
The Government will be making legislative and policy changes so that new supermarkets can have an “express lane” to boost competition, Economic Growth Minister Nicola Willis says.
This would remove barriers preventing competitor supermarkets from launching or expanding in New Zealand, Willis says.
Earlier this year, the Government ran a Request for Information (RFI) process asking what would help challenger supermarkets take on the current duopoly.
“The responses revealed widespread frustration with restrictive zoning, slow consenting, and cumbersome regulations that make it extremely difficult for new competitors to gain a foothold in the New Zealand grocery sector," Willis says.
The Government has now agreed to introduce legislation so that new supermarkets could qualify as fast track referrable projects under the Fast-Track Approvals Act.
Legislation would be introduced to Parliament in November and passed by the end of the year. This would be supported by a new Government Policy Statement on Grocery Competition.
Alongside this, Willis says it will streamline building consenting processes for new supermarkets.
This would be done by choosing a single building consent authority “to standardise and streamline building consent processes for grocery developments that would enable competition regionally or nationally”, Willis says.
The Government would also amend Building Act regulations to facilitate pre-approved building plans for multiple grocery developments and improve the operation of the Overseas Investment Act regime by “clarifying the pathways available for grocery investments, including through grocery-specific provisions in the Ministerial Directive Letter”.
Willi says the Government would also be amending the Commerce Act “to better combat ‘predatory pricing’ with the introduction of an objective economic test for the prosecution of firms misusing their market power to exclude or stamp-out competitors” and explore options for potential food importers to bring in new product lines.
“Ultimately those businesses will make their own investment decisions about whether and when to launch new supermarkets - the Government’s policy changes are intended to give them more confidence to do so."
While the Government has been in talks with Costco, Willis says it’s disappointing that international retailers such as Aldi and Lidl decided not to take part in the initial RFI.
“It’s possible that the changes we are announcing today will encourage them to take a more serious look at New Zealand.”
Some respondents to the RFI discussed breaking up Foodstuffs and/or Woolworths.
“A decision to restructure the supermarkets is not a decision that would be taken lightly. It would be a significant intervention that would carry costs and risks that would need to be rigorously weighted against the potential benefits to shoppers.”
A cost-benefit analysis is underway on specific options for restructuring the duopoly, Willis says.
This would inform future advice the Economic Growth Minister says she would take to the Cabinet on whether more legislative changes are needed to improve competition.
“Our objective is a more competitive grocery market that delivers better prices and more choice for Kiwi shoppers. We remain open to potential market-led solutions that may be put forward by the major incumbents.”
'Time for half measures has passed'
The Grocery Action Group has welcomed Willis' fast tracking planning processes to support new supermarkets and it acknowledges the prospect of structural reform remains on the table.
"However, we urge government and policymakers to recognise that only bold, decisive structural reform - targeting both retail and wholesale - will deliver genuine relief to Kiwi consumers at the checkout," the group says.
Incremental measures are not enough, the group says.
Grocery Action Group chair Sue Chetwin says: "Breaking up this entrenched duopoly is the single most effective course of action if New Zealanders are to see lower prices at the checkout, and to see them quickly."
"The time for half-measures has passed. Meaningful, enforceable structural changes - alongside streamlined planning processes for newcomers - are the only way to ensure genuine competition, fair pricing, fair treatment of suppliers and a thriving, accessible supermarket sector for all New Zealanders," Chetwin says.
Labour's finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds says "a fast-track regime for supermarkets makes sense, but it won’t make any immediate difference for New Zealanders who will keep paying high prices at the checkout today".
“Kiwis still won’t see their grocery bills coming down for years under National. Nicola Willis still doesn’t have a timeline for when a new player could come into the market."
'A big fat yes to new supermarkets'
When asked about some global grocery players not taking part in the RFI, Willis told the press on Wednesday afternoon that the country has a really strong welcome mat to present to them.
"I reckon they should give New Zealand another look."
Willis says "this exercise has made it clear: New Zealand has a reputation for being a really hard place to set up a supermarket. We have to change that reputation".
The Government's changes make it "crystal clear that instead of being one of the hardest places on earth to open a new supermarket, we're making ourselves one of the easiest places on earth to open a supermarket", Willis says.
"What we're saying is a big fat yes to new supermarkets."
When asked about how long New Zealanders would have to wait to find relief from their grocery bills, Willis says that is in the power of existing supermarkets right now.
"Any day, they can make a choice to reduce their margins and offer lower food prices for New Zealanders. The changes I'm announcing today will make it far more likely that they do so in future.
"Put it this way, if you're a New World or a Woolworths, and a new Costco opens up next door, chances are you're going to sharpen up your pricing."
