sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Chris Trotter argues that National cannot regain power by simply hoping for the worst

Chris Trotter argues that National cannot regain power by simply hoping for the worst

By Chris Trotter*

Waiting for the miracle, as Leonard Cohen observed, is an agonising test. Especially if its arrival is far from certain. Judith Collins is living through that test right now. Convinced that political disquiet is taking hold of more and more New Zealanders, she waits for evidence of its existence outside National’s rural heartlands. Collins’ “Demand the Debate” campaign has undoubtedly stirred the latter, but is her caucus capable of holding its nerve until those former National supporters who voted Labour in 2020 start showing similar signs of feeling “left out”?

The “Groundswell” protests were generated primarily by the Government’s unrelenting imposition of regulatory responsibilities on an already stressed rural sector. Farmer anger and impatience was readily mobilised because rural dwellers still enjoy a significant degree of effective political representation and are well-used to participating in decision-making forums. Federated Farmers, in particular, reaches into every wool-and milking-shed in the country. The Fonterra co-operative is run by and for its highly engaged farmer members. Farmers are used to having their say – and being heeded.

Collins’ problem is that the rest of New Zealand has become decidedly rusty at defending its interests. Gone are the days when working-class Kiwis could rely upon their peak trade union body, the Federation of Labour, to flex its industrial and political muscle on their behalf. The current peak union body, the NZ Council of Trade Unions, is overwhelmingly a middle-class institution dominated by the Public Service Association, the teacher unions and the Nurses Organisation. Since its formation in 1987, the NZCTU has operated as a “top-down” organisation. Middle-class unions don’t ask their members – they tell them. (That Labour and Green activists are drawn disproportionately from this social layer and its representative structures is no accident – a point we shall return to presently).

That the National Party lacks the ability to raise Cain in either the working-class or the professional middle classes with the same swift effectiveness that it rouses the ire of rural New Zealand is a truism of New Zealand politics. Only Rob Muldoon demonstrated any facility for breaching the electoral and cultural defences of the working-class, and even then, his infamous “Rob’s Mob” encompassed only a small fraction of New Zealand workers.

National’s grasp upon the professional middle-class first began to weaken in the 1970s, but it was the Springbok Tour of 1981 that generated the first really significant migration of professional support from National to Labour, where – with a worrying wobble-or-two under John Key – it largely remains. Poor performance by Labour may send some of this social-liberal support leftward to the Greens, but only rarely rightward to National.

Among the conventionally wise, National’s “Demand the Debate” campaign is dismissed as dangerously mis-targeted. By their reckoning, Covid-19 and its economic fallout remains the central issue of New Zealand politics. A serious misstep on the part of Jacinda Ardern’s government in relation to the Coronavirus – most especially an outbreak of its highly infectious Delta variant in the community – is seen as the eventuality most likely to move the needle decisively in National’s direction.

While it is hard to argue that a Delta variant outbreak would not, indeed, rebound to National’s electoral advantage, that does not free the main Opposition party from its obligation to take the political fight to the Government on other issues. After all, the Delta variant may not break through the border. By the end of the year, most adult New Zealanders may have received both jabs of the Pfizer vaccine. As predicted, inflationary pressures may prove to be temporary. New Zealand’s economic growth may continue to surge ahead of forecasts. National cannot regain power by simply hoping for the worst.

While massive and widespread economic dislocation remains the principal reason for Governments being hustled out of office, the same result may befall political leaders for whom a sudden loss of public faith has been engineered. The fates of Richard Nixon, Gough Whitlam, Bill Rowling and Donald Trump bear testimony to how rapidly political fortunes can change when a decisive majority of the voting public gives up on you in disgust. Engineering such a reversal is never easy, but Collins could learn something by studying Muldoon’s demolition of Labour’s Bill Rowling in 1975.


Support us AND go ad-free! Find out how.


