
The Coalition will offer a $1.7 billion tax break to businesses that make capital investments as part of a budget package aimed at boosting growth while reining in government spending.
Finance Minister Nicola Willis set a Budget 2025 spending limit of just $1.3 billion. This is one of the tightest operating allowances since 2012 and effectively a zero budget.
However, that money has been paired with $4.8 billion in spending cuts and $600 million in new revenue, to form a $6.7 billion reshuffle of the Government’s $150 billion core spending.
These cuts include $2.7 billion saved by reforming the pay equity laws and another $2.1 billion cut from other areas. Much of this money has gone back into key services with a $1.9 billion boost for health and a little under $300 million each for law, education, and defence.
But the centerpiece of the ‘Growth Budget’ is a $1.7 billion annual tax incentive for investments in productivity-enhancing capital assets. The policy allows businesses to immediately deduct 20% off the cost from their taxable income, and still claim depreciation on the remaining 80% over time.
This effectively brings forward the tax benefit and lowers the cost of investment by shifting some of the risks and opportunity costs from firms to the Crown.
This encourages earlier and larger investment in productive assets than would otherwise occur, and Treasury estimates it will increase gross domestic product by up to 0.5% over the next five years.
Save yourself
Willis said she had received advice that most of the benefit would flow to workers in the form of higher wages and higher rates of employment.
Pushing back against this employment boost is a reform to KiwiSaver, which will lift the default contribution rate from 3% to 4% and require businesses to match the higher rate.
This policy will push New Zealanders to save more for retirement, but it has an economic function like a payroll tax.
Raising employee contributions reduces take-home pay and acts like a form of forced saving, potentially dampening consumption. Raising employer contributions increases the cost of hiring and functions like a payroll tax, which can slow wage growth or employment.
But it could boost long-term savings and contribute to the domestic capital pool, some of which may be invested in local businesses and infrastructure — helping to sell the policy as a pro-growth measure.
Willis said Treasury had advised it would “marginally” suppress wage growth, although the net effect of the budget package, with accelerated depreciation, would be positive for wages.
One of the fiscal savings came from cutting the Government’s own KiwiSaver contribution cap from $521 to $261 and removing eligibility for anyone earning over $180,000. This will save $580 million this fiscal year and up to $650 million in future years.
Unlike last year, Budget 2025 documents did not provide an easy-to-read list of exactly where the $2.1 billion in cost savings had come from.
Growth story
Despite the pro-growth budget, Treasury still forecasts a slower economic recovery relative to its half-year update in December.
The US trade war is expected to knock 0.2% off NZ’s gross domestic product over the next two years, due to slower growth of trading partners and an unwillingness for businesses to invest amid the uncertainty.
GDP is predicted to grow approximately 3% over the next three fiscal years, as the economy bounces back from recession, before paring back towards 2.5% in the longer-run.
Unemployment is now expected to peak at 5.4% and wage growth settle at 2.6%, while house prices are forecast to flare up with over 6% annual growth over the next four years.
Meanwhile, Budget 2025 sees the Crown’s surplus again at risk of slipping beyond the forecast period. Even with ACC excluded (OBEGALx), the budget only just balances in June 2029 with a statistically insignificant surplus of $214 million.
OBEGAL (operating balance before gains and losses) has been the main fiscal indicator since 2008 but Willis adopted a new measure which excludes the deficits being run by ACC.
These occur partly because its revenue earned from investment gains are excluded from the measure, but also current levy rates fall short of covering expected claim costs.
With ACC costs included, OBGEAL will be at a $3 billion deficit equal to 0.6% of GDP. However, this would still be a significant improvement on the $15 billion, 3.4% of GDP, deficit in the fiscal year covered by Budget 2025.
Net core Crown debt is expected to peak at 46% of GDP and not fall below 45% in the forecast period. Net worth, which is the broadest measure of the Crown finances, will fall from 39.9% today to 31%.
36 Comments
The National-led coalition plans to income-test the parents of 18 and 19-year-olds who want to go on the Jobseeker or emergency benefit from July 2027.
I await with baited breath how they are going to do that and who is going to do that?
Why would the process be any different from income testing uni student allowances?
Might be the same..that's what they need to decide. Next question....who is gonna do it? Are they going to expand student services? Where will they get the accountants from.
You do realise student is a manual task, nothing like IR systems. Lots of work...unless its self assess, no checks.
As I say....good luck
I await with baited breath how they are going to do that and who is going to do that?
Similar as what currently exists with Student Allowance?
