sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Time travelling; Hi-tech financial bondage; Cost cutting extreme; 007's fondness for crispy notes; Micro-entrepreneurs

Personal Finance
Time travelling; Hi-tech financial bondage; Cost cutting extreme; 007's fondness for crispy notes; Micro-entrepreneurs

By Amanda Morrall

1) Time travel

As a kid growing up in the foothills of the majestic Rocky Mountains, I spent lots of time on summer holidays tramping, camping and chasing squirrels. No iPads, Game Boys, Wii, PlayStation or iPod touches. The big tech thrill of the day was at the arcade playing Pacman (poorly in my case) or else Pong on my father's primitive '70's era computer. 

Wind the clock back to 1930 in New Zealand and telegrams were all the rage. According to Statistics New Zealand, in its latest CPI newsletter, Kiwis used to send roughly 18 million of them a year. I'd be interested to know how that compares with the number of texts sent today. Stats NZ can confirm that there are more cell phones in the country than people which is probably not too surprising given how quickly the technology is changing. 

History geeks might enjoy the comparisons in clothing prices and communications from yesteryear and today contained in the Price Index News.

And for those of you with old, unwanted cell phones kicking around, why not do a good turn by giving them to Starship Hospital which recycles them for money. Read more about their programme here. 

2) Mobile phone insurance

I won't deny that technology has made life easier in many respects but it has foisted upon us a whole raft of stupid expenses. Given the initial outlay, and our propensity to lose, break or misplace stuff, insuring these gadgets seems mandatory.  Radio Nazis' Jules Older, in yesterday's afternoon show, discusses  the upside and downside of insurance plans and also individual liability with respect to workplace issued technology.

3) Cutting back 

Cell phones, and all the other gadgetry we've become besotted with may seem essential, but in reality most of us can due without it. To a large extent, technology is just a lifestyle choice. In his latest blog, Mr.Money Moustache breaks down his household outlay and compares that to his still employed colleagues who have become financially enslaved by their lifestyle. Be sure to read his "middle-class and kick-ass"  cost comparison chart. The numbers are shocking.

4) Bond, James Bond

Once upon a time, Roger Moore was my favourite Bond. I only have eyes for Daniel Craig these days. Nonetheless, I was interested to read about Mr. Moore's relationship with money as he was the subject of a recent Telegraph Fame and Fortune profile. He admits a real fondness for the "sheer luxury of crispy notes." I hear you 007 but you won't find any in Amanda's wallet. EFTPOS has killed my paper relationship. 

Here's a snippet about how an early lesson from his father about  having respect for money had no material impact on his behaviour. He's a shameless materialist.   

 

HOW DID YOUR CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCE INFLUENCE YOUR ATTITUDE TO MONEY?

We lived in Stockwell and I remember my father one Sunday afternoon, slippers off, feet up, said, "Pop down the sweet shop, son, and get me a half-pound bar of Brazil nut chocolate," and he gave me 10 shillings to go and get it.

I got to the sweet shop and got the chocolate and went to pay for it and I had no 10-shilling note. It took me an hour searching every crack in the pavement and the kerb on the way back home. God knows what I was going to say. When my father said, "Where's my chocolate and where's my change?"

I was absolutely trembling. "I lost the money," I said. And he said: "Well, that will teach you to be more bloody careful next time, won't it?" And he put the 10-shilling note on the table in front of me and said, "You dropped it on the way out," and I said: "You let me go all the way down there?" And he said: "That's to teach you respect for money." Well, I've had no respect whatsoever my whole life. Now I'm extravagant.

5) Micro-entrepreneurs

Two people I know recently launched their own apps. Because the developers were based in China and India, they saved themselves a small fortune. How much? In one case, a friend was quoted a price of NZ$15,000. They ended up paying A$800. Another, paid less than US$200.  Business Process Outsourcing, a term used to describe this practice of using cheaper overseas skill, is the future. Reuter's Philippines correspondent Jeremy Wagstaff looks at the booming trade of micro-entrepreneurs.

To read other Take Fives by Amanda Morrall click here. You can also follow Amanda on Twitter @amandamorrall

 

 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

6 Comments

Radio Nazis !!!

Up
0

#5 I watch this trend with interest because Outsourcing, especially to India, is a management idea that in the short term (before testing back in the western world) makes management look good but in the medium term invariably ends up costing more because :-

 a) the Indian developers will never say "no" and will always say everything is fine, right up until you reply "but this bit doesn't work", at which point they will do an about-face without changing expression and reply "yes you are right, it doesn't work".

b) if you make a mistake in the spec that is so obvious an on-site developer would think to query it with the BA, the Indian developer will just develop as it is on the spec even if it's totally incongruous with the rest of the application.

c) if there is a problem they tend to involve the entire team of developers - you will often see 10 Indian developers all around one desk trying to resolve a problem.

This is not being racist, it's simply cultural differences that make it very difficult and usually more hassle than it's worth. Besides, if you have spent any length of time in India you'd have to think twice about expecting anything quality to come out of that environment. India has it's charms - half of which are a result of nothing working properly in a way you would expect here in the Western world.

And let's not forget Made In China isn't exactly a byword for quality either. You get what you pay for. Maybe for a small phone app it makes sense, but I've seen all of the above happen and it's never a cheap fix.

Just ask the RBS - who laid off all their experienced expensive UK IT staff and used cheaper 3rd world labour. The total cost of that debacle - over 100 million pounds. You can employ a lot of expensive IT guys with that much for a long time...

Up
0

I read Trademe's would-be competitor, Wheedle, was developed in India. I suppose you get what you pay for (and I'm not just saying that because I'm an expensive IT staff).

Up
0

Haha I didn't even know about Wheedle until I heard they went down on the first day of trading. Genius.

Of course you would think by now that as there is still no-one trying to knock Ebay of their pedestal despite another dotcom boom going on with any crappy idea getting a few million dollars in seed money, trying to take on the entrenched auction website is a total no-go anyway. Even Ebay themselves had a crack early on and realised that TradeMe was the done and dusted winner.

Also I have some friends who have a very successful internet company in NZ and while they found developer talent overseas, they moved them to NZ to work and paid them accordingly. Go figure.

Up
0

We're not doing too bad either with our business (www.irontech.co.nz) so you must be right - some people are still prepared to pay for quality and stuff that actually works as it should :)

Up
0

http://www.thegoonshow.net/scripts_show.asp?title=s08e07_the_red_fort

Lakagee:
I will, I will, but Mr Lalkaka, would it not be more adventageous if we stood the door in the upright position?

Lalkaka:
Indeed, indeed Mr Lackagee, that is a splendid idea, admitting. I will get Haveldar Singiz-Singh to hold the door upright against his face.

Lakagee:
Giving you credit for your intelligence, I do not see the point of having Haveldar Singh holding the door upright.

Lalkaka:
Please letting me explain the reason that it is, and simply the reason comes man. Now listen please.

Lakagee:
I am listening. I am listening.

Lalkaka:
Will you kindly remain in a condition of serenity and calm, and I will explain the whole principal of the idea. Toodle pip.

Lakagee:
Explain. Chin chin.

Lalkaka:
Chin chin. Now the natural position of the door is being upright, is that not right so?

Lakagee:
Indeed yes, indeed yes.

Lalkaka:
Hooray

Lakagee:
I am in complete accordment with the statement you have just vouchsafed.

Lalkaka:
Alright. Therefore in this position we are able to make the requisite preparation for the testing of the key.

Up
0