sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

The need for and production of food isn't going away. Angus Kebbell says we should celebrate the work farmers do, and make sure the progress they make on climate change is science-based to protect global food security

Rural News / opinion
The need for and production of food isn't going away. Angus Kebbell says we should celebrate the work farmers do, and make sure the progress they make on climate change is science-based to protect global food security
happy beef farmer

Farming – it's more than just planting seeds and harvesting crops. It's a lifeline that feeds the planet. For non-farmers, when we sit down for a meal, how often do we think about where our food comes from? Behind every plate of food lies the dedication, hard work, and resilience of farmers.


Farming is the backbone of global food security. It's responsible for nourishing the billions of people who call this planet home. From rice paddies in Asia to wheat fields in the American heartland, farmers provide us with sustenance and life. Food security isn't just about having enough food; it's about having access to safe, nutritious, and affordable food. Farming is the bridge that connects us to this fundamental human need.

Furthermore, it’s important to remember that agriculture plays a significant role in the world economy. It's a source of livelihood for millions of people, directly and indirectly. It fuels local economies, providing jobs and income. In developing countries, agriculture is often the primary source of income for rural communities, lifting them out of poverty and improving their quality of life.

However, despite its importance, farming is facing severe challenges worldwide, and here in New Zealand we are no exception. Farmers everywhere are grappling with increasing input costs and growing policy pressures.

Our picturesque landscapes often belie the struggles farmers are dealing with, including the skyrocketing costs of production. The price of fertiliser, fuel, and other essential inputs has surged, eating into their profits.

Adding to their woes are the policies that seem to create more hurdles than support. Many regulations and taxes are making it harder for farmers to maintain their operations. In the pursuit of sustainability, they often feel caught between a desire to protect the environment and the need to make ends meet.

So, what's the solution? It's clear that policies should be designed to support rather than hinder farmers. This isn't just a New Zealand issue; it's a global one.

Governments can play a pivotal role in crafting policies that promote sustainable farming practices and ensure farmers can thrive economically.  

Additionally, public awareness and appreciation for the hard work of farmers are crucial. When we value our farmers and the food they provide, we're more likely to support policies that make their jobs easier rather than harder.

Climate change is a big topic and one farmers are having to cope with on many fronts is significant and the global understanding of climate change science has evolved significantly since New Zealand’s targets were set in 2019.  

B+LNZ, along with Federated Farmers and DairyNZ, has been working with leading climate scientists from Oxford University, to inform a submission to the Climate Change Commission (CCC) on New Zealand’s methane targets.

With the CCC set to review New Zealand’s methane reduction targets in 2024 in line with the Zero Carbon Act, Federated Farmers, B+LNZ, and DairyNZ have commissioned research to help inform the conversation and are asking the CCC to take this new research into account and set targets based on a climate warming approach. This research will help work out the most appropriate way agriculture can contribute to New Zealand’s climate goals.

The study, led by internationally respected climate scientist Professor Myles Allen, measured the warming impact of New Zealand’s current methane targets.  

Allen is a Professor of Geosystem Science at the University of Oxford, Director of the Oxford Net Zero Initiative, and has been described by the BBC as ‘the physicist behind net zero’.

“The report tells us that the current reduction targets could see methane offset all of the expected additional warming from carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide from the entire New Zealand economy,” says Jim van der Poel, Chair of DairyNZ.

“Essentially the current targets would see New Zealand peak its warming in the 2030s and reverse back to 2022-27 levels which is well ahead of most other countries which are currently aiming to achieve peak warming (‘net zero’) from 2050. 

“The research is a critical contribution to the conversation about climate change and raises serious equity concerns for farmers who may be being asked to do more of the heavy lifting, and bear more of the cost, than other parts of the economy.  

“We need to be taking a science-led approach to the targets and its important they reflect the impact each gas will have on warming,” says van der Poel. 

The study also considered what level of reductions would be required for methane from New Zealand to make no further contribution to global warming.

Farming is the bedrock of global food security and a linchpin of the world economy. Farmers worldwide, including those here in New Zealand, face growing challenges, from rising input costs to complex policies. It's imperative that governments and societies alike recognise the importance of farming and work together to create policies and pathways that support rather than hinder food producing nations.

Listen to the podcast to hear the full version.

Angus Kebbell is the Producer at Tailwind Media. You can contact him here.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.


Good read Angus. Thanks.

A personal perspective on developing nations and poverty alleviation.

The measures by which poverty are measured in 'developing' countries are fundamentally a western 'deveoped' nation complex construct - asserting what we enjoy and take for granted is right and good and that all people should aspire to achieve equivalence.  Seems to me the strongest driver, couched in cosy terminology, is to expand markets and profits for those deveoped western nations - blindly following the, ultimately fatally flawed notion that there must always be growth.

Spending 2 years in East Timor working with remote rural,  subsistence, agricultural communities, the focus was improving food security and the nutritional value in the diet of those communities.

By many western measures of development, those communities were impoverished.  Yet, by and large, the communities were healthy, with surprising longevity, and exhibited a contentment that a westerner would struggle to achieve in such context.

By contrast, in the city of Dili,  the place of opportunity for the younger generation and essentially a monetarised population, there were arguably greater issues around food insecurity and poor health outcomes.

The more I reflect on my time in East Timor the further I move from seeing such 'under deveoped/lesser deveoped' nations as needing to be fixed by western development aid, and move more toward viewing such countries as offering valuable lessons to western countries on finding contentment.

I reflect on the wastage in our throw away society and conclude that we are moving irrevocably toward collapse of the western capitalism system and that is going to be bloody.



A future Labour-Green government will bring in a wealth tax.  That will be the finish of NZ agriculture, and the export earnings it provides so that Kiwis and import computers, i-phones and all the rest.  Farms will have to pay GST, income tax and the wealth tax on the value of all assets each year, including the family home (Green policy).  This will be the finish of most farms.