sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Statistics NZ reports GDP growth of 1.0% in March quarter and 3.3% for the year; slightly below economists forecasts

Statistics NZ reports GDP growth of 1.0% in March quarter and 3.3% for the year; slightly below economists forecasts
<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/">Image sourced from Shutterstock.com</a>

By Bernard Hickey

Statistics New Zealand has reported GDP grew 1.0% in the March quarter and rose 3.3% in the year ended March, which was slightly below economists' expectations for the quarter, but slightly stronger for the year as previous growth figures were upgraded.

The New Zealand dollar was solid above 87 USc after the result, which confirmed a buoyant outlook for interest rates. Economists said the result firmed expectations for another Official Cash Rate increase on July 24 before a pause until December.

The kiwi dollar had earlier risen half a cent after the US Federal Reserve lowered its growth outlook for 2014 and signalled continued low interest rates, making the New Zealand dollar's interest rates relatively more attractive.

Statistics NZ said strong construction industry growth was a big factor in the economy's expansion, which was the third consecutive quarter of growth of over 1% in the quarter.

"Construction activity grew 12.5%, due to large rises in residential and non-residential building. Growth in construction activity was strong in Canterbury and in the rest of the country," Statistics NZ said.

"Construction was responsible for two-thirds of GDP growth this quarter," national accounts manager Gary Dunnet said. "This is the largest increase in construction in 14 years."

The expenditure measure of GDP rose 1.3% in the March 2014 quarter. Growth in construction activity was reflected in a 2.1% rise in investment.

Rises in residential and non-residential building were partly offset by falls in plant, machinery, and equipment and intangible assets.

Spending by New Zealand households was flat, while spending by tourists increased 7.7%.

Growth in the March quarter from the same quarter a year earlier was 3.8%, slightly above market forecasts for 3.7% growth because of an upward revision in previous quarters.

Economist reaction

ANZ Senior Economist Mark Smith said the result was slightly weaker than market expectations and the Reserve Bank's forecast, but remained "strong and robust."

"While construction growth dominated in the quarter and services activity was soft, it’s typical for NZ to bounce around from quarter to quarter as the growth baton changes hands," Smith said.

"With growth in demand (3.8% annual) outstripping supply (we put the potential growth rate in the 2.75-3% range), there will remain pressure for the OCR to move up (so we’re still calling a July hike)," Smith said.

JP Morgan Economist Ben Jarman described the result as "very punchy numbers for an economy that has in the past struggled to generate much above 2% growth without inflation challenges," adding that average growth was likely to drift lower as exports settled and earthquake spending began to fade.

"As to what has changed that is allowing such a favourable growth-inflation trade-off, there are two main possibilities. One is that excess capacity is yet to be absorbed. The other is that robust migration inflows are boosting realized growth, but predominantly through a supply-side effect. That would be contrary to the last such experience in the middle of the 2000s, where migration forced a housing and broader inflation explosion before it noticeably contributed to the supply side," Jarman said, adding he favoured the latter supply-side effect explanation.

ASB Senior Economist Christina Leung said the result did not change ASB's view that the Reserve Bank would hike again in July before pausing until December.

"The 1.0% increase was a touch softer than our forecast of a 1.1% increase, but does not change our core view that the NZ economy remains on a solid footing," Leung said.

Political reaction

Finance Minister Bill English said the GDP was the latest in a run of encouraging indicators.

"We are making good progress but our long-term challenge is to make the enduring structural changes needed for New Zealand to reach its economic potential," English said.

Green Party Co-Leader Russel Norman said economic growth was only benefiting a few.

"Average power prices have also risen by $360 under National, while nearly half the workforce didn’t get a pay rise last year," Norman said.

"New Zealand is the only developed country hiking interest rates right now, attracting hot money, pushing up the dollar, and undercutting our exporters," he said.

