Fletcher Building offers downbeat view of year ahead after confirming loss of $196 mln for year to June 2020

Fletcher Building offers downbeat view of year ahead after confirming loss of $196 mln for year to June 2020

Construction giant Fletcher Building is offering a downbeat assessment of the prospects for the next 12 months after confirming its previously signalled after-tax loss of $196 million for the year to June 2020.

Fletcher's expecting the first six months of the new financial year (IE up to December 2020) will actually be better than the next six months. So, in other words things will get worse as the year goes on. 

Already the company has announced cuts to its workforce of 1500 (1000 in New Zealand and 500) in Australia and it is expecting to save about $300 million in operational costs through doing this. But Fletcher clearly indicated it may have to, and would be prepared to do more in this regard if circumstances dictate.

"We have sized our business for a market downturn of around 25% in New Zealand and around 20% in Australia, although there is a high degree of uncertainty over the outlook," the company said.

"We will be looking hard at the trends in activity over the next few months and will be ready to adapt and respond if needed."

The first half of full-year 2021 (to June 2021 is expected to be stronger than the second half of the year, as the economic impact of the Covid-19 pandemic flows through to activity levels, the company says.

"However, the outlook is uncertain, and the Group will remain vigilant to macro factors and movements in forecasts. The Group has a strong balance sheet and is well-positioned to implement its strategy with the ability to react to market activity as needed."

This is the statement issued by Fletcher Building on Wednesday:

Fletcher Building today announced its audited annual results, confirming a net earnings loss for the year ended 30 June 2020 (FY20) of $196 million compared to a profit of $164 million in the year ended 30 June 2019 (FY19). The Group also confirmed strong operating cash flows of $410 million and ended the year with a strong balance sheet with liquidity of $1.6 billion.

Summary:

  • Final results in line with market announcement of 11 August 2020
  • Revenue of $7,309 million
  • EBIT before significant items $160 million
  • Net Loss After Tax of $196 million, compared to a profit of $164 million in FY19
  • Strong cash flows of $410 million
  • Balance sheet strong with liquidity of $1.6 billion and net debt of $0.5 billion
  • Nil dividend

Fletcher Building CEO Ross Taylor said: “Fletcher Building’s FY20 performance was characterised by the impacts of COVID-19 and the actions we took to ensure we were well positioned to successfully navigate the market uncertainty in FY21 and beyond. Prior to March 2020, the business was trading in line with expectations and making good progress with operating efficiencies. The subsequent lockdown in New Zealand and restrictions in Australia had a significant impact on our FY20 revenues and profitability.

“Our focus through this period has been on three key areas: the health and safety of our people; enhancing the resilience of our business by managing our costs, cash flows and balance sheet; and ensuring we stay focused on strong customer performance and delivering our strategy.

“We have been unwavering in our commitment to health and safety. We are driving positive change in our safety culture through our company values and a genuine belief that all workplace injuries are preventable. In FY20 serious injuries reduced from 15 to 8 and we had no fatalities. While our Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR) 5-year trend continues downward, our FY20 rate was slightly up from last year. This only strengthens our commitment and focus on preventing all injuries.

“Anticipating lower market activity ahead, we have taken some difficult but decisive actions to reset the cost base of the business. We expect these actions to deliver a permanent reduction in our cost base in FY21 of approximately $300 million per annum. Significant items in respect of this restructuring, along with one-off charges in our Rocla business and from the early repayment of our USPP debt, have totalled $276 million in FY20. We have sized our business for a market downturn of around 25 percent in New Zealand and around 20 percent in Australia, although there is a high degree of uncertainty over the outlook. We will be looking hard at the trends in activity over the next few months and will be ready to adapt and respond if needed.

“As already announced, we decided to raise a further $150 million provisions against our historical construction projects. While this was disappointing, Fletcher Construction, through a reset of bid margins and disciplines now has a $2.4 billion forward-order book of new work with a materially better margin outlook and lower-risk profile.

“Pleasingly, our operating cash flows in FY20 have remained robust at $410 million, supported by effective working capital management in a disrupted period. We have also preserved strong liquidity and funding lines. Our leverage ratio remains below the bottom end of our target range, we have total available funding of $2.1 billion as at 30 June 2020, and liquidity for the Group was $1.6 billion. In addition, we pre-emptively renegotiated covenants with our lenders to enable us to rely on more favourable terms for covenant testing through to the end of 2021, should we need to.

“As a result of the actions we have taken, our business is well-positioned to continue to drive its strategy and performance improvement. We will continue key investments in our digital and innovation strategies, while also taking opportunities to grow our market share either in our existing product lines or in logical adjacencies. With our strong balance sheet, we expect the tougher market will present better opportunities to achieve our aspirations and overall strategies.”

In line with the Company’s Dividend Policy, the Board has not declared a final dividend for FY20.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

15 Comments

A good take over target, Fletchers. Who will bid, the Aussies, Chinese or some PEF ?

11
up

The New Zealand Government, if they have any sense; cut out the middlemen with the infrastructure builds etc.
Same should happen to AirNZ (wrap it into Kiwirail as one transport body).
Both vital infrastructure bodies, and a source of volume employment and 'stimulation' when the economy needs it.

Same for electricity.
We need all the generating assets operating in harmony, taking advantage of current weather conditions.
How can the Onslow scheme go ahead in a competitive market without designing a pricing system so complex that it is ripe for exploitation.

Hopefully the onslow white elephant doesn't go ahead. Its got stuff all use, particularly once we increase the amount of renewable generation elsewhere on the grid. We already have tons of hydro storage (unfortunately mostly at teh bottom of the south island) for smoothing out variable generation from renewables.

..time for you to head back to Russia

Hasn't it been proven that the least effective way to run a company is to have the Govt run it. There are a few exceptions to this rule but as a whole NZ fails at running companies effectively. As a builder, if I'm asked to do a quote for a Council I estimate everything high and then add 20% as I know it's going to be run badly and there will be payment delays.
$500,000 for a slide at the Beehive..........

I think that's kinda the point, they are run in favour of their customers not just their shareholders if they are govt owned. Profit isn't the be all and end all, and shouldn't be for essential services either.

Yes, and would enable the govt to really pump up it's housing program

I'd love to see the for and against odds at the TAB for it

Bring it on, definitely the best case scenario for me.

Nah, Government ownership in building industry is not good for the industry or the country.
The Management skills required are very different. In my view, some Asian company is the best choice.
The Lenders to Fletchers should be looking at that option.

It's a doctrinaire view to say the govt can't run a big construction company.
Clearly the private sector can't!
Not saying if the govt bought it that it would be anything close to perfect...a lot would depend on the calibre of executives

What does “market downturn of 25% mean?
25% less profit, less building, less GDP or what?

Low interest rate and demand in construction should be up 25% not otherwise

Yes but it' not the Kiwi's who are building on all these bought up residential sections is it. The only ones I see build at least in Auckland are the Chinese.