sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Labour announces new policy to tackle housing affordability, wants infrastructure bonds, more 'medium density' and relaxed height limits

Labour announces new policy to tackle housing affordability, wants infrastructure bonds, more 'medium density' and relaxed height limits

Content supplied by Phil Twyford, Labour's housing spokesperson

Labour’s ground-breaking new policy on reforming planning rules will make housing more affordable, Labour’s Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford says.

“Labour will free up density and height controls to allow more medium density housing and reform the use of urban growth boundaries so they don’t drive up section costs. This will curb land bankers and speculators.

“The other new element is changing the way we fund infrastructure for new developments. Currently those costs are either subsidised by the ratepayer or passed by the developer onto the price tag of a new home. That makes houses much more expensive. It also means they are paid off through mortgages at expensive bank interest rates.

“Our new policy will see infrastructure funded by local government bonds, paid off over the lifetime of the asset through a targeted rate on the properties in the new development. This will substantially reduce the cost of new housing.

“Reforming the planning rules will stand alongside Labour’s commitment to crack down on speculators, and build 100,000 new homes for first home-buyers. These are the game-changing reforms that will fix the housing crisis and renew the dream of Kiwi homeownership.

“National has been blaming councils and the Resource Management Act for rising house prices for the past 10 years, but have done precious little to fix the problems.

“Labour has the policies and the political will to get the job done,” Phil Twyford says.

Twyford has sent through the actual policy wording. It is ...

That Labour in government reform urban development rules, through using an NPS on affordable housing under the RMA to give Councils clear direction:
* on freeing up density and height controls to allow more medium density affordable housing; and
* to reform the use of urban growth boundaries.
And alongside these changes, Labour will reform infrastructure funding based on principles of user pays, access to local government borrowing rates, and repayment over lifetime of the asset.

Twyford was quoted a saying that Auckland Council is "facing pretty staunch opposition from some nimby groups."

"That's denying a whole generation of New Zealanders affordable housing options in areas where they want to live. We are going to say from central Government's view that affordable housing is a matter of national importance and we are going to require councils, like Auckland Council, to restrict the use of density and height controls so they can't be used to prevent affordable housing being built."

"It will be a reduction in the veto power of existing residents. At the moment ... they put a premium on the right of neighbours to object in a community. What we are saying is we have to take into account the whole of New Zealand and future generations who desperately need affordable housing."

(Updated with exact Labour Party policy wording.)

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

10 Comments

Sounds fairly sensible.

Up
0

Surprisingly, it does. See what National will do about it

Up
0

first they will call it loopy
then they will say who going to pay for it
then they have put in measures to help
then nada, nothing, sit on hands
finally when the polls start to show its gaining traction they will implement 1/2 of it with a six to eight month lead in

Up
0

At the risk of sounding pedantic, 'nimby' is not a word. In the interest of journalistic integrity, could we please have our acronyms capitalised? Cheers.

Up
0

The 2010 Max Cryer book, "Common Phrases" says it is "now usually lower case". It might be upper case in England, but not here anymore.

Up
0

Thanks for the response - will agree to disagree on this (I don't believe acronyms should be adopted into language in this way, because you lose the actual long-form reference). I enjoyed the article, however.

Up
0

Phil has overlooked another win/win/win/win possibility. Uncharacteristic.

- kick-start modular housing factories like Concision
- exempt products of such factories from all consenting as ISO or similar QC should be a required attribute.
- require TLA's to divest themselves of most inspectors and plannerista.
- offer said B-Ark types employment in aforesaid factories, on condition they join a Union.

What hitches can the common tateriat see in this Modest Proposal?

Up
0

Its seems Labour has not got a single original thought when it comes to policy .

There is absolutely NOTHING NEW in this so-called policy .

Its a cut and paste from the new Auckland plan ( circa 2011)............. more density and high-rise

The problem is not money either , so Bonds are a waste of time , we are awash with money for the development of Auckland.

The problem lies squarely between Auckland council intransigence and our immigration policy

Up
0

Nothing about tackling demand (immigration).

Up
0

that's where WP comes in, as part of his agreement to govern he can get them to roll back allowing students to work and tighten the rules

Up
0