNZ forecast revision that the big Q1 drop in unemployment did, and the very hawkish June MPS that followed. Rather, the RBNZ are likely to take this survey as confirmation that the recovery remains on track (as we do) and that capacity is being soaked up at about the rate it thought it would.

As such it will probably firm up the Bank’s thinking from the October review, and the forecasts published in the September MPS that implied the next OCR hike coming in Q1. To us, March remains the most likely date to restart the tightening cycle with the risks shifting to earlier rather than later.

More important that the precise timing of the next hike, as we have pointed out many times before, is that interest rates are likely to push significantly higher through 2011 assuming the economic recovery continues as we think it will.  

Westpac economists Brendan O'Donovan and Dominick Stephens said the data showed unemployment was past its peak and falling, despite some volatility in the figures.

Here are their comments.

Another way to cut through volatility is to look directly at the rate of joblessness rather than the official unemployment rate. This has fallen from a peak of 11.8% to 10.8%. Joblessness counts everybody who is either available for work or actively seeking work.

By contrast, people are only counted as unemployed if they are both available and actively seeking. People searching only via the internet or in newspapers are not counted as "actively seeking", and nor are people conducting full search but not available to start immediately. Instead, these people are counted as not in the labour force (NILF).

Trouble is, it seems that large numbers of people are to-ing and fro-ing across the blurry border between unemployment and NILF, creating artificial volatility in the unemployment rate. As an aside, it is worth noting that by not counting people who search for jobs only via the internet, we may be systematically understating the unemployment rate relative to the rates reported in the 1990s, when internet search was uncommon.

News that unemployment is above-average but falling was no surprise to us - surveys and benefit payments had already signalled as much. At most, the labour market may be slightly tighter than we expected. Our overall economic forecasts will change little in light of this data. We still think New Zealand is on a path towards economic recovery, although the pace of growth slowed through mid-2010.

The Reserve Bank is likely to feel the same way about the HLFS. In its September Monetary Policy Statement, the Bank was at pains to emphasise that it now treats the HLFS as just one piece of a broader mosaic of labour market information. The reported unemployment rate was consistent with other parts of the tableau, so the RBNZ is unlikely to be greatly moved by this data.

That said, the possibility that last quarter's jump in unemployment was a sign of much worse to come was being seriously entertained by financial markets before this data came out. That possibility has now been priced out, so there was quite a large "confirmation" move when the data printed. The exchange rate rose a whole cent, and two year swap rates rose 9 basis points.

Markets are now pricing in more OCR hikes than the RBNZ signalled at the September Monetary Policy Statement. And fair enough too - we expect the RBNZ will deliver even more OCR hikes than markets are pricing. Markets are most likely to take swap rates even higher in coming weeks, as more data confirming the economic recovery rolls in.  

Here are Jane Turner's comments:

Both employment growth and unemployment rate suggest the economy has performed better than expected over Q3.  However, to some degree today’s results were likely to be somewhat discounted by both the market and the RBNZ, given the unusual amount of volatility in the survey over the past year.

Indeed, earlier this year, market’s (and our own) confidence in the economic recovery was buoyed by a surprising drop in unemployment, only to be reversed the following quarter.  

Nonetheless, attempting to look through the volatility, the trend in the labour market appears to be gradual improvement, which is to be expected given the nature of the recovery and more appropriately fits with anecdotes.  

In addition, today’s result provides a better fit with Tuesday’s stronger than expected wage outturn.

Overall, the continued improvement in labour market will start to feed through to stronger wage growth over the next year, and will underpin a recovery in consumer confidence. 

The employment, filled jobs and hours worked figures released this week reinforce that some economic growth occurred over Q3, notwithstanding the impact of the earthquake.

The unemployment rate, while lower than market expectations, was still higher than the RBNZ’s optimistic forecast of 6.2%.  

Nonetheless, the general improvement in employment growth is likely to have been close to the RBNZ’s broader expectations for the economy in Q3.  

On balance, the flow of data over recent months has been marginally weaker than expected.  However, the RBNZ is likely to remain comfortable with the medium-term outlook. 

We continue to expect the RBNZ will keep the OCR on hold until March next year.

(Updates with JP Morgan comments, Momentum comments, Westpac comments, BNZ comments, ASB economist comments, chart)

The charts below are for unadjusted figures:

Unemployment

Select chart tabs

Actual - not seasonally adjusted
Actual - not seasonally adjusted
Actual - not seasonally adjusted
Actual - not seasonally adjusted
Actual - not seasonally adjusted

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

33 Comments

At the same time as the Gov't publishes its unemployment figures it should also publish the statistics for people who are on other benefits e.g. DPB, ACC, Sickness Benefit etc.  We could then clearly see how the unemployment statistics are fiddled by simply transferring these people onto other benefits.

Up
0

Andy

Here's our interactive chart showing the Ministry for Social Development's numbers on beneficiaries

http://www.interest.co.nz/charts/labour/benefits-numbers

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

Rubbish.

 "Despite the fall in headline unemployment over the quarter, the number of people who said they were under-employed rose in September from June."

The real indicator is the falling govt revenue and the growing govt expenditure.

