sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

US retail sales, industrial production and consumer sentiment weak; China retail sales industrial production, rents weak; South Asia faces killer risks; UST 10yr yield at 0.71%; oil and gold down; NZ$1 = 65.4 USc; TWI-5 = 68.6

US retail sales, industrial production and consumer sentiment weak; China retail sales industrial production, rents weak; South Asia faces killer risks; UST 10yr yield at 0.71%; oil and gold down; NZ$1 = 65.4 USc; TWI-5 = 68.6
Lindis Pass, Otago. Photo by Roger Harris

Here's our summary of key economic events over night that affect New Zealand, with news that both pandemic and climate risks are gnawing away at economic activity.

American retail sales rose in July, but by less than was expected. The +1.2% gain in July from June was timid compared to the +8.4% rise in June from May, and less than the expected +1.9% rise. And without a +24% jump month-on-month for purchases of electronic goods (almost all of which are imported) it would have been even weaker.

American consumer sentiment is remaining low and down almost -20% from August a year ago.

US industrial production is still shrinking fast, down -8.2% in July form the same month a year ago, but at least that is better than the June shrinkage of -11%. The real weakness in is the production of business equipment; that is down -14% yaer-on-year.

And that is quite the contrast with Canada. Their industrial production is rising, and fast (although admittedly this data is for June). Canada seems to be a winner with the new NAFTA trade pact.

In good news for Australian iron ore demand, China's crude steel production jumped more than +9% in July to over 90 mln tonnes. But China also reported surprisingly weak retail sales in July, and unusual decline. And their electricity production fell more than -4.6% in July from June and was up only +1.9% year-on-year. In China's terms, these are very weak results.

But a survey by the American Chanber of Commerce in China has found that almost 90% of American companies had no immediate plans to leave China, despite sour American-Sino trade relations. In fact, they are finding trading conditions quite good.

However, for many locals, rents in 20 major Chinese cities fell -2.3% in July from the same month year earlier, the fourth consecutive month of decline in a market that’s been buoyant for years. It is a trend that is corroding the fortunes of millions who bought apartments for rent. Now they face mortgage payments that aren't being covered by rents, and vacancies are rising.

McKinsey is warning that the diversion into pandemic risks is obscuring a focus on climate change risk that needs to be addressed now. And they see two thirds of these global risks in Asia. South Asia is particularly at risk because it has such a high number of poor people, who tend to rely more on outdoor work, living in areas most vulnerable to extreme increases in heat and humidity. By 2050, the loss of that labour could cost the region almost $US5 tln per year in GDP, about two-thirds of the global total at risk. But not every country in the region will suffer. They make the point that Australia and New Zealand's crop yields could rise by up to +45% by 2050.

Wall Street is ending the week on a flat note. The S&P500 is down just -0.1% so far today and that means for the week a modest +0.4% gain. But it also means it is very close to a record high and since the start of the year the S&P500 has added almost +US$1.1 tln. Overnight however, European markets all fell sharply, down by more than -1%. Yesterday, Shanghai ended up +1.2% on the day in a surging late session for an unchanged weekly result. Hong Kong ended unchanged that booked a +2.7% gain for the week. Tokyo was up +0.2% on Friday to book a +4.3% gain for the week. The ASX200 was up +0.6% on the day and a +2.0% weekly rise. Bank shares were responsible for most of this rise. The NZX50 Capital Index ended its day down -0.4% and a weekly loss of -1.7%.

The latest global compilation of COVID-19 data is here. The global tally is 21,011,000 and that is up +305,000 since this time yesterday and no slackening of the spread. Global deaths reported now exceed 761,000 (+10,000). The pace of deaths is rising.

A quarter of all reported cases globally are in the US, which is up +66,400 from this time yesterday to 5,449,800. US deaths are now just over 171,000 and a death rate of 516/mln (+4/mln). And the net number of people actively infected in the US rose overnight to 2,424,500, so sill many more new infections than recoveries.