Sounds back to the future. Student allowances were income tested on parent's incomes until age 21 back in the 90s. And it was a low threshold. I remember only farmers' kids and the genuinely poor ever got an allowance.
Yes, I recall that.
These folks are so bereft of ideas and even knowledge about the subject matter (buzz words) they kick around.
Social investment, for example could have solved/avoided this measure easily. Just guarantee each and every 18 or 19 year old paid work and if they refuse it, or find work elsewhere, that's all good - no alternate benefit other than for those not able bodied.
That's what the Jobs for Nature program was set up to trial - a kind of permanent Conservation Corps - and it was extremely successful;
https://www.jobsfornature.govt.nz/
But, they have not extended that initiative.
They are so stupid.
Are they going to income test the over 65s on the benefit?
Best income test their children too - surely by the same logic we can expect them to support their own family rather than relying on the state?
But if families and communities looked after each other
What would the state do?
Would have been much better than dumping the funding for pay equity claims and means testing 18 and 19 year olds.
Apparently when you turn 65 means testing becomes too hard to do
They cant help but touch kiwisaver can they. First they got rid of the $1000 kick start, then taxed employer contributions now cutting government contribution by half. Australians must be having a field day with this...
...people reading their employment contracts searching for the total remuneration clause wording
Why does the Government (that's you and I, taxpayer) contribute anything to anyone's KiwiSaver?
Encouraging people fund their own retirement is cheaper than the state paying for all of it.
I actually think people should get 10 grand from the government into a kiwisaver like fund at birth, then a grand or two a year thereafter till 18.
Retrograde from my way of thinking. NZrs by and large are abysmal at saving. For all of his faults and peculiarities at least Michael Cullen was one who had a go at improving the record and even then it was recognised as hardly enough and to dilute that even more simply increases future problems.
Kiwis are poor at saving because we live in a grossly expensive country with low rates of pay and exorbitant house prices.
There is bugger all left over to save, especially for the screwed over middle class.
Is the compulsory employer contribution going up from 3 to 4%?
Press release suggests that but it's not clear
It's complicated...
The new 4% rate is a default rate for both employers and employees. The current 3% rate will rise to 3.5% from April 1 next year and reach 4% on April 1 2028. However, there is an optional rate. Employees will be allowed to pay at 3% if they wish, and this would mean their employers’ contribution would be 3% as well.
https://www.interest.co.nz/personal-finance/133400/kiwisaver-employer-a…
So from April 2028, if employee pays 4%, then employer has to pay 4% (I think)
I'd be interested in an article with a league table of average contributions from NZ employers. Who are the 3% stooges?
Right now? Majority of employers would be at 3%...
"house prices are forecast to flare up with over 6% annual growth over the next four years"
So, predicting 25% house price growth over 4 years? Disaster!
Edit: I hope that this is some sort of mistake, or my math's is wrong.
It won't be perceived as a disaster in a country whose economy for 40 years has been a housing ponzi game with a few sheep and cows tacked on for show.
Sounds like there's heaps of opportunity then for someone to start a business.
Can’t. Busy paying too much on our mortgages on our overly expensive homes.
It's all about priorities
Yes to true. And collectively paying $7b to the big four banks is THE priority. Add in the other overseas owned rentiers and there's definitely no room for collective savings.
It doesn't have to be.
You can go down to the companies office and start a company for a small amount of money.
I'm starting to see why there's the belief the country only trades houses, entrepreneurship and imagination is dead.
6% annual is 26.25% over 5 years.
Better race down to the local real estate office pronto
wage growth settle at 2.6%, while house prices are forecast to flare up with over 6% annual growth over the next four years.
ROTFL
lets say avg wage into a house is 100k and average price is 1mil or 10:1
in 5 years
Avg wage is $113.7k avg house is 1.338mil or 11.7:1
sure.................................... average person would need to take on another 338 debt or goto aussie....
I'm sure everyone has their own opinions however to my mind the most egregious budget failure: taxpayers continuing to subsidise private schools. Immoral.
https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/supporting-school-choice
There is a $200 mill allocation for further oil and gas exploration. Appreciate Ardern’s government abruptly curtailed all of that but given the record of relatively intensive exploration now for over sixty years is it not possible that there isn’t actually anything much to discover? No expert myself but have noted other participants herewith knowledge. What say they?
I don't have any inside knowledge, but there's probably a giant blob of oil just off the coast of Wanganui that hasn't been spotted yet because it is in one of the grid squares that hasn't been allocated for oil exploration at this time. Never underestimate the bureaucracy, do not assume that anything has been allowed as yet, let alone investigated.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.