At the heart of Muldoon’s campaign was fear. The First Oil Crisis of 1973 had raised well-justified fears of impending economic dislocation. Rowling’s decision to borrow his way through the crisis was attacked to great effect by the National Party’s “Economic Wizard”. With his in/famous “Dancing Cossacks” political ad’, which characterised the Labour Government’s newly-established Superannuation Fund as an anti-Capitalist Trojan Horse, Muldoon also exploited New Zealanders’ Cold War-stoked fear of socialism.

It was, however, a much more diffused fear that Muldoon exploited most effectively. The fear that the New Zealand in which most of the voting public had grown up was under insidious attack. The moral and political certainties of the post-war years, he asserted, were being undermined by liberals and radicals who held the “traditional values” of the majority in ill-disguised contempt.

Muldoon’s stroke of political genius was to implant the suspicion that these revolutionary ideas had found a home in the upper echelons of the Labour Party. Ideas which had received short shrift when “Big Norm” Kirk was alive, Muldoon insinuated, were now tolerated – even encouraged. The ill-conceived “Citizens for Rowling” campaign was portrayed by National’s leader as a bunch of academics and liberals pouring scorn on a humble champion of the “Ordinary Bloke”. It was out of this febrile political atmosphere that Muldoon distilled National’s winning election slogan of 1975: “New Zealand the way YOU want it.”

If Collins can pull off a reprise of Muldoon’s political miracle, then she too can win. For that to happen, however, the normal electoral order of things must be reversed. In 1975, for example, it was not uncommon to see eager young university students waving placards celebrating Labour’s promise of “A New Society” being shouted down by young working-class adults chanting “We Want Rob!” Those young workers had jobs they feared losing, and mortgages they feared being unable to pay. They interpreted Labour’s new society as a threat – not a promise.

If Collins can blend together the twin challenges of responding to Climate Change and fighting racial injustice into a single, frightening, threat to the way of life of New Zealand’s comfortable majority. If she can persuade voters that getting rid of their prized SUVs, sending people to jail for “Hate Speech”, and setting up a separate Maori justice system for the Mongrel Mob, are all illustrative of Labour’s and the Greens’ determination to change everything – irrespective of the wishes of the majority – then there is every chance the electorate will respond negatively.

Should Collins further lace her political concoction with the idea that the Labour/Green “social revolution” is being driven by a new priesthood of public servants, academics, journalists and “woke” members of the helping professions – all of whom have come to regard their less-enlightened (deplorable?) fellow citizens as “suitable cases for treatment” – then she will lead the National Party to an election result as miraculous as Muldoon’s 1975 reversal of fortune.

The only questions that remain to be answered are whether Collins possesses Muldoon’s ruthless and unwavering political aggression; and whether or not her caucus is as terrified of her as Muldoon’s caucus was of him. If the answer to both questions is ‘No’; and Covid-19 can be kept at bay; then in 2023 Jacinda Ardern and Labour will ensure that National remains left out of the debate. Still waiting for the miracle to come.


*Chris Trotter has been writing and commenting professionally about New Zealand politics for more than 30 years. He writes a weekly column for interest.co.nz. His work may also be found at http://bowalleyroad.blogspot.com.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

30 Comments

They'll likely benefit from a regression to trend as traditional National voters return but fundamentally they are out of step with urban New Zealand. That's a problem as Urban is almost 90% of New Zealanders.

Up
0

Interesting article, but CT is missing an important contributor to the political debate that wasn't present for Rob Muldoon; the internet? It is much easier for voters today to validate or otherwise the information given to them by the politicians (as well as being able to fall down the conspiracy black holes). I would also suggest that he is too ready to dismiss the potential of Act, as David Seymour has shown himself to be very much a pragmatic voice for some sectors of the population. True some people still view Act as a far right party, but are they really? While the Greens persist in being what I would call an extreme left one, and their stumbles certainly seem to call into question their fitness for being a counter to either of the two main parties in NZ.

Still I'm hopeful that Winnie or someone of his ilk, and skill (which Shane Jones isn't!) will return to be the voice to represent middle NZ!