In Australia, there have now been 22,743 COVID-19 cases reported, another 358 overnight, and still very much concentrated in Victoria. But there were cases recorded in four other states too. Australia's death count is up to 375 (+14). Their recovery rate is now over 58%. There are still 9023 active cases in Australia (+22) indicating fewer recoveries than new infections now.

The UST 10yr yield is softer by -1 bp at 0.71%. Their 2-10 curve is +6 bps holding at +56 bps. And their 1-5 curve is slightly flatter at +16 bps, while their 3m-10yr curve is much flatter at +58 bps. The Aussie Govt 10yr yield is unchanged at 0.93%. The China Govt 10yr has slipped marginally to 2.97%. But the NZ Govt 10 yr yield is +2 bps firmer at just under 0.67% and off its all-time low.

The price of gold is lower again today and down -US$15 to US$1,943/oz. That is a -4.3% fall for the week. Silver is down today too and a net -7.6% fall for the week.

Oil prices are softish today. They are now just under US$42/bbl in the US and the international price is now still under US$45/bbl.

And the Kiwi dollar fell overnight and is now at 65.4 USc. Against the Australian dollar we are also softer at 91.3 AUc. Against the euro we are down too at 55.3 euro cents. That means our TWI-5 has dropped to 68.6 which is where it was when we were about to go into Level 1 last time at the beginning of June.

The bitcoin price is only marginally softer from this time yesterday at US$11,482. The bitcoin rate is charted in the exchange rate set below.

The easiest place to stay up with event risk today is by following our Economic Calendar here ».

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs

Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
End of day UTC
Source: CoinDesk

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

75 Comments

Lockdowns out of proportion, and they explain why. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIeGoHZ37yY

Up
0

.

Up
0

Interviewer: Let's ignore the science for now.
Interviewee: All of the responses from these countries (South Africa, Australia and New Zealand) smell of panic. Typical authoritarian response [my paraphrasing]..

I don't think our govt's response was either panicked or authoritarian. Not altogether consistent in places (bureaucracy is never 100% efficient) and engaged in a high trust model - which is, if you're suspicious of people or believe in authoritarianism - considered to be naive.

This video doesn't really explain to me why lockdown is unnecessary, but it does buy into bog standard fears of state control. And fair enough - but isn't that what governance is - a balancing act between certainties and uncertainties?

Up
0

See it first as relevant commentary for this site as it discusses New Zealand.

I'll go with your 100% efficient statement, which is quite correct and also relevant. Lockdown was based on the premise they would be 100% efficient. They werent, the virus is here. It was never going to be kept out, anyone that thinks it was has lost their clarity of thought (if they had it in the first place).

Up
0

Yes I agree with regards to the commentary - the interviewer also says that they want to hear from people in those countries - he is far less didactic than the interviewee.

With regards to elimination - I may well have lost my mind according to you! We are islands without land borders, so such an outcome is at least as possible as mutations and dormancies.

Luck too, is part of a pandemic.

Up
0

Yes it relies on close to perfection in execution.
That's why I said yesterday that it would only work with an authoritarian managerial approach. Which hasn't occurred and won't occur.

Up
0

We will die for our freedoms, fight on the battlefields of Europe and Asia, but give us a virus with random outcomes and you can just take them all away without a whimper.

Up
0

yep, run crying to aunty

Up
0

What freedoms have you lost Andrew?

Up
0

Yeah, until this recent outbreak I personally went about more-or-less normal life in NZ.

Up
0

Currently I can't visit my relatives in Auckland, and they can't come and see me.

During the first lockdown we had Police acting unlawfully. That affects everyone ultimately, if not just in the present. We also had a culture of informing develop. That is now a permanent change that affects everyone.

Despite all this the virus is here.

In the video above the pose the question, is this martial law type environment the new normal? What are you going to do if it is? And since you aquiesced to it in the first place?

