
The Reserve Bank should cut its benchmark interest rate to 2.25% to reignite the housing market and construction sector, former Prime Minister John Key says.
Key told Auckland business leaders that the central bank had held rates too low during the pandemic and then too high once inflation began to cool, according to a story in NZ Herald.
“Interest rates are too high. I don’t want to sound like Donald Trump telling off Jerome Powell but they should be 100 basis points lower,” Key reportedly said.
The RBNZ held the Official Cash Rate at 3.25% after its July meeting, pausing after six consecutive cuts from a high of 5.5% a year ago.
Financial markets imply traders expect another 25 basis point cut this year and a strong chance of a further cut by early 2026.
Some economists think the central bank will need to go further, forecasting the key rate will eventually fall to 2.5%. Others believe high headline inflation could prompt the RBNZ to stop at 3% after its next meeting.
High frequency indicators suggest New Zealand’s economy hit a road-bump in the June quarter after six months of steady recovery. RBNZ’s real-time GDP forecast predicts a 0.3% contraction over the past three months.
Monetary policy typically takes 12 to 18 months to fully affect the real economy, but many expected a quicker response as more households had shifted to short-term mortgage rates.
The housing market has barely budged with prices actually still falling in real-terms. Key pointed to this as being a potential cause of the weak recovery.
“If you want to get things going, the core of what’s wrong is the housing market. The guts of what’s wrong is that the housing market is going down, not up,” Key said.
Homeowners claimed they wanted houses to become more affordable, but in reality were only willing to borrow and spend their own money if values were rising.
“When house prices go up, everybody tells the pollsters, ‘Oh that’s terrible, my son or daughter can’t buy a house. I feel really bad. The technical term for that is ‘bulls***’,” Key said.
Conscious uncoupling
This all puts the former Prime Minister at odds with the new generation of National Party leadership, which has resolved to bring down the cost of housing relative to wages.
Housing Minister Chris Bishop said he wants to decouple house prices from economic growth.
Both rents and purchase prices have been declining, although this may be more related to the economic downturn and net migration than policy reforms.
Various economists told interest.co.nz it was possible for the economy to bounce back without house prices climbing significantly, but it would be a slower recovery.
This is not just because of the link between asset values and consumer spending, but also the impact it has on the construction sector.
Malcolm Fleming, the chief executive of NZ Certified Builders Association, said the sector was only now nearing the bottom of the cycle. Almost half of respondents to a recent survey still expected conditions to worsen.
Work on new homes had largely dried up, and most members were focused on alterations and additions. Just 33% of firms reported less work than a year ago, down from 55% in the previous survey, suggesting the slowdown was easing.
Construction firms have expressed frustration at the Coalition Government for cancelling many of Labour’s infrastructure and housing projects without having alternatives ready.
Only $10.2 billion was spent on physical assets such as roads, hospitals and schools in the first nine months of this fiscal year, 21% less than planned. Money committed to projects in the full year was $16.1 billion, down from $18.9 billion the prior year.
On Sunday, Government ministers announced $6 billion of infrastructure work set to start before the end of the year, which may help address the underspend, though not the overall budget.
Lanyards vs hard hats
This was likely aimed at fending off opposition attacks which blame the Coalition for the prolonged downturn in construction activity.
During a debate last Wednesday, Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins asked Prime Minister Christopher Luxon if he stood by the promise of “fewer lanyards and more hard hats” — a reference to cutting policy jobs in Wellington.
“If so, why does the Builder Sentiment report show a consistent decline in demand under his leadership, resulting in 15,000 fewer construction jobs?”
Luxon responded by saying it was high interest rates which had negatively impacted the construction and building industry. But there were $125 billion of projects currently under construction and a pipeline worth $207 billion to come.
John Key also had an indirect political warning for his successor. Many tradespeople were working three-days a week and none of them could afford Christmas holidays.
“To win an election, you have to win where the tradies live … Don’t worry about Remuera, don’t worry about anywhere else,” he said.
17 Comments
No, JK is talking out of his self interest, thats nicer than saying talking out of his ....
JK, You might have a trump like personality cult following but friggin stay from giving directions to the RB would ya
Trump has publicly vowed to lower house prices and make homeownership more affordable for Americans, framing high housing costs as a key component of the cost-of-living crisis.
Trump’s platform includes cutting costly building regulations (which he claims account for 25–40% of new home construction costs) and opening portions of federal land for new housing development, both designed to stimulate supply and, theoretically, lower prices. An executive order to this effect was signed early in his second term.
https://thehill.com/business/housing/5244326-trump-housing-crisis-polic…
AKA, please bailout my son, the now sad property developer. His Chow mates (previous sexytime shop owners) would appreciate it too.
