By Chris Trotter*
Rory Stewart, the former Conservative Party cabinet minister, last week offered the world a truly disturbing image. He and Alastair Campbell, co-host of the podcast “The Rest is Politics, were examining the “National Security Strategy of the United States of America November 2025” (NSS25) and Stewart, clearly as stunned as many other political commentators around the planet, observed that it was as if the United States had “ripped off its mask”.
What NSS25 confirms, according to Stewart, is that all the accusations levelled against the United States by its critics over the last 100 years were nothing less than the truth; the USA is indeed a ruthless, violent, and exploitative regime; which bears no resemblance to the wholly benign entity, the “indispensable nation”, the “shining city set upon a hill”, that America’s defenders have presented.
Campbell, Tony Blair’s indispensable spin-doctor, did not dispute his Tory co-host’s analysis. He, too, seemed utterly flabbergasted by NSS25.
This was hardly surprising, since, as he read the document, Campbell could hardly have avoided the bitter conclusion that all the people who warned Blair and his government back in 2003 had got it right. “Sexed-up” dossiers notwithstanding, by joining the US attack on Iraq the United Kingdom was participating in an act of naked aggression – a clear breach of international law.
According to the geopolitical logic of NSS25, however, the US was perfectly justified in imposing its will on Iraq in 2003. What’s more, the US is now ready to impose it again upon any nation, or combination of nations, foolish enough to stand in its way. As the document insists over and over again, the United States is the mightiest nation on Planet Earth, and as far as the administration of President Donald Trump is concerned, might is always right.
How should New Zealand respond to this new – unmasked – United States? Where should we stand in this radically changed geopolitical environment? Should we be moving closer to the Americans, or distancing ourselves from them? Whichever option we choose, the diplomatic, economic and military consequences will not be trivial.
Given the temperament and ideological positioning of both New Zealand’s foreign minister, Winston Peters, and its defence minister, Judith Collins, this country’s initial response to NSS25 is likely to be one of cautious support. Both politicians will find much to applaud in the Strategy’s clear determination to gird-up America’s loins for the looming struggle with the Peoples Republic of China. Whether this initial enthusiasm survives their encounter with the brutal policies the US intends to adopt to retain/regain its global hegemony is much less certain.
NSS25 makes it clear that the US is currently too closely involved and dependent upon the Chinese economy to risk an immediate challenge. Instead, the document indicates a measured disengagement from China’s increasingly unchallengeable spheres of influence in East and South Asia, to be offset by the rapid and ruthless assertion of US power in the Western Hemisphere.
From the Arctic to the Antarctic, from Greenland to Terra del Fuego the hemisphere is to become America’s natural resource base and cheap labour reservoir.
If the nations of Central and South America fail to make the necessary ideological adjustments – i.e. refuse to get rid of their socialist governments – then American intervention can be anticipated. In a naked and unilateral reassertion of the 1823 “Monroe Doctrine”, any and all “foreign” powers currently engaging in resource extraction and/or significant industrial development in the Western Hemisphere will be expected to vacate the markets they have developed in favour of American investors. What punitive tariffs cannot achieve, American aircraft carriers will secure.
That this strategy amounts to a great deal more than a bombastic declaration of predatory intentions is attested to by the current massive build-up of military resources off the coast of Venezuela. The message could not be clearer to the socialist regime presided over by Nicolás Maduro: “Get out now, or we will take you out.” And, lest anyone should be in any doubt about America’s ruthless words being backed by ruthless deeds, more than a dozen vessels alleged to be transporting narcotics to the United States have already been blown out of the water – along with their defenceless crews.
The impact of such aggressive power projection on the formulation of New Zealand foreign affairs and defence policies can only be considerable. Washington will expect Wellington to back without reservation every one of its reconditioned imperial ambitions. Such residual support for the United Nations, and for the international conventions ratified by its member states since 1945, as remains in New Zealand society will be disregarded. Those elements of New Zealand society unwilling to accept the effective re-colonisation of the Western Hemisphere (and South Pacific?) should expect to be disciplined.
But Māori won’t be alone in registering the cultural impact of this resurgent American imperialism. That part of the New Zealand population that looks to the British Isles and Europe for cultural inspiration and solace will have to adapt to a world in which the USA has emboldened and empowered the Russian Federation as a counterweight to expanding Chinese influence on the Eurasian landmass.
