sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

US consumers save, don't spend; factories expand everywhere except China; Aussie wages fall; Z buys Caltex; UST 10yr yields 2.18% ; NZ$1 = 70.9 US¢, TWI-5 = 75.8

US consumers save, don't spend; factories expand everywhere except China; Aussie wages fall; Z buys Caltex; UST 10yr yields 2.18% ; NZ$1 = 70.9 US¢, TWI-5 = 75.8

Here's my summary of the key issues from over the long weekend that affect New Zealand, with news of a major move down by the New Zealand dollar.

American consumer spending unexpectedly stalled in April as households put their extra income into savings, cutting back on purchases of cars. Consumers did not come to the rescue early in the second quarter.

But factories may have. There were two factory activity reports out overnight (here and here), both showing expanding conditions. They are both reports for May.

The April Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) price index, excluding food and energy, increased +1.2% from April a year ago. The PCE index is the Fed's preferred measure of US inflation, and at that level it may not be enough to trigger policy concerns requiring action.

Factory data out of China overnight was not very encouraging. Orders, output and prices all fell all due to weak export demand. But the Chinese results are out of step with what we are seeing in both Japan and India. Those two countries reported expanding output, employment growth, and higher prices. That is especially impressive for Japan.

It was also surprising to see the Australian factory sector post a rare expansion. Activity was boosted by a lift in exports which have benefited from the lower Australian dollar.

There was other data out in Australia yesterday that helps put our performance in perspective. They are crowing about the 580,000 visitor arrivals they had in January. New Zealand recorded 302,000 in the same month, more than half the Aussie level. Also interesting is that they are now only reporting January data; our Stats agency has already reported for April.

And staying in Australia, the central bank looks unlikely to change their official cash rate which is currently at 2% when they wrap up their monthly meeting later today, and this is despite continued sluggishness in their domestic economy. Accentuating the sluggishness, data out yesterday showed a rare fall in wages and salaries paid in the March quarter.

In fact, Aussie GDP data is due out on Wednesday and if it is weak, that may set the stage for another rate cut in July.

In New York, the UST 10yr benchmark yield is climbing again after its big fall late last week. It is up +5 bps today at 2.18%.

The US oil markets are a little higher again today with the US benchmark price now just over US$60/barrel again, and Brent crude is up $2 to over US$65/barrel. OPEC is huddling later in the week.

Locally, Z Energy is about to buy the Caltex network after taking over the Chevron shareholding in NZ Refining. They are paying about $800 mln for the assets.

The gold price is down $2 to US$1,189/oz and where we left it on Friday.

The New Zealand dollar starts today lower threatening 70 USc but at the moment it is at 70.9 US¢, at 93.2 AU¢, and at 64.9 euro cents. The TWI-5 is at 75.8.

If you want to catch up with all the local changes on Friday, we have an update here.

The easiest place to stay up with event risk today is by following our Economic Calendar here »

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs

Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
End of day UTC
Source: CoinDesk

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

16 Comments

My calender just popped up with this, a blast from the past Re RB accuracy of predictions,

http://www.interest.co.nz/business/62385/bernard-hickey-details-top-10-…

RB predicted,

4.9%, but we are at 5.8%, so I wonder what effect putting up the OCR had? maybe that 1% of ppl unemployed would now/still have a job.

Housing inflation, no worries.

Maybe if they had acted faster on things like the LVR?

Up
0

Not just the US consumer but the global one,

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-05-22/jpmorgan-something-ha…-

"It would be difficult to overstate the recent downside surprise in global consumer spending," writes JPMorgan Senior Global Economist Joseph Lupton."

China,

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/chinas-coming-crash/2015/05/24/f…

"Because China is a huge customer for raw materials (grains, metals, fuels), their prices would remain depressed."

Meanwhile the BDI rocks along at a value not seen in, well a long time, 500~600, half teh rate of the last 5 years. To get an idea of that scale of down its been 1000 odd for 5 years down from peaks of 11000? and now 550..

http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/BDIY:IND/chart

G7 to whine about no growth,

http://www.ibtimes.com/g7-finance-ministers-address-faltering-global-gr…

and will "fix" Greece, this just cracked me up,

http://www.doomsteaddiner.net/blog/2015/05/30/the-crash-of-2015-going-g…

"They’ll [G7] get to all this after they have figured out how to keep Greece from nuking the European Union by defaulting on its obligations because Greece hasn’t got any f’’ing money, either."

