A review of things you need to know before you go home on Tuesday; car sales drop, Ardern pitches CPTPP to Moon, hydrogen chosen, NZ wins on trade, big bond rate falls, NZD rises, & more

A review of things you need to know before you go home on Tuesday; car sales drop, Ardern pitches CPTPP to Moon, hydrogen chosen, NZ wins on trade, big bond rate falls, NZD rises, & more

Here are the key things you need to know before you leave work today.

No changes today.

None here either.

Car sales enter a sales shadow in November with SUV demand lower, down -7.3% year-on-year, especially for medium-sized SUVs which were down almost -17%. Commercial demand stays strong however.

The Korean President is in New Zealand. In addition to the usual the heady international issues discussed, New Zealand is promising eGate passport access, and a system where people will be able to use both New Zealand residence and contributions to the Korean pension system to help them qualify for pension payments from either country. Korea is not a member of the CPTPP and New Zealand would like to draw them in.

Ports of Auckland is to build a hydrogen production and refueling facility on the waterfront. In partnership with Auckland Council, Auckland Transport and KiwiRail, it will invest in hydrogen fuel cell vehicles including port equipment, buses and cars as part of the project. The goal is emissions-free operating equipment, including heavy equipment like tugs and mobile container lifting/loading machines, devices hard to power with batteries. Hydrogen allows storage, rapid refueling, and emits nothing but clean water. The new facility should be working by the end of 2019.

After yesterday's heady rises in Shanghai (+2.6%) and on Wall Street overnight (+1.1%), and mirrored on the ASX (+1.8%) and to a lesser extent on the NZX (+0.6%) yesterday, today's eyes are on those same markets given that the bond markets have given the current situation the thumbs down (see below). Well, today Shanghai has held all yesterday's gains but is unchanged (+0.1%) in early morning trade. But Aussie investors are less positive, down -0.7% in early afternoon trade, while the NZX is flat/unchanged in late afternoon trade.

Statistics NZ published data on the levels of two-way trade today, exports-plus-imports, goods-plus-services. International trade rose to $160.7 bln for the year ended September 2018, up a remarkable +11.6% from the previous year. This is far higher growth than in any previous year in a long time. Our trade with Australia (16.4%), China (17.9%), the USA (11.4%), Japan (5.4%), and the Eurozone countries (9.1%) accounted for more than 60% of all our trade. And in 2018, a sudden spurt of trade with China has edged out Australia as our number one trading partner. Through all of this, our goods and services exports totaled $81.6 bln in the latest year, while our imports totaled $79.1 bln. New Zealand came out on top with a surplus of $2.4 bln, although that was the smallest in five years.

Australia posted a Q3 current account deficit of -AU$12.6 bln. For the full year it totals -AU$48.6 bln. That is 32% worse than the -AU$36.8 bln current account deficit in the year to September 2017. Their Q3 GDP result will be published tomorrow. Our C/A and GDP data won't come until December 19 and 20.

Australia has lowered its wheat production forecast by -11% to the smallest in a decade amid a crippling drought across the country's east coast that may cut exports from the world's fourth biggest supplier. Their winter crop production is forecast to be -20% below their 20 year average.

Wholesale swap rates are down -2 bps for a two year duration, down -3 bps for a five year duration, and down -4 bps for a ten year duration. The US Treasury yields are also moving fast today, dropping, and by the time you read this, they may have moved again. The UST 10yr, which ended yesterday at 3.04% is now down under 2.95%. The long end is falling faster than the short end and the 2-10 curve is now below +14 bps, a level not seen since mid 2007. (And remember, this 2-10 curve was over +30 bps at the beginning of November.) The Aussie Govt 10yr is at 2.54% and down -8 bps, the China Govt 10yr is down -5 bps at 3.37%, while the NZ Govt 10 yr is at 2.54%, down -7 bps. The 90 day bank bill rate is unchanged 1.97%.

The bitcoin price is now at US$3,850 which is a -5.5% fall since this time yesterday. Still it is above its recent low on November 28 of US$3,642. But with the stronger NZD, we are actually not far off a 2018 low in local currency.

