sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

RBNZ holds OCR at 3%; says will have to hike it to remove stimulus 'at some stage'

RBNZ holds OCR at 3%; says will have to hike it to remove stimulus 'at some stage'

By Bernard Hickey

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand has held the Official Cash Rate (OCR) at 3% as expected, but has commented that it expects to have to remove monetary policy stimulus by increasing the OCR 'at some stage'.

This is in line with its comments at the September Monetary Policy statement when it said the economic outlook had deteriorated and that any increase in the OCR in future would be lower and slower than previously forecast.

Economists have kept their expectations that the Reserve Bank will leave the OCR on hold at 3% until the March 10 decision next year.

“Despite some data turning out weaker than projected, the medium-term outlook for the New Zealand economy remains broadly in line with that assumed at the time of the September Monetary Policy Statement," RBNZ Governor Alan Bollard said.

"Continued household caution has seen consumer spending and housing market activity remain muted, and many firms have become less optimistic about their future prospects," he said.

“While it is appropriate to keep the OCR on hold today, it remains likely that further removal of monetary policy support will be required at some stage.”

The New Zealand dollar blipped up slightly after the statement while wholesale interest rates were broadly unchanged.

Wholesale interest rates have nudged higher over the last 3 weeks from around 3.71% for two year swap rates to 3.82% as some investors begin to fear a resurgence of inflation in coming years in the wake of money printing by the US Federal Reserve and other central banks.

Fixed vs floating?

That is expected to keep banks from further reducing their fixed mortgage rates.

Advertised floating mortgage rates are likely to remain on hold at around 6.2% until at least March next year while the Official Cash Rate is on hold.

The fixed vs floating decision remains a difficult one dependent on the outlook for the OCR and a borrower's personal situation.

The Reserve Bank's current view is the OCR is likely to rise around 1.5% between early 2011 and early 2013, which would imply a floating mortgage rate of around 7.7% by early 2013. 

Advertised two year fixed mortgage rates are currently around 6.7%, which means it's a toss-up decision on which one is cheapest and depends on the speed and size of OCR hikes.

Borrowers who expect the economy to remain weak and the RBNZ to keep rates low would be better off staying floating.

Those who expect a faster and quicker rise in the OCR would be better off fixing.

Your view?

See all mortgage rates here.

Here is the full statement below from the RBNZ.

We will update with more detail and comment through the day.

Reserve Bank Governor Alan Bollard said: “Despite some data turning out weaker than projected, the medium-term outlook for the New Zealand economy remains broadly in line with that assumed at the time of the September Monetary Policy Statement.

“Downside risks to the outlook for global growth continue, with high public and private debt inhibiting recovery in many developed economies. Moreover, it is unclear how further policy support would impact on the outlook for growth in our Western trading partners.

Offsetting this weakness, strong growth continues in China, Australia and emerging Asia. “Domestically, recent data has turned out weaker than projected.

Continued household caution has seen consumer spending and housing market activity remain muted, and many firms have become less optimistic about their future prospects. However, continued high export prices, along with reconstruction and repairs in Canterbury, will support activity over the coming year.

“Overall, continued GDP growth is expected to gradually absorb current surplus capacity over the next few years. Headline inflation is expected to move higher following the recent increase in the rate of GST. The subdued state of domestic demand suggests this inflation spike will have limited impact on medium-term inflation expectations.

“While it is appropriate to keep the OCR on hold today, it remains likely that further removal of monetary policy support will be required at some stage.”  

Here is reaction from economists.

BNZ commented:

There were no surprises in the RBNZ's October OCR review this morning, which was essentially a repeat of the general message from the more comprehensive Monetary Policy Statement issued in September: interest rates are on hold for now but are likely to push higher through 2011. The RBNZ certainly acknowledged the generally disappointing data, but also highlighted that the medium-term outlook for the economy remains broadly in line with the September MPS projections.

These projections implied the OCR would start rising again around March 2011. Today's statement effectively endorses this view – a view that we share. However, we anticipate interest rates to eventually push higher through 2011 than either the RBNZ currently projects or the market currently has priced in.  

ASB commented:

The RBNZ left the OCR on hold at 3.00%, as widely expected. The tone of the statement was also in line with market expectations, with the RBNZ noting that despite some weaker than expected growth outturns recently its medium-term outlook on growth was broadly unchanged. As at the September MPS, the RBNZ expects medium-term inflation expectations will move lower in the face of the spike in headline CPI from various Government charges over the coming year. The RBNZ reiterated that further removal of monetary policy stimulus would likely be required sometime in the future.

