sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

A leaky house on the North Shore stole the show at this week's apartment auction

Property
A leaky house on the North Shore stole the show at this week's apartment auction

Ray White City Apartments sold five apartments under the hammer with another three passed in at this week's auction, although one of those that was passed in was subsequently sold shortly afterwards.

Half of the apartments on offer were quick flicks that were purchased late last year and then put back on the market, perhaps after being given a tart up.

There was surprisingly strong bidding for a leaky, mono clad house at Browns Bay on the North Shore, with potential buyers prepared to take a punt that the cost of recladding or rebuilding would be less than the improvement in value that would result from fixing it up.

See below for the full results of this week's Ray White City Apartments auction and also the latest apartment sales results from Impression Real Estate.

Ray White City Apartments auction results:

  • 7C/105 Albert St. Manhattan building. An 80 square metre two bedroom, two bathroom unit with a car park. Vacant. There were multiple bidders but it was passed in at $630,000 but then sold later in the day. The eventual selling price was not disclosed. According to QV.co.nz it had been purchased for  $359,000 in 2007. Rates were $1496 and the body corporate levy $5999. The agent was Krister Samuel
  • 308/53 Cook St. Aura building..Quick flick. A 49 square metre, two bedroom/two bathroom unit with narrow balcony. Vacant. There were multiple bidders and it sold under the hammer $450,000. According to QV.co.nz it had been purchased in September last year for $374,000.Rates were $1088 and the body corporate levy $4367. The agent was Dusan Valenta.
  • 8C/11 Howe St. Meridian building. Quick flick. A 21 square metre, partially furnished studio. Vacant. There were multiple bids and it sold under the hammer for $240,000. According to QV.co.nz it had been purchased in October last year for $215,000. Rates were $907 and the body corporate levy $3111.The agent was Krister Samuel.
  • 44B Carlisle Rd. Browns Bay. Leaky home.  A 200 square metre, two storey house with five bedrooms, two bathrooms and a double garage on a 500 square metre rear section. Vacant. The house was a leaky building and there was no possibility of making a legal claim against third parties, and it would need to be reclad or rebuilt. There was spirited bidding from a handful of potential buyers and it sold under the hammer for $454,000. According to QV.co.nz it had been purchased for $382,000 in 2003. The agent was Dominic Worthington.
  • 8F/18 Scotia Place. Nova en Scotia. A 53 square metre, two bedroom apartment with a car park. Vacant. There were multiple bidders and it sold under the hammer for $525,000. According to QV.co.nz it had been purchased for $245,000 in 2011. Rates were $1434 and the body corporate levy $4749. The agents were Mitch Agnew and Ryan Bridgman.
  • 318/184 Symonds St. Citta building. A 39 square metre studio with a car park. Vacant. There was only one bidder for the unit and it sold under the hammer for $310.000. According to QV.co.nz it had been purchased in 2004 for $233,000. Rates were $1006 and the body corporate levy $2957. The agent was Keisha Gutierrez.
  • 2B/18 Scotia Place. Nova en Scotia building. Quick Flick. A 53 square metre, two bedroom unit with balcony. Vacant. There was only one bid on the property and it was passed in at $430,000. According to QV.co.nz it had been purchased in December last year for $383,650. Rates were $1310 and the body corporate levy $3515. The agents were Mitch Agnew and Ryan Bridgman.
  • 8/145 Symonds St. Madison building. Quick flick. A 68 square metre, three bedroom unit. Vacant.  Recently redecorated. There were no bids and it was passed in. According to QV.co.nz the unit had been purchased for $407,500 in August last year. The agent was Dusan Valenta.

Recent Auckland apartment sales by Impression Real Estate:

  • 1514/430 Queen St. Volt building. A 37 square metre, two bedroom furnished unit with balcony. Vacant. Sold for $338,500. Had previously been purchased for $250,000 in 2008. Rates were $1125 and the body corporate levy $4280.
  • 1516/430 Queen St. Volt building. A 40 square metre two bedroom, furnished unit with balcony. Rented at $430 a week. Sold for $335,000. Rates were $1175 and the body corporate levy $4619.
  • 1414/430 Queen St. Volt building. A 37 square metre, two bedroom unit with balcony. Sold for $338,000. Tenanted at $450 a week. Rates were $1113 and the body corporate levy $4238.
  • 2D/2 Eden Cres. Argent Hall building. A 32 square metre, furnished studio with balcony. Sold for $270,000. Was previously purchased for $102,000 in 2001. Rates were $1014 and the body corporate levy $2618.
  • 206/53 Cook St. Aura building. A 49 square metre two bedroom unit with balcony. Vacant. Sold for $377,000. Rates were $1088 and the body corporate levy $4131.
  • 505/72 Nelson St. Zest building. A 36 square metre, two bedroom, furnished unit. Vacant. Sold for $290,000. Previously purchased for $157,500 in 2003. Rates were $1088 and the body corporate levy $3371.
  • 1007/53 Cook St. Aura building. A 49 square metre, two bedroom unit with balcony. Vacant. Sold for $381,000. Rates were $1224 and the body corporate levy $4958.
  • 206/207 Federal St. Federal building. A 48 square metre, two bedroom, furnished unit with balcony. Rented at $520 a week. Sold for $401,000. Previously purchased for $314,000 in 2008. Rates were $1212 and the body corporate levy $4063.