However the Kiwi dollar is firmer, now at 69.3 USc. On the cross rates we firmer as well at 94.3 AUc and at stronger at just over 61 euro cents. That puts the TWI-5 up at 73.8.. (We are also up to 54.5 UKp and that is another 14 month high.)

This chart is animated here. For previous users, the animation process has been updated and works better now.

Daily exchange rates

Select chart tabs »

The 'US$' chart will be drawn here.
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
The 'AU$' chart will be drawn here.
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
The 'TWI' chart will be drawn here.
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
The '¥en' chart will be drawn here.
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
The '¥uan' chart will be drawn here.
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
The '€uro' chart will be drawn here.
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
The 'GBP' chart will be drawn here.
Daily benchmark rate
Source: RBNZ
The 'Bitcoin' chart will be drawn here.
End of day UTC
Source: CoinDesk

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.


Balyasny Fires 20% Of Its Staff As Hedge Fund Loses Billions; Einhorn Is Down 28% YTD


"Pure balderdash. But nobody argues with Economists and central bankers. So, the French government thought nothing of enacting an enormous burden on the working folks of France and those who as elsewhere around the world have absorbed the costs of one lost economic decade facing downward again toward a second.
It’s booming, alright. There are very real consequences to a world without economic growth. People won’t, can’t, put up with it forever. The whole world isn’t Japan."


"The elites have gone too far. The costs of the 2008 financial crash have been met by ordinary people, not the greedy bankers & financial spivs who caused it. The people have had enough of austerity & falling/stagnant wages. What’s happening in #France now is only the start."


You don't just make Hydrogen from tap water, you need lots of electricity to do it . Would have thought it would make more sense to have the plant in the South island , and ship the hydrogen to Auckland.

Or maybe ship the Aucklanders to the South Island instead?

We're quite happy as we are thank you. Ship to Sydney perhaps? Maybe we should make it worth their while, solving the housing crisis the easy way.

Recipe for a huge loss of shareholder value in this one.


Nine words that should strike fear into the heart of anyone...

"In partnership with Auckland Council, Auckland Transport and KiwiRail."

Indeed, the true "axis of evil."

That rings a bell, Isn’t the naki going to make hydrogen by magic?

What idiot signed off on this folly? Patently someone with weak grasp of technology and big wads of other peoples money to spend. Hydrogen is a terrible battery, lucky to have 30% energy in to energy out efficiency, and the equipment is shockingly expensive, and dangerous, and doesn't last (fuel cell stacks have half-lives that make them useless after a few years.

Batteries are cheaper and more efficient and improving fast. They make a lot more sense for operations around a port. Just as they do for cars and buses (where interest in hydrogen is now almost dead)

What they’re trying to do is encourage a fuel source that can still be heavily taxed per unit. How do you tax the energy on someone’s electric vehicle if they’re charging it at home? Slapping a 50% tax on power costs penalises everyone. An electric vehicle levy built into the registration would turn people off electric cars.

I agree with AJ, France is a bell weather country for the West. They are not only on the front line, they often are the front line. Large parts of Europe are in major decline, especially in Italy, Greece, Spain & southern France. Small provincial ares in particular are really hurting & I've been waiting for the Frogs to kick up stink. They always do. This time, however, they've got a real beef. They (a three person family) can't live on 1,300 Euros a month. I don't think I could either. There's a huge urban / rural divide opening up across the planet, but when we can't feed our own people, things are grim indeed. We read a lot about Brexit & all the woes that's going to create, well, the EU too will miss the Brits contributions massively. This is all playing out right up Putin's street. When people are hungry they've got nothing to lose. When the people have got nothing to lose, look out.

I spent quite a bit of time over the weekend watching the live Ruptly coverage of the street battles. See here for the action on Saturday:


Start at the seven hour mark for a true dystopian, apocalyptic scene of devastation. At 7:16:20 the guy in the wheel chair with the Indian chief's headdress and waving a tricolour really sets the scene amongst the burning vehicles. I walked down there two years ago.

I did think to myself, it's like these guys have nothing left to lose. It was very stirring stuff.

