Siah Hwee Ang on investors buying their way into NZ through scholarships for school kids, the [in]efficiency of the OIO & concerns over the yuan becoming a reserve currency

Siah Hwee Ang on investors buying their way into NZ through scholarships for school kids, the [in]efficiency of the OIO & concerns over the yuan becoming a reserve currency

An Asian business expert is warning the Government to be clearer about what it wants from foreign investors keen to buy property in New Zealand.

The BNZ Chair in Business in Asia at Victoria University, Professor Siah Hwee Ang, says the Government should tread with caution, before permitting foreigners to buy sensitive land on the basis they show their commitment to the community by giving school kids scholarships, for example.

His call comes further to the Overseas Investment Office (OIO) this week making headlines for the way it permitted a man in China to buy a lifestyle block on Paremoremo Road in Northern Auckland, for his family to use when they visit New Zealand.

Maohua Ye bought the 3.9ha property for $8 million, despite it only being valued at $2 million in July 2014.

He also pledged to give local low-decile schools scholarships and employ a caretaker to look after the property during his absence to meet the Office’s ‘benefit to New Zealand’ criteria.

Ang isn’t surprised Ye paid a potentially inflated price for the property.

“They [Chinese buyers] will just pay their way through the system to come here, so I don’t think so called ‘fair market value’ actually works for them,” he says.

However he questions the purpose of all the deal’s trimmings.

“In some ways we have to be careful – how much is considered enough as a contribution to the country?” Ang says.

He says the Government needs a more definitive criteria on what investors need to pledge to do, to prove they’ll make a valuable contribution to New Zealand.

“If money can solve all the problems then why bother to ask them to use the money to pay for the scholarships?... Just ask them for cash?” he says.

Furthermore, Ang points out scholarships usually represent or commemorate something special, and have lasting meanings or connotations attached to them.   

“We also don’t want to start taking out scholarships for the sake of taking our scholarships because someone has the cash,” he says.

Being slow and steady may not always win the race

Ang also warns the OIO needs to pick up its pace processing applications from foreign buyers, if it wants to attract investment.

He makes this comment further to the OIO and government ministers taking 14 months to decide to reject Shanghai Pengxin’s Pure 100 Farm bid to acquire the Lochinver Station.

The decision has prompted Pure Farm 100 to seek a judicial review on the decision and a Pengxin International director, Terry Lee, to slate New Zealand for treating overseas investors as “privileged” as opposed to being the bearers of opportunity.

“I don’t understand what is going on inside there that takes 14 months,” says Ang.

“A lot of Asian countries in particular, they work at a very fast pace, so for them they really need to get things done in a month or two. It’s very difficult to tell them they have to wait for over a year to get a bad position.

“It’s no surprise they quickly turn away and do other things.”

Ang suggests the OIO say no to investors that don’t meet its criteria from day one, rather than going back and forth, so they don’t waste their time and hold on to false hope.

He says the process needs to be streamlined.  

“It’s a long process that starts to kill investment… A lot of big companies make major acquisitions of a few hundred millions to a couple of billions of dollars, within a couple of weeks. That’s the kind of pace we’re talking about,” he says.

Ang maintains New Zealand take a more consultative approach to foreign investors than our international counterparts.

He notes the OIO’s slower pace could also be a resourcing issue.

While he describes investors as “impatient” and ready to invest, he says it’s a matter of meeting somewhere in the middle.

He believes that once the process is improved, all the talk around its problems will stop.

Bright-line rules helping curb Auckland property speculation

Ang says anecdotal evidence China investors are retreating from the Auckland property market, indicates the new bright-line rule is curbing speculation in the property market.

He says it’s no surprise the law, which taxes residential property buyers who on-sell within two years of purchase, is slowing down the market and adjusting prices.

He says investor interest may pick up again once people start to make sense of the new regulatory environment.  

Will China take a more hands-off approach to the economy now that the yuan has reserve currency status?

Ang says there’s too much at stake for the People’s Bank of China to take a hands-off approach in its management of the economy, as the yuan’s been included in the International Monetary Fund’s basket of reserve currencies.

The IMF this week granted the yuan reserve currency status, leaving it more exposed to the market and subject to fluctuations.  

While this is a milestone for China – a country that’s been contributing about 28% of the world’s GDP growth – Ang says it’s still sparked concerns.

“The Chinese economy is all planned market oriented. It’s not a free market flow, but it’s planned within a certain bandwidth.”