Up
0

"It is much easier for voters today to validate or otherwise the information given to them by the politicians"

Quite important when the MSM is beholden to the Govt for its survival, currently $105M & counting. And the funding is conditional on supporting the Govt policies and positions.

Such practices used to be called propaganda.

Up
0

You mean the ‘regional journalism’ fund? Most projects to be funded seem well aligned with government policies.

Up
0

Yes & Muldoon was the first of our politicians to exploit the power of TV & he used this destructively too resorting to personal attacks that wouldn’t be acceptable today. Personally I am disappointed with Collins, and for same reasons Bridges too, because she is undoubtedly a highly qualified lawyer but not of the cutting barrister ilk, ie cross examination is not her strong point. Muldoon was not a lawyer but he, as with both Bob Hawke and Paul Keating, could produce devastating quick think sound bites. Muldoon though met his nemesis in David Lange who was a lawyer and think most would agree he was much more able in debating then than those two two above counterparts today.

Up
0

I work in the agricultural section and many people I know are voting for Act now.

Up
0

Ex National voters have switched to ACT because National have lost the plot. National has to come up with a decent leader before the next election or it will be either gifted to Labour or we could have such a mish mash of parties in that nothing gets done. Mind you nothing is getting done right now so how could it possibly get any worse ?

Up
0

Agreed. Myself and many of my friends are in the ACT camp and until National has a serious clean out it's unlikely we will vote that way again. Their performance over John Key's 8.5 years is what really set it off for me, but having Judith at the helm makes it even worse.

Up
0

If NZ is still closed in 2023, expect there to be a huge change in voting... whether anything gets done after the 2023 election is debatable.

Up
0

What you do, is turn a finite stock of fossilised carbon (fossilised sunlight) into food. In calorific terms, you do that fairly inefficiently; I've seen counts as high as 70 calories of oil to one calorie of food, but 10-27 is the usually-quoted range.

So what you do is temporary, as formatted.

Doesn't matter who you vote for, that's your bigger problem.

Up
0

*our problem PDK. Hunger makes people do wild things

Up
0

That last sentence does next to nothing to take away the fact that the post has no relevance to the article. You appear obsessed and not in a healthy way.

Up
0

Cassandra was proved right in the end.

Up
0

Sure was, but as RP suggests not in great shape to witness the dire consequences, quite mentally tortured in fact. Of course it didn’t help either that she was a feature of the family of doomed royalty, facing the oncoming downfall. Hard to explain really, how to convince the unbelievers, except that history shows that fanaticism and derision of counter views is hardly persuasive.

Up
0

Kunsgnos,

And who were they voting for before-mostly National is my bet. In effect, ACT is simply taking more of the right of centre pie, not growing it and that won't bother Labour one bit.

Up
0

Trouble is that 5+5 and 9+1 both equal 10. We need a circuit breaker for what is effectively a two party system — ACT /National, and Labour/Green. As I said in a lower comment, an electable independent party is a must for an MMP system.

Up
0

National leadership have become (even more) reactionary focusing on the trivial and copying ACT press releases. The candidate selection process must filter out anyone capable of idealogical conviction. National have not communicated any plan for Covid or housing and the worse these get the more you have to look to ACT or Labour. All signs point to Luxton being even worse than Collins (he's already using the language of the progressives, too scared to get any bad press). https://www.newsroom.co.nz/i-dont-have-that-lived-experience-luxons-dif…

I think the public is more than ready for centre right populist (like Muldoon or maybe even Boris) to put ACT back in its place and force Labour to realign with the left populists. Winston is even going to have another go because of Nationals weakness and block anyone else from having a shot at 5%. National are a bunch of careerer politicians OK with sitting on the sidelines when things get difficult.

Up
0

Things will have to get worse before National have a sniff, given their terrible public image. Truth is Labour are a very comfortable fit for your average suburbanite -- on economic policy there's very little difference between them and National, and Adrian Orr is more influential than either of them. The working class, as Chris remembers it, doesn't exist any more; there is no sense of class identity, just families looking out for themselves. Unions are run by a middle-class minority nostalgic for a different time, who struggle to connect emotionally with actual low-income working people. Those low-income working people have no uniformity of affiliation; their voting is as likely to be determined by their religion, ethnic ties, or ideas about vaccination as anything else...

