Beleaguered Fletcher Building has delayed its return to share trading till Wednesday and says it will now update the market then about expected further losses in its building and interiors division; in discussion with lenders

By David Hargreaves

Fletcher Building has delayed the update it was going to provide to the market on Monday about its strife-torn Building and Interiors Division (B&I) and says it is currently in discussions with its lenders about the expected breaches of covenants it informed the market of last week.

The company, which signalled last week that the losses on the B&I division this year were going to be even worse than the $160 million earlier indicated, had said it would resume trading on the NZX on Monday - and would be holding a briefing for analysts and the media.

But now the company says that won't happen till Wednesday.

In explaining the request for an extension of trading halt on the shares, Fletcher said: "The request has been made because the review of the key projects in its Building and Interiors (B&I) business as part of the preparation of the Group accounts for the six months ended 31 December 2017 is still ongoing and not yet complete."

Fletcher told the NZX that as announced on 8 February 2018, the current expectation of the board is that there will be further "material" losses in the B&I business beyond what was provided for in October 2017 at the annual meeting and that once those further losses are determined and provided for, this will result in a breach of one or more of the covenants in the Group’s financing arrangements.

"Since making the 8 February announcement, the Company has commenced discussions with its lenders in relation to the expected covenant breaches."

The Company expected the trading halt to continue until the commencement of trading on Wednesday 14 February 2018 prior to which it will provide to the market an update of its review and the status of its discussions with its lenders.

Fletcher, according to its 2017 annual report owes over $1.9 billion, some of this is to the usual range of banking suspects, but intriguingly the vast majority - over $1 billion - is owed to private investors, mostly in the US and Japan.


It is probably stating the obvious to say that a delay like this is not a good sign.

While the official line from the company is that it needs more time to finish the review of the key projects in its B&I business (which include the new SkyCity International Convention Centre and the Commercial Bay waterfront project, also in Auckland), my eyes were drawn to the part of the statement that said the company has "commenced discussions with its lenders" over the expected covenant breaches.

It falls into the realm of speculation on my part, but it would be no surprise if disagreement with the lenders is the real reason for the delay.

As I've pointed out previously, a large chunk of Fletcher's debt is actually owed to private investors, which is unusual. I confess to not knowing who they are. But, private lenders potentially could react quite differently in a situation like this to bankers. Therefore reaching agreement with them to provide a waiver for the covenant breach could potentially be more problematic.

It is to be hoped that whatever is going on behind the scenes can be resolved by Wednesday and that the update - for better or worse - can be provided to the market.

In a more general sense, the timing of all this could not be more lousy, with global share markets throwing a collective tantrum over the prospect of rising interest rates and what that might entail.

It all puts further pressure on Fletcher to come out with something fairly convincing in the way of explanation - once it finally thinks it is ready.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment or click on the "Register" link below a comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current Comment policy is here.


Well...I feel sorry for those that bought shares recently. Does't look good for such boom times I would wonder if there was a down turn in the economy if things were going to be a lot worse for them. Loosing money in this market. No doubt a shake up at senior management.

... the fact is , the company di-worsified itself over the years ... spreading out into different directions and countries ... expanding for the sake of getting bigger and bigger ...

Well bugger ! ... if they can't make munny hand over fist in the good times ... and when the Gnats are handing them every advantage , oversight of every repair job in earthquake shaked Christchurch ... then sh*t a brick , how bad will things get when the market turns down ...

... yes , there'll be a shake up at senior management ... more costs and losses for the company , as they fork out for generous dollops of gold in the form of watches and parachutes for the dozy drips who lead the company into this series of parlous losses ...

Shareholders ? .... pssst ... who gives a toss about you , at FBU ...

GB exactly! Good question would be as well what percentage of shares in the hungry lion does that the government & agencies hold, add up to. What a bunch of cronies going back to Muldoon & Trotter. Tax payers, minority shareholders, what mugs and peasants they are considered to be by that ivory tower lot!

"Since making the 8 February announcement, the Company has commenced discussions with its lenders in relation to the expected covenant breaches."

This trading halt exhibits the features of an asset bail-in for locked out shareholders.

Expect shares to go up or down. A bail in is a risk you take as a share holder.

A possible bail-in when they misrepresented their financial position and kept paying dividends. Mismanagement on this scale should involve consequences.

This extension of trading must mean that losses must be much more serious than first thought.
Surely Fletchers must have had a full summary of their losses before they first told the market and had a plan and explanations all ready to go. Obviously they have run into a majot hitch.
Good time to sell Fletcher shares short through off-market deals.

Another good example of why it is good to get rid of all debt before paying any dividends; any unnecessary interest is money down the drain, especially if rates rise.

>be building material monopoly in housing bubble
>somehow still lose money

Hilarious. Can't make this stuff up, I feel bad for the shareholders.