Rodney MP Mark Mitchell is seen by many as the underdog of National’s leadership race but to him, that does not matter. Interest.co.nz asks the former Defence Minister what he brings to the table

Rodney MP Mark Mitchell is seen by many as the underdog of National’s leadership race but to him, that does not matter. Interest.co.nz asks the former Defence Minister what he brings to the table

Former Defence Minister and cop Mark Mitchell says one of his biggest strengths is something most people have written off as his greatest political weakness – he is relatively unknown.

When he jumped into National’s leadership race earlier this week, a resounding cry of “Mark who?” spilled out from much of the country.

Despite his relatively high-profile defence portfolio in Government – a portfolio he held for a little over six months – he has very little name recognition with most New Zealanders.

This is something he admitted in the press conference when announcing his candidacy.

But Mitchell does not seem care. In fact, it is something he embraces.

“One of my strengths is that I am a blank canvas,” he says

“[If I win the leadership race] I can go out and start campaigning and allow the country to find out who I am, and what makes me tick.”

There are no preconceived ideas around who he is, Mitchell says. “You might actually see that as a real strength, rather than a weakness.”

In the meantime, the fact that his level of political fame has become so prevalent puzzles him.

“At the moment, my profile does not matter because the only people who can vote for me are the people at Caucus; most of them know me pretty well.”

He has a point. Next Tuesday, all 56 National MPs will file into their Caucus meeting room and go through the motions of selecting their leader.

Although they can be lobbied by the public, it’s their vote that matters.

“The challenge for me if I’m elected leader next week, will be to get out to the country and then raise my profile,” Mitchell says.

A refresh in policy, but not the front bench

Unlike some of his competitors, such as Amy Adams and Simon Bridges, he is willing to discuss what policies he would spearhead if he was elected leader.

“You would definitely see a refresh around our policies.”

He says most New Zealanders see National as strong fiscal managers and that’s what the party brings to the table. But Mitchell says he wants to “bring a softer face” to National.

“This means being able to present ourselves to New Zealand as not just being very good fiscal managers but actually just having heart and real passion and feeling for what’s happening in the country and in the community.”

One “soft face” policy he wants to champion is having a serious look at occupational health and safety.

He also suggests that under his leadership, National would be looking closely at environmental policies and issues related to climate change, as well as ways to get kids more active outdoors.

When it comes to his front bench, he is less concerned about bringing in newer blood than some of his leadership rivals.

“I’m not one of these people who comes out and says ‘there is going to be a massive generation change’

“There is not going to be massive changes in terms of a generational refresh under my leadership because every single one of those Caucus members have earned the right to be there and they all get judged on their own merits.”

He has already indicated he would keep National's finance spokesman Steven Joyce in the role should he be elected leader.

Coalition partners

Any National MP will be quick to point out that their party is the “largest Opposition in New Zealand’s history,” and at 44.5%, they’re correct.

But under MMP, this is not as impressive as it might sound. National lost the election because it was unable to form a Coalition with New Zealand First.

To have a real shot at winning in 2020, National needs to do a better job of managing those relationships.

One of Mitchell’s main strengths is he is well-liked across the political spectrum – notably, he and NZ First Leader Winston Peters are good friends.

When quizzed about his ability to bring in Coalition partners before the 2020 election, Mitchell says being National’s leader means being able to build relationships to put the party in that position.

“The leader of the National party has a big responsibility under an MMP environment to position our party to put them in the best possible position to be able to form a government with whatever result the people of New Zealand decide to deliver under our MMP system.”

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

18 Comments

Comment Filter

Highlight new comments in the last hr(s).

A " blank canvas " ... geez Loiuse dude , we want some colour on the canvas ... mostly blood red to be perfectly honest ... we want something remarkably different from the bland blank looks of Wild Bill English , the Jolly Kid , Nick Smith , Jumbo Gerry , Awful Amy ...

... we want someone to cover the canvas in a riot of colours that'd make Vincient van Gogh look as if he'd been hitting the meth too hard ...

Which is why I'm doing a 180 turn , and calling for the Crusher to lead the Gnats ... on a rock and roll rip and snort , tear up the joint , throw out the old rule book ... splatter the colours across the canvas and see what emerges from the maelstrom ...

... " blank canvas ! " ... tsk tsk ... no pizzazz , my friend ....

Blankety-blank. Say no more.

Blood you're after Gummy? If this story is to believed then he's your man https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/21-02-2018/why-aspiring-national-leade...

'Spin' in their name is appropriate in my experience so I don't bother reading anything they write in case the click counts towards their revenue line.

Regardless, do you not think that his involvement, in what is effectively a company hiring out mercenaries in dubious wars, is relevant to the voting public?

Don't forget his involvement in Dirty Politics where he may have paid Lusk and Whaleoil to write attacking pieces about other National contestants to further his own standing.

He continued, ‘I can sort out Mark no worries, he doesn’t mind spending.’ Mark was Mark Mitchell, another of Lusk’s paying clients, who was competing for selection in the safe National Party seat of Rodney, where long-time MP Lockwood Smith had decided not to stand again. Mitchell was a good example of the hard right MP grouping Lusk was trying to build. ‘I’d really like to have him win to prove it can be done, and that you and i are crucial in peoples career.’

Over the following weeks Lusk and Slater wrote over 20 Whale Oil posts about the Rodney electorate selection process, attacking first a local candidate and front runner named Brent Robinson, then the other front runner, Scott Simpson, and also various party officials who were standing in the way of Lusk’s client.

You can read the chapter here.

I don't read Spinoff articles. I did watch him on AM though and he didn't impress as bringing anything special to the mix. I'd like to see Crusher in the role. National need an attack vehicle and it needs to be female. She can step down for someone more electable one year before the election.

Unable to fill in canvas due to being devoid of creativity?

Really he's playing the political game and has nothing to offer that's any different.

For me , all that comes to mind are 2 words ............ trust and bargepole

Another two - mixed metaphors :D

I know someone can do a good job with this leading role - he has a guide dog..

Stevie Wonder??

Establishment conservative and economic growth dinosaur - no thanks

He sounds like a strong-arm Troy boot boy, if there ever was one. Other nutter cops in politics such as Clem Simich, Ross Maurant. Need anyone say more.

Of an age, but recall Dick Emery. He called them Bovver Boys. And in truth, his character, well there is some resemblance to be sure.EG have a look at ladies tights clip u tube.

He's got that religious nutter aura.

Having been in the Rotorua Police at the time he was is a bit of a red flag too. It was a creepy little nest of sexual predators covering up for each other. What did he know?

The question is whether any one is interested in writing on that blank canvas...

National Party Cyrogenic freezer escapee rejoins Moral Majority brethren