Up
0

Muldoon is yesterdays politician, his style and the style of his supporters just wouldnt cut it today in a new millenium where social media rules. Collins and the National Party have to adapt to the new media, but in the face of Covid it is very difficult to change the narrative. Only when people dont like the Govt Covid policy will there be a reaction and change.

Up
0

If, quite an if admittedly, vaccination has covered sufficient of the population by the end of the year, then the government must proceed with a system that allows re-opening of the borders to the point that NZrs, those that are vaccinated most probably, can travel overseas and return without entering MIQ. Politically don’t think the government can maintain the status quo much beyond say March 2022 at the utmost. Hopefully the planning for this development is occurring much more in depth and earlier than what was applied to the vaccination program itself because there will still be the very clear dangers of the above travellers returning infected, unwittingly many of them too, and being transmitters of any one of the variants that have developed. There are many unknowns and unpredictables that could strike and rightly or wrongly the government will get the blame. 2022, what shall we call it “the year of what happens next?”

Up
0

Can't open during winter. Little to nothing to be gained by keeping the country closed for another 12 month cycle, yet tens of billions to be lost. Temporary economic damage will become structural.

Up
0

Law and order is a potent issue for Collins to exploit. Her background as a minister of police is giving her an unusual opportunity to hammer Ardern and Poto Williams on law and order.
Eight days after Harry Tam told the nation Ardern trusts him, the question of her being soft on gangs is still running hot. A split-screen with gang members riding in convoy alongside Ardern talking in this tough interview with Ryan Bridges is the kind of publicity she really doesn't need.
Muldoon got the better of Rowling by painting him as weak and ineffectual. It won't be too hard for Collins to do the same to Ardern — and she's doing it.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2021/07/prime-minister-jacinda-…

Up
0

I believe people are a bit over the constant whistles aimed at a very small % of our population - a simple health policy would address that issue, which is still long overdue. What National need is an err national strategy - sell us and NZ will support it. not a soul crushing fear fest but an inclusive national pride. of who we all are and not just one. Jacinda is killing it in this area. Already one of the greats.

Up
0

...duck or rabbit...

Up
0

If the 'ute tax' makes it to your top 3, you're just admitting that things aren't bad at all.

Up
0

My view is that Collins is emphatically not an electable leader. She is not quick witted, not overly articulate, lacks the ability to ‘connect’, doesn’t have charisma, and does not do TV well. All that eyebrow stuff for Gods sake, and walking into that ‘Karen’ trap. Then there is the Dirty Politics stuff, the history of undermining and leaking, and her feud with JK. Her caucus doesn’t fear her, although many actively dislike her. Luxon has been anointed and will be crowned in the next few months. Of that I am sure. Rather see Bill English back, though. The National Party desperately needs backbone and integrity.

Up
0

Luxon is as unelectable as Collins.

Up
0

mercenary Mitchell - get some military in there. We might need it. I'm all for a deterrent. go right for the right reasons. an eco conservative movement getting stronger.

Up
0

As an addendum, the only current MP I feel able to relate to is Nicola Willis. David Seymour at first glance seems the real deal, but quickly fails the scratch test. A sad state of affairs for someone like me, a slightly to the right of centre voter. It seems we have just two parties, Green/Labour and ACT/National. MMP is a sham without the likes of NZ First, or some other genuinely independent party.

Up
0

Whoops , I thought demand the debate was a request for someone to come up with some fresh ideas for the National party.
Question time is the place for the debate, but Collins almost always gets walked over by Govenment MP's. she seems apologetic and almost shy after asking a question , and backs down , often withdrawing questions. I suspect she is actually quite a nice person , trying to act tough . Her "getting it in the behind "slogan, came across as a naughty upper class boarding school girl trying to impress the farmer boys, who probably would have preferred something a bit cruder.

Up
0