sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

China sensitive about crop reporting; Japan and Australia take China to WTO court; Delta variant threat rises; another large supply chain threat; UST 10yr stays at 1.44%; gold and oil soft; NZ$1 = 69.3 USc; TWI-5 = 72

China sensitive about crop reporting; Japan and Australia take China to WTO court; Delta variant threat rises; another large supply chain threat; UST 10yr stays at 1.44%; gold and oil soft; NZ$1 = 69.3 USc; TWI-5 = 72

Here's our summary of key economic events over the weekend that affect New Zealand with news there are new or renewed threats to the global recovery emerging.

But first in China, reports are filtering out that Beijing is detaining and arresting analysts who report on crop yields. This sort of work is very hard to do unless you tour and observe crop regions first hand (which is how it is done is most countries). But independent reports have been snuffed out in China over the past few weeks. It does raise the question about why Beijing needs to be so heavy handed on this arcane, technical corner of market assessments.

China is looking to grow its passenger car market by +10% this year. And a key part of that is an expected nearly +50% surge in sales of new energy vehicles. This rise would put them on track to sell a quarter of all cars as NEVs by 2025. Lithium mining is set for an even bigger boost if this transpires and lithium mining is an especially dirty process at present. If SRI funds aim to avoid polluters, why should they think battery cars are 'green'? At present, Australia is the top lithium miner and China's NEV drive will benefit them most. Although most of the known lithium reserves are in South America.

Despite its drive to control commodity prices, China is still not getting iron ore or coal prices down. Threats against 'speculators' are growing, but so far it seems this latest rise is more a reaction to regulators limiting supply.

As we have reported previously, Australia is challenging the Chinese tariffs on barley aimed at it. Now Australia is doing the same at the WTO against the Chinese for the tariffs the middle kingdom has applied against it for its wine exports. Neither action will be resolved soon and if the decisions go against China they will almost certainly appeal, stringing out the 'illegal' tariffs. But Australia's action won't be impressing Beijing as it ramps up its efforts to stand up to them. Beijing isn't used to being challenged.

They are also annoyed at Japan who have started an action against Chinese tariffs on stainless steel products.

In Australia, an influential economist now says their official cash rate will start rising in 2023.

Separately in Australia, their largest home loan lender has told brokers that they will assess borrowers on the basis of a 6.77% mortgage rate. This is now well above the assessment floors of the other major banks in Australia where ANZ is at 5.1%, Westpac 5.05% and NAB 4.95%. (We have an update of New Zealand serviceability test levels here.)

In Germany, producer prices are zooming higher, with input prices up +7.2% in May from the same month a year ago. That is their steepest annual rise in 13 years.

In virus news, the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) that first emerged in India, is now in a serious surge in Russia and parts of Europe, especially in the UK where it is well established. A key concern is its ease and speed of transmission. This is the strain raging in Fiji now and the one causing concern in Sydney. It is also causing concern in the US.

In the US, a key Federal Reserve official said that he sees the first rate hike by the American central bank coming as early as 2022. This is way earlier than the recent indications from the Fed's own meeting dot-plot. Some people like the new shift. But it is a view that unnerved Wall Street, delivering an almost -1% retreat. Oddly, bond markets reacted by driving down yields, an unexpected shift.

Along the US-Canada border, there are two events to report that affect trade. First, the Americans are unhappy the Canadian government is keeping the border closed to people movements based on the pandemic risks. But perhaps more importantly, the Lake Ontario/St Lawrence Waterway levels are now so low they are affecting shipping in one of the world's busiest waterways. This is adding to supply-chain difficulties and adding to shipping costs with echoes internationally.

Canadians took out almost C$18 bln worth of new mortgage debt in April, the fastest monthly increase on record and enough to bring their total housing debt to almost C$2 tln and a +7.8% annual rise. (In Australia, and economy just slightly smaller than Canada, total housing debt exceeds AU$1.8 tln, and it is rising at about +6% pa.)

The UST 10yr yield starts today down -1 bp at 1.44% and giving up all of its gains since mid-June. The US 2-10 rate curve is holding at +119 bps. Their 1-5 curve is also unchanged at +80 bps, while their 3m-10 year curve is still at +140 bps. The Australian Govt ten year benchmark rate starts today at 1.51% and down another -2 bps. The China Govt ten year bond is still at 3.15%. And the New Zealand Govt ten year is now at 1.80% and unchanged at its higher level.

The price of gold starts at US$1764/oz which is down another -US$4/oz from this time Saturday.

Oil prices are a little softer at just over US$71/bbl in the US, while the international Brent price is just over US$72.50/bbl. The slow pick-up in drilling rigs in operation accelerated last week. In North America, there are now 300 more operating than this time last year, so they have now more than doubled in that time and are back to year-ago levels.

