![](/sites/default/files/styles/full_width/public/feature_images/Planes_0.jpg?itok=e4j4WcEx)
The latest migration figures from Statistics NZ show the annual net gain was 70,147 in the 12 months to the end of January, down 1.6% compared to the year to January 2017.
However the net gain for the month of January 2018 was 8577, up 1.6% compared to January last year.
That suggests the recent trend of a decline in the rate of migration is probably still fairly fragile and it's possible there could be another surge in migration-fuelled population growth.
However the annual growth rate is still extremely high by historical standards, and you only need to go back to 2012 when there was a net loss of 3134 people in the year to January.
That turned to a net gain of just 12 in the the year to January 2013 and then surged upwards to the net gain of 71,305 in 2017.
The biggest source countries for new migrants remain China and Hong Kong, with a net gain of 10,057 in the 12 months to January, although that was down by 8.7% compared to the previous 12 months.
That was followed by India 6707 (-21.7%), the UK 6136 (+2.6%), South Africa 4946 (+9.1%) and the Philippines 4775 (+4.3%).
There was a net gain of just 38 people from Australia in the 12 months to January, down from 1264 a year earlier.
The figures also show a net loss of 993 New Zealand citizens in the 12 months to January and a net gain of 71,140 citizens of other countries.
And Australia continues to attract far more kiwis each year than those that return home from that country, with with 20,362 New Zealand citizens departing long term for Australia in the 12 months to January and 15,231 returning from an extended stay across the ditch.
The biggest group arriving in this country long term were coming here to work, with 46,457 arrivals on work visas in the 12 months to January which was up 9.5% compared to a year earlier, followed by 38,715 NZ and Australian citizens (up 2.2%), 24,144 on student visas (-0.6%), and 15,393 on residency visas (-7.9%).
Net long term migration
Select chart tabs
78 Comments
How can the Labour party that professes to care for the homeless and disposed, allow even more immigrants into this country while there is an ever increasing number of people without out homes? That is ok, just come in and take this or that persons home, or you could just simply buy a people mover and live in that along with quite a few New Zealanders.
Clearly they are going to take a while to get house building ramped up; years? So how can they justifiably continue Nationals policy of pouring petrol on the fire. So far I see that they are little different from National in terms of the housing problem and the Ponzie economy. The time has long past to call a complete halt to immigration, except for returning Kiwis and direct a significantly increased number of our people to building the housing that we so desperately need.
Just a reminder to put into perspective how far out of kilter our immigration is, here are some immigration figures for different countries as a percentage of their total population
New Zealand currently 1.56% !!!!!!!!!
NZ Labour proposed (40,000) 0.9%
UK 0.39%
USA 0.3%
France 0.04%
Germany 0.19%
Australia 0.75%
I think you're expecting too much too soon. The immigration and housing problems have been festering for years, and a rational, concise and multi-pronged solution is needed. Immigration levels need to be reduced, the building supplies duopoly needs fixing, compliance/consents need streamlining, zoning and land use regulations need relaxing... The list goes on. A new government can't just wave a magic wand and solve them all the issues left over from National's reign within five months.
That being said, I totally understand where you're coming from and I agree with you on all your concerns.
It's 2018, and with a fresh new left wing govt in place homeless will now be referred to as 'rough sleepers' by all right (left) thinking journalists. We should henceforth celebrate the miraculous solving of this problem by our new leader, and congratulate the virtuous self-reliance these wonderful people demonstrate in getting back to nature and choosing such a low-impact lifestyle.
It's possible there could be another surge in migration-fuelled population growth
Looks like we have admitted to ourselves that there is very little the government can actually do to stop people from pouring into our cities and cramming our infrastructure further. Migration, at this point, seems to be completely market-driven with our immigration department serving as a rubber stamp without any real control over the situation.
As you say the tools are in place. Another effective tool is to charge serious money for employing foreigners. That was how PNG did it 25 years ago; my employer needed my unique skiils so paid me generously but also paid the same again to the government in income taxes and another fixed sum for the work permit - just that work permit charge would have allowed the PNG government to employ about 3 local teachers. As you can imagine my employer made localisation of jobs a very high priority.
If the businesses that employ foreign 'chefs' and 'bakers' were forced to pay for the privilege then the numbers of foreign 'chefs' employed would go down leaving NZ with maybe Gordon Ramsey or Michel Roux. It would help the governments income. And it would stop dead in its tracts the most of the rorts detailed in Prof Christina Stringers report on 'Widespread Worker Exploitation".
What a bummer - I am naive and ignorant. I believed election promises.
Sad to say when we finally catch up with other countries and adopt a sane immigration policy it is quite probable they will go too far and stop the small number of really talented and skilled coming to NZ. We really do need those top PhD level graduates with say 5 years experience in IT or engineering from India or China or Europe but they rarely come to NZ - they end up creating or managing wealthy exporting businesses in California.
