Polls show National resilient after Collins resigation; Green sewage treatement pln; Labour says National's partners want NZ$42 bln of tax cuts

Polls show National resilient after Collins resigation; Green sewage treatement pln; Labour says National's partners want NZ$42 bln of tax cuts

By Bernard Hickey

With just over a fortnight to go until the September 20 election, here's my daily round-up of political news on Friday September 5, including signs National has brushed off the latest controversies in the opinion polls.

Two polls published on Friday suggested 'Dirty Politics' and the resignation of Judith Collins have not significantly hurt the Government's chances of re-election in just over a fortnight.

Fairfax's Stuff/Ipsos poll taken on September 3, well after the resignation of Collins, found support for National rose 3.4% to 54.2%, while support for Labour fell 1.8% to 24.3%.

Green rose 1.1% to 12.9% and New Zealand First fell 0.4% to 3.6%. Conservative fell a further 0.3% to 2.4% and is down 1% in the last 3 weeks.

In an article headlined "All over bar the shouting," Fairfax's Tracy Watkins wrote National was on track for a resounding win and Labour was set for a trouncing.

The NZ Herald's Digipoll published this morning found support for National fell just 0.6% to 50.1% in the third week of the election campaign, while Labour fell 0.3% to 23.8%. New Zealand First was the only major winner for the week, rising 1% to 6%.

Conservative rose 0.5% to 3.8% and Green was flat at 11.4%.

John Key told Audrey Young the results reflected a "huge fatigue factor" with 'Dirty Politics'. The Digipoll also found support for Labour had fallen to an all-time low of 18.4%.

Green plan for better sewage plants

The Green Party announced it would, if elected, invest NZ$20 million per year for 10 years to help smaller towns upgrade their sewage-treatment systems.

It said it would re-establish the Sanitary Works Subsidy Scheme (SWSS) for smaller communities, but with stronger environmental rules. It was set up in 2002 but wound up and closed down in 2013.

Sewage plants that posed health risks to towns would be prioritised, as would projects with land-based solutions. The maximum subsidy for eligible capital works would be 50% for towns of up to 2000, reducing proportionally to 10% percent for communities of up to 10,000.

“Families should be able to head down to their local swimming hole or beach and jump right in the water without worrying about getting sick,” said Green Party Co-leader Dr Russel Norman.

“We must stop National from using our rivers as drains, and establish or upgrade wastewater systems where needed," he said. 

“National is turning a blind eye to how the faecal and nutrient pollution from wastewater discharges are ruining our rivers and lakes. The major decline in our rivers and lakes over the past decade has largely been due to agricultural intensification. However, towns and cities have contributed to the pollution problem and need better wastewater systems."

Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) welcomed the Green policy, although said NZ$20 million would not be enough to alleviate the problems.

Whaledump signs off

The hacker known as Rawshawk announced on his Twitter account he would stop releasing documents hacked from Cameron Slater's account.

"By the time you read this, every device used in this operation will have been destroyed and disposed of along with all the decryption keys," Whaledump wrote.

"Don't try this at home.. unless you think it's important enough to risk 7 years in jail."

Whaledump's exit came on the eve of court proceedings brought by Cameron Slater to stop more publication of the hacked emails and messages.

Justice John Fogarty ruled that Whaledump/Rawshark could not release any more material, but he did not stop media organisations from continuing to report from material already obtained directly from the hacker.

Labour says National's partners' tax plans total NZ$42 billion

Labour Finance spokesman said National's potential partners, Conservative, ACT and United Future, had promised tax cuts that would cost at least NZ$42 billion and possibly as much as NZ$50 billion.

“National claims to be extremely concerned about the fiscal prudence of the next Labour Government. This is despite Labour producing a fully costed alternative budget with headroom for coalition arrangements after the election," Parker said.

“To please the politically naive yet stubborn Conservatives, National would need a tax-free threshold up to NZ$20,000 with a flat tax rate of 25 per cent thereafter. That would cost at least NZ$6.5 billion a year even though this would actually increase taxes on incomes between $20,000 and $48,000. Then to mollify the ACT party National would have to cut tax on earnings above $70,000 to 20 per cent which would cost an additional $1.3 billion," he said.

"The ACT leader has said the party’s top priority in government is to lower the tax paid by corporations to 20 per cent costing around $2.8 billion a year rising to over $5 billion when cut to 12.5 per cent in 2017/18. All up these tax promises cost at least $10.5 billion a year which works out over four years to at least $42 billion, and possibly as much as $50 billion by end of the 2018/19 financial year. And that is without including the forgotten Peter Dunne who wants to introduce the regressive income-tax ‘splitting’ measure which Treasury said would cost around $500 million a year."

See all my previous election diaries here.

See the index for Interest.co.nz's special election policy comparison pages here.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

8 Comments

Comment Filter

Highlight new comments in the last hr(s).

One of my biggest hopes for election day is an end to Peter Dunne - the man who brought us the "keeping legal highs legal" legislation on behalf of his son who worked as the lawyer/lobbyist for the legal high industry (read it here);
 
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/9985816/Dunne-legal-high-confli...
 
And here;
 
http://www.chenpalmer.com/people/james-dunne/
 
And the Cabinet office at the time found no conflict of interest (what a joke).
 
The legislation was so cr@p, that they had to ban the poisons anyway after a massive public outcry.  How many kids and young adults got ruined during that interim period, I wonder?

You forgot to mention how he was a puppet for the alcohol industry as well.

And there was a conversation between Slater and Jordan Williams in the last of the public whaledumps that was not referred to in Dirty Tricks - my guess being because it was only circumstantial and, if true, would have been a serious breach of the Electoral Act. Different industry though and I won't cut and paste it here.

And my second biggest hope for election day is an end to ACT.  I'd rather Christine Rankin won the seat if National don't want it .. as we'd at least be able to retire for good the memory of Roger Douglas. 

Dunn is the biggest flip flopper.  An advocate of privacy who single handedly gave the nation the GCSB bill, solely to save his bacon after leaking the Kitteridge report to that reporter he was infatuated with.   We won't forget.

Roy Morgan Poll out tells it differently
Today’s New Zealand Roy Morgan Poll shows a sharp decline in support for National (45%, down 3%) following the revelations of Nicky Hager’s ‘Dirty Politics’ and a similar gain in support for a potential Labour/Greens alliance (42%, up 3%)
 
45vs 42 is geeting too close to call from the most reliable polling in NZ

Roy Morgan is the most reliable because it is the only one polling cellphones as well as landlines.

All of those poll changes you record here are within the margin of error.  In other words the change could be just noise, and really do not show any change at all.  Pity reporters aren't prepared to report poll results accurately, preferring or being forced (by the current media structure) to seek out contraversy where none may exist.