sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Big jump in foreign migrants coming to New Zealand in the second quarter but more New Zealanders leaving as well

Property / news
Big jump in foreign migrants coming to New Zealand in the second quarter but more New Zealanders leaving as well
Immigration counter

The flow of foreign migrants into New Zealand has turned positive for the first time since Covid-19 pandemic restrictions were introduced in early 2020.

The latest migration estimates from Statistics NZ show a net gain of 1090 non-NZ citizens in the June quarter.

That was due to a strong increase in the estimated number of non-NZ citizens arriving long term, which jumped to 10,625 in the June quarter, up 47% compared to the June quarter of last year.

That was easily the highest number of long term foreign migrants arriving since Covid pandemic restrictions were first introduced.

Also in the June quarter of this year 9535 foreign migrants were estimated to have left the country long term, giving a net gain of 1090 for the quarter.

Although the June quarter figures may mark a turning point as foreign migrants start to return to these shores again, the numbers are still tiny compared to pre-pandemic levels.

In the second quarter of 2019 there was a net gain gain of 10,729 non-NZ citizens from migration, and that jumped to 20,000 over the following two quarters.

However although the number of non-NZ citizens migrating to this country appears to be rising, there was still an overall population decline from migration in the June quarter because there was an estimated net loss of 2755 NZ citizens, with 8345 leaving long term and 5599 arriving long term.

That took the total change in population from migration in the June quarter to an estimated net loss of 1665.

However, Statistics NZ's migration figures that are less than 16 months old need to be treated with caution because of the way the information is gathered.

The monthly, quarterly and annual figures are subject to revision for up to 16 months from the time they are first released and for the first three months or so these revisions can be substantial.

For example, in July Statistics NZ estimated there was a net loss of 1692 NZ citizens from long term migration in the March quarter of this year. But when those figures were revised in August, the net loss was increased to 2389, up 41% from the previous month's estimate.

The revisions start to decrease substantially after about four months, are insignificant after about 12 months and are considered accurate and no longer revised after 16 months. An explanation as to how Statistics NZ compiles its migration data is available here.

While the latest figures could face some significant revisions over the next few months, what they suggest so far is that the number of New Zealanders going overseas to live is heading back towards its pre-pandemic norm as travel once again becomes a viable option, while the number of non-NZ citizens moving to NZ is starting to pick up again following the reopening of the borders and the recent resetting of immigration rules. 

However it will likely be several more months before the figures start to become reliable enough to pick definitive trends.

  • You can have articles like this delivered directly to your inbox via our free Property Newsletter. We send it out 3-5 times a week with all of our property-related news, including auction results, interest rate movements and market commentary and analysis. To start receiving them, register here (it's free) and when approved you can select any of our free email newsletters.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

36 Comments

Positive immigration, a staple of housing market analysis. 

Up
13

Looks like bad news for those heavily into housing then.

"That took the total change in population from migration in the June quarter to an estimated net loss of 1665."

More houses being built to house fewer people. Could all change later in the year of course, place your bets now. 

Up
3

Is it not obvious. Borders opened up in July.

Up
2

Be interesting to see how it adjusts in the future, given custom's net -16,708 for July.

Otoh, customs has ~ +1400 for August so far.

Up
1

The numbers I see with Customs border movements is a net loss of 18k people so far this month (Departures - Arrivals).  

From Jan 2020 to August 2022, there's a net loss of 156,519 people across the borders.  But if you take out Jan 2020 (42k gain) and Feb 2020 (34k gain) then we've lost 232k people across our borders since the first Lockdown in 2020.  

https://www.customs.govt.nz/covid-19/more-information/passenger-arrival…

Up
3

Yup, that was my source ^^

I eyeballed it, rounding to the approximate 100 per row, so the . didn't affect my calculation. rounding errors might of a bit, hence the ~.

But there isn't an average loss over 1000 people per day in that data.

Up
0

Select the data.  Copy and paste into excel.  Total sum each column.  Subtract Total Departures from Total Arrivals.  

 

Although as Matt_B has spotted, there was a full stop instead of a comma in one of the days.  So it's a 9k loss so far this month.  

Up
0

Arrivals Departures

10593 10243

9608 9037

8916 8165

9113 9969

11158 10838

10767 10203

10600 9569

8863 8943

8496 8680

8496 8680 <-- Though suspiciously the same as the day before

10203 10222

9851 10762

10770 10852

11472 10546

10074 9861

9201 9378

Total: 158181 155948 , or a net 2233 positive arrivals.

Up
0

You're correct.  Just spotted a second full stop in Sunday 14 August.  Was meant to be 11,472 but they keyed as 11.472.  

:facepalm: 

Up
1

Customs has an error in their data on the Monday 8 August 8.863 arrived. They have put in a decimal point instead of a comma

 

Up
0

Ah good catch.  I copy and pasted the data into excel and total summed each column.  The arrivals for that day would have been 8.8 people instead of 8863.  