Willis says the measure of success for her would be seeing a new chain of supermarkets opening up nationwide.
"That's the ultimate destination," Willis says.
24 Comments
Come back next year, folks
So the announcement is around construction of new locations, not actually entry of a business into the NZ market...
Lame. Regardless, Aldi is not coming. ROI and ROE (effort) not worth it.
Exactly. Beyond the red tape the numbers don't add up. There needs to be a major overhaul for wholesale and distribution to make them more efficient. Otherwise there's no financial incentive for another major entrant.
Woolies Aussie share price smashed this morning. Down 13% - $5 billion wiped off in the first hour of share market trade. Coles up 8% y'day.
Guess who's winning.
https://insideretail.com.au/business/woolworths-profit-drops-despite-st…
Yep
Just turn up those NZ prices where they don't need to compete, in order to compensate
Darn. I don't know why, but I actually thought this might be something to bring the cost of groceries down :-).
NZ is a small economy with very few large, dense population centers. Is it actually feasible for a third entrant? I'm struggling to see the numbers add up for most operators when they look at the options across NZ. Where is there local demand to support 3 grocery chains in close proximity? Possibly in some parts of Auckland it could work due to the population size but elsewhere I don't see it.
Asian grocery is currently the fastest-growing channel in the U.S. grocery sector, driven by explosive consumer demand, demographic shifts, and broader influence on mainstream food retailing.
https://thoughtforfood.jtmega.com/the-powerful-growth-of-asian-grocery-…
Wouldn't surprise me to see our smaller grocery/dairy outlets step up. Some hard working immigrants are doing long hours for damn all and are prepared to keep at it. I can here their excitement already.
Dunno about you folk, but I often hit the asian and indian supermarkets/minimarkets for things like bulk spices and other things you can't get elsewhere. Very affordable, and lovely people to deal with. It's great to have them here and have the options they bring :-)
From experience just check the used by date.
The other thing to consider is the inflationary impact on local suppliers - a third operator will need inventory sourced locally. If it's bringing inventory from offshore that is going to be expensive given NZ's location. Typically, even competitive markets maintain prices that deliver profits over the long-term and this will still be an imperative for new entrants.
As with the electricity sector supply is constrained to meet demand such that prices always rise to deliver profitable returns. This is what is supposed to happen because free-markets do not lower prices by default. That's called deflation and that won't be allowed to happen.
It's about adjusting current market share across additional entrant/s for the same overall product demand, not incremental supply.
My personal opinion is that economies of scale is better in a small market than more competition. For example would we be better off with 5 hardware chains all with the overheads of head office, purchasing, own brands, smaller stores, etc compared to just Bunnings and Mitre 10?
And then there's the koha you have to pay to obtain Maori's blessing. I wonder if some of these overseas companies do sufficient due diligence to realise this additional impediment to get the construction going at a site, let alone other resource consent issues which Willis is going to remove. Seems like fast track in another form.
Overstated
My understanding is that Aldi doesn’t have much coverage of Australia yet. Why bother opening a handful of stores here with all the overheads of entering a new country, when you can open more in Aus.
While I’ve mentioned it several times, the big reason NZ supermarkets are dearer than overseas is GST. In Aus they don’t have it on basic food items (eg meat, dairy, fruit, veg, etc), in the UK it’s exempt from most supermarket food.
Even if Willis is successful in driving up competition, it’s hard to see anything more than 1 or 2% price reduction, and possibly even price increases for those that aren’t near the new chain similar to the gull effect. Costco for example, how many stores are they realistically going to open in the next 10 years, and if you don’t live near one, the best you can hope for is the duopoly don’t make up for their losses near Costco by increasing your prices.
You don't seriously believe that if GST is taken off groceries that the 15% will be automatically passed on to the consumer.
Given the complexities of pricing there is no way. Some will end up as additional profit for the supermarket chains and suppliers.
And there will be endless arguments around cooked chicken v raw chicken etc, etc.
Just leave the GST system as is. At least it is simple.
I’m not necessarily saying they should change it. But there is no way our supermarkets could be the same price with a 15% tax difference. That’s probably more than their margin.
And yes I do believe most of it would be passed on. Why wouldn’t it? The government could easily watch and make sure.
Most countries report on it being a shambles to administer and lots of grey areas, so expensive to run. Good for accountants
Nothing makes us seem like an insignificant Pacific island like having a Ministry of Grocery Deregulation.
I think in this case the fix is to make general business easy to establish and supermarkets can be the proof it worked. As it stands fast track just makes the slow track stand out as ridiculous.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.