Some farmers are feeling let down by government after the recommendations from the select committee on military-styled weapons have been announced.
The particular piece that they are at odds with is that only .22 calibre rifles (or less) are allowed to be semi-automatic and with a magazine capable of holding 10 shells or less. Any larger calibre rifles are only to be used by licensed contractors.
To be fair to the government, from my recollection, at no point did they indicate that higher calibre semi-automatic rifles would be allowed, and it would have been incredibly naive to think otherwise. The only animals needing these weapons are likely to be goats with possums and rabbits quite able to be culled by .22 or shot guns.
According to DOC feral goats occupy about 14% of the land area on New Zealand and about half of this is conservation land. Their numbers while uncertain may range up to several hundred thousand.
While a semi-automatic rifle may be effective, I can’t help but wonder how much these would be used in reality on most farmland. The schedule for goat meat now $4.70 in the North Island which equates to around $70 for a reasonable goat. Surely if the goat populations are so great that semis are required then it would be far more productive to muster the goats and sell them.
In the early 1980’s on the North Island East Coast and around the Wairoa region when the demand for feral goats, particularly white and black ones, went crazy as a means to upgrade to angora and cashmere flocks, shepherds and farmers alike spent many a weekend supplementing income by mustering the goats in and were so effective in reducing the goat numbers, the blackberry and gorse, a problem in the best of times, went crazy when the goats were removed.
Covers only got back under control when the goats returned when hunting pressure was removed several years later.
My point is if landowners are really serious about removing goats from farmland then there are more effective and profitable ways to do it than shooting them.
DoC land is a different situation and it is likely contractors have been used in the past to cull these areas and so for here nothing has changed. As someone who when younger did his fair share of hunting I struggle to understand why some people seem so hell bent on hanging on to semis for what can only be construed as pandering to their egos.
In another attack on a farming staple tool glyphosate or Round-Up is having a major battle in the US where the courts are not waiting for science to provide evidence and are finding in favour of applicants who are suing the chemical giant Monsanto.
These claims range from US$63 mln to US$80 mln after one claim got reduced from US$273 mln awarded by to jury. The FDA’s latest report completed in 2016 and published in 2018 said “We analyzed for glyphosate and glufosinate residue levels in 274 grain corn, 267 soybean, 113 milk, and 106 egg samples. No samples contained violative levels of glyphosate or glufosinate; and no residues were found in the milk and egg samples.”
And the yet the courts found in favour of the plaintives.
Only three have made it to court so far but allegedly there are 11,000 queuing in the wings claiming glyphosate-based herbicides such as Round-Up cause non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and Monsanto has hidden the risks and manipulated the scientific record. It appears that the courts have given more weight to a report by epidemiologist Beate Ritz, professor at the University of California Los Angeles School of Public Health, which casts doubts on the methodology Monsanto used to conduct their tests as to whether glyphosate posses health risks and also a review by Dennis Weisenburger, a pathologist specializing in studying the causes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and the potential linking of it to glyphosate.
Monsanto has appealed the courts decisions and has made its research reports available to try and win the science battle. No doubt the ‘debate’ will be continued for some time yet.
From a farming perspective clarification over the safety or overwise of glyphosate needs to be quick and correct as it is too valuable a tool to be banned on whims but also too common to be used if there are serious dangers associated with it.