sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Goff says policy would see most people's tax payments fall due to NZ$5,000 threshold; Understands CGT doesn't raise much short-term

Goff says policy would see most people's tax payments fall due to NZ$5,000 threshold; Understands CGT doesn't raise much short-term

Labour’s tax package to be announced on Thursday will be a broad-based package that would see the majority of people's tax payments fall, leader Phil Goff says.

Meanwhile, Goff would not comment on speculation Labour was about to announce a capital on assets other than owner-occupied housing, although admitted “in general” that he was aware a capital gains tax did not collect much revenue in its first few years.

The policy to be announced on Thursday was certainly not "tax and spend," Goff said in answer to a question of whether the policy would be a tax switch, or a way to collect more revenue.

“What are our priorities? One is to have a fairer tax system. That means for most New Zealanders their tax rates will go down,” Goff said.

“The other reason, is to pay down our debt. We know we can’t continue to accumulate debt, and we’re not going to sell off our assets as a one-off quick fix to try to cover that problem,” he said.

The fall in most people's tax payments would be because Labour would make the first NZ$5,000 of income earned tax free. Introduction of that threshold is expected to cost about NZ$1.3 billion a year.

“And it won’t have escaped your notice that yesterday Australia has moved from the first A$6,000 tax-free to the first A$18,000 tax-free. If we’re closing the gap with Australia on taxation policy, we’re not going about it the right way,” Goff said.

Coy on short-term debt

Asked whether Labour's policy would mean they would need to borrow more than National in the short-term, Goff replied in the medium-term the two parties' debt tracks would be similar. He would not be comment on the short-term, saying details would be released on Thursday.

Pressed on what would happen with the debt-track in the short-term, Goff said:

“I think what matters to the financial institutions in terms of your ratings is whether you’ve got a credible policy to pay down debt, and to live within your means. Our policy will be very credible in that regard.

Asked whether he was aware that it would take some time for a capital gains tax to bring in revenues, Goff replied:

“Yes I am aware of that generally.”

'Thanks for talking about us'

Goff said the public discussion and debate that had taken place over the last few weeks about possible policies had been helpful.

“It’s given people the chance to look at the principals of the taxation system, the changes that need to be made, and why those changes are necessary,” he said.

“It’s not been unhelpful to have that general discussion prior to the announcement, and I’m very pleased that there is so much focus on what Labour is proposing as a clear alternative to what the National government is, or is not, doing.”

In any policy announcement it was good that people focussed on what needed to be changed in the system, Goff said.

“We’ve seen a series of broadcasts and articles through the media that have been helpful in setting the scene for the changes that we’re making," he said.

'Dagger in the heart of growth'

Meanwhile, Prime Minister John Key came out firing at his post-cabinet press conference on Monday afternoon, saying Labour's expected policy would be a "dagger in the heart" of economic growth. Key argued New Zealand already had a form of capital gains tax, rendering Labour's upcoming policy announcement extraneous.

“The first question you’ve got to go back to and ask is, does New Zealand need another tax? And the answer to that is, no. Not if you follow National’s plan," Key said.

"You’re going to be back in surplus within three years, you’ll have debt topping out under 30% of GDP, I think we will have created the better part of 170,000 jobs, we’ll be in a position where the economy’s growing where it can afford its liabilities. And in my view, why do you want to put another tax on the economy, which is frankly just a dagger through the heart of growth? I can’t see the point in that," he said.

“Secondly I don’t actually accept the view that New Zealand doesn’t have a capital gains tax. It does. Yes, it’s not as comprehensive as some jurisdictions, but actually if one goes and looks at those jurisdictions you’ll see that there are a lot of differences actually. They’re not all purist in the way they’re delivered, and actually the interaction between the personal and company rates in New Zealand’s quite subtle."

Budget 2011 and Budget 2010] included a "considerable amount of changes" that addressed the property investment situation.

“Labour’s actually fighting a problem they had when they were in office, but not actually the problem that exists today. Go and ask people who have been buying and selling properties, or buying and selling shares, and selling probably anything in under five years, whether they’ve had a knock on the door from the IRD," Key said.

New Zealand’s current taxation of capital gains depended on what your intent was when you bought an asset.

“If you bought an investment property, you would have been renting that property and in the business of renting properties for a considerable period of time. If you didn’t, you’ve probably breached your intent rules," Key said.

"So I think if you go and have a look at the overall mix of taxes we have in New Zealand, and the integrity of that tax system under National, all I can tell you is the system is a lot better, a lot less complex, and more likely to deliver revenue," he said.

“Yep, in the very long-term of course you can always put new taxes on. But if the answer to New Zealand is more taxes, then New Zealanders better get used to lower growth, and lower wage growth and less jobs. Because in the end this is just another sea anchor on the economy that’s been proposed by Labour because they want to spend more money and in the end they’ve got to square the circle. And the answer to that is put another tax on New Zealanders.”