The Kiwi dollar opens today at 69.3 USc and starts this week a full -2c lower than this time last week, its lowest since November 2020. It is really all about a surging greenback. Against the Australian dollar we are little-changed at 92.7 AUc. Against the euro we are unchanged at 58.5 euro cents. That means our TWI-5 starts today at just 72 and a six month low.

The bitcoin price is now at US$34,555 and down another -3.0% from this time Saturday and -11% lower than this time last week. Volatility in the past 24 hours has been very high at +/- 4.2%.

The easiest place to stay up with event risk today is by following our Economic Calendar here ».

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs

Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
End of day UTC
Source: CoinDesk

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

47 Comments

Congratulation to Jacinda Arden and Mr Orr for making NZ on top of the list for Housing Bubble in the world :

https://www.domain.com.au/news/these-are-the-biggest-housing-bubbles-in…

And this lady's main election promise was to solve housing crisis.

Power corrupts.

Up
0

With the pandemic turning off the immigration tap for over a year where is the demand side being driven from?

Is it still not clear that this is all about supply of credit into residential housing? Turn that tap back and you will start to fix the problem - though the squealing of the banks and all other cheerleaders will be deafening.

Up
0

For many developed countries, the price ratios are now higher than they were before the financial crisis

Evidence that everything that led to 2008 has been amplified rather than fixed.

Up
0

Population growth in 2020 was still 100,000 people (and natural increase is only 25 or 30,000). Far too soon to stop blaming the demand side.

Up
0

Source? Stats NZ report the increase for 12 months to March 2021 was 33k down from 118k in 2020. Net migration was negative.

Up
0

Yep, take a look at the chart in the article on the front page of Interest about migration settings. 2020 was a big year for population growth.

https://www.interest.co.nz/news/110931/productivity-commission-outlines…

Up
0

Not sure you're looking in the right place. See here for monthly migration figures, which have collapsed since March 2020.

Maybe the graph you refer to is until March 2020 - look at the collapse on the same graph for 2021.

Up
0

It's "still not clear" if you're invested balls deep in real estate.
Last week the local (very prominent) REA sent out a newsletter with an open letter to Jacinda Ardern. Key points were: don't try to control house prices, remove all(!) LVR restrictions to allow everyone to buy a house.
Incredibly stupid or disingenuous? Take your pick. Hint: that REA has had her name on about every other sale in the area for the past several years. She can't be stupid.

Up
0
Up
0

NZ First have been saying for years that NZ could not sustain immigration at the levels allowed and this was a key element of their going with Labour which also wanted to reduce immigration. Unfortunately Labour did not keep to their side of the bargain. NZF is not anti immigration it prefers a more measured approached that would ensure the infrastructure and housing could keep pace with the expanding population. National is all growth and never mind the cost to the environment or quality of life. Labour are more concerned with enabling the minorities and following UN policies with no real regard to the majority of the people of New Zealand.
Allowing more and more people into NZ and ever increasing debt for short term gains to a few is a reckless approach to the future of this country.

Up
0

And yet they had their chance in power to do something about the numbers, but it never happened.

Up
0

You fail to realise that they did not have the numbers with in the coalition to make it happen.

Up
0

After Winnies latest speech i'd pick a surge in NZ First support. He can read the mood.

Up
0

I never thought I would be a WP fan, but I am. I realise that Labour really did need the hand-break of NF.

Up
0

It's pretty crowded with political parties chasing that segment of voters - Act, National and now NZ First.

Up
0

Agreed, but National simply 'don't get it'. I truly believed when they went into damage control meetings after their election loss, they would clean up their house and get rid of the dead wood. Why on earth didn't they get rid of the likes of Gerry Brownlee? As an optimist, I thought that National would have wanted to reinvent themselves. Tui moment.

Up
0

Yes National are a lost cause at the moment, if things don't change significantly they will be irrelevant in 2023.

The most frustrating part of this for me is that bar having probably the most human leader of political party ever, Labour has done just about everything wrong. They have been a catastrophe but National is making them look good!

I like what Winnie says and as you say he can read the currents but he is pretty unelectable to those under 40 and so won't get much momentum. Looking like another wasted fringe vote for me.

Up
0

Not only not getting rid of dead wood. Not helping themselves when they have a genuine opportunity to renew.

https://www.newsroom.co.nz/pro/national-party-all-out-of-love-for-retur…

Effectively makes a statement about Collins' priorities & values

Up
0

I'm more generous to Ardern than that. I don't think that they are corrupt, instead they are well meaning but incompetent.

They did not understand that implications of the actions taken to get asset owners spending, then got upset when the expected scenario played out. I think it is more surprise than deviousness, shown up by the next steps they took, rash and silly targeting of their "enemies", and again failed to understand that the impacts of their actions would be on renters.