(Updated with more detail, reaction, NZ$ moves (corrects earlier link between GDP move and NZ$)

Economic growth

Select chart tabs

year on year real growth
quarter on quarter %
GDP nominal annual $mil
GDP nominal quarterly $mil
growth % per capita year on year
year on year real index
Source:

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

17 Comments

How much of that is Chch? and how much of taht Chch %  is inflationary driven by temporary shortages / high labour costs?

regards

Up
0

Ostrich

Many thanks.

Yes.

My mistake and apologies. I have corrected.

Bernard

 

Up
0

nzd/eu cross improved again.

Up
0

Spending by households was flat. 

Which will become flatter and flatter as increased mortgage repayments  kick in. 

Up
0

The majority of NZers do not have large mortgages.

For those who do, if they failed to take out insurance (ie: fix long term last year when blind freddy could see rises coming); then I don't have much sympathy.

Up
0

Regardless of when a household fixed the rises will reduce household spending. Fixing last year meant you paid more early in the cycle.  Perception of another 18 months of hikes will also suppress consumer spending. 

Up
0

Around May last year it was not difficult to negoitate 5 yr for 5.75%.

If borrowers chose not to, then they should have budgeted on 7% rates as a minimum when calculating how much they should borrow.

 

They should have structured their repayments based on this higher figure.

That way when rates rise their payments stay exactly the same.

Just that their principle repayments reduce as their interest repayment increases.

No effect on their household cashflow.

 

It ain't rocket surgery !

 

Up
0

Regardless of your good judgment and others' decisions  -  the reality on the ground for retailers, small businesses, service sector etc who run their businesses with the hope that most households will have some discretionary spending ,   they will notice that household spending will retract.  Refer back to the article  -  household spending was flat for the MArch quarter.   What will household spending be in the next quarter?

From an individual borrowers perspective  (which was not the main point) In a rising cycle  -  those that fixed at 5.9%  a year ago also missed out on 4.8% 12 month rates over the last year.  So they lost money up front -  you can't really win in the long run. 

 

Up
0

Which just goes to show that households should not over borrow.

If they do, they will be called into the headmaster's office for a lesson in cashflow management.

Well done Mr Wheeler for bringing this point home early, before the problem escalated further.

 

Up
0

So who is our democratically elected Minister of Finance?

Without healthy household spending, it is the business sector that will ultimately be 'punished'.

Up
0

Spottie, what you are saying is the correct way to do things, this is because you are educated/knowledgeable and or have experience and hindsight.  You are by a massive gap the minority of borrowers and then again a smaller number who have your knowledge and have large mortgages.

Mortgagebelt is correct, you will see a flattening or reducing in consumer spending going forward as OCR hikes it.

Even in my household where we have a $2000.00~ a fortnight discretionary spend (This is after every bill, expense and payment you can think of has been budgeted for IN ADVANCE) and guess what we are doing? Throwing it on the mortgage. We aren't going out for dinner, movies, buying clothes, cars holiday etc. We are 27yo and no kids – we are the people that SHOULD be spending etc.

 

Up
0

TfT

I don't believe it is bad long term for NZ Inc for you to be reducing debt rather than spending more on consumer items.

I am more towards  the other end of the age spectrum than you so don't worry , I am taking up your slack when it come to spending.

I plan on spending most of my investments rather than leave  them to someone else.

I have little doubt your frugal habits now will pay off big time if you have a family or as you get older.

 

 

 

Up
0

The time to fix for five years was 12 months ago.

I reckon in 4 years time when we look back and compare that scenario and floating from 2013-18, the fixing will be well ahead.

Up
0

On behalf of NZ Inc, I'd like to thank EQC and the wider insurance industry for our GDP numbers today. Without you this would not have been possible. Thank you once again.

Up
0

Next objective in boosting GDP,  Wellington?

Up
0

How much of this is real growth rather than an increase in money supply and population? GDP always strikes me as a bit of a dud metric.

Up
0
Up
0