Up
0

I have visited both Tibet and former Soviet countries. What we have here is a very long way away from martial law.

Up
0

Learn the history of how those countries imposed authoritarianism and you will see it was the ineptitude and lack of stomach to fight for freedoms by majority that allowed well organised, aggressive, spin-doctored, militant minority to overthrow incumbent government

Up
0

And here's me thinking that for Tibet it was because the ex-allied powers chose not protect it when they needed a stronger China. As for ex-Soviet countries.. in general I'd say it is a complex mix of cold war proxies, massive industrialisation and extraction initiatives by CCCP, and in some places, good old fashioned nepotism..

Up
0

It's playing havoc with the education of our children, something that isn't always considered.

Up
0

Won't somebody please think of the children!!

Up
0

im stuck in NZ, need a holiday in the sun.

Up
0

Perhaps somewhere where it rains a lot to remind yourself of it. Warm and wet, the tropics it is, or needs to be.

Up
0

Don't you live in Hawkes Bay!?

Up
0

yes and it is a beautiful day, frosty morning though, really cold start. Made the tractor grunt starting.

Up
0

Freedom is also consent. That's what a high trust model is - a social contract/agreement. Sometimes complicit, sometimes implicit. No whimpering or lack thereof here.

Up
0

I would like to think I too would scrap hard out for freedoms, but what about when exercising my freedom takes away someone else's freedom?

Up
0

That's an old ethics dilemma. Personally I think it depends on whether one puts one's individual freedoms or the group's freedoms at the start of your question - knowing that all outcomes will be imperfect and all situations temporary..

Up
0

During wartime, people’s freedoms were impinged on far more than they are being now. Because it was necessary, as it is now. To celebrate the sacrifices of the past while whinging about the sacrifices of today doesn’t make much sense to me.

Up
0

When fundamentals are weak but speculation remains high, the question of sustainability on both financial and environmental fronts has increased risk. And yet both gold and oil are soft?

Without an indexed standard and with massively increased QE, and possibility of negative OCRs -markets are running like video games.. bubble plus ultra?

I'm throwing my hat in the ring here.. that just leaves land..

Up
0

From Bloomberg just yesterday:

“Unprecedented government stimulus has allowed more companies to borrow at lower rates than ever before. Yet amid the credit boom, smaller firms that power America’s economic engine are often being shut out, hamstringing the recovery just as it begins. [emphasis added]”

Is it a credit boom if most of what makes the economy work hasn’t participated in it because it can’t? That’s not a boom! There is everything wrong in just this one paragraph, starting with the myth of “government stimulus”; and there’s more:

“Banks are tightening conditions on loans to smaller firms at a pace not seen since the financial crisis, while many direct lenders that have traditionally focused on the middle market are pulling back or turning to bigger deals instead.” Link

Up
0

AKA 'land' grab. Or whatever wealth value attribute (asset) class that fits here.

Up
0

Trickle-down economics

Bank reserves at any level, Bernanke replied, “are not the issue.”

“CHAIRMAN BERNANKE. The issue is the state of financial conditions. And we are still able to lower interest rates, improve, broadly speaking, asset prices, and that provides some [stimulus] incentive.”[my emphasis]

Up
0

I don't disagree, at least according to the rules of the turn-based game. The fundamentals of the mechanism has provided a group of countries with stability since WW2.

But.. and here's the part where I part company with the neocons.. when selfish interests remain unchecked, experience has not shown that the market self-regulates. Some interventionism is necessary to prevent domination by vested interests.

And the machine has changed. It is not what it once it was. Now those promised trickles are simulacra for most, credits to a game where the rules preclude most from levelling up.

Up
0

Exactly, it is hard to fight the scam when it is run buy your officials.

Up
0

The US - acting on 'laws' it drew up itself - has just stolen oil owned by someone else, destined for someone else.