They remind me of Harry Enfield's classic character [Tim - nice but dim]

Up
0

Beijing isn't used to being challenged.
Hmmmm,,, - The US’s greatest danger isn’t China. It’s much closer to home

The greatest danger we face today is not coming from China. It is our drift toward proto-fascism. We must be careful not to demonize China so much that we encourage a new paranoia that further distorts our priorities, encourages nativism and xenophobia, and leads to larger military outlays rather than public investments in education, infrastructure, and basic research on which America’s future prosperity and security critically depend.

There is More to BlackRock Than You Might Imagine
How Biden Can Leverage Missile Defense in His Summit with Putin

Up
0

Too late? A common tool of Governments to distract their populations from internal issues (seizures of power) is to create an external threat. The US has been doing it since the 50's, it is clear the CCP is doing it, Russia does it - nothing changes. It is how a powered elite hold onto their power. The trick for populations and media is to recognise the problem, call it for what it is, and use elections to hold Governments to account. Not as easy as it sounds!

Up
0

Never too late when it comes to sanctions related to expensive US LNG gas exports to Europe versus cheap Russian pipeline gas - Diplomat: US anti-Russian sanctions meant to resolve problems of its own uncompetitiveness

Up
0

"It eerily reminds of the 1979 Peter Sellers film character, Chauncey Gardiner, in Being There" That is such a great line from the journal-neo. link. I'm sad laughing but it makes so much sense.

Up
0

China last week on here reported 3-4 times annual increase in sorghum and corn imports. I smell a rat

Up
0

Whoever created the video simulation of the Three Gorges Dam collapsing in link three will be on their way to a re-education camp. Crazy scary stuff.

Up
0

I’d say a food shortage is on the cards in China soon enough and they’d rather their people starve than import corn from Aussie.

Up
0

Build to rent
Safe haven
Etc
Take a look at first quarter of Mauldin article
Perhaps this explains partially how demand exploded without immigration, apart from leverage and QE of course

https://ggc-mauldin-images.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/pdf/TFTF_Jun_19_202…

Up
0

"China looking to grow its passenger car market" That seems a short sighted thing to do. Modernising itself by going backwards.

Up
0

"China is looking to grow its passenger car market by +10% this year. And a key part of that is an expected nearly +50% surge in sales of new energy vehicles."

I am guessing that their 50% of 10% growth is still 2-3 times more than the entire combined fleet of NZ.

Up
0

When they have bargain priced popular EV like Hong Guang Mini EV,at $6500 NZ equivalent pricing, and those selling at 40000 units a month,maybe they can get to 50% new sales . Actually..if our rebate is $8500 on a new EV , why cant we land 10000 of them here? Getting paid to own one,at that price....rebate being 2k higher than the chinese locals purchase price...

Up
0

It's a death trap. Have a look at the crash tests, doesn't even have airbags.

Up
0

I looked into it,bit more than you,airbags can be fitted ,as options. I doubt its more a death trap than the tens of thousands of japanese micro-cars, that have been permitted to drive on nz roads for decades.But ,anyway, the options are there,for local use ,and its unlikely to be in high speed /motorway speed crashes. More urban 50 kmh crashes ,possibly,less as 50 km/h is aspirational speed in many urban driving situations..

Up
0

Missing the point that the sales pitch that we can replace ice with ev and carry on with individual car ownership as we always have is a lie.

Needs to go to PDK re-education camp..

Up
0

But like from yesterday. The problem we got is that until more baseload say hydro, is commissioned this next wave of EV are all coal powered.

Because any margin baseload demand increase (& network services) is like now met with coal from Indonesia.

Looks like we will have Coal Powered EVs for 10 to 20 years until the hydro baseload (from where) comes on line. This far out it could be nuclear.

# CPEV.

Up
0

Best get on with the lake onslow pumped hydro storage scheme. Equivalent to 25000 hornsdale mega batteries
https://i.stuff.co.nz/business/122319866/4-billion-lake-onslow-pumped-h…

Up
0

The use of coal is a temporary dry-year problem, not an ongoing issue. With climate change, dry years may become more frequent but we have time to address this by building Lake Onslow over the next 10 years.

Have a look here to see the amount of hydro capacity not being used:
https://www.transpower.co.nz/power-system-live-data

Also remember that using coal to create electricity to run EVs produces less emissions than petrol vehicles due to the greater efficiency of a power station running at constant load than a small petrol engine under varying load. https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikescott/2020/03/30/yes-electric-cars-are…

And remember that just refining oil at Marsden Point uses 230,000,000 kWh of electricity
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/power-spikes-could-cost-oil-refiner…

Just this week, a new windfarm was announced that has capacity equivalent to powering 375,000 EVs. Will be a while until we get enough people out of their diesel utes to reach that number.
https://evsandbeyond.co.nz/mercurys-turitea-wind-farm-will-power-375000…

Up
0

KMum, looking your Forbes link, it confirms the problem NZ has.
That the NZ use case of next wave of EV power demand in NZ is coming from coal.
- we are the exception noted.

