sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Property Editor Greg Ninness looks at the risk that Auckland's housing market could turn, stop delivering gains and hurt some investors

Property Editor Greg Ninness looks at the risk that Auckland's housing market could turn, stop delivering gains and hurt some investors

By Greg Ninness

Looking at the latest REINZ sales figures for Auckland you can't help but wonder whether the region's skyrocketing house prices will continue their gravity defying course, or whether they'll come crashing back to earth in an equally spectacular fashion.

The sheer momentum of the market, which has pushed the region's median house price up by an average of nearly $3000 a week over the last year, to be 25.8% higher in June than it was in June last year, has been breathtaking, especially when you consider that the median price in the region's western Waitakere district increased by an incendiary 33.2% over the same period, while in Auckland's central suburbs they were up by 31%.

However there are signs that the rate at which prices have been rising is starting to slow.

While the median price in June was up 25.8% compared to a year earlier, it was only up 0.8% compared to May which over a 12 month period would be a less spectacular 9.6%. 

The monthly increase appears to have been driven mainly by prices by Waitakere, where the median was up 1.9% in June compared to May, while in other parts of the region median prices actually declined in June compared to May, with Rodney showing the biggest monthly decline (-3.5%), followed by Manukau (-2.9%), Auckland Central (-2.4%) and North Shore (-0.6%).

And recently I have been hearing from some real estate agents who complain about having to deal more often than they used to with vendors who have unrealistically high price expectations, which is making the agents' lives more difficult.

That doesn't necessarily mean that housing prices in Auckland have peaked, but it does suggest to me that the rate at which prices are going up has started to slow.

The next big test of the market will likely come in October when the new tax rules the government announced in the Budget, especially those that relate to overseas buyers, will come into effect.

But I suspect they probably won't have a huge impact on the market.

Net migration into Auckland continues to increase at a fair clip and the number of new homes being consented continues to fall well short of what is required just to keep pace with the resulting population growth, and the shortfall is getting bigger each month.

Which means demand continues to outstrip supply by a substantial margin, so I don't see any immediate easing in the pressure there.

On top of that mortgage interest rates are falling and could fall further, which should also stimulate buyer activity.

So overall, I think some upward pressure on Auckland house prices will continue as we head into spring, but at a slower rate than we've seen over the last year.

However looking beyond that, there's potential for the situation to change quite quickly.

All of the information I've been seeing lately about the reconstruction of Christchurch suggests that the supply of homes in the city is rapidly catching up with demand and may be about to overtake it.

That means Christchurch may soon be facing an oversupply of new housing.

I'm also hearing that the commercial building projects already in the pipeline will be sufficient to satisfy existing demand from commercial tenants for new space and that vacant office space could become a feature of the Christchurch market by 2017.

So construction activity in Christchurch could start to wind down fairly quickly, which means more builders and building companies could start looking to Auckland for work.

That could help to open up the housing supply tap in Auckland.

Then there's the economy.

I doubt that many Aucklanders have felt the effects yet of the drop in dairy prices which is afflicting the rural sector.

But there's a growing sense that the economy is not doing as well as it has been and some commentators are even talking about the possibility of a recession.

If that flows through to a downturn in employment it could affect migration.

If jobs are harder to get we are likely to see fewer kiwis returning home from overseas and fewer migrants from other countries coming here as well.

So there's potential for demand for housing to start to decline just as supply starts to ramp up.

There's also been talk recently about the flow of investment money from China that been coming into the Auckland property market, turning into an avalanche.

From what I've been hearing, investment from China has definitely been increasing and is already substantial.

But my feeling is that it could dry up as quickly as it arrived.

The Auckland residential property investors I talk to are increasingly falling into one of two camps.

There's the traditional investors who are wanting cash flow and decent income from their properties.

Many of these investors have built up their portfolios over many years, but over the last 18 months or so many have preferred to sit on the sidelines, as the huge surge in prices and resulting decline in rental yields has made it harder (some would say impossible) for them to find new properties that would provide them with an acceptable return.

They've been content to watch the value their existing properties rise, along with their rental income, and are keeping their powder dry for the time being.

Some have even been taking advantage of the currently high prices to sell some of their Auckland properties and diversify their investment portfolios or reduce debt.

If the market does head into a downturn, many of these investors will likely be well placed to move in and pick up a few bargains.

Then there's the ones who seem determined to borrow as much as they can to buy as much as they can.

Many of these investors are relatively new players to the market and they often seem to be driven by an almost evangelical zeal.

They are the property market's true believers, who read the books, attend the seminars, and search the web for the next big thing.

If that next big thing is Auckland residential property, they pile in.

But regardless of where they come from, there is often something of a herd mentality among these investors and it might not take much to spook them.

They are generally chasing the quick buck from capital gains rather than long term income and my sense of them is that if they get a whiff of a market downturn, their natural instinct would be to cut their losses and bolt.

