Local Government New Zealand's campaign to increase voter turnout garners support

Local Government New Zealand's campaign to increase voter turnout garners support

Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) is enlisting the help of a wide range of different partners in a bid to get Kiwis to vote in this year’s local body elections.

LGNZ President Dave Cull says it’s joining forces with Federated Farmers, Canterbury Employers’ Chamber of Commerce, Employers and Manufacturers Association, Wellington Chamber of Commerce, Multicultural NZ, Neighbourly and the Ministry for Women in a bid to get more people to vote in October.

“Getting these major partners on board is integral to the Vote 2019 campaign – they’ll each bring their own expertise and networks to help reach and inspire voters and candidates. They can relate and extend Vote 2019’s messages to their audiences, increasing the reception and reach of the campaign while using the wider platform to promote their message.”

Cull says LGNZ’s research shows people are interested in local government but don’t vote, or they want to vote but say it’s too hard to find information on who the candidates are.

In a bid to address the problem he says LGNZ is planning to work with the website and information service Policy. The website provides information on political parties and their candidates, what their policies are. The service was set up in time for the 2017 General Election and says it had 140,654 people use the site in the run up to voting day.

In the 2016 local body elections only 38.5% of eligible voters in Auckland bothered to cast a vote. Nationwide the turnout was just 43%.

Local body voter turnout varies significantly across different age groups and geographic areas. But according to LGNZ the highest voter turnout in the 2016 local body elections was in the 70-plus age group (89%), while the lowest was in the 18-29 age group (34%). 

The main reasons for people not voting are not knowing enough about the candidates (33%), they forgot or left it too late (23%), or they were not interested or too busy (each 16%).

In May 2018 Auckland Council announced that it was planning to trial online voting at this year’s campaign. But its support was conditional on the government passing amendments to the Local Electoral Act 2001 in time to allow an online voting system to be trialled. The council also called for the management of the online security risks, confirmation of related costs and final Auckland Council Governing Body approval before the trial could go ahead.

Auckland Mayor Phil Goff said at the time that online voting was the future and if the Auckland Council continued to rely solely on postal voting it risked losing a whole generation of voters.

But the online voting trial was cancelled at the end of 2018 due to a lack of funding from central government and the fact the law changes wouldn’t make it through parliament in time for the October ballot.

For more information go to www.vote2019.co.nz

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

4 Comments

Comment Filter

Highlight new comments in the last hr(s).

Organisation no one is heard of wants people to vote more! Otherwise if no one thinks about them they'll fade away and die!

If only. LGNZ needs a complete gutting and review of what it's role is towards the ratepayers and residents of Local Councils. The introduction of secret workshops and meetings are a total affront to open democracy. LGNZ have turned into a dictatorial power hungry monolith of self interest to get their political aspirations achieved first and foremost, regardless of the opinions of those who pay the resultant bills.

The reason you can't tell who to vote for is the verbose, long winded, obscure, very long worded language style that is the current fashion. So the candidates can only allude to their biases for fear of offending anyone. Plain speech has been banned it seems.

The last Nelson vote came down to stating whether they were for, or against, a new road into town (one that has been talked about for decades and is a long standing polarising issue). It gave a clear indication of whether you should vote for them.

We really need to upgrade our local governance. People, systems, the lot. As central governments flounder right across the planet, the obvious next step is for strong local governance to step into the void. Why? Because it has too. In the west, central governments are failing their people on a massive scale. We vote for this (less immigration) & they do that (more immigration). The constant lies & immoral behaviour of many of our so-called leaders, is a disgrace to democracy. If you want to know where democracy has failed, look at the people running the place. It has become so self-serving that even the blind can see the corruption - which is going on just about everywhere you look. Our leadership has failed & as a result our cities are failing, as are our communities, our families & our society in general. This is not ending well folks. We really do need some better leadership. Quickly.