sign uplog in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announces $325m to be spent over four years to extend paid parental leave from 18 to 26 weeks

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announces $325m to be spent over four years to extend paid parental leave from 18 to 26 weeks
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern

The Government has announced paid parental leave will be extended by two months from mid-2020.

The duration of parental leave entitlements will be bumped up from 18 to 22 weeks on July 1 2018, and then 26 weeks on July 1 2020.

The average in the OECD is 48 weeks.

Speaking at a post-Cabinet press conference, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says a bill to make the change will be introduced to parliament on Wednesday.

She notes former Labour MP Sue Moroney’s Parental Leave and Employment Protection (6 Months' Paid Leave) Amendment Bill was last year supported by a majority in the House, but was vetoed by the National-led government.

“That will not happen again. The benefits of paid parental leave are well understood, but the benefits of paid parental leave have not translated into New Zealand legislation and practice,” Ardern says.

“This is a key part of our Families Package and one all three parties of government have been proud to support because it’s the right thing to do.

“We want children to have the best start in life. Evidence shows having a parent at home as long as possible to care for a child provides a huge benefit for that child’s development.

“Some 28,000 parents currently enjoy 18 weeks of paid parental leave, but that’s one of the lowest in the OECD. We know that many primary care givers want to spend longer with their babies. We can do better and we will.

“The increased support for working families has a net cost of $325 million over the four year forecast period, which is what we budgeted for and fits within our fiscal plan.”

While the cost of paid parental leave is borne by the government, Ardern recognises increasing its duration may present some challenges to businesses - small ones in particular.

“But I hope that by setting out the timeline that we have, they’ll be able to plan for that.

“I also hope that overall… they may perhaps be more likely to see their employee return to work because they’ve had a decent amount of paid parental leave, or at least a more reasonable amount of paid parental leave.”

Furthermore, Ardern says the impact of finding someone to fill in for a staff member on leave for 14 weeks for example is the same as finding a fill-in for 26 weeks.

“Some may find it easier perhaps to find someone to replace for a period of 26 [rather] than 14 weeks…

“Today, we are proudly delivering on another key pledge in our 100 Day Plan. We promised we would be a government of action and that means we’re moving quickly to make changes so we can improve the well-being of New Zealanders.”

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.


Nothing but good news here.

Indeed, more parental leave, much more minimum pay, free education, higher teacher's pay, $1 billion for the regions, Lot more $ for the environment...

Please can someone tell me where the growth is coming from to pay for the governments spending?
Trees, that’s right, although I thought they took a fair while to grow?


They are going to tax Landlords more heavily.

You mean the by-proxy tax on renters?

This assumes the landlords are not already "taxing" at the max rate they can get, I dont accept that argument.

I don't accept that either. Also, Corelogic does not accept that argument. See here:

Talking about whether landlords will be able to pass on higher costs from the Healthier Homes Bill, the article says: "I think it’s worth asking whether it’s likely that the costs will be passed onto tenants and I don’t believe they will. Previous increases in the cost to landlords haven’t necessarily been passed on. This makes sense because rents are more closely linked to income than they are with rental costs. Landlords will have to shoulder the cost, so when some take that into account, their numbers may not stack up for particular investment properties."


Could you please tell me where the growth was coming from to pay for ever increasing house and rental prices, while the government subsidised the cause of the original issue?

THE GROWTH is going to come from giving more people, more money for doing nothing more or even doing less. At least this is limited to women who are employed which cuts out some of the monkey brains.

Some or all of the leave can be transferred to the father - this is the 21st century after all

Where has growth come from previously? And governing is about looking after all members of society and not just chasing a gdp number.

They can’t tax us anymore than they are now!
We pay full tax on every cent of profit so how are they going to load it anymore!
Talk is cheap so it is going to be very interesting when the proverbial hits the fan.


Poor old John Key who sold his house to some Chinese chap for a 10 million dollar tax free profit. Oh yes,his effective marginal tax rate was / is far too high. Nod nod wink wink.

When you get more money into lower income earners hands, the money cycles through the economy more times, resulting in a greater tax take.

Compared to trickle down economics, where money gets spent overseas or trapped in investments, never to cycle through our economy again.

325 million would house a lot of homeless people.

Barfoots commissions down 80 million y/y. Auckland down 200 million.


This is great news. Having a parent at home is very important and enabling poorer families to do this is beneficial for our society. The cost is low so it's a no-brainer in my view. Personally I hoped they would bring in a higher tax band like Australia and UK. But NZ is in a good fiscal position so why not loosen the purse strings and help out the ones that need it.

these policies are good for countries with massive employers, and the ability to absorb cost. NZ is a country of small businesses. Either we change structurally, or something's got to give. The next couple of years are going to be very interesting to watch from the sideline.

businesses too small to be good for society have no reason to exist then.

bit rough ian64. approximately 50% of the workforce are employed by enterprises of less than 49 people.