sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

As PM Christopher Luxon survives another confidence vote from his National Party colleagues, how are things shaping up as the election inches closer?

Public Policy / news
As PM Christopher Luxon survives another confidence vote from his National Party colleagues, how are things shaping up as the election inches closer?
National leader Christopher Luxon gives the thumbs up sign
Which Act and NZ First policies would get the thumbs up from National leader Christopher Luxon?

by Anna Whyte and Mandy Te

This election marks a pivotal point in the future of New Zealand, NZ First leader Winston Peters contends, as the country closes in on election day - November 7.

National has just undergone two leadership confidence votes in the space of a few months, and now is faced with whether it can turn its bruising period around to reconnect with voters. Meanwhile the cost of living remains front of mind for voters, but with limited funds for big party promises, the political landscape for spending is tough. 

Interest.co.nz asks political commentators what they think National needs to do and whether parties are giving voters hope this election.

 

National’s election campaign

A major party leader surviving two votes of confidence is something former Minister Peter Dunne can't recall during his 33 years in Parliament.

There were various rumblings during the time of David Lange. 

"In the end it was pretty clear that the caucus was becoming more and more dissatisfied and less united, and he chose to resign, but I've never experienced a situation where two formal confidence votes have been held in such a short period of time in the lead up to an election."

The situation feels damaging, and National needs to do something big, and get some big results, Dunne said.

While time is of the essence, Dunne said National needed to concentrate on their successes, "ironically, this comes down to people like Erica Stanford in education, some of the infrastructure stuff that Chris Bishop has done."

"You get a sense at the moment... it's a bit like a repeating record, really. They're just saying the same old thing, and it's not resonating with people."

"The other thing they've got to do is put the blowtorch much more strongly onto Labour... contrasting Labour's record with National's record, because a lot of people still have reservations about Labour's time in government and National needs to do a much better job reminding people of the things they didn't like three years ago."

National Party leader Christopher Luxon launches the party's 2023 election campaign

National sitting in judgment

Political commentator and former Labour staffer Esther Robinson said National cannot rerun its 2023 campaign.

"At the last election, voters were principally judging Labour’s record. This time, they will be judging National’s."

"National’s campaign therefore needs to move from talking about Labour, to demonstrating why a second term would leave households and business materially better off. This is a hard sell as relief won’t be felt before the election," Robinson said.

"In effect, National is asking voters to bank a recovery they have not yet experienced and trust that it will reach them during another three years in government."

Owner of Curia Market Research and former National staffer David Farrar does not think National needed to drastically change its planned 2026 election campaign, despite this week's confidence vote on Christopher Luxon's leadership.

"Look, this is messy, no one in National would have wanted this. But actually, after the last time it happened, Luxon had a very good two-three months, he was sharp on message."

"They've still got some important laws to pass through the House. Tying into the cost of living, one of those is the rate caps legislation, and Labour have yet to come out with a position on it," said Farrar.

"National would probably be hoping Labour votes against it, because that's going to give them a great whacking stick about 'Labour's voted to allow 20% rates increases', in the future."

Political commentator David Farrar. Image source: Mandy Te/interest.co.nz

Farrar said National needed to remind the public about work done on law and order. "Likewise, on education, they've got a good story to tell about the changes Erica [Stanford] has made."

Dunne, Robinson and Farrar all were of the view the possibility of National going for a third potential leadership change before the election was very low. 

"I think the masochism is not that high," Farrar said. "Like, if you're into that, go find the dominatrix to whip you."  

The environment

​The cost of living is still top of mind for New Zealanders - power prices are high, food prices are high and petrol continues to fluctuate.

"The ingredients for change politics are certainly present, but under MMP dissatisfaction can fragment across several parties rather than produce a straightforward change of government," Robinson said. 

Farrar said in his polls the cost of living was still the biggest issue, and was polling three times higher than the second biggest issue for New Zealanders. 