Ang says therefore the PBoC can’t suddenly change tact in its management of the economy.

He points to the collapse in the capital markets as evidence of this.

“Hands off is hard unless they keep printing money to suppress it,” he says.

“The scale of it makes it so difficult to manage, without managing it.

“I am sure they will be trying to do a bit of a managed planned approach, as opposed of letting loose. It will be very brave of them to do it, because we’ve seen the yuan come down quite significantly, affecting everyone in the world.”

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

12 Comments

Comment Filter

Highlight new comments in the last hr(s).
11
up

Bribery by any other name is still bribery! This NZ Government is corrupt and the OIO is one of the leading edges of that corruption.

Corrupt?

I don't think so.

Inept?

That's more like it!

Both

Some good comments, and questions, in this article from Ang. Could the sale in Paremoremo not be described as outrageous? Be interested to hear from Iconoclast on this one, distortions in the market are one of his areas of expertise.

The deeper question that needs asked is if a purchase like this results in positive money expansion. Positive as in productive activity (genuine growth not balance sheet growth)
that leads to employment.

Sometimes we need to think a little further. If these people of their own volition are willing to:
A/ Pay a premium for the PRIVILEGE of holiday home ownership in our country N.Z.
B/ Willing to contribute to the N.Z. economy and community.
C/ And dare I say perhaps to be involved.?
Maybe what Professor Siah Hwee Ang says has validation and maybe we should listen to what he is relaying to us.
We have got to be a little careful with our assumptions because that is all they are. Our culture is quite different for starters and so it is not easy really to understand the intentions of someone different coming in.
Now add to that if they are willing to do this for our country and community because they see this as a special privilege, then why would we not encourage this and accept this as a gift?? instead of being so suspicious?
God knows that in this small act they show appreciation for our country and the people.
Through this small act for them, they have already contributed more to our society and country than (dare I say this) a lot of wining kiwi's do in a lifetime. So is this the real problem then??
It is time we grew up and stopped being so small minded about some of these matters.
I am very sorry that many of you will take offense to this and yes I do know that it is also not politically correct in this day and age, but often the truth is like that and we should be more worried about that than political correctness.

In many cases the OIO has appeared to frequently rubber-stamp and allow purchases which (to an outsider) appear to have little or dubious benefits to locals.

Anecdotally, I recall a person posted on here some time ago that during a previous farmland purchase the OIO listed that the supposed benefit to NZ was the foreigners had to 'purchase fertilizer' from a New Zealand company .

We have got to be a little careful with our assumptions because that is all they are. Our culture is quite different for starters and so it is not easy really to understand the intentions of someone different coming in.

Yes, maybe you should take some of your own advice and consider why foreigners want to buy up NZ land and assets. I doubt it's as simple as benevolence to New Zealanders.

Do you really understand anything you are talking about? The trouble with forums is they allow anyone with an opinion to put their case. A bit like voting really. Can you really say you have the depth and breadth of intellectual thought to comprehend all the issues that this foreign money coming in does to New Zealand? Not many do.

So I will give you one detrimental but concrete effect of non residential investors. They shrink the money supply, making less money available for productive New Zealand enterprises to borrow. You have to understand the money supply to grasp this of course. The money supply is multi layered, so there will be multiple distortions and all of the detrimental to New Zealanders.

Another aspect that is clearly evident - "Our culture is quite different for starters and so it is not easy really to understand the intentions of someone different coming in." they are not buying for our culture, the evidence is that they don't start acting and behaving like us. They bring their own expectations of bribery, mistreatment of women (it doesn't matter that they don't see it as mistreatment, it is NOT our culture!), expected status and so on. The fact that they can buy their way into the country, and in the process make it less affordable for those born and bred here is nothing less than outrageously offensive. I don't care where they come from, so long as there is a benefit to the people of NZ, and paying an outrageous price is not what I call a benefit.

Interesting Con in Canada being exposed.

http://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/chinese-have-been-paying-mill...

"This is where Wang comes in. He allowed his clients to fake their lives in Canada so they could maintain their permanent residency and not have to give up their chance to eventually become a citizen."

Any chance of our wide boys going down the same route?

not surprised here normally just park the family to become citizens and claim any benefits (schooling, health) and come and go as they please

interesting item

Our borders need protection from capital inflows. Otherwise we will become tenants in our own land.