The open-ended wording of the statement’s conclusion gives the RBNZ flexibility to start hiking again when appropriate. We continue to expect the RBNZ will keep the OCR on hold until the March 2011 meeting.

ANZ commented:

At the margin we can see a slightly softer tone in today’s assessment. The economic data since September has been "weaker than projected", though it still fits within the spirit of their September forecasts. Sentiment towards the global economy has shifted from "slowing" in September to "downside risks". In addition, the RBNZ now thinks growth is expected to only “gradually” absorb current surplus capacity over the next few years, as opposed to “progressively”. But beyond such semantics, the real message appears to be one of business as usual and waiting patiently on the sidelines. We continue to expect the next move in the OCR to be up, starting from March 2011.

We believe the loss of momentum in the economy over Q2 and Q3 is nearing its end, and signs of a pick-up will start to become evident. The RBNZ made reference to firms becoming less optimistic about their future prospects, whereas yesterday’s National Bank Business Outlook survey showed a rise in the own activity reading. This may well signal a turning point in this regard. We also take comfort from supportive financial conditions, and high commodity prices leading to a record-high terms of trade, which will eventually filter through the economy. We are not saying that the economy is set to boom, rather simply that conditions for improvement are in place. Underlying inflation (excluding government policy changes such as GST increases) has bottomed, and will start to rise, though we expect it to be contained within the target band. But for now the RBNZ clearly has time on its side to wait and assess developments.

The tightening cycle we are looking for next year will be staggered, and the end point for the OCR will be lower compared to past cycles. This partly reflects the positively shaped yield curve and the higher proportion of borrowers on floating and shorter-dated fixed rates, giving the OCR lever more potency. We expect the OCR to reach 4.25 percent by the end of 2011, and rise towards 5.25 percent over 2012. This is modest by historical standards, but more aggressive than current market pricing.

Westpac commented

Given the uncertainty about global conditions, and the fact that the domestic recovery to date hasn't lived up to its early promise, it's understandable that the RBNZ would pause for a while to assess the situation. Moreover, the RBNZ has made some big assumptions as part of its central forecasts: that households will further increase their rates of saving; that inflation expectations will decline even as headline inflation rises above 4%; and that the rise in the terms of trade will only be temporary.

These assumptions will need a lot of accumulated evidence to either prove or disprove. We expect the next OCR hike to be delayed until March, as do most forecasters. That said, we can't ignore the massive improvement in New Zealand's purchasing power resulting from the continued strength in world demand for commodities.

If this has anything like its usual effects on the broader economy, it's hard to see consumers remaining reticent, or wage and price expectations remaining contained, for as long as the RBNZ is assuming. As a result, we expect that by the second half of next year the OCR will be rising further and faster than the RBNZ's current projections.

JP Morgan commented:

RBNZ Governor Alan Bollard this morning left the official cash rate (OCR) at 3% (J.P. Morgan and consensus: no change) as unanimously forecast by all economists surveyed by Bloomberg. Indeed, the poor run of economic data, which has “turned out weaker than projected”, meant there was little chance of a rate hike today. The recovery in New Zealand effectively has stalled; hence, the accompanying statement was suitably downbeat on the domestic economy.

We believe that the RBNZ Governor will leave current policy settings in place for some time in order to encourage a sustainable recovery. The Governor reiterated today that “further removal of monetary policy support would be required at some stage.” Our base case is for the next rate hike to be delivered in March 2011, although we acknowledge the risk that the next move could be delayed if current accommodative policy settings are still required to prop up growth in the New Zealand economy.  

(Updated with detail, Fixed vs Floating section, comments from economists)

No chart with that title exists.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

21 Comments

So to translate = So, should never have raised it back up but needed to, and sooner or later, I think there will be enough of a recovery to prove my point, and most likely at some other stage further down the track there is a chance the market does what I previously expected when I had my rose tinted glasses on, and we get to where financial stimulation of the economy is less required but possibly not if the rest of the world does not rotate around little old NZ. Either way my bets are hedged and those suffering from the impact of the GFC can possibly scrape by supporting their businesses or lifestyles including consumables both dietary and electronic by having reduced mortgage costs, additionally we have no chance in a currency war if we put our cards on the table - end of translation...

