A fresh-faced Christopher Luxon stood in front of what was left of the National Party faithful shortly after National’s bruising 2020 election loss, delivering a charismatic, upbeat speech with tones reminiscent of John Key.
He was one of just a small handful of new National MPs - a scarcity after the ‘red wave’ wiped out the notion of many of the ‘safe’ blue seats.
Luxon drew a bigger cheer than then-leader Judith Collins. He was clearly leadership material.
From there, he swept in, performed well on the campaign trail, and finished 2023 as prime minister. Luxon was ripe and ready to lead.
Fast forward to lunchtime Friday, where Luxon endured a painfully awkward press conference batting away intense questioning around his leadership following fresh speculation, leaning on a repetitive crutch to survive the five-minute onslaught:
- “I have the support of my caucus.”
- “I have the support of my caucus.”
- “I have the full support of my caucus.”
- “I'm confident I have the numbers and I am confident I have the support of my caucus.”
- “I know that I have the support of my caucus.”
- “I'm very confident I have the full support of my caucus.”
- “I'm just saying to you, I have the support of my caucus.”
- “I talk to my caucus members all the time, and I have the full support.”
- “As I said to you, I have the full support of my caucus.”
News of the press conference performance had swept through Wellington political circles in almost as much time as the stand up lasted.
One journalist asked, “what do you say to MPs in your own party who are nervous about your performance…?”
“Can you tell me who they are?” he said. “Who are they?”
Signs point to a pool of National MPs concerned that if current polling numbers were replicated at the election, their caucus could shrink down to a size only slightly larger than that of 2020.
Politicians are not exempt from the plight of psychological egoism - and clearly, no one is selfless in politics. You are in Parliament for your party, your people, yourself.
And for many of these MPs, it is not only the state of their party or the likelihood of being able to govern after the next election that rattles them the most. The real rattler is the raised uncertainty of a job post-November.
Former Minister and United First leader Peter Dunne said MPs are constantly thinking of their own futures. "[Former Labour Prime Minister] Mike Moore used to joke that the three most uttered words in politics were, 'why not me?'
"MPs have that survival instinct… the party will be one thing, but the other thing will be, where do I finish in all of this? And if we're going to lose, why am I going to sit around and just let us sink into oblivion? Why don't I make a move to do something about it and hopefully save myself."
Dunne said it was likely there was internal polling looking at what seats were at risk, "and some of those MPs in those very marginal seats will be starting to get very twitchy..."
"All of those factors come into play, and that does inevitably give rise to a sense of desperation, whether that's wise or not is an entirely different question."
More recently, Luxon appeared to have shaken off the quite intensive leadership rumours circulating earlier this year as National’s polling dropped below 30%.
Luxon also appeared to have improved his media performance in the last week, which coincided with reports of the recruitment of Rachel Smalley as a communications advisor. In a media conference on Wednesday on fuel, Luxon cut most of the corporate speak he's famed for and was relatively clear on his messaging.
But on Friday, the rumours resurfaced sparked by the Herald’s frontpage story on leadership speculation, alongside a Talbot Mills corporate poll putting National at 29% to Labour’s 36%. Talbot Mills also does Labour’s internal polling.
Dunne said National was in a difficult position.
"If they stick around 30% they're not going to be very strong players in the future coalition the way they have been in the current one, so their long term positions are a bit weak.
"If they, on the other hand, change the leader, then history suggests that they will struggle to win the election. It’s a rock and a hard place."
Looking back to the 1997 coup where Jenny Shipley rolled then-PM, the late Jim Bolger, Dunne described the situation as "a bit like Dead Man Walking from the from the day she took over."
"What the public sees is a sense of disunity, and disunity is always fatal. While it might be people thinking about their own futures, the public just get a sense of this thing sort of falling apart, or they can't sort of pull themselves together... that's equally devastating."
28 Comments
Reading the paragraphs around the context surrounding Mike Moore’s quote it makes it quite obvious that MMP via the list introduced both a negative and an unwelcome aspect whereby Members of Parliament have become overly preoccupied with their status and future at the expense of their actual role and duty. Whereas before it was quite simple. Represent your electorate well, valuetheir confidence and respect their condition, and you will get re-elected. This complaining by those who entered politics, surely aware of the vagaries and uncertainties, to my mind identifies the typical career politicians that ars only in it for themselves.
The SOE Act (Geoffrey Palmer, no surprises there) went out of almost all ways possible to avoid Ministerial responsibility.
There are good alternatives:
https://www.nzinitiative.org.nz/reports-and-media/reports/who-runs-the-…
Hmm bit generous to act like pre-MMP MPs were all noble public servants. FPP had ambition, backstabbing and careerists too, just less obvious
Yes true back then there were the old safe seats occupied by some old dunces and duds but likely the tempo today of politics and events would quickly find them out and see them off. That is they wouldn’t be able to keep up, and it would show.
".. the tempo today of politics and events would quickly find them out and see them off."
Thats something of an optimistic assessment....people havnt changed.