He wants to be rich lister, high flyer magnate by 35.
11boomer & nzgecko have it spot on above. Keys overriding self interest was well demonstrated over his 3 terms of laissez faire hands off policy failures
“If you want to get things going, the core of what’s wrong is the housing market. The guts of what’s wrong is that the housing market is going down, not up,”
As I've said before, the Ponzi is the be all and end all. At least Lord Key has the kahunas to say it. Jacinda was schooled about it behind the scenes. But everyone should understand that if you put all your bets on black you can't simply walk away. You have to back that bet until you win.
My opinion is John is part of the problem and not part of the solution. The sooner he and his ilk no longer get publicity, the better off as a country we will be. He just wants to double down on the problem (more debt) instead of looking to the future and saying 'hey what is going to be sustainable in the long term and how do we set the country up to be better for future generations'.
John is the definition of crony capitalism.
- Ex prime minister, promotes housing bubble for political gain.
- Moves to board of largest bank with most debt issued to housing market, promoting lending into a housing bubble (then jumps ship as soon as he see's housing market is in trouble)
- Sets up sons Real Estate gig. Tries to use his popularity to sway public opinion on what direction interest rates should go for his and his own financial benefit.
John is a machiavellian crony capitalist.
Sadly it worked wonders for his bank balance.
My personal opinion is that we need to do the opposite of what the likes of John Key suggest. He's got his way for decades (ever lower interest rates) and become extremely wealthy as a result of being in the right place at the right time (entering the work force when interest rates peaked in the early 80's) and look at where that has got us...
Sure if lower rates were the solution to our problems then after 4 decades of ever lower rates our economy should be flying! But it is not.
I think John like many other suffer from recency and confirmation bias - assuming that what has happened in the past is the solution to our current problems eg lower rates. But that is only because it is all he has known his entire working life. It has meant easy sailing with tail winds his entire career - constantly being bailed our by lower interest rates instead of improved productivity.
At some point you actually need to fix the underlying problem (private debt levels vs productivity/GDP) instead of ignoring that issue and just saying 'lets cut rates so we can keep issuing more and more debt'.
OK. I concede that Lord Key's self interest and reputation are at stake. But I don't think my position about the "be all and end all" is wrong and I'm giving his Lordship the benefit of the doubt that he's referring to the trade-offs of keeping the Ponzi alive by any means necessary. We are not Japan in that we can soldier on economically on our industrial strength and power. I will accept that you could kneecap the Ponzi overnight and the immediate repercussions would not be noticeable. But trust me bro, it wouldn't take long. I can assure you of that.
Market forces are greater than any of our thoughts or opinions (and John Keys now he's no longer in a position of direct influence).
I think he's a symptom of something economic and culturally that has gone very wrong in the west these past few decades.
Lord Key made most of his moolah at Merrill Lynch in the 90s performing and running teams on foreign exchange. Now I'm not expert on institutional forex trading, but it's largely about very many very small wins on large hedged positions while ensuring you don't take a bath on long tail events. Eeking out that extra gain, however small, is where you get rewarded and recognized. FWIK, his Lordship is not a quant savant, but I suspect he has good trading intuition and understanding of mkt behavior. And anyone who knows the industry will understand that luck can play a part in one's success or failure.
Arguably, Lord Key was never a Ponzi cheerleader until quite late in the game. In fact, it seemed to be a concern of his early on.
Phoenix...yep, JK might be feathering his own nest, or Max's nest, or some old banking pals nests, but right or wrong at least he's discussing it.
Unlike the echo chamber of the interest comments section, how good would it be if some punters on here were to offer genuine alternative ideas to getting NZ's economy going...apart from the classic invest in productive assets not property...I would love to see a map out of our current woes and into a prosperous future for all kiwis without property/construction playing a significant part. And a tip on what "productive asset" to invest in wouldn't be bad either.
Many of us have. Go have a read of the original Morgan TOP policy and in particular the need to spread the tax burden and remove the property bias.
It's all there if you wanna look ..... and analyse with some open minded thinking.
This does seem like an Inverse Cramer type scenario
This public comment really just screams "sell out" to Banking interest. Perhaps he had stock options in his in his time as Chair of ANZ NZ.
Key was a favourite for some years and was so popular he could have push through reform this country needed.
Instead he wasted it, preferring to be Hosking's bestie.
Needs to move to Hawaii permanently.
Hosk today on the ZB was cheering on for rate cuts........we all know the Hosk has put it all on black with his recent and late to party (too late tbh) investment ponzi properties.
As it all falls apart at the seams, the Oneroof cabal wheel out the 50cal: Jk to jam his thumb in the busting property sectors, over ripe and preggers Dam
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.