President of Property

Up
0

To be fair.....back in June there was some signs of a recovery....there was a possibility that bad events could occur that would stop the rises and even reverse them....these now at the end of october look pretty likely.....

I think one thing to take is the extreme un-predictable volitility markets & economies now face going forward that means just about everyone is making a guess........some policies aimed to try and smooth that is about the best that can be done IMHO.

We have no chance in a currency war no matter what we do, full stop....

I mean really what can we do? our options look bad,

Print $NZD as fast as everyone else? so we race to the bottom, though if everyone else is there also the net change is? actually what is the neg impact(s) on NZ if we match others?

Dont and see our export sector curl up and die as our NZD reaches parity with the US?

regards

Up
0

The Bill Gross letter is a great read from the boss of the worlds biggest fund.

Some of the gems:

We are, as even some Fed Governors now publically admit, in a “liquidity trap,” where interest rates or trillions in QEII asset purchases may not stimulate borrowing or lending because consumer demand is just not there. Escaping from a liquidity trap may be impossible, much like light trapped in a black hole."

"Having arrived at its destination, the market then offers near 0% returns and a picking of the creditor’s pocket via inflation and negative real interest rates."

 "But either way it will likely signify the end of a great 30-year bull market in bonds and the necessity for bond managers and, yes, equity managers to adjust to a new environment."

It was also run on ZH: http://www.zerohedge.com/article/bill-gross-calls-fed-mother-all-ponzi-schemes-says-30-year-bond-market-ending

Up
0

Andrewj Thanks for the tipoff. A cracking read I agree. Have led the Top 10 with it

http://www.interest.co.nz/opinion/thursdays-top-10-nz-mint-towelling-yo…

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

So which is it Mr Bollard?  Are you fighting inflation or helping 'growth', lowering exchange rates, increasing jobs and incomes ?  Oh what's that I hear .. you can't do any of these?  There's a surprise ! 

Fact is that the RBNZ and other Govt agencies are out of ammo. They got nothing.  The global financial system, economic and social models are on their last legs.  And more and more people are slowly realising this.  Although for most people their frame of reference is still very much Keynesian and socialism (since that has dominated world economics for the last few generations).   But really, when the horse is dead, floggin it is pointless ... you have to get a new horse.

What I have been reading with interest much of these days is the alternative economic theories and systems. The Austrian model seems to be by far the most popular of the emerging solutions, although there are many others.

Would be interested to hear any discussion on any of these from others who post here.?

Up
0

Austrian? no....far from it....if anything there seems to be a leaning on keynesian in order to try and fix the broken monitery / neo-classical models which have dominated for 30 years...

Social models generally works what has broken it and itself is the quasi-greenspan financial / ponzi scheme model.

What has or will break the economic model is peak oil, no more growth in energy supply and like junkies the withdrawl will cause bad shakes...(volitility) and a reduction in lifestyles.

regards

 

 

Up
0

FYI I've updated with a section on Fixed vs floating.

"The fixed vs floating decision remains a difficult one dependent on the outlook for the OCR and a borrower's personal situation.

The Reserve Bank's current view is the OCR is likely to rise around 1.5% between early 2011 and early 2013, which would imply a floating mortgage rate of around 7.7% by early 2013. 

Advertised two year fixed mortgage rates are currently around 6.7%, which means it's a toss-up decision on which one is cheapest and depends on the speed and size of OCR hikes.

Borrowers who expect the economy to remain weak and the RBNZ to keep rates low would be better off staying floating.

Those who expect a faster and quicker rise in the OCR would be better off fixing.

Your view?"

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

Ive stayed floating and so far im $ in....nice eh?

I think those looking to redo should wait until the new year. Right now its nothing but madness out there, so I cant see an imediate recovery and hence inflation. Seeing the GOP win in November in the USA would indicate a definate depression and hence floating seems the best choice IMHO....Inflation and the need to rise rates will only happen when we have bottomed out and employment is dropping IMHO....and since I believe in Peak oil and thats 2012....I dont see us ever recovering...

Those with huge 80~100%+ mortgages should just pop down to the pharmacy and buy 1 or 2 kg of paracetamol now.

regards

Up
0

I'm doing the Alan Bollard and having a bob each way - fixed at 6.5% a bit over a year ago, floating for the rest.

Up
0

Came off fixed in June at 8.7.

 

Now on floating at 6.25.

 

Very happy.