Up
2

Yea I was looking at it a few days ago and did the sums and visually it didn't look right.

Took 10 mins before I figured it out. 

They also did it on the 14th also. Seems like same person entering data.

I wonder if they pick it up at the error end of the month

 

Up
0

Gotta fill all those empty houses in Akld

Hope they're all cashed up...

Up
9

what empty houses?  Average occupancy in Auckland is above the national average.

Up
0

What is considered “long-term”?

Up
0

There's a link in the story which takes to you an explanation of how the numbers are calculated.

Up
1

Be classic if they were all walking through arrivals with t-shirts saying "✈️✅"

Up
2

And here we go, the start of the low-skilled mass immigration once again.

The bottle shops and cafes will be super pleased.

Up
19

NZ currently ~3.5 practicing physicians and 11 practicing nurses per 1000 people. The least the government could do is apply quotas on medical visas as a % of total numbers to maintain this ratio so we're not terribly worse off overall.

The border closures bought INZ enough time to take back some of the control from employers over who comes to NZ. However, all they have achieved in the 2 yrs+ is adding a few more tick boxes on the application forms.

Up
8

Yep, NZ’s world leading economic strategy of the last 20 years - pump immigration and housing!

Astounding strategy and leadership, whether it is Blue or Red in charge!!!!

Up
27

... send the message to Red & Blue ... vote for someone else ( I always do ) : power to the mini minor parties !

Up
1

Wait there is more...

Green wants more vulnerable migrants in NZ so they can represent a bigger audience in their battle for social justice.

Yellow argued in the run-up to the 2017 election that all immigration policies should be dropped to the extent that there is level-playing field between locals and foreign workers in securing a job here in NZ. Even the US Republican partypeople aren't this unhinged!

Up
17

The Greens policy is utterly insane. Say what you will about the pros and cons if immigration, economists tend to agree that broadly speaking for the purposes of a comment thread:

a) high skilled long term migrants are generally good (in so much as they then work here and contribute to the economy)

b) wealthy migrants are generally good (in so much as they then invest here, setting aside for the moment of overinvestment in interest.co.nz's favourite asset class)

To purposefully target people who fit neither of those categories like the Greens do is trying the best you possibly can to lose from your immigration policy...

Up
5

If we could replace Peter Thiel with a thousand Patrick Lam's, the outcome would be far, far preferabel

Up
0

F*ck off, we're full (until housing is affordable and hospital ED queues aren't 12 hours long)

Up
14

You have erectile disfunction? We're not full ether, we desparately need more low skilled labour.

Up
1

Yes, we need to suppress wages and weaken the ability of Labour to make demands of the capital owners because we need to grow our biomass.

The growth ideology of present neoliberal is the ideology of the cancer cell.

Up
3

According to Customs border movements there is a net loss of 18k people so far this month (Departures - Arrivals).  There might be a net gain of 1090 non-citizens in the quarter but that's small fry.  200k people arrived into the country in June alone.  

Jan 2020 to August 2022, there's a net loss of 156k people across the borders.  But if you take out Jan 2020 (42k gain) and Feb 2020 (34k gain) then we've lost 232k people across our borders since the first Lockdown in 2020.  

https://www.customs.govt.nz/covid-19/more-information/passenger-arrival…

Up
2

exactly - comments here reflect what people (landlords and realtors) want to believe - reality is a massive net loss of people.   

Up
4

A net loss of a lot of people.  I.e. 230k people = 57k houses worth of people at 4 people per dwelling, yet we're still building more houses.  But this fact is not reported..........

And we wonder why the property market is tanking?  

Up
2

My employer (manufacturing), is lobbying hard for the immigration flood gates (esp Phillipines, UK, India) to be opened so we can fill "skillz shortages".

We have a  lot of machine operators and fitters leaving, either for Aus or for better pay within the region.

Up
6

In manufacturing too. Exactly the same issue. Owner has gone all in on immigration to fill vacancies. Are you Auckland based? 

Up
1

Canterbury. ~400 employees

Up
1

Down here in Christchurch, I continue to receive (for well more than a year now) emails from hiring organisations in desperate need to fill positions such as truck driver, fork lifter operators, packing crew, machine operators and the like. I note that they pay rate is only a couple of bucks higher than minimum wage though and despite their inability to find people, there is no change in the advertise rate, or any other forms of remuneration (e.g. performance based payments and the like). This shows two things:

1) Employers rather miss on revenue than increase their cost base (I have no idea why this is, it may be something than NZ business owners know more about). Maybe because the revenue future prospects are not that bright?

2) minimum wage is high relative the  

Up
2

Nice to have some low wage labour to undercut these unreasonable locals who want "living wages".

Up
4

Greg,

 

On the topic of data reliability due to the lack of departure cards forcing stats to use ML models to estimate these things then revise and update over time, do we know how reliable the data is? Have they published or discussed confidence intervals?

e.g Flow reported at end of month, 16 months later 99% of the time been revised by +/- X%

 

Up
0