So although the Auckland property market is currently hot, there's at least a chance it could turn to not in the next year or so.


Our free Property email newsletter brings you all the stories about residential and commercial property and the forces that move these huge markets. Sign up here.

To subscribe to our Property newsletter, enter your email address here. It's free.

Email:  


 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

25 Comments

I have sympathy for Graeme Wheeler, and predating him, the RBNZ who had the foresight to recognise the damage that lower interest rates/higher property prices were eventually going to do to the NZ economy. That he was beaten down by popularist calls from the Government, in effect, and being left on his own to deal with what is a governance issue is a disgrace. If the market corrects, for whatever of many,many reasons, let no one be unclear as to whose responsibility it is - and the RBNZ will bear less than most.

Up
0

BW.....paying interest on money that doesn't actually exist does not deserve sympathy!!

Show me the hard cash in the banking system and then lets work out what interest should be and who should be setting the rates!!

You do know how a mortgage is funded?!?!

Up
0

Probably as well as any on here, given that I oversaw funding of, and setting of the lending rates for, a bank's mortgage book some years back.

Up
0

So you were setting an interest rate on mortgage instruments that a bank had already sold.......

Are you telling me that the banks actually funded mortgages with physical money?

Up
0

Physical money? An oxymoron if ever I heard one. The gold standard is long gone my friend.

Up
0

rjn1 - yes well I wasn't talking about the gold standard!

Up
0

I guess, you will also be familiar with this central bank claim?

"Rather than banks receiving deposits when households save and then lending them out, bank lending creates deposits" … "In normal times, the central bank does not fix the amount of money in circulation, nor is central bank money 'multiplied up' into more loans and deposits." Read more

Up
0

This is an extremely relevant article that is read and understood by far too few.

Up
0

The trouble is that cold hard cash is treated the same as the click of the mouse entry that doesn't physically exist......

The promise to pay something which as yet hasn't come into existence as it hasn't been earned should not be treated the same as something that exists and has therefore been earned.

The world has a systems problem when it comes to money, finances, taxation and financial accounting methods......it appears humans have always traded their freedoms and liberties for a corrupt system!!

Bill English is playing the game that is expected of him......we need to remember that the IMF has stepped on NZ before.......and talking of the IMF...didn't NZ have to contribute something in the last 2 to 3 years??

Up
0

...the issue we have is that the fundamental re hosuing have looked crazy for so long. Thus, those that do read, educate themsleves, understand the numbers etc have been made to look silly. Poster boy for this being Shamubeel Eaqub (not to mention Hickey who will never be allowed to forget his 30% call)....

Up
0

New Zealand's golden age of misinformation and obfuscation. Anti-intellectualism of the highest order.

Up
0

If the property boom is driven more by overseas money looking for a safe haven and not looking for capital appreciation, does it really matter if there is a drop in prices ?
And in case of such a drop, won't more funds come in from overseas to take advantage, as well as those powder dry guns, to restore some balance quickly ?
The real issue is Housing seems to be the only game in town.

Up
0

Yes seems logical to all of the above IMHO.

Up
0

Greg - while Key, Joyce, Smith, Collins and co are running this country you can expect the Chinese to continue to pour in and therefore Auckland house prices will continue to escalate putting them beyond the reach of anyone else. Another 25% price increase over the next 12 months is highly likely. Exposing our tiny housing market to the global market through ease of immigration is clearly ludicrous and completely out of control.

The sign needs to go up as Chris J says - "Auckland is full".

I challenge you Greg to head down to Barfoots auction rooms today and tally up the number of homes where the hammer falls to a Chinese buyer. It will be well in excess of 50% - not 39.5%. Go to Barfoots auction room on the north shore tomorrow and it will be in excess of 60%. It doesn't matter whether or not they are offshore foreign based buyers. Our net migration gain is likely to hit 100,000 and most are going to be locating in Auckland.

http://www.barfoot.co.nz/Auction-Search?l=34%20Shortland%20St&s=15/07/2…

This government is so pro Chinese it is not funny - permitting an economic invasion of NZ on a scale that is mind blowing - from Oravida to One Pure Water, Shanghai Pengxin, the list goes on and on.

http://www.3news.co.nz/tvshows/campbelllive/who-owns-new-zealands-water…
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10013696/Judith-Collins-regret…
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/farming/dairy/65179972/Chinese-report-N…

Where is John Campbell?

Up
0

and will Labour be any better considering their past failure?

Up
0

Is it humanly possible to be any worse than this current lot?

Up
0

At least, unlike the Government and Barfoots, Labour are trying to tell us that Chinese are buying houses in huge numbers, leaving owner occupiers out in the cold.
I was foolish to vote for John Key last time, I certainly will not be voting for them again just on this issue.
John Key does not want us to know the real extent of Chinese ownership in our houses and farms for fear of a major backlash.