Labour constantly brought up on how critical it is to bring down immigration levels. 4 months into the government and we still have not heard a peep from them. Why you ask?
It is easier said than done since a large part of our short-term economic success is tied to record migration (e.g. business confidence, export education albeit low quality); meddling with which may plunge is into a sudden slowdown in economic activity. Labour clearly does not want to be seen as the party that inherited a booming economy and turned it to bust within its first year in power.
I'm sure that's correct. They may be doing something subtly though. My partner works for a large tertiary institution that has lost a significant number of international students because the new government have just recently made the ability to work after completing lower tier qualifications much more complex. Word is getting around and there are far fewer Indian students enrolling. This institution has also been warned by immigration after it was found to have 200 students who were enrolled but not legally allowed to remain in the country for the duration of their studies. There will be hit to the money coming from these sectors that the National party pumped up but they were totally unsustainable in the first place. Hopefully they have a long term plan in place to minimise the damage done by the former government.
Ngrrk,
I think our immigration finally went looking for visa fraud and found it in India, obviously wasnt hard.
Indian numbers for January are down about 10,000 and two intakes may translate to down 20,000 this year
That is only part of the game because there is obviously fraud in the Independant Tertiary Institutes in NZ.
However it all comes down to the Holy Grail of Residency and the scam is NZ has been offering Residency based on bad NZ qualifications.
It has to stop, right now.
immigration finally went looking for visa fraud and found it in India
No surprises there. There have been reports on all those multi-billion frauds over the years,where perpetrators with deep pockets walk away without even a slap on the wrist.
Then there is a toxic corporate culture of excessive expectations: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/demanding-t…
We should be more careful on what culture we bring in!
Good point. However it would take a while to put these things in place, assuming that they are being put in place! And scarily there will be lobbying from parties like immigration consultants and those who wish to create enclaves of their ethnicities in NZ in the background.....
Net migration doesn't show the full story as cultural expert Trevor Phillips's explains here https://youtu.be/Tb2iFikOwYU?t=1645
Even if net migration were zero that doesn't mean there aren't good honest kiwis leaving and being replaced by (generally) more dishonest, (generally) less skilled migrants.
bilbo. There is no question that much of the recent immigration has been low skilled. Anecdotally you can see this almost everywhere you go within this country and stagnant productivity growth confirms it.
The last government was aware of this yet negligently allowed the tide of lower skilled people to keep flowing in, the coalition talks a tough game on migration but that's all, just talk; lets have some 'conversations' and set up committees to investigate. Peters is invisible on immigration; loud war cries in opposition, a wimp in government.
Few kiwis seem to give a toss about the dramatic change to this country's ethnic, social and skill base mix, being imposed on us by the Wellington social engineering elite.
It was a simplification. In reality there are two camps.
The underclass:
The low skilled students who want to set down a grappling hook for their family. Statistically some immigrants have higher birth rates, even while living in conditions which would put most NZ couples off having kids. These groups always have a strong cultural identity which more often that not passes onto the children. Combine these two facts and it's easy to see huge demographic changes driving identity politics down in decades to come. Just look at the demographics of Fiji.
The over class:
Wealthy immigrants who own more and more land, businesses, rental housing, university qualifications, high end jobs.
Two different groups but the outcome is the same for each. Segregation. New Zealanders fleeing into the suburbs.
There are already separate shops for different groups e.g. These two Harcourts are right next to each other.
All in the name of multiculturalism and cultural appropriation..... such a shame we can't be more like china or Japan in this regard.. I can't but think that there is a direct relation between strong cultural indentity is based on exclusion of other alien identities
Interesting quote from the narrator in the video:
"By and large, I don't think the motivations for this pattern are sinister. But I've always believed that separate streets and neighbourhoods would pretty quickly lead to separate ways of life - and, separate values."
(After which he goes on to discuss the issues highlighted by segregation and the terrible conditions segregated underclasses live in.)
Too high a volume seems to encourage segregation rather than becoming part of the wider community, with not the greatest effect over time. A terrible case of economic short-termism we've had.
and to your point rastus; I note the recent increase in people who have immigrated here in recent years, now leaving for elsewhere. How many of these, I wonder, have left behind them their elderly relatives, whom they were able to bring in under family unification provisions before that gate was partly closed, for taxpayers to provide ongoing free healthcare and partial pensions?
At least National also put our taxpayer money into housing them:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/74902576/pensioner-housing-for-aucklan…
The voters for the parties that formed the coalition are in Dreamsville if you think they are going to follow through with there promises!
Seriously, can someone please tell me what they have actually followed thru with fully apart from stupid working groups.
Absolutely nothing!,,
I hope the media are all over it and all over the immigration numbers, houses built etc. I also hope the opposition will be pushing it. Many voted for this type of change...new baby due or not, the coalition should be held to account and made to perform as promised. That's why we vote.