Up
0

US consumers are not saving they paying down debt. It's not about to change, the reality is that the US consumer has no money. Negative GDP growth is going to get interesting.

http://www.oftwominds.com/blog.html

In its basic form, Credit is someone’s promise to pay “money” at some point in the future. Credit instruments are an “IOU.” Importantly, new Credit/“IOUs” create additional purchasing power. Especially late in prolonged Credit booms, financial instruments and claims come to account for enormous amounts of system “wealth.” Crises are the process of rectifying the divergence that develops between financial wealth and actual underlying economic wealth. This process invariably unmasks the systematic wealth redistribution that gathered momentum throughout the boom cycle.

http://creditbubblebulletin.blogspot.com/2015/05/my-weekly-commentary-o…

Up
0

"Saving" and "paying down debt" are two entirely different scenarios! AndrewJ, I always look for your take on what is happening in the world. My hat is off to you once again. Thanks!

Up
0

I close my eyes, pick one then buy

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-06-01/bulls-in-the-china-shop/6513026

then at 2:14..
Meet Roger Ying, of Pandi the peer to peer lender charging up to 30% for margin loans..
Roger is happy as a Larry saying no risk no reward...

- its the beginning of June, not April, right?

Up
0

Ludwig von Mises "There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as the result of voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved."

Up
0

It still seems to me the least bad solution will be helicopters of money from central banks, funnelled through tax cuts at the low end of the income stream- so everyone gets some. Or ECB ultra cheap loans to Greece, Portugal, Spain, France etc.
Will boost spending without increasing debt- in fact it will help the private sector repay some debt. Otherwise the world has a significant spiralling problem. Wages dropping in Aussie is just one more local canary, but really should be an alarm bell for us.

Up
0

You are looking for the escape button when it doesn't exist. We need to contract credit which looks like it's beginning, more 'saving' by paying down debt.

Most of my life I've been able to borrow money very close to the rate of inflation or even less, like houses in AKL. However, now I'm paying above the interest rate by the widest margin I have ever seen. The true cost of money will become crippling for many.

Up
0

Quote
All real resources are deployed or consumed on a pay-as-you-go basis. Currencies are just markers for future demand--if anyone will take them. We are trading future spending power of money for current consumption, and will continue until the markers have no value. The connected few who could hedge their way into real assets will own everything while the majority will own nothing. It will be the greatest strip-mining operation slash theft of all time.

http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com/from-whence-cometh-our-wealth-the…

Up
0

http://itsthepeoplesmoney.blogspot.co.nz/2015/06/you-know-you-understan…

Quickly go through these points before you're beyond help.

Up
0

Onwards, help me with this problem that's being going around in my head for years.
China sells goods to the USA, the USA pays in dollars. The Chinese government takes those US dollars and issues Yuan to the local Chinese company. Then it takes those US dollars and buys treasuries. I keep thinking something is wrong in this process?

Up
0

Many people will also tell you that Modern Monetary Theory is what has got us all in the spot we are in today. It's 'understanding' MMT that confuses the people that accept it, not those who know the value of sound money. MMT 'sounds good' but its reality may be far worse than can be imagined. The simple answer is: "If there was an answer, MMT being 'it', then why are we facing the worst Depression that any of us is likely to experience?"

Up
0

It was MMT that's saved us from the greatest depression thanks to Bernanke's QE solution. It was 'sound money' ideas that caused the Great Depression in the 1930's. Let's be honest here. Sound money or MMT, it doesn't really matter does it because U.S. Politics will always influence either implementation.

Up
0

Yes we are heading for a Minsky Moment

Up
0

"helicopters of money from central banks"
Hasn't that been tried before? Ancient Rome, Germany's Weimar Republic or Zimbabwe - same result. A as Von Mises said the "final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved." Or is it different this time.

Up
0