There will be those who, propagandised, will disparage both countries - but they have rights to do what they want vis-a-vis each other. This blatant theft. Blatant thuggery. And it goes with the UAE spin yesterday (note Trump trying to pull something heroic the day after Biden's running mate was announced.

https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/tamara-nassar/united-arab-emirates…

The tide goes out and the rock show up for what they are....

Up
0

I wonder who gets the money for that 'seized' oil.

Up
0

The UAE rose to this threat last time and built a pipeline across the country to Fujeirah. Now they can ship from the Gulf of Oman (and they also have massive bulk storage in India already)

Up
0

US gets the oil, Israel gets the arms and UAE gets rich.. business as normal then?

Up
0

1/. The USA already has more oil than it needs.
2/. The Israeli military currently rates at number 14 in the world (but don't forget it's +1... MURICA!) they don't need more arms.
3/. The UAE is already eye-wateringly wealthy...414B USD GDP and only 1.4 million citizens!

Quite why they REALLY did this is more aligned to the coming election than any feelz I believe. Drumpf desperately needed a 'win' and what the Emiratis stand to gain from this is yet to be revealed but, trust me, it's got nothing to do with Israel.

Up
0

One burns oil - one always therefor 'needs' more. Flawed thinking, therefore
Yes. Israel is a worry. The Holocaust losses? 6 million. Palestinians currently in ghetto conditions? 6 million. Weight given to both by the MSM?
UAE wealth is 'invested' and digital. Therefore as vanish-overnightable as any other.
Yes, Trump needed an announcement to nullify the announcement of Biden's running mate, and the average US punter can't tell the difference between the UAE, Palestinians, Iranians or any other.

Up
0

Possibly I was being flippant - I think it's less about needing oil per se than controlling supply. 'Arms' is rarely just that in terms of shipping units - I basically agree with you that Israel is murica plus - U.S. has always needed a toehold in the region.. also agree about Trumpy needing a win. As for UAE... the obvious answer is shared intelligence services - those ports in Yemen aren't going stay stable by themselves y'know...

Up
0

All that "free" QE money is simply being gambled on assets

Up
0

I can see the logic to it tho - excuse the analogy, but if it's suddenly 'game over' (redo from start), then infrastructure / assets are a place to start from... assuming no debt is owed on them. Thoughts?

Up
0

Orr says something and the markets react, the Kiwi $ has no reason to be softer other than his remarks in the past few days re the OCR and negative rates

Up
0

Headline : Growing economic risks ignored by equity market.

David what about Housing Market ...is it running on fundamental just like equity.

Up
0

True enough.. although scarcity on a couple of islands with increasing population will always be a factor.

Up
0

Well this is an interesting story I just picked up. True, or rumour working overdrive I don't know.

NEWS FLASH - It seems our government isn’t being overly truthful with us.

We can report that the outbreak in Auckland is being investigated by both the Police and the Department of Corrections.

We have been informed that the 20 something daughter of the South Auckland family concerned, allegedly visited her boyfriend (or associate) who was in quarantine having recently been deported from Australia for criminal behavior. The boyfriend has Covid-19 and has passed this onto the daughter via their meeting which is believed to have taken place at an Auckland quarantine site.

The daughter, who is currently unemployed and well known to Police, was given a substantial amount of cash by this person. It is this cash that funded their travels around the North Island, particularly Rotorua with her young child. The pair stayed at the expensive Wai Ora Lake Resort and splurged cash on many other luxuries normally outside of the means of the family.

This is the quarantine breach that Winston Peters reported to Australian press.

Police are currently working with the Department of Corrections to try and map the daughters movements. She is apparently well known to both government agencies and is not necessarily cooperating with investigations.

Up
0

“A Team of Five Million.”?

Up
0

As mad as this sounds, I hope it's all true. It would mean we have caught the outbreak at the initial source.

Up
0

Humans huh? Dang problem solving primates with a predictable tendencies towards pattern recognition and a desire to escape the conditions of their existence...

Funny how some people don't believe in 'law' particularly when motivated by selfish desires. And sometimes when they do..

