sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

If one of the Rankine units in Huntly gets removed, wholesale electricity prices could increase by up to 12% between 2026 to 2028, gentailers say

Public Policy / news
If one of the Rankine units in Huntly gets removed, wholesale electricity prices could increase by up to 12% between 2026 to 2028, gentailers say
auntly
Genesis Energy's Huntly Power Station

The country’s four largest electricity generator-retailers estimate if one of the Rankine units at Huntly Power Station is removed, wholesale electricity prices would increase by around 10% to 12% between 2026 to 2028, and 6% over the long-term.

That’s what Genesis, Mercury, Meridian and Contact have told the Commerce Commission as they apply to establish a strategic energy reserve at Huntly Power Station.

The energy companies shared their plans on Monday. The plans are for 10-year ‘Huntly Firming Options’ covering 150 megawatts, 50 megawatts each for Contact, Meridian and Mercury.

As well as this, Genesis plans to establish a fuel reserve of up to 600,000 tonnes for dry winters with low hydro flows.

The stockpile will be coal but Genesis says the reserve may transition to biomass, such as wood products, as it becomes available in coming years.

If it goes ahead, one of Huntly’s three coal and gas powered Rankine units, which was set to be retired in February 2026, will remain in commission. Rankine is a thermodynamic cycle used in power generation.

In August last year, the country narrowly avoided blackouts due to low hydro lake levels, limited wind generation and tight gas supplies, forcing officials to ask businesses and households to reduce electricity consumption.

And as winter approached this year, prices began to creep up and familiar problems threatened another supply crunch.

This continued until May, when electricity producers struck a deal to buy natural gas from Methanex and rain topped up hydro lakes.

Commerce Commission

On Wednesday, the Commission published its statement of preliminary issues relating to the application and has invited interested parties to share their thoughts on the proposed arrangements, including any impacts on things like wholesale energy costs.

One of the things the Commission raised was whether the incentives of the applicants or other market participants will be affected when it comes to investing in “new generation capacity going forward” compared to a situation where one of the Rankine units gets retired.

“This could include: new generation capacity in general; or flexible generation capacity (such as thermal energy generation) that might operate in competition with Huntly to provide capacity during dry winters, taking into account the relative uncertainty as to when such generation capacity might be required and the phase out of non-renewable energy.”

The energy companies hope the agreements will be in place from January 1, 2026.

‘Rules of how this will be triggered will be interesting’

Professor Nirmal Nair from the University of Auckland’s department of electrical, computer and software engineering says this is a “stop-gap arrangement to ensure ‘energy capacity insurance’ particularly during dry-year risks, through a mechanism that is agreed upon by the existing gentailers”.

But there would be no separation between the companies, Nair says, which “is going to smother the visibility of a pure market”.

"The rules of how this will be triggered will be interesting.”

Previously it would have been the Government that would trigger this, Nair says, but if it were up to the companies to trigger this, mandates should be placed telling them not to trigger during certain months.

“Then you’ll manage your water properly, you just can’t play the dry-year risk all the time and put the marginal price on top,” he says.

He also wondered why this agreement was for 10 years. Nair says this should be five years instead. “Otherwise you’re going to give them a free pass for a decade.”

“This is the time for us to really leverage these guys to play financially and really look at other options because right now, we’re playing it very safe.”

“I hope it does not decelerate the ongoing renewable energy resources project from coming online, by scaring off investors who would like their returns in the coming 10 years.

“Else we will both lose on the decarbonisation targets, and not achieve electricity security or affordable energy,” Nair says.

‘Important buffer’

The announcement was welcomed by Energy Minister Simon Watts and Associate Energy Minister Shane Jones.

Watts says last year’s dry winter highlighted vulnerabilities in the country’s energy system.

This led to high prices and unacceptable pressure on New Zealand industries, businesses and households, Watts says.

“I have been extremely clear with power generators that the Government expects them to deliver additional supply so we can reduce the risk of winter power shortages during periods of low lake levels.”

“This will reduce the need for significant commercial power price spikes and the need for businesses to reduce their power use,” Watts says.

Jones says this will “act as an important buffer during periods of high electricity demand in winter and when renewable energy generation is low”.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

9 Comments

Artificial scarcity - is essential for the NZ electricity sector to maintain rising prices and therefore profitability.
Proposals for additional hydro storage and hydro generation capacity (for which NZ has unlimited resources) are strongly resisted by the sector - decrying 'the risk that lower and more stable electricity prices will discourage investment.' 
The electricity sector is not designed to serve the NZ economy it is designed to exclusively serve share holders who take billions of dollars in dividend payments every year.

Up
6

designed to exclusively to serve share holders who take billions of dollars in dividend payments every year. The majority shareholders taking those billions being NZ taxpayers ...you do realise the government is majority owners of Genesis, Mercury, and Meridian?!

I'll take 600,000 tonne pile of coal any day over a $20 billion pumped hydro scheme at wrong end of the country. 

Up
3

The NZ taxpayer should not be extracting profit from the private sector economy - that is economic cannibalism. The private sector shareholders are leaches - sucking value out every single part of the economy with no strategic long term plan for the rest of the country or its economic future.

Over one 5 year period the electricity sector paid out $8 billion in dividends - $3 billion of which they borrowed against their assets. The generators have deliberately stalled growing the generation capacity to ensure a constrained supply of electricity - no different to OPEC.

 

Up
6

yes we need energy reform, as a BE Elect I can say this is overdue

Up
0

This should be an election issue. My pick is that the current government will use every opportunity to do as little as possible to move NZ towards a sustainable renewable energy supply.

Up
0

we are already very sustainable due to hydro, the issue is where our growth comes from....

 

Up
6

NZ could very easily meet over 100% of its electricity supply with Hydro within a decade if it chose to. But that would not be profitable because of the upfront investment and very long term returns that would accrue across the entire economy and not just to the generator shareholders.

Up
0

Shane Jones on LNG. He asked the CEOs of the major gentailers to go away and find out how much an LNG terminal would be and the cost of the gas. The gentailers commissioned a report by a UK-based energy consultant Gas Strategies Group Ltd (Gas Strategies), with local engineering support from Wood Beca Ltd. In the past decade (since ~2015), the UK has not built any new LNG import terminals—the last major one, South Hook LNG in Pembrokeshire, opened back in 2009. en.wikipedia.org
If I recall correctly Germany has built additional LNG terminals in the last 3 years, courtesy of Russia. Why go to the UK? via ChatGPT and wikipedia

Not withstanding that I did a matchbox exercise long before the report came out and came out at with a gas cost of $235/MWh (23.5c/kWh) only and after an assumed overall efficiency of 25%. No interest costs on any capital or opex costs on running the plant.
That's expensive considering one is only paying a residential rate of between 30-35c/kWh
This report is avaialble for any interested in the report.
https://cms.clarus.co.nz/assets/Uploads/PDFs/LNG/Public-Release-NZ-LNG-…

Up
1

Sourcing more expensive options for electricity generation lifts the price for all sources and ensures good returns to shareholders - the electricity sector is not designed to deliver efficient outcomes for its consumers - it is designed to maximize profitability for its owners.

Up
1