Bernard Hickey senses the 'independence' of our monetary policy is evaporating as opposition parties make it political again; He thinks it will 'get ugly' from here. Your view?

Bernard Hickey senses the 'independence' of our monetary policy is evaporating as opposition parties make it political again; He thinks it will 'get ugly' from here. Your view?

By Bernard Hickey

New Zealand's businesses, borrowers and savers should prepare for an unprecedented bout of uncertainty around monetary policy in the years ahead.

Politics will matter just as much as economics for interest rates and the exchange rate in the years to come.

For more than twenty years, monetary policy has been firmly off the political agenda and set in stone by the 1989 Reserve Bank Act.

That truce ended this week.

It happened with a bang of sorts at a parliamentary select committee hearing in Wellington.

A newly emboldened collection of Opposition Party Leaders, including Labour Finance Spokesman David Parker, Green co-leader Russel Norman and NZ First Leader Winston Peters, challenged new Reserve Bank Governor Graeme Wheeler's defense of the current Reserve Bank Act at every twist and turn.

In recent weeks the potential coalition partners have been working together to call for an official inquiry into the slump in manufacturing jobs and to call for monetary policy changes to lower the New Zealand dollar.

The Greens have even called on the Reserve Bank to print money to buy Government Earthquake Bonds to help finance the Christchurch rebuild.

This was Wheeler's first appearance before the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee and it didn't go well.

Wheeler had primed the opposition members with his October 26 speech setting out his stall in favour of pure inflation targeting, a hands-off approach to the currency and a staunch opposition to money printing.

Wheeler's approach is clearly more othodox than that of his predecessor Alan Bollard and it sets him up for a direct clash with any new Labour/Green/NZ First coalition government if it were to be elected in 2014.

If Wheeler is true to his word, as outlined in the speech and in his first appearance before the committee, he would not be able to 'fudge' a new Policy Targets Agreement with any new government.

Any attempts by a new government to change the way the Reserve Bank ran monetary policy would require a complete reworking of the Reserve Bank Act to include multiple targets, the ability to intervene in the currency and bond markets, and potentially a change in the way decisions are made. At the moment all these decisions are vested in the hands of one man, the Governor, rather than through a Monetary Policy Committee or board, as is the case in most other central banks.

How this changeover is managed could get ugly.

Market expectations about interest rates closer to the 2014 election (or at any other time if there was a snap election) would have to take into account the risk of a clash between the Governor and a new government.

Would the Governor be forced to resign? Would a new Government have to wait for Wheeler's five year term to expire in 2017 and then appoint a replacement? Would a new government change the Reserve Bank and force him out? Would this mean interest rates and the currency would be lower without Wheeler in place?

This is new territory for business decision makers, savers and borrowers alike.

Until now it was relatively easy to set expectations as long as viewers understood the current framework and knew what the Reserve Bank's expectations were for the economy.

All of that goes out the window in such a politicised environment where the future Governor and the way the bank operates is uncertain.

That is the price to be paid because of the break-down in the political consensus on monetary policy that has been building since just before the last election and has now burst out into the open with the National-led Government's appointment of a hard-line orthodox Governor wedded to the Reserve Bank Act.

Wednesday parliamentary committee hearing broke up amid acrimony with the Governor and the media being tossed out while the committee bickered over procedural matters.

The opposition MPs wanted more time to question Wheeler, but were blocked by National's committee chair Todd Mclay on the grounds the meeting had run out of time.

It was a fractious beginning for the new Governor. He can expect many more to come.


This item was first published on the Herald on Sunday. It is used here with permission.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.


Comment Filter

Highlight new comments in the last hr(s).

Fighting over a shrinking pie, of course it will get ugly.

all politicians want the pie with the most pork.

And when all lies in ruin, the Head of State Aotearoa, Chief Toheroa, will observe "there may have been some method in Ruth Richardson's madness after all...."

As I believe Russel Norman has said, there is nothing sacred about monetary policy. It is merely another policy to be debated. Given Wheeler is a National appointment, and in circumstances where English knew that the opposition parties wanted a different approach, (and have plenty of international case studies to support that view) then the opposition have clear grounds to debate the RB's policies and actions. It's therefore no surprise that there hasn't been much of a honeymoon for Wheeler.
Somewhere between English and Wheeler, they need to explain why their policies (rather than those proposed by the opposition) will likely give the best outcome for the economy; including on inflation, employment, business competitiveness, housing, the current and fiscal deficits and so on, where such explanations stand up to logical scrutiny. So far there has been zero such explanation that I've seen. Merely simplistic parroting of old fashioned "orthodox" dogma; and blaming of the rest of the world for no longer playing the same game.

Bill keeps mentioning "Settings". Can someone  please help me by explaining - to what is Bill referring?
Is doing nothing a "setting"?

In the basement of the Beehive, below the civil defence bunker, there is a room filled with a series of levers that control the economy.
Someone broke the handle and got tomato sauce from their pie in the mechanism a few years back, hasn't worked since, despite an army of economists working on the problem.

No there isn't Robby, beneath the basement bunker...built to provide protection for Piggy et al...but used as a disaster HQ...can be found a few metres of steel reinforced concrete....which extends all the way up to the ninth floor...where it also resides between the ears, in the skulls of several pollies.

Thank you Robbie, Wolly and Steven
you are each and every one of you - 100% correct

The most elegant explanation yet, well done.

Yes its know as "cruise control" set the speed and then go to sleep at the wheel.
So we are going somewhere, at the expected speed, we just dont know where.

The problem I have with "logical scrutiny" is its like "common sense" often it isnt.
However you are right, that it should be clearly anounciated just why this is the best course because I have severe doubts it is, any more.
What does worry me though is the alternatives could be even worse.....just because the rest of the world is acting like lemmings and running off fiscal cliffs doesnt make us right to follow.

Got gold?

Thanks for the heads up Bernard...been distracted building a what we have is the carpet bagger, the socialist marxists and the watermelon party exposing their desire to manipulate the money.
I recall 'Parky' suggesting social credit fluff, some months ago....that all would be well if we had upstanding citizens incharge of the 'printing' and lending for infrastructural development of course.
How more 'upstanding' can we get than Shearer Norman and Peters....not.
Imagine the mess if these clowns controlled RBNZ policies.!
Quite how these fools expect to bring about utopia using truckloads of dosh and dirt cheap credit, remains a mystery....even to them.
But they do know there are enuff dumb peasants out here who will believe in the tooth fairy, flying pigs and a money tree.....and that is all that matters to them...headlines today votes tomorrow....