"That's not far off what it was when inflation was 7/8% - before inflation got out of control under the previous government, it was only 2%. So we're definitely not back to the days where inflation, cost of living isn't a factor."

He expected quite a few election policies on the cost of living - with a caveat that the country has "very little money." 

"We're in deficit, and it would look very irresponsible for any large-scale tax cuts, welfare entitlements."

Any hope for voters?

Farrar said normally what parties would be doing would be looking how to increase incomes, lower tax and increase working for families. 

"What you're probably more likely to see is people doing, I call it 'hopeful' rather than 'hope' - "which is, we're going to do something to the supermarkets, we're going to do something to the power companies, which which is going to reduce the cost of power and food."

Robinson said the political landscape remains open for a party to connect with a message of hope for households.

"The missing bridge is between easing the pressure of next month’s power bill and New Zealand’s prosperity over the next decade," she said.

"Voters don’t just want hope as a slogan. Parties need to acknowledge how difficult things are, offer a believable pathway to improvement and be backed by a plan that withstands scrutiny."

Dunne also did not think any political party had hit the nail on the head when it came to delivering the public a message of hope.

"In previous elections parties have been able to do it because they've been able to paint a picture of what they're trying to achieve, whereas that's missing in this case," said Dunne.

"You've got the Labour Party that seems scared to say anything in case it upsets people, and the National Party that doesn't really quite know what it stands for. It's a pretty dissatisfying situation."

But there's still a lot that could still happen before the election, Dunne said.

Opportunity Party leader Qiulae Wong. Image source: Mandy Te

There were question marks over what the Greens will do, "are they just going to go along for the ride an risk being jilted by Labour in favour of Opportunity?"

"And the Opportunity Party have still got the big challenge. My gut feeling is they may have peaked too soon," Dunne said.

"There's so many uncertainties. Who knows what Trump will do in the meantime that could completely change the game."

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

23 Comments

Bishop and Stanford are not the only National MPs that are working hard and producing gainful results. The problem for all of them is that they have a PM whose blunders and poor public image obscures those efforts. In short if the PM is not credible neither is the party and that of course raises concerns that it will further deteriorate with repetitive similar gaffes and misspeak when the real heat of the election campaign is on. The furore last week resulted simply from an attempt to reset the party and present a younger, fresher and accomplished new face to the electorate. Presently they have a PM, colourless, unconvincing and unpopular and there is little confidence in that improving as necessary. 

Up
6

100%. The complete lack of self awareness of their leader (and his deputy to an extent) will alone destroy their chances of victory, regardless of others in government who might actually be competent. 

Up
5

I hate the term "cost of living". It implies that we should only care about costs and not income. The way they fix the cost of living is by making people unemployed, suppressing pay rises, bancrupting businnesses, killing the economy, and massively increasing mortgage costs while pretending they arent a cost. 

People should be careful what they wish for. 

Up
6

This could help his stumbling campaign: https://e.vnexpress.net/news/business/economy/world-s-second-richest-co…

Singapore is handing out to its citizens a cost of living support payment. Easy to do as a self issuing currency democracy.

Up
4

And Japan’s cabinet has approved a plan to reduce the food rate from 8% to 1% for two years beginning April 2027, subject to the relevant legislative process. There would also be benefits intended to make the effective burden zero for some low- and middle-income households.

On inflation, Japan's approach:

1. The govt is not afraid to intervene in markets to preserve the purchasing power of the people

2. A hyper-competitive domestic industrial structure suppresses prince inflation

 

Up
1

There is no way that the National Party can come back after what happened last week. They are finished, and Luxon will resign soon after the election. He has been one of the weakest leaders the party (and our country) has ever seen. 

Up
4

No Jacinda was much worse, she got nothing done but blowing money with a majority (which they squandered).