(Long John Martin - I disapprove of that term you used. We have no need of these ancient animosities anymore - I know you meant it affectionately. How times have changed)

I thought that was a misprint . "live Ruptly coverage "

"The world of negative interest-rates now has negative economic growth too"
It was not that long ago that many of us “experts” in the interest-rate market felt that negative interest-rates could not be sustained. Back then the past Swiss example could be considered a tax – which remains a way of considering negative interest-rates – and the flicker in Japan was covered by it being Japan. Yesterday brought some fascinating news from the front line which has been in danger of being ignored in the current news flow.

Sweden’s GDP decreased by 0.2 percent in the third quarter of 2018, seasonally adjusted, compared with the second quarter of 2018. GDP increased by 1.6 percent, working-day adjusted, compared with the third quarter of 2017. ( Sweden Statistics).

Firstly let me reassure you that Sweden has no Brexit style plans. What it does have is negative interest-rates as this from the Riksbank shows.

What Sweden needs is plenty of immigrants - the theory goes it is all to do with quantity; who cares about quality, just plenty of immigrants say 1.5% of the population. We should send Mr Lees-Galloway and the national party nonentity (name forgotten) who was his predecessor to Sweden so they can learn from us.

In less than two months , (since October 8) , NZD has appreciated 10.3 percent against CAD, 9.9 percent against GBP, 9 percent against JPY and CHF, , 8.7 percent against the EUR, 8.3 percent against the USD ,7.4 percent against the CNH and 4.8 percent against the AUD. Do we export milk powder or cheese or something.

We had a bit of a discussion about mortgage stress in the 90 seconds at 9am article this morning. DFA have been getting a lot of exposure lately around these parts. I was wondering if David Chaston or someone could do a bit of a critical review of DFA. Something doesn't seem right to me and we need someone with nous to pick things apart.

It seems to me that mortgage stress in Australia is being exaggerated and misrepresented. He seems to use his own definition. Wage rates, employment and mortgage rates are largely unchanged so why are people stressed? However I am no expert.

All I can say is that I went and read his fairly recent article,"Mortgage Stress Busts The 1 Million Households" and the only link was to the Reserve Bank of Australia's PDF, Household and Business Finances:


Reading this document left me with totally the opposite impression to the article and the current situation. It seemed upbeat to me. According to the RBA all is well and almost everyone is well positioned and stress is minimal. What the hell is going on?

CBs and RBs always sound upbeat until shit hits the fan. Then they look for people to blame

Part of the RBA role is to keep up morale so the market doesn't cave in with a massive loss of confidence. If the RBA told the truth the consequences would be severe.

The difference with DFA is they actually carry out surveys and collect data. If you want David to review DFA then I would suggest examining his data collection techniques given the inputs are what drives the analysis and conclusions.

I'm surprised zachary boy doesn't know this

God bless them

That's just nonsense. It's obvious that a million Australian mortgage holders are not on the verge of defaulting.

Perhaps you could provide your statistics and data analysis to counter DFA?

What's the matter with you guys? it's like you have all lost your minds. DFA do not use the standard definition of mortgage stress. According to them you could spend less than 30% of your income on a mortgage and still be stressed. They openly admit this.

Basically it's like saying if a million mortgage holders lost their jobs they would mostly default on their mortgages.

Have you guys analysed the "data"? Would love an expert opinion on this.

Any Australians in the house?

"Our analysis uses the DFA core market model which combines information from our 52,000 household surveys, public data from the RBA, ABS and APRA; and private data from lenders and aggregators. The data is current to end September 2018. We analyse household cash flow based on real incomes, outgoings and mortgage repayments, rather than using an arbitrary 30% of income."

No they use the unusual definition of real income and expenses. The quote is from the article that you are referring to.

Oh, right, "the DFA core market model", a reputable global standard.

It doesn't say what you want to hear, so appeal to authority rather than find actual problems in the methodology?

Come on, the above quote clearly states they use their own criteria and not the generally recognized standard to determine mortgage stress. Isn't that a bit suspect?

People's mortgage payments increase. People need to adjust their spending habits. People are asked if they find this stressful. People say yes. This is mortgage stress.

Dunno, i'd say when your outgoings are greater than your income you are (or should be ) stressed.

Basically it's like saying if a million mortgage holders lost their jobs they would mostly default on their mortgages.

Sounds pretty spot on to me.