 

Saving $170 a month

Up
0

BH

You predicted a few months back (and promised to pour a cold cup of coffee on your head if wrong)a floating rate at 9% by end 2011 (please correct me if I'm wrong- I couldn't find the link). Are you sticking with this??

My humble advice- stay floating , bank interestwars are coming and wait for the 2 year rate to approach 6.25% then lock in quick (prob around mar 2011) before OCR lifts early 2011

Regards

Up
0

I agree with the President of Property and and Matt S - Alan B is typically having a bob-each-way.  Here are my views - and yes, to declare my intwerest, i work for the firm that this link will direct you to.

Up
0

He has to go each way, if nothing happens we have an aenemic recovery, and he slowly raises, if something bad happens and it cant be corrected we enter a depression.....and he dropsthe OCR...there is no way to say with any certainty what will happen IMHO.

regards

Up
0

I've updated with comments from BNZ, ANZ, ASB and JP Morgan economists.

Interestingly, both BNZ and ANZ are saying the markets are too dovish in forecasting relatively a relatively low OCR.

BNZ's Doug Steel sees the OCR at around 5% by early 2012, which would push floating mortgage rates to at least 8.2% by then. It sees GDP growth of around 4% in the next 12-18 months, rather than the 2.5% forecast by the RBNZ at the September MPS.

ANZ sees the OCR rising towards 5.25% over 2012, which would imply a floating mortgage rate of around 8.4%. It sees economic growth of around 4% next year.

The RBNZ is forecasting the 90 day bill rate (which is typically around 30 bps above the OCR) ardoumd 4.4% through 2012.  The market is forecasting an OCR of around 3.6% by October 2011. http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/cbuilder?ticker1=CS1YRBNZ:IND

Someone is wrong here.

cheers

Bernard

Up
0

Dilbert Rules.

The only reality is that no one knows.

I think we are looking for one dimensional answers, but the problems are across three or four dimensions - economic, political, currency, debt, sovereign wills.

Long Live Dilbert - his corporate inefficiencies have become our global uncertainties..

Up
0

Well who's been doing better at guessing?  the bank economists have generally been totally clueless....and its the same neo-cons as ever over there.....Im with Bollard I think his ppl seem to be showing more of an idea......the biggest reason for me is the USA and Europe led by Irelend and Greece look so much like basket cases, so but Im even more Dovish....or at least Im public about it....if AB sasy oops depression then that is almost self-fulfilling

regards

Up
0

"markets are too dovish in forecasting relatively a relatively low OCR."

Markets should be reflecting investor's decisions not some oracle central bankers tea leaf taniwha inspired proclamation.  Central bank setting of interest rates is monopolistic price fixing.

OK I'll shut up.

Up
0

Ok Mr Bollard is now history. Next  in line is the RBA on Nov 2nd. Will they rise or keep the 4.5% ?. To jaw bone or not to jaw bone. That is what actualy matters.

Up
0

Mt question is, Did Mr Bollard's wording help the AU/ NZ trade and the export led recovery ? According to the mkt reaction it did not. He is probably hoping for a rate rise in AU. Will see next Tuesday.

Up
0

Hot off the NZMEA presses, enjoy.

Open up on policy options - 29 October

It is time for the Government and Reserve Bank to open up on monetary and fiscal policy options say the New Zealand Manufacturers and Exporters Association (NZMEA). The Government and its officials should be working harder to encourage a more balanced economy and should be opening up debate rather than shutting it down.

It is well recognised that our tax system skews investment towards assets rather than activity, and that interest rates control inflation via the negative impact on the tradeable sector rather than acting directly on the source of inflation in the non-traded sector. Our politicians and officials are well aware of these points and their consequences.

NZMEA Chief Executive John Walley says, “The trade offs in the economy need to be discussed. We need to open up about whether we want a high wage economy based on elaborately transformed exports, or low wage asset based economy exporting raw materials to the world.”

“Only one will deliver high living standards.”

“One of the competitive advantages a small country has is the capacity to change and adapt faster than larger economies, but we will only see this benefit if we open up to new initiatives. Even large institutions like the International Monetary Fund have begun to review their stance on economic best practice, it is time our political leaders and officials did the same.” 

http://www.realeconomy.co.nz/124-open_up_on_policy_options.aspx

What do farmers think?

http://www.nzfarmersweekly.co.nz/article/8567.html

Cheers, Les.

www.mea.org.nz

Up
0