........
Under current conditions, driving an electric car is better for the climate than conventional petrol cars in 95% of the world, the study finds.

The only exceptions are countries such as Poland, where the electricity network is still mostly based on coal-fired power generation.

In countries with a heavily decarbonised system such as Sweden and France, which have large amounts of renewable and nuclear generating capacity, the average lifetime emissions from electric cars are up to 70% lower than petrol cars, while in the UK, which is rapidly phasing out coal but still has a reasonable amount of gas-fired power plants, emissions are around 30% lower.

Up
0

Some things are worth addressing, some will have to be discarded, and some should be built pronto.

Firstly, yet-to-be-proven tech is out; we haven't the lead-time.
Secondly, BAU is not the yardstick; what we can maintain long-term, ex FF, is the yardstick (because they are leaving us)

Which means we should be asking what can be supplied in a sustainable long-term manner, how intermittently, and making our other plans around that. My guess is that Onslow is a legitimate build (but that a lot of EV drivers will object). My guess is that small-scale local generation will be most of the rest, build-wise. I'm guessing we will be overtaken by events before a Straight-cable upgrade/doubling happens. I'm guessing Tiwai is history, meaning the SI is potentially more resilient. I'm guessing we won't do half the coal-to- school-boiler type upgrades, for the same overtaken-by-events reason.

And as for what we do with the thousands of shiny 'I-am statements sitting parked fuel-less on the sides of countless roads, I dunno. Turn them into mobile chicken-coops on the regenerating ex-dairy paddocks? Night shelters for homeless bank economists?

Up
0

Thats the point the "should be built pronto", is not happening.

Its another tell for "climate change is life and death" being false or wrong.

Up
0

Onslow is important not just for the storage but also to add voltage support as more distributed (read PV) energy makes the grid less stable. Tiwai is an interesting card to play, 13% of current generation heads that way and next time we have the "will they won't they" pantomime "look out behind you!" we may actually have a critical need of that. If we don't do a good job of managing the grid it will be required simply to avoid the "fields of dreams" scenario you have described above but if we do manage to add local generation we might just have enough daylight left to look at it producing Green Hydrogen which would really enable us to cut emissions. (Heavy vehicles are heavy emitters and they are the ones who can best take advantage of fuel cells)

Up
0

Who do you see as responsible for managing the grid network?
And how are they doing (marks out of 10)?

If it was being done well, further hydro would be with us now, not this pump it up hill Onslow that may never be built or function as advertised.
If it was being done well, energy prices would be declining.

Up
0

As you may know we have a set of responsibilities so marks out of ten gets complex.

The Electricity Authority (EA) is responsible for the governance of the players and operations of the wholesale market. Transpower as the System Operator is charged with the operation of the grid and works with the Distributors to ensure supply quality. Gentailers have both a generation and a retail arm and are not accountable for much other than being wholesale market makers by the EA. Distributors are regionally responsible for the operation of the distribution arms of the network.

You can see the managing of the grid is bureaucratic and complex. Is it being done well? - if your timeline is 100 years and there is no technology disruption then yes - 8-9/10 based on the availability of supply. There is change upon us and so we will see how this complex system reacts to the introduction of 100% more demand in a shorter time period.

Hydro is a complete nightmare to get consented and the business case has not been there for some time. In the time you spend just getting hydro designed and consented you could have built a few wind farms and be earning a return. (see Meridian strategy) If we want Onslow done or indeed other hydro it will have to led by the government.

Energy prices have not reduced as we have made added a lot of cost to its delivery through the revisions of the market post ECNZ. In addition the cost has grown in line with inflation. Prices are unlikely to come back down unless there is major market change as at this time the market players are incentivised to increase the prices for their shareholders.

Up
0

HT - no.

Energy underwrites money; how many times does it take?

So NO energy will 'become cheaper' from now on.

Up
0

Kmum the Transpower link is as at now, lunchtime today. You are forgetting that lake levels are not correlated to electricity demand.
Low lake levels are a thing but not necessarily for the reason you suggest.

It a mistake to point to a now capacity & say, "I claim that for EVs." If your logic worked, no Indonesian coal would be imported now.

You say 10 years, same as my 10 to 20 years, before hydro comes on. During that 10 to 20 year period the next wave of EV are coal powered.

Up
0

Kmum, with the wind farm, you are missing the network services required by unreliable wind.

If you thinking was true, then EVs could only be charging while the windmills operated, had wind, and they would be everywhere. But as you see, no one relies on wind only as a power source, its too unreliable.

Up
0
Up
0