sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

ANZ NZ December quarter profit rises 33% to $393 mln

Bonds
ANZ NZ December quarter profit rises 33% to $393 mln

ANZ New Zealand has posted a 33% rise in unaudited first quarter profit as expenses fell, income rose and the bank recorded a write back, rather than a provision, for credit impairment.

The bank says profit after tax for the three months to December 31, 2013 rose $$97 million, or 33%, to $393 million from $296 million in the same period of the previous year.

In a statement ANZ attributed its rising profit to "gathering economic improvement," increased lending, lower provisions for bad debts, plus reduced costs and productivity gains from its simplification programme, which included putting the ANZ and National banks on one IT platform in late 2012, phasing out the National Bank brand, and reducing the number of products offered to customers.

"The successful merger of the ANZ and National Bank brands and technology systems has enabled the business to continue growing deposits and lending, including market share growth in mortgages," ANZ said.

December quarter net interest income rose $33 million, or 5%, to $688 million. Total operating income was up $49 million, or 6%, to $896 million.

Operating expenses were cut $26 million, or 7%, to $372 million. And the bank booked a write back of $19 million versus a credit impairment of $44 million in the December quarter of 2012.

Mortgage growth strong

Residential mortgage lending increased by just under $1.3 billion, or 2.3%, to almost $57.9 billion. Lending where borrowers had a deposit of less than 20% fell $380 million, or 2.8%, to just under $13.1 billion, representing 22.6% of ANZ's total home loan book. At nearly $1.3 billion,

ANZ's December quarter volume growth was more than double that of its nearest rival, which was Westpac's $477 million.

ANZ grew gross loans by $1.4 billion, or 1.4%, in the three months to December 31 to $102.25 billion. Term deposits rose $392 million, or 1.2%, to $34.254 billion. Total deposits and other borrowings, including UDC Finance's debenture stock and commercial paper, rose $3.4 billion, or 4%, to almost $81.1 billion.

The bank said its cash profit surged $101 million, or 32%, to $416 million. Cash profit excludes what the bank terms non-core items and tends to be the major Australasian banks' preferred measure of profitability. However, the way cash profit is reported has come under fire from some banking analysts.

Here's ANZ's full release.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

8 Comments

Compared to the other banks and the staff employed, not such a high profit.  However the big 4 Australian banks take out of the country something like $2.5b tax paid dollars per year and employ ony about 22,000 staff.  That is about $114,000 tax paid proffit per employee.  - seems extortionate to me. 

Up
0

Chris - seems to me the amount of profit per employee is totally irrelevant as they fund and apply capital to do so on a ship load of NZs assets. The measure that counts to my mind is their return on that equity that they are supplying to NZ to fund those assets?  where does it sit in the spectrum of NZ public companies ....averagely ?

Up
0

Grant, comparing a much higher leveraged banks' return on equity to a retailer, electricity generator and retailer, telco, airport, casino operator or building materials maker and distributor doesn't seem like comparing apples with apples to me.

A much better comparison is comparing NZ banks to ones from similar economies (ie the so-called developed world). If you do that you'll probably find the major NZ banks' ROE at the top end with their Aussie parents and the major Canadian banks.

Cheers.

 

Up
0

Good point Gareth, but quality of management on those respective countries will be a factor between them as well. It would be good to look at the net interest margins in those respective countries to really get a feel for why they sit where they do.

Up
0

I actually think ROA is the best measure for banks because it eliminates what are sometimes wild variations in levels of equity/leverage ratios from bank to bank.

Up
0

Low level comment deleted, Ed. Please see our commenting policy here - http://www.interest.co.nz/news/65027/here-are-results-our-commenting-po…

Thanks.

Up
0

Healthy profits will allow the banks to make discount rebates to their customers,  just as Woolworths can revisit redesign prices to suppliers after their profits were not enough. 

So borrowers who have been faithful borrowers for a decade could expect a $1000 reward,say, instead of giving it to new customers. 

Up
0

Bonuses all round then?

The cleaners already got an extra 50c the other week, so they are fine!

 

Up
0