Up
0

Bigblue if you stopped for one moment and took a big breath of air........exhale slowly..........

Forget about the rights of Chinese buyers for one moment !! Because no matter how you word it is going to be called discrimination!!

BUT....are NZ'ers being discriminated against in their own country? And that is a very different question to ask??

NZ does not have the same rules and regulations as e.g. China.....so is it harder to make money in NZ vs our example China?

Excluding housing what is the cost of living in NZ vs say China?

Are the tax rules the same in NZ vs perhaps China etc?

Can NZers borrow money at the same rate of interest as say Chinese citizens or any other Countries citizens?

Can NZ'ers do the same business undertakings in other countries as what can be done in NZ?

There is not a one world currency where we are all on the same footing...and there is not a one world tax rate, and not a one world rules book where we are all on the same footing........therefore economic and ethnic discrimination is rife....maybe it is kiwi nationals who are being discriminated against and pushing that barrow is surely going to furrow the brow of Dame Susan as she probably won't get it!!

There are many NZ citizens and residents who are Chinese.....why pick on them

Up
0

If as Chinese and their real estate agents are claiming all over the media since Sunday that there is no foreign buyer problem in NZ, then there should be no problem shutting the doors on foreign buyers from any country buying here or restricting them to buying only new builds or locating in cities other than Auckland. If it is such a small number of Chinese foreign based buyers then shutting the door on them will be offending very few people. Don McKinnon - who cares if China is listening to our housing debate!

Up
0

It’s worth noting the baby boomers are the big winners, buying property in Auckland some 25 years ago for $20k now worth $1m+, they also had tertiary education and health paid for including pensions. And now they compete with wealthy foreigners; Somewhat unfair to younger generations.

X, Y & Z have been brought up in a materialistic world where banks make debt alluring, cheap and easy to access. A world of instantaneous gratification until one has to pay back the burden of interest. You must agree the debt is the root of problem and we’ll be the undoing/down fall; the opposite has happened to what was intended post GFC 2008, people paying down debt etc. We've just been rearranging the deck chairs.

Completely agree they are new investors players / green (the last 15 years) and are determined to borrow as much as they can to buy as much as they can, driven by an almost evangelical zeal. Property market's true believers - reading books, media, attend seminars, scour the web for the next big thing - being Auckland residential property, they pile in classic herd mentality driven by greed and fear of missing out.

They read the real estate media releases in the news of untold windfalls, combined with banks providing the means, they see their valuation/sales soar and try to live up to their celebrity lifestyles.

What they fail to understand/realize is that housing and the economy is inextricably tied/link to what locals earn from productive assets such as exporting; that sets the bar, particularly with a basic human need – housing, it fundamentally must be affordable to working locals.

The Government and Councils have dropped the ball and continue to tinker only avoided / exasperating the problem, rather than aggressively increasing supply. What could result is major change that could seriously tip the apple cart resulting in property being worth less than one paid/loaned for.

Up
0

It takes two to tango..say if I am selling a house in Auckland, some Chinese guy offered 1.2 mil and an average kiwi couple offered me $800K.. Let's see which offer I will accept.

Up
0

Exactly...greed.

Anyone's who's bought in the past 5 years with the intention of selling to make capital gain, has contributed to the problem.
.

Up
0

First, the initial premise is highly unlikely. These canny rich Chinese financial wizzos didn't get to be that way by paying way over what the next highest bidder was offering.

Second, answer the question. If you were selling your house, would you forego hundreds of thousands of dollars to ensure that it went to a Kiwi family rather than a Chinese one? What about an Australian family, or a Canadian one?

Perhaps you haven't sold a house and don't intend to do so. But there are plenty of other ways in which you can demonstrate your willingness to make huge financial sacrifices to help other Kiwi families buy homes. You could, for example, make a large donation to the next Kiwi you see going to a house auction, so that they can outbid the Chinese guy. That would make both the buyer and the seller better off, so not one but two Kiwi families would benefit from your sacrifice.

Have you done that? Or is it only other people who are supposed to forego substantial wealth in order to help Kiwis to own homes?

Up
0

So you wouldn't sell to the highest buyer DFTBA???

It is downright greedy and obnoxious that Councils have severely restricted supply!
I mean where was/is there sense of patriotism and loyalty to the citizens?
It certainly isn't first and foremost at the front of their minds is it?

Your suggestion that anyone who has purchased property is there to make a capital gain actually identifies that there is a housing shortage in the first place...do you really think that people would continue to buy if there was an over supply?

I don't like the high prices in Auckland either.....I think it is entering a very troubling phase......and could quite easily have severe ramifications so I'm happy that a percentage is going into foreign hands.

The thing is it is both locals and overseas investors putting pressure on prices and locals don't seem prepared to relocate so it is very hard to have sympathy for them.

Up
0