Up
0

Do we believe any of this!? As poster Chris, (who has two years statistics reading at uni.), pointed out to me here, yesterday, these numbers are just produced from a computer modelling exercise, generated from statistcial sample pools....or some such nonesence. No one 'said' anything to anyone about what they were doing; what jobs they did or didn't have or what benefits they did or didn't claim.

Up
0

I feel very sorry for Stats NZ - their credibility is all but gone.

Such massive swings as we've seen in the figures in the past few quarters never actually happened - it's all just a figment of some lowly paid statistician's imagination.

How possibly could male unemployment fall from 6.9% to 5.7% in one quarter, while female unemployment rose from 6.8% to 7.2% for the same period?

I noted 2 quarters ago (when unemployment apparently plunged) that some of the figures they were quoting had no relationship to real population changes and that there was with 100% certainty no possible way the survey results were within the margins of error that they were quoting.  Subsequent survey results have vindicated this with volatility and preposterous claims such as those outlined in the previous paragragh.

The margin of error on these statistics must in all reality be at least half a percentage point - that's plus or minus 10% - I could probably get it that accurate by staring into a crystal ball!

Up
0

Maybe male unemployment fell due to more construction jobs in Christchurch. Just because the stats aren't saying what you want them to say, doesn't mean they are wrong!!

Up
0

If anything, Jimbo, Chris_J is on 'your side' of the argument; and even he's perplexed!

Up
0

Its not the number but the trend month on month that interests me.....as the banks are saying it looks like there is a slight improvement. Compare with the US where the "official" un-employment is 10% ish but the real unemplyment is probably around 18%....thats a shocking stat, 3 times ours.....

Oh and a good low number is anything under 5% and here we are about 6.5%....really nz is fairly well.....though around me its looking tougher in the last month....so if what im seeing is anythign to go by I'd expect it up next month.

regards

Up
0

Why the Household Labour Force survey is even used as the main measure of unemployment when the actual number of registered unemployed jobseekers is known (check Stats NZ infoshare) at 124,886 as at 30 September 2010.

That number was up 5.8% on the June 2010 number.  Up 15.8% on September 2009 and up 163% on June 2008.

Up
0

The unemployment figure is meant to show how many people who are actively trying to find a job can't - it is a measure of whether there enough jobs for those who really want them.  It is not meant to be a measure of how many no hopers there are that can't be bothered trying to find a job.  I don't know what the registered unemployed jobseekers statistic is, but I assume it is basically everyone that is on the dole?

Up
0

Exactly Chris_J - why use a non-sense indicator when the REAL ONE which costs us REAL MONEY (we don't have, I might add) gives us a REAL indication of just how bad it is getting out there.

And I note from the Stats comment;

The rise was dominated by an increase of 13,000 in part-time employment. 

And I doubt this is permanent part-time employment - more likely casual/contracted positions - which will indeed be on the rise as employers shy away from taking any chances on a REAL recovery.

Up
0

Bernard, your graph doesn't correspond to the official unemployment figures.

Dec 09 7.3%

Mar 10 6.0%

Jun 10 6.9%

Sep 10 6.4%

Could you please let us know what is plotted and why it's not the "official" released figures?

Up
0

Chris J:

The difference you note is the difference between "seasonally adjusted" which is what Statistics NZ, economists, and journalists generally, focus on. Statistics NZ supply three official series - seasonally adjusted, trend, and actual.

However, almost all our charts (and certainly this one) are based on the actual, unadjusted numbers. In a text story, I think you get a better feeling for the changes using s.a. data. But when you see a chart, you can 'see' the seasonal effects intuitively, which is why we record the raw numbers in them.

The decisions on how to record employment / unemployment data has been debated for centuries. Statistics NZ uses offocial ILO methodologies. However, that is not perfect either. We have set out the criteria used in the notes to the charts here >>  http://www.interest.co.nz/charts/labour/unemployment They are worth reading.

They are another reason why we have added a tab to our chart for part-timers who want more work - an interesting series and trend that is part of the official data release by Statistics NZ.

Also, remember "unemployed" is a different count to the numbers of people on the unemployment benefit. You can easily be unemployed and not [yet] on the benefit. The unemployment benefit data is in this chart set >> http://www.interest.co.nz/charts/labour/benefits-numbers

David Chaston

Up
0

Thanks David,

However the seasonally adjusted series does demonstate the extreme volatility seen in Stats NZ's data - as shown on the seasonally adjusted chart on their website:

http://stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/work_income_and_spending/employme…

Normally you would not expect such a large zig zag in a seasonally adjusted series.

Further illustrating the dubious quality of the HLF survey, is that while registered unemployed rose from 118k to 125k, while official unemployed fell from 155k to 145k, an unlikely occurrence for the numbers of those that meet the requirements of being unemployed but are not receiveing the unemployment benefit to nearly halve from 37k to 20k in a 3 month period.

The survey seems to have about as much accuracy as a political poll the day before an election!  (Which reminds me of some famous utterances by Jim Bolger).