Yeh fair point on the pace today, but thats prob due to smartphones and 24/7 media more than MMP
That’s my point. The media these days are so headline ambitious that a wayward, non performing, unpopular mp is asking for it and will get mostly likely get it, right out in the open where it hurts.
Ahh right, if that was the point all along, we got there in the end 👌
I would wager that this century the percentage of resignations and firings, across the board in parliament, has increased more than markedly and that is attributable to the greater scrutiny of the media and the activity of opposing parties due to the fast flowing data, information and accounts that are so readily accessible electronically and would be the same whether MMP or FPP.
Aye, less opportunity to pull the wool over the constituents given the speed of information today.
Aye - MMP wasn't voted in because the voters were happy.
I voted for MMP too. Call me a malcontent then, but I can’t say today that I feel decidedly more favourable about our parliament and the performers therein.
MMP wasn't the problem
Neoliberalism/growth, impacts thereof, were the pending problems - but nobody saw it like that (including me, back then).
No of course MMP itself doesn’t deserve the blame. My thoughts at the time was firstly the ongoing shenanigans by the previous governments of both parties could not continue and secondly that the list segment would allow and provide an improved balance and diversity in parliament and attract identities with valuable and practical experience who might not otherwise have the opportunity. The entrance of the initial Greens was thus encouraging. However all parties have persisted in introducing characters that to put it politely, were not fit for purpose and in my opinion the overall calibre has been diluted and integrity diminished.
The journalists of this country should be ashamed of themselves.
Humanity, on this finite planet, is an overshot species. The choices do not include more growth; the choices are controlled degrowth or uncontrolled.
But studiously avoiding that, they end up asking not who could best lead us through the bottleneck - but who might challenge whom as if there is no bottleneck.
The cock crowed three times, as I remember the story.
I am no fan of Luxon and I think what he stands for is stupid - ignorance in the extreme - but what we need leadership for is the bigger question than is Brutus approaching your back?
He will be rolled and after the election I think Willis will lose finance.
Bishop will be Leader, Mitchell deputy leader.
The lefty journos will celebrate with Chardonnay, but
Hippy will be next, Labour cannot win with him as leader, Auckland HATEs what Labour did under Covid. And jabbing our kids is now in his face. TPM is waring moko's and the Greens are trying as hard as possible to not be Man Bussy's (we have not forgotten).
What a cluster F we have on our hands.
Winnie, if he can live to the election, will be the winner.
*selective Aucklanders
Lets have a poll on that later in the year......
...includes my Auckland relative who now votes NZF/Winston. Absolutely the reason is that last Covid lockdown.
We may need a whiteboard for that post
Is it that Labour had Auckland in lockdown, or is it that Hipkins isn’t particularly inspiring? I reckon if they had a good leader (probably female) they’d get enough vote to only need the greens. Unfortunately for them they don’t really have anyone better than Hipkins.
Seems to be the same problem the world over, no inspiring leaders.
Their last female leader needs police protection when she travels back to NZ..........the world is over this woke equity based BS
no inspiring leaders. and
must be female...
like WTF lets limit the field even further to female black Indigenous lesbian poets...
Hint here the UK TORRIES have actually done this and seemingly have a winner...
we want capability, hence why NAct doesn't look great, the left look like a dumpster fire.
Hippy / Chloe / Who knows who is in charge? like who is injunctioning who in high court?
vs Winnie / Seymour / next Nat leader
its not a beauty contest for sure but IMHO the right wins a dirty game of rugby here.
I reckon their last leader would get more votes than Hipkins - if it wasn’t for the dickheads that require her to need police protection. Plenty of people hate Luxon, but they don’t threaten to kill him, because they aren’t fuckwits. Would be nice to run the election on democracy not death threats.
I didn’t say they must be female, but do remember about 50% of voters are female, and they’d probably prefer a female to vote for as much as you’d prefer a male. I think politics is becoming more gender based than ever before.
I wouldn’t really care what gender they are, but I do prefer the likes of Jacinda who wanted to make NZ a better place, compared to the very stale Luxon and Hipkins. You can’t honestly tell me NZ has got better under Luxon.
Probably the best part about Jacinda was her youth, she started to get stale towards the end too, so maybe we just need another very young leader.
You can’t honestly tell me NZ has got better under Luxon.
No. but we all know it would have got much worse under hippy, after JA ran away due to not enough gas in the tank...
Seems to have used a lot of hot air / gas internationally, now one comes back in Sydney? Hon degrees in being a female leader seem not to translate into international leadership roles after all? Why did the united nations not see the potential in one of the worlds greatest female leaders?
Looks like three talkback callers sharing one keyboard
Talkback banter is far more insightful than anything you get from the lanyard class.
He will be rolled and after the election I think Willis will lose finance
She's atrocious IMO. Way out of her league. A real product of dogmatic thought.
Is anyone else profoundly bored with the coverage of rumours and hearsay around the McPolitics of seat-warmer MPs largely ill-equipped for public service?
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.