In effect, the geopolitical breakthrough effected by Richard Nixon’s and Henry Kissinger’s opening to Beijing in the early 1970s is about to be reversed. It is difficult to see how Ukraine – or even Nato – will be able to accommodate the Trump Administration’s opening to Moscow. Not when the American Right’s detestation of Europe is so openly on display.
One has only to parse the following extraordinary passage from NSS25 to realise just how little the United States now cares for the rest of the world’s good opinion:
“As Alexander Hamilton argued in our republic’s earliest days, the United States must never be dependent on any outside power for core components—from raw materials to parts to finished products— necessary to the nation’s defense or economy. We must re-secure our own independent and reliable access to the goods we need to defend ourselves and preserve our way of life. This will require expanding American access to critical minerals and materials while countering predatory economic practices. Moreover, the Intelligence Community will monitor key supply chains and technological advances around the world to ensure we understand and mitigate vulnerabilities and threats to American security and prosperity.”
Be warned China: when the USA no longer needs you, it will come for you.
Be warned New Zealand: An America made great again will have no need of allies – only vassals.
The mask is off.
*Chris Trotter has been writing and commenting professionally about New Zealand politics for more than 30 years. He writes a weekly column for interest.co.nz. His work may also be found at http://bowalleyroad.blogspot.com.
15 Comments
There is no mask. It was there to see.
There has been an inane war somewhere for a long time now.
I have no expertise to offer, but bullies are often weak people behind all the bluster, so I wonder whether the US is really as all-powerful as it likes to make out. Is an huge aircraft carrier such an awe inspiring weapon of war in a new age of drones? Perhaps we will soon find out. I imagine that both Russia and China will be only too happy to supply Venezuela with such weapons and the expertise to use them.
Pretty much agree and as CT points out he is apparently demonstrating his resolve to apply force against any who don't kneel to him to bring them into line. If China and Russia both seek to supply Venezuela, getting past the US blockade may be a problem.
All this and one of the key architects bought his NZ citizenship a few years ago...
A big question though is that trying to stay neutral may be as problematic as picking a side. Helen Clark ensured we would be defenceless for decades so we have little to no ability to stop anyone coming ashore. The question will be who gets here first, China or the US?
A lot will depend on what Australia chooses to do. We can but sit and wait, observing.....with perhaps a prayer or two.
The great powers have great global ambitions, all three of them apparently. Out of interest, what then would be the lifestyle choice out of governance under Washington DC, Moscow or Beijing.
I think we need to renew closer ties with Aussie.
Aussie already has what it wants from NZ. The ability to buy land, and a lot of our educated youth to pay that there. I doubt they want the rest. and regularly show that with deportation of kiwis raised in Aussie with no family here.
NZ still has the option to join the Australian Federation...
https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/your-questions-on-notice/q…
https://nzhistory.govt.nz/new-zealand-turns-down-federation-australia
Probably a +ve idea in the long run, the Oz States have a reasonable amount of independence. NZ would gain in security and participate within a broader economic base.
The US want control of the largest oil reserve in the world. Aka Venezuela.
We are lucky that we dont have a giant oil reserve in NZ. The usual suspects would be interfering with us politically and probably have an aircraft carrier thereabouts.
Edit. There are over 2000 US Marines in Darwin with associated toys. Anyone heading our way would see US and Aussie attack planes ariving quickly.
Let's not forget...satellites see all.
There's probably oil undersea within our territorial waters, it has just yet to be found.
You can see where has already been mapped, and bored here
Its a bit of a stretch to call Maduro's Govt socialist - dictatorship would be more accurate. Certainly not a democracy
For NZ best position is to ensure we remain a country no one else wants to invade - or one they want to protect or at the very least ignore - so Switzerland comes to mind. We are not in that position but could be if that was our strategy
They could pump out so much more oil from Venezuela if there wasn't so much loss int he chain due to corruption. They have a need to pull it out of the ground to keep their country functioning, and some will get traded, but look at their volumes here and clearly they have no recovered after their coup in 2018/2019.
I remember being in Colombia not long after and tossing up heading there regardless, but decided against it after hearing from people who had had issues at the border days before. Govt cut off all cell networks in Caracas to block communication and people were flooding out of the city to get food as the farmers bringing it in were getting robbed, so stopped coming.
I met some Venezuelans in the north of Colombia who would hike plastic tanks of fuel across the border to Colombia along with cashew nuts, and sell for a meagre profit to feed their families.
It will take significant military investment to come even close to being like Switzerland. True neutrality is only maintained by the ability to hit back if someone takes a swipe at you.
America has no permanent friends or enemies, only interests. Henry Kissinger
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.