Up
0

sequencing the alleged boyfriends covid-19 swab would soon establish the truth of the matter.

Up
0

I've heard of this - it was circulating as a social media rumour a few days ago. Since no source is given for the "news flash", and it was posted here by someone anonymous, I would assess the veracity of the story as minimal.

Up
0

Therefore this captures too Hosking’s comment Friday morning something like “I know what Winston knows and Winston knows that I know what he knows and when this new is released, all hell will break loose.” OK we all poised and agog. Let us have it then! Otherwise it is blatant, calculated scaremongering.

Up
0

Who is the bigger narcissist, Peters or Hosking? As for all hell will break lose, I don't see that. Lots of hot air and posturing maybe. This could definitely be a wild rumour, but hey this site has been a bit inane of late, always is around election time, good to spice it up a bit.

Up
0

Aye, and the weekend intervenes, and come Monday morning, comment on Friday can be easily forgotten.

Up
0

Agreed. Actori incumbit onus probandi.

Up
0

Cool story bro.
Best left on FB.

Up
0

Yes another fake news story that has been debunked today

Up
0

Here is why the forthcoming recession is different from any other....

https://www.google.co.nz/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2020/08/14/heres-why-th…

Up
0

Yes it's the Phantom Menace alright - but - and this links to Audaxes comment below - consumerism remains supreme in a system that only accounts for profit. It's also where I agree with Powerdownkiwi - systems themselves do have limits and a lot of those limits are physical, tangible things like heat, electricity, environmental stability etc.

In other words, the financial model itself is IMHO no longer fit for purpose.. it becomes necessary to manage the financial, environmental and societal together as one interrelated and massively diverse networked organism.

Up
0

Sorry, JP, there is zero prospect of being able to 'manage' all of that 'interrelated and massively diverse networked organism'.

It's the Anthill issue: it's easy, with our linear and pattern-seeking minds, to look at the anthill and try to discern the Manager Ant that 'controls' it all. Trick is, there ain't one.

The anthill is an emergent product of a myriad of individual ant transactions, generated by gene-driven behaviours, pheromone trails and simple interaction rules like 'Site the midden as far as possible from both cemetery and colony' (Johnson, 'Emergence' Pp32-33). No 'manager', just like slime molds, ecosystems, and, yes, that 'interrelated and massively diverse networked organism'.

There's no 'Gaia Manager'........Let's let Johnson have the final say (from 'The Myth of the Ant Queen' chapter, ibid):

..we are starting to think using the conceptual tools of bottom-up systems. Just like the clock-maker metaphors of the Enlightenment, or the dialectical logic of the 19th century, the emergent worldview belongs to this moment in time, shaping our thought habits and coloring our perception of the world.

Up
0

Considering half my PhD is in relational emergence, I can only agree with your general premises! But I wasn't suggesting a manager ant - far from it - I'm far more interested in quantum / IoT AI as a means to predictively manage/ adapt/ manage across systems in a co-emergent manner.

Up
0

Ah, the 'trillion devices' meme. But as these devices are proprietary IP, sold and monitored by private enterprises for the most part, and certainly are being looked forward to as a nice solid private revenue stream ($USD 11 trillion by 2025....), I wouldn't bet the house on much 'management' at (say) a country/Governmental level of these 'diverse networks'. Because the main objective is private profit from ownership of the Big Data streams.....

And in the light of the economic havoc wreaked by Covid reactions, the other question begged is - how can a world struggling to claw back to some semblance of BAU, Afford dese tings?

Up
0

Well.. SOCs for swarms aren't that expensive - DIY hacker/maker spaces more common in US/Europe than here. And I didn't go that way myself - as the other half was in metaphysics..

I agree with you about quantum computing - IBM and the like are not going suddenly mass produce any time soon. But for me the elephant in the room for true AI is not production costs but desire for absolute replicability of answers - which is not how relationality works!

It's that ole desire fer control again..