I have done Payroll in UK, Ireland, Australia, and NZ. Most payroll data and stats I have seen roughly show:
20% of people have zero savings. i.e. literally live pay to pay.
80% of people have less than 1 pay period in savings. i.e. could probably survive for 1-2 weeks without pay.

Extrapolate this out to the working population (with mortgages), and bingo...

A major job shock and within a month their would be absolute chaos not just for house owners, but renters as well. I can't see many landlords keeping a bunch of tenants who aren't paying rent.

You sure you not Ben B.? He sounds exactly like you when he was the fed chair

Misery loves company Zach that's why DFA's following is increasing. Try broadcasting a vlog that states how good things are… very few would follow it

Doesn't 99% of the media do exactly what you state.. Everything fine in the land of the long white clouds.. no mention about the high level of debt etc, and you'll salivate reading it

I take the view that if the DFA analysis is correct then the RBA won't increase the OCR for many years, or decades. Their OCR has been 1.5% for more than 2 years now and they don't seem to have any room to move it without squeezing the bank in the worst position.

RBA has just followed the economy down, looks likely to bump along the bottom for a bit.

RBNZ has done the same, until they hit the point where the OCR decoupled from the bank's rates.

perhaps the discussion needs to be more around what will cause interest rates to rise, can we predict that outcome? I don't think Reserve banks control the outcome, I don't think they will be happy with stagnation either.

This discussion thread has really centred around DFA and their analysis. Certainly an increase in interest rates would confirm which theory is correct. Perhaps a more on topic approach would be to consider all of the interest only mortgages that switch to P+I starting January 2019. The interest rate doesn't go up but the payments do, and that change will expose any cash flow issues, or at least increase mortgage stress.

Hi Andrew, great question. My guess is I don’t think they can raise rates without increased borrowing to replace and grow the money in circulation to counter the money disappearing through loan repayments. Does that seem likely? I can’t see it. We haven’t really borrowed for productive ventures to offset the increase in the cost of higher rates.

Yvil, it's like a mental illness.

However Interest.co.nz seem upbeat, that's why I'd love to read David's thoughts on the matter.
The claims are so extraordinary that I suspect they are viewed the same way flat-earther's are.

I guess they see this as an exploitable market segment. Only 147 Patreon patrons so far. Early days.

Why do you think we have, or can sustain, interest rates lower than those in the USA; the biggest economy on the planet?
Would you lend money to a rich man or a poor one? And if you picked the poor one, for whatever reason, would you charge a lower interest rate than the rich man could command? If so, why?
Traditionally we here in Australasia had to pay a premium to borrow money ( the above reason) of some 3% (Aussie) 4%(NZ) if we were to attract capital inflow. That we have such low rates now should tell us that 'things aren't right' and if you take the World at face value, The States seem to be doing ok. So why are our OCR and the Aussie Cash rate, so low?
Answer: We are in strife, and any 'normalising' of interest rates will spell economic hardship that will show you first hand, if DFA's views on 'stressed mortgage holders' is right or not.
(NB: The RBNZ has been progressively changing the mix of funds that the local banks are required to hold. It's why they compete for longer-dated Term Deposits etc - to replace the foreign funds that have or may dry up in due course.)

Very clear you guys are becoming mental with the fear of the housing market collapsing.. very sad..

At least you may get a chance to meet JLR

You know how we just gave hospital cleaners a pay rise, Ive got bad news


"Speaking to an audience of high net worth Chinese investors at the Allfin conference in Melbourne, Mr Gillespie said it was a matter of when, not if, house prices fell further....(He) has joined the chorus of experts tipping a further decline in house prices, saying Sydney properties still have (another) 10 per cent to fall just to be in line with the firm's fair value estimates"....Mr Gillespie's comments come only a day after CoreLogic's latest home value index revealed Sydney property values had slipped 9.5 per cent since their peak last July.


Just an opinion of course, but from Elleston Capital, The Packer Family (one of Australia's rich set) money managers.
The writing is on the wall, literally, and it's only a question of what we each decide to do about it.
Some will try to ride it out and get through to wherever the future is.
Others will try to do similar and fall by the wayside (those distressed mortgagors?)
That applies for not only the property market but all asset markets - probably worldwide. But time will tell, and there may not be much of it left....