I think Luxon has had a difficult coalition, I do not believe they understood the gravity of the Ponzi finishing and how embedded it was in our economy.  His leadership style may have worked in the past, but in an always on digital world I think he lacks the charisma to connect with average NZers.  National had a chance to change but they seem not to want to change.

 

Up
7

 I do not believe they understood the gravity of the Ponzi finishing and how embedded it was in our economy.

Precisely. The Ponzi has directly affected land prices, which is translated in to utilization costs. This impacts price inflation across almost everything.   

Up
4

Yes a difficult coalition. I deliberately voted for NZF to shaft them all. It partially worked but I'm surprised how long it has lasted. I think Winstons main driver is need for status, which imo kept him co operating until now, and now he needs to generate protest votes to get another chance to do the same... 

Up
3

There sure was a lot of repealing going on after that last labour govt that supposedly got nothing done. 

Who do we owe for finishing the ponzi?

Up
3

National need to pivot and partner up with the Opportunity Party to leave the racist rhetoric and divisive scaremongering of New Zealand First. That's what they need to do.

Up
4

TOP policy is explicitly racist: to the extent of separate health & justice systems 

"Support devolution of services — backed by real resources and autonomy — in key areas where outcomes are unequal, especially health and justice."

https://www.opportunity.org.nz/honouring_te_tiriti

Have you any other views on the embedded racist rhetoric of Labour, Greens, TPM...?

Up
3

How many rentals do you have KKN...?

Up
1

surely you can come up with better than these logical fallacys, ad hominem attacks, off topic, irrelevant strawmen & incoherent rebuttals? it leaves one to think you have no real argument.

I have had zero rental properties for ~ 2 decades now.

Up
4

No-one does Racism like NZF - they are the experts in this area. ACT is right up there too, with National not too far behind.

Up
3

The greens are pretty racist and definitely sexist. Stale male and pale for example. 

Labour not great either, particularly last term. Wern't they going to use race to determine your level of heathcare? 

Does that mean we don't have a single party that treats all races and genders the same? Maybe National?

Up
3

Have you actually looked at the Greens party list? Clearly not, if your comments above are anything to go by.

Up
3

Objective need at the population level happens to correlate with ethnicity

Up
2

To quote an interviewee I heard the other day: this has become a contest between dumb and dumber.

There needs to be a "no confidence" box to tick when voting: if enough people do so, the parties have to try again - which might mean strange and alien things like releasing coherent policy and addressing the electorate rather than sponsors.

Up
5

Which one's dumber? 

Up
0

Agreed, Golem.



Anyone that understands the mechanics of debt-based money creation in NZ and the resultant woeful performance of our economy, will feel utterly disenfranchised in terms of who to vote for in the looming election. There needs to be some clear way to denote this, rather than this cohort simply being counted as either didn't vote or cast but invalid. 



Sadly there is not one single economic policy amongst the contenders that even mentions the existing fundamental structural debacle, let alone attempts to address it.



Iain Parker explains the disastrous effect of the status quo bubble-blowing monetary idiocy as well as anyone on the planet.



Any Kiwi who visits his site and for even a few minutes, can very quickly enlighten themselves as to the fact, that as long as we leave ~97% of our money creation in the hands of private banking monopolies, then absolutely nothing will change for the good aboard the Western-centric Fiat-Titanic.



 https://www.facebook.com/groups/sovereigncredit.nz/posts/15458955331622…   

Up
2

The particular aspect that gives me pause is the level of private debt to overseas institutions. Particularly given that much of that debt is in a property market that looks like it still has a long way to fall and there's no elegant path out for the large number of older people who have planned their retirement around said market. 

Up
3

Your point, Golem, illustrates one of the manifestations of the way ~97% of our MS is created, and why...



#1 This debt is owned by parasitic overseas private banking monopolies, when this capital could be created locally as credit in a public utility model.



#2 And why these deliberate bubbles are blown in the first place. 



I promise you - if you visit Iain's site, all of this will become crystal clear to you.

Up
2