But to.answer your question more directly and pragnatically, network capacity already is accessible - by subscription. Microsoft Azure platform for instance can for instance, determine where in the world is the cheapest place to run your stateless computing code at any precise moment.

But yeah, if you want to DIY for cheap ... old mobile phones on Bluetooth networks might be a way to go? Or tiny solar powered arduino that only transmit when enough power state is achieved..

Up
0

McKinsey is warning that the diversion into pandemic risks is obscuring a focus on climate change risk that needs to be addressed now. And they see two thirds of these global risks in Asia. South Asia is particularly at risk because it has such a high number of poor people, who tend to rely more on outdoor work, living in areas most vulnerable to extreme increases in heat and humidity. By 2050, the loss of that labour could cost the region almost $US5 tln per year in GDP, about two-thirds of the global total at risk. But not every country in the region will suffer. They make the point that Australia and New Zealand's crop yields could rise by up to +45% by 2050.

Who could afford to buy it from us?

Up
0

Reply above ☺

Up
0

Can you believe this - you gotta read it - they're playing the race card already
CV-19 is 'racist', critics say
The latest outbreak is centred in South Auckland, and has disproportionately affected Māori and Pasifika people
https://www.stuff.co.nz/pou-tiaki/300082800/coronavirus-quarantine-poli…

Up
0

If birds of a feather flock together, then intra-community transmission is to be expected.

Up
0

They weren't concerned with the clusters at Rosewood Aged Care Facilities, Bluff wedding, Matamata restaurant, Marist College etc - they were silent - now they're taking advantage of circumstances that suit their narrative. Another thread of the grab for power and special treatment

Up
0

Not sure if I'd call it a 'race card'. This roopu is simply tryng to point out that from a tiriti perspective, compulsory equates to paternalism. They're quite correct when they also point out that compulsory quarantine did not happen before, when it was mainly Pākehā who were asked to go into quarantine.

Be that as it may, there is a difference with regards to process - there's a lot that has been learnt since the outset of the pandemic.

So this position is part of wider conversations around tino rangatiratanga - Māori who have had enough of abiding by laws that affect them, without them.

You can disagree and say there is one law for all, that everybody is treated the same under the current laws that we have. But experience has proven otherwise for many Māori. So this is less about the 'race card' and more about who gets to make what decisions and how do those decisions affect particular groups.

Up
0

Double Speak

The substance of your claim is that prior to the introduction of compulsory quarantinig, pakeha were the dominant subject group of confinees, whereas after compulsory quarantining was introduced on 9 April the dominant subject group have been Maori. Interesting. Do you have any support for that claim or is it simply an example of make the claim and pakeha won't contest it, they're too scared to, and thus by definition it becomes true.

In the case of the current outbreak, the subject family and their contacts are neither Maori nor Pakeha. The family are confined to their home. Explain that.

Up
0

Not double speak. I was not actually making an argument - simply saying that I can understand the context of the perspective.

Up
0

Intellectual dishonesty

Up
0

This is just really poor execution, from a government that prides itself on poor execution:

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12356780

Up
0

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=12…

Auckland Mayor rants about price gouging just after the council ignores public responses and hikes rates 2.5%.

The irony.

Up
0

council has to fund infrastructure, there are a few areas where they could certainly shed a few bodies.
ratepayers don't want to pay for the infrastructure they use, and are demanding be expanded (roads & PT depending on which side of the green/blue divide you are on).. surprise fucking surprise.

Up
0

We are down to the EROEI levels now, and juggling that many aging balls now, that no Council can/will ever charge 'less'.

We need to be very careful to identify cause, and differentiate if from effect(s)

Up
0

I think the statement "New Zealand's crop yields could rise by up to +45% by 2050" is incorrect.
The web page referenced says "Rather, by 2050, annual probability of a *10 percent yield increase* could increase; for example this could rise from 21 percent today to 45 percent for the Australia and New Zealand region."

Up
0