You can receive all of our property articles automatically by subscribing to our free email Property Newsletter. This will deliver all of our property-related articles, including auction results and interest rate updates, directly to your in-box 3-5 times a week. We don't share your details with third parties and you can unsubscribe at any time. To subscribe just click on this link, scroll down to "Property email newsletter"and enter your email address. 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

14 Comments

This is a C()(@ -up of epidemic proportions

NOT ONLY does Government subsidize rentals through the housing rental subsidy for low income earners , it allows tax deductions and income off-sets for housing investors . The PI therefore not only gets a tax break from the rest of us on his personal tax , his rental income is topped up by the Government .

How did it ever get to this .?

This utter stupidity cannot go on forever .

'Its costing ordinary taxpayers and the Government big money AND TO WHAT END ?

Up
0

maybe the government should then own the properties and rent them out instead subsidizing investors and property owners.

Up
0

ala singapore which they like to hold up as a model of open economy etc

Up
0

I thought I read on here yesterday that the Government owns 1 out of every 16 homes in Auckland already so I don't think that the Government ownership model is of any use to anyone....people living in State houses get accommodation supplements too!

Up
0

they own 63000 of which 46% are in Auckland so 29,000 in Auckland, last census 2013 had Auckland with 500,000 houses, so 1 in 16 is about right.
people in state housing only get charged 25% of their income hence the queue to get into one, and once in the fight to stay

Up
0

Absolutely Boatman.
You must have watched the same video as I did on NZHerald's business website yesterday.
( on Herald's new 'Hub' ).
This is the most succinct telling video interview I have ever seen on the property boom. Absolutely brilliant !!! And HSBC's Paul Glass tells it like it is ! What an eye-opener . Everyone even remotely interested in the housing market MUST WATCH THIS VIDEO INTERVIEW !!!!!!!!!!

Up
0

please link.

Up
0

Sorry Spacex, I'm from the pre-IT-revolution era, thus I don't know how to link.
On rereading my article I hope no-one thought I was being ironic......I genuinely think this video
is a revelation.

Up
0

"This utter stupidity cannot go on forever ."

Hmm, it can until it can't. They will pull every lever to keep the ponzi scheme going, keeping those at the top from taking a hit at the expense of all the rest. We know this, we have seen this before and they gave it a name. "too big too fail". Now keep in mind that the US is hardly a socialist country. So imagine the TBTF concept being implemented here in NZ? You really think the government let the likes of Fonterra sink?

Up
0

Same thing in dairy land prices

Up
0

No true - yet. See rebuttal in this thread.

Up
0

Aside from the market activity of Auckland housing, let's consider the core product. Most suburban Auckland houses are not strong, good quality houses. They leak, they are cold and damp in winter and can only be comfortable once you have a heat pump or two roaring away on outside walls. These houses are basically sheds.

Poor quality houses aren't a 90s aberration either. Local tradies shake their heads (as they do about everything, admittedly) about the corners cut with new builds. They certainly seem pretty shabby, flimsy buildings from the outside,

We seem to have collectively lowered our expectations. Aucklanders are getting into debt buying sheds.

Up
0

You must run in different circles to me. Plenty of good quality houses around. I prefer houses built in the 1960's for quality bones. Then fully insulate floor, roof and walls.

Up
0

Doesn't really matter what you build its going to be damp even if its not leaky. Auckland has just crazy levels of humidity. I have to run two dehumidifiers to try and get the moisture level down to anything close to what is considered normal in many countries. Yes you need a couple of heatpumps and yes overall the build quality is poor and many will argue we are still putting up sheds. My house has some serious flaws, but I got lucky and the roof doesn't leak and the design incorporated eaves.

Up
0