Up
0

Real Estate agents are now working as dept collectors. Students, who should join the workforce go on a one year surfing trip to Indonesia. Kiwis try the irons, copper’s and gold’s in Aussie on masses. Truck drivers dig holes for Works infrastructure and dairy farm workers are holding the sign stop and go all day long. Sales representatives are now hiring vacuum cleaners and coffee machines for a day. Young people do it for MacDonald and other names, so they can just afford to be alive.  Finance CEO's in case not overseas - are now working in prisons, knitting socks for the nation. Staff of warehouses is stressed and need to be replaced by other part time workers and so does ACC and IRD and many other government agencies – more staff (bureaucracy) because more mess. Lawyers, drug/ weapon and other mafia gurus have doubled not only in seize and the police/ teachers are rather shrinking., but costs more – and nothing has really done in this country – but bright and cheerful importing thousands of more chairs, infrastructure needs and consumption goods into NZ  - my god what an economy !!!! 6.4% unemployment – HA !

80.6% employed "doing" what ??????

Kiwis - back to the basics - a small, happy home with a veggie garden and a bike ride with the kids to the beach. 

...and don't talk about economics all day long - you even don't understand - DO IT !

Up
0

Sweet words , Walter . But some time ago you admitted to me that you personally don't veggie garden ............... C'mon Kunzie , back it up with some action mate  . ........ Beans , broccolli , tomatoes , corn , pumpkins .......... It's balmy November . Till the soil . Smash the sods . Sow the seeds .....  DO IT !

Up
0

Are you still shaken Rogie – I never said that – our veggie garden is coming up brilliantly this year.

How can you not like a veggie garden zh, zh !

Up
0

Perhaps we have had a large jump in the number of people moving to Oz or other countries

Up
0

There is a good industry for the govt...exporting unemployment.

Perhaps we should have oz mining recruiters stationed at WINZ

Up
0

Periodically , Oz recruiters , or individual states do hold employment " expos " in major cities . WA has targeted Christchurch , to induce Kiwis to emigrate , for several years . ....................... We're off ! Yipppppppppppeeeeeeeeeeeeee ...........

Up
0

In context to my article 12:22pm - why not simply talk about the quality of employment in order to improve our economy, in stead of going senselessly around all day long with stupid numbers and charts ?

Up
0

Wow, low unemployment, low interest rate, banks screaming for new loans, more houses for sale than buyers, high dollars.  Just all the ingredients we need for a ......   I just need to grow some bxlls....

Up
0

....complete collapse of the property market? Otherwise, why would all those indicators be in play?

Up
0

In context to 12:22pm

….and what are we going to do between the discrepancy of the NZsystem providing great NZeducation potential and the NZsystem plus the NZprivate industry not striving of using that and developing that farther ?

Exporting brain power - what a waste for an economy !!

 ...and what a vicious cycle for our economy. It reminds me on the Warriors Rugby League - the warriors losing against great Kiwis playing for the opponents. Remember the American’s cup -  Alinghi !!

 Here lays the biggest problem of our economy leading to the slow destruction of our society.

A society, which constantly goes cheap cannot buy quality.

Up
0

..and it doesn’t take long and I say goodbye blog. Intelligent,  good educated Kiwis start debating issues, which really matter for our country. What you are doing here is wasting time going around a circle.

..before it is too late !

Up
0

Persnoally i don't like the idea BUT all the issues highlighted made a good case for us to merge with Australia (well except for their housing bubble).....

Up
0

Interesting graphs Bernard

When I look at the DPB growth figures it seems that we can no longer be called a nation of sheep shaggers !

Oh well - Better to have something going up other than the $ !

Up
0

Noddyland will be a feature film to rival Alice in Wonderland....you couldn't dream of better BS than the stuff being produced in wgtn. On the one hand govt revenue is in a dive..on the other unemployment is said to be down...and govt benefit expenditure is up...while retail spending is down...and the collapse in house building is cronic...and the mortgage approvals data is like a chunk of Swiss cheese....sorry Walter!

Up
0

I've updated this with Westpac comments on how joblessness (which includes those not in work and not looking for work) is still 10.8%, although down from 11.8%, and how two year swap rates rose 9 basis points on the news as markets priced in more OCR hikes over the next year or two.

cheers

Bernard
 

Up
0

Updated with BNZ economist comments that employment recovery underway and slight risk now of next OCR hike being earlier than March 10.

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

Westpac's comments include...." people are only counted as unemployed if they are both available and actively seeking. People searching only via the internet or in newspapers are not counted as "actively seeking", and nor are people conducting full search but not available to start immediately. Instead, these people are counted as not in the labour force"

What a bloody farce.

Up
0

A timely article considering the wave of economic blather coming from 'economists'.....

 http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article23998.html

" Zarlenga blames the wreckage of the world economy on "the financial establishment and their economists" and describes the latter as being the mouthpieces of the 'Money Power'. The reason why the corrupt system of modern banking has endured for so long despite its abysmal performance is because professional economists almost never point the finger at the banksters nor do they ever challenge the fraudulence of private, debt-based money creation or the outrageous deceit of fractional reserve lending"

(Parky will love this)

Up
0

BS, they all went to Aussie is all

Up
0