Opinion: The NZ pork industry's protests about foreign pork sounds like Aussie complaints about our apples; We can't have it both ways

Opinion: The NZ pork industry's protests about foreign pork sounds like Aussie complaints about our apples; We can't have it both ways

By John Pagani

Isn't apple meant to complement pork?

It's ironic that in the same week our apples are finally sold in Australia, our pork industry has been in court trying to keep overseas pork out of New Zealand.

Their grounds bear a striking similarity to the grounds Australian apple growers used to exclude our product for about a century.

We have one of the few pork industries in the world that isn't affected by a disease that can kill young pigs (it doesn't affect consumers). They say that if we allow imported raw pork imports, there is a good chance the disease will get in and take root.

MAF says that's all trotters: They say that with a few careful controls, we can make sure imported pork doesn't bring the disease in.

Back in the day Aussie apple growers claimed our apples would bring disease to their crops. We produced all sorts of science to show it wasn't true. And they went to the courts to challenge the science and delay and misdirect for years, and the years turned into decades.

In both cases, the debate over science was a proxy for a deeper worry.

Our pig farmers are worried about trying to compete with big Canadian factory pork farms. The Aussies can't grow apples that taste like ours.

Biosecurity science is never going to be conclusive: You can always say something might squeak through. But if we took that literally we would never let anything in.

The court might make a decision to keep imported pork out.

But that still won't make the decision right.

If we're going to allow spurious science to keep our pork out then we are going to have to put up with Australians keeping our apples out. We'll have to accept French and UK farmers keeping our lamb out so they can keep food miles down, too. Food miles science is just about in the same category as the pork industry case.

Look at this piggery, where the owner pronounces the main problem is that New Zealand workers are 'lazy and unmotivated'. 

So it's fine to bring in the workers to grow the pork, but there's a problem with bringing in pork?

What is the advantage to New Zealand workers and consumers from that?

If the industry wants sympathy, it really needs to be seen to be doing everything to respond to the preferences of Kiwi consumers. They have been distinctly trotter dragging in responding to concerns about sow stalls.

In Australia, apple growers haven't yet been wiped out by demand for our products. Consumers seem happy.

But if there is a sudden interest in our product, it will put pressure on apple growers there to reassess their business. Maybe what they need to do is innovate and develop new varieties or products that imported goods can't match. 

That's how trade works, and all our trade exposed businesses have to adapt to it.

  ====================

* John Pagani is an independent political consultant and writer who has worked as an adviser to Labour Leader Phil Goff. He writes his own blog at Posterous.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

7 Comments

Comment Filter

Highlight new comments in the last hr(s).

So, I get suckered in at the supermarket to buy some 'A grade' apples in this week's grocery shop. And still, a couple of floury, mushy ones in there. How'd you like them apples Australia?

I have never , ever agreed with anything that John Pagani has said or written in the past , but as a free marketeer I am with him on this one.

The other one is chicken .... why on earth is chicken so ridiculously expensive here ?

We need to be allowed to import frozen chicken from Brazil , Mexico and the US, where it retails for a fraction of the price in NZ .

In Africa and South East Asia , chicken is a really cheap source of protein readily available everywhere  , but in NZ the price suggests its a luxury  

So where is the profit being made? is it being made?

regards

The two edged sword of free trade sounds good as theory.

But almost no free trade exists in the world anywhere.  Almost all international trade is subject to multiple levels of regulation and tax structure designed to give one party an unfair advantage.

Whilst freedom is a banner we walk under trade policy must be tempered with the pragmatic of what is possible in the circumstances.

Sure we can be just as fair as Aussies been to us on the apples.

So that means in 90 years time we might come around kicking and screaming to allowing pork imports, under very strict conditions of course.

 

I object to state created monopolies.....it makes for an easy life for business and an extra expense for consumers....

NZ should be going organic we are small and can compete on quality.....I only buy organic pork and if I cant get it I dont by it....but that should be a choice for ppl.

regards

Well I also don't think we should allow any food into NZ from countries that have much lower food standards than us, which of course we currently do.

It makes a complete mockery of having food standards at all, if overseas companies can bypass all the standards and produce food much cheaper.
if you are going to allow it, then it should be pretty well notified on the packacking, which we know it's not.
 
I think you're pretty safe anyway, this country would be too gutless to keep all that overseas pork out.