Im happy with that there does need to be accountability, and they need to stick to promises. I do think a bedding in period, as anything thats done off the cuff, normally ends in failure. So some planning is required and some research.
But not 9 years of stuffing up the country and creating huge generational issues where people struggle to afford the basics. Who would have thought one small bottle of beer is now equivalent to what I bought a crate for when I first got a job.
Well at least Filipino, Brits and South Africans actually come here and work , many ( not all ) of the rest are opportunists , fortune seekers , snake oil salesmen, property speculators, $2 shopkeepers, dodgy doctors and tax evaders (or elderly parents of the same group described above) .
When it comes to long term population in NZ I keep hearing " we need to have a conversation about where we want this to go long term " Absolutely true! But all we ever hear is this sentence. We completely lack a forum where NZ can have this conversation. It seems this conversation is never going to happen. We need to create a way that the NZ public can have these types of conversations and make a decision.
"we need to have a conversation about..." = we will talk about this privately with a few of our mates, but with no urgency 'cos it's a tricky issue that will mostly lose us votes no matter which way we jump, but if we do eventually have to do something then we will dump our decision upon you on a Friday afternoon before a long weekend and also release a hoard of squirrels to distract the media.
Normal migration that requires people to voluntarily make another country their home and have the resources to establish themselves would have interesting consequences for the host country. Immigrants will mostly go to the gateway city and main business hub. Being driven sort of people, interested in improving their lot, they will endeavour to buy houses in the best neighbourhoods and send their children to the best schools. This will inevitably result in a situation where immigrants are, on average, more well off than the locals. I am confident that if you did a survey of immigrant net wealth and local net wealth you would find that immigrants are wealthier or at least growing wealthier. A class system could develop where locals descend more into poverty and more recent arrivals ascend the social ladder.
Importing more refugees and poor immigrants could address this concern, if indeed it is a concern.
I must say earlier reports of immigration having plateaued or peaked seemed to me rather odd. Net gains of 70k compare to net losses a few years ago are still extraordinary differences. Even if immigration halved it would still be massive and have society changing consequences. For the better or for the worse would depend on one's circumstances.
Since we will never stop Kiwi citizens bringing their foreign partners to NZ (13,000 per year) then totally stopping immigration is impossible. However those 13,000 will bring more than enough diversity and unlike the current 'swamp them' immigration will not build ghettos/colonies.
Not so sure.
If immigration is stopped cold-turkey, eventually the foreign partner syndrome will exhaust itself. It is a symptom of another culture. Most locally born native-NZ'ers couple up with locals. They don't seek mail-order-brides. Noted that you refer to Kiwi-citizens. You really mean citizens of New Zealand. Or perhaps more accurately, permanent residents. One often becomes the other.
Here's a good place to start if you haven't been paying attention.
http://www.labour.org.nz/100_days
Note this is a month out of date so will be missing some things. As I'm sure you're aware, there's a tough line to tread between criticisms of not doing anything, and criticisms of not thinking before they do anything. There's a bunch of people out there who decide they want to complain about the new government first, then think of what to complain about second.
"there's a tough line to tread between criticisms of not doing anything, and criticisms of not thinking before they do anything"
But a pretty thick wedge between that and making campaign promises without researching what it will take to follow through. Icecream and pony rides for everyone!!
Shame Jones has announced that by end of next year they will have planted just 7.5% (15million) of the (200million) trees promised.
Kiwibuild: Promised 10000homes per year pre election, now saying they will deliver half (16000 in this term) of that. Costs escalating, 'houses' becoming small apartments. Anyone want to bet on them even getting to 16000 overpriced, undersized hovels?
[edit] MBIE estimate they will only be able to do about 8000kiwibuild homes this term - about a quarter of their promised 30000. It's even bullshittier than i thought.
Lets bullshit our way through this
Taxinda had a Freudian slip on the AM show when asked about Kiwibuild. She said the Government was going to buy the houses, then changed that to build. There's a dollar in this for anyone wanting to sell some dross, sell it to the Government wrapped up in a Kiwibuild banner.
Yep. Incoming flipper tax window extension to five years. Incoming restriction on overseas ownership. Ring fencing of tax loss. Anti slum lord legislation (minimum standards). Actively seeking an answer to deliver more low cost housing (no answer here yet). Moves to stop the education/immigration scam (reduced immigration). Professional investors with lots of equity are probably yawning. Ma and pa specuvestor land will definitively be worried..
Yes slumlords are obviously a problem, but the real problem is the age and quality of the housing stock.
Its the owners I feel sorry about. Who will look after them?
First you buy a house then need to spend almost that again to retrofit insulation, double glazing, efficient heating, new roof, and then a repaint/reclad to ensure watertightness as well.
According to Stuff.co.nz
In 2017 More than 37,850 work visas under partnership were approved last year.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/101821889/husband-defeated-as-official…
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.