(Updates with PM's reaction, comments on debt track, capital gains tax)

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

10 Comments

So.. that means the few that will be paying more will be paying truck loads more to compensate the most who will  be paying less... what a load of shite Goff

So all this including debt repayment.. re-employing all the public sector jobs.. handing out more to non working families.. 

talks about debt repayments but at the same time talks about borrowing similar amounts to the Nats...

Does anyone really believe that this is possible..

Up
0

Does anyone believe as a nation we still accept & allow this calibre of individual to work his whole career & indeed post nz career taxpayer funded , and after 30 years still have to listen to this garbage.
What Goff is really saying. We are appealing to our easiest to manipulate voters , and will cOntinue to foster an environment of envy & jealousy. We don't have anything to lose because we can't win & have nothing to offer the nation in terms of positive go ahead strategy.
Apply this to every one of the 121 or is it 122 now , and the country gets what it deserves.
Don't future generations deserve better or more engagement from the public?

Up
0

First $5000 of income tax free....  great idea... 

Capital Gains tax......   another good idea...

I'm all for broadening the tax base... PAYE is not a fair tax.

I'm all for multinationals paying tax.... 

I'm all for a reduction of the total amount of tax taken..... over time...  Sadly thou Govts. and local bodies don't know how to reduce spending.. 

 

Up
0

Did Gof say 'fall', he should have said fail.  Why is he committing political suicide with a CGT proposal- all this will do is appeal to some pointy heads, quite a few regulars (not all) on this site (who number about 30), and about 1/3 of the population who think life's opportunities have passed them by and are resentful.

Meanwhile Key and National go on up in the polls and Labour go below 30%, although they are 40% with the defacto Greens 10%.

Who is currently the most desperate, Labour or ACT, it's a toss up?                                       / Meanwhile National just sails along.

Up
0

Phil Goff is doing what a good opposition politician should be doing ! He's opposing the status quo; stimulating a discussion. Maybe it will be to his personal detrement. But 'good on him'. Because he is doing the job we pay him for, and got us all talking; thinking and voicing an opinion.

Up
0

Maybe Muza maybe but at least Mickey Mouse Oops sorry Goffy got sum attention with you Fearless Property Investors A.

To call yourselves Smart Property Investors Will Be Quite APPT 4 the Future 4 u will need to BE if he take 15% of your PROFITS

I Think it should be 25% Myself :]

Regards

Up
0

This rush of cgt blood to the head of the unionist/socialist/marxist mob of envy. It is aimed at buying votes.

The very last thing Labour leadership want is growth and an improvement in the wealth, education and skill level of individuals. To grab and hold power they need poverty, unemployment, low incomes, poor education, benefit dependency and for a majority of voters to feel envious and angry at the few who have escaped the traps and made something of themselves. That is the origin of the 'tall poppy' whatsit.

Goff has gambled on the envy factor..that he can gather enough votes from the dumb in NZ to win power..what else can he do!

National on the other hand assume it is possible to erradicate the idiocy from this country..that fools can be turned into productive thinking individuals..complete bollocks of course.

  

Up
0

If Labour were smart, they'd explain that you don't do anything - whatever - without energy.

That there wouldn't be anything - whatever - to tax without it.

Our publicly-owned energy generators are being prized away from us, and post-the-fiscal-collapse (it's inevitable (the generators and us are in physical proximity - nobody else is), that they will be reposessed. Continued ownership is a lot less messy that nationalisation, or storming the dams and corporate offices. Overseas owners can only stave that off - for a while - with guns.

Better we keep that without which nothing else happens.

Better that was explained clearly to the populace.

Better Labour got itself some expertise in realities - the sciences - and jettisoned the current  'economics-trained'  priesthood.

 

Up
0

Simey, I reckon you are dreaming if you think guys like Muzza won't organise things to minimise any CGT, probably have houses in names of various family members. CGT on commercial property might be a problem for them  though- however, already the no depreciation legislation on buildings has been quietly shelved on commercial buildings.

If Labour ever becomes the government and wants capital gains tax to help fund all it's spending promises, they won't raise much in a hurry and they can only raise the amount they would need by including the 70% of residential houses that are already owner-occupied which of course would be complete political suicide.  So the reality will be for an even bigger and bigger debt under the Labour scenario.  What joy to behold.

Up
0

"Labour’s tax package to be announced on Thursday will be a broad-based package that would see the majority of people's tax payments fall, leader Phil Goff says".  

Am I wrong to assume that Labour thinks that most of us are pretty stupid so they can pull such stupid comment and we will believe them ?  Blimming goofy if you ask me! 

Up
0