sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Anna Whyte looks at Christopher Luxon's second National Party leadership confidence vote, his brutal ministerial sacking and what a new political poll means

Public Policy / analysis
Anna Whyte looks at Christopher Luxon's second National Party leadership confidence vote, his brutal ministerial sacking and what a new political poll means
lux
Christopher Luxon emerges after the National Party caucus meeting. Photo: Anna Whyte.

  • Christopher Luxon is still the country’s Prime Minister
  • He sacked Chris Penk as a minister for a leadership challenge
  • New polling sees large moves and Opportunity on 8%

In what feels like dejavu, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has swotted away yet another round of leadership speculation. This time only three months ahead of the election and only four months after his last leadership vote.

Standing in the exact same position in Parliament’s banquet hall with Nicola Willis on his right, Luxon read out another short statement, citing unity and a successful confidence vote by his caucus, before leaving media without taking questions.

Christopher Luxon, with Nicola Willis on his left and Silvia Wood on his right, after August's leadership confidence vote - Anna Whyte

Exactly like April’s confidence vote, where he moved a formal motion to confirm his leadership after reports of discontent in his caucus began to circulate and polls showed a sharp decline in public confidence.

In April, his notes were printed, this time they were handwritten. He and Willis stood alone in April. This time he stood with his top MPs, including Erica Stanford who was tipped as a potential leadership contender, and National Party president Silvia Wood.

"The caucus has answered clearly and decisively. It has backed my leadership. That matter is now closed, and it won't be, and I won't be commenting further on it,” Luxon said in April.

“I have the full support of our caucus,” he commented this week. “Our caucus is united and it is determined to win this election.”

But this time, Luxon delivered a brutal ministerial sacking. Defence Minister Chris Penk, widely viewed as a capable up and comer, lost his place in Cabinet following what Luxon said was a leadership challenge.

His position was untenable.

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon stands next to Finance Minister Nicola Willis, as he reads a prepared statement about his leadership. Image source: Anna Whyte

The country was more than six months out from the election last time, and now it’s only three.

Meaning for National, without the potential new leadership buoyancy most parties experience after a change, a rabbit out of the hat in the way of a turbo-driven election campaign will be needed to convince the country to come back on board.

The 1News Verian Poll, which was in the field up until Tuesday evening, had National steady on 29% and Labour down 2 %-points to 30%.

The Green Party was on 12%, ACT on 9%, NZ First on 8% and Opportunity Party was up to 8%. Interestingly, ACT was up by 3%-points and NZ First was down 3%-points since 1News’ last poll in June.

The right bloc would have 57 seats with those numbers if reflected on election day. Labour would have 38 and the Green Party would have 15 and Te Pati Maori would have six if they won back all their electorate seats, giving that side 59. Opportunity would have nine seats.

The magic number is 61, and Opportunity may be looking like an attractive coalition partner for Labour following Te Pati Maori’s recent internal troubles.

Parliament wraps up at the end of next month, rising on September 24 and dissolving on October 1 before the November 7 election. It's all at stake for these parties, and you can bet there will be even more drama as the country heads closer to the polls. 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

19 Comments

National just blew the election

I cannot vote for Willis as Finance Min anymore so National lost any chance of party tick from me

 

 

Up
10

What has Willis done wrong? To me she seems like a Bill English replica, with Luxon the poor man's John Key. Clasic National, but I suspect the world has moved on since then. 

Up
2

The ferry debacle for starters.



We would have had ferries this year if not for that, and now we must wait another 3 years for worse ferries, while shortly 2 of the 3 interislander boats will be off to the drydock for servicing overseas. I've a friend who works with them and will be paid to fly to Singapore and come back with one of them when servicing is finished.



Now consider the loss in freight capacity from this, the impact on freight costs resultingly during the capacity squeeze, the loss of passenger capacity, and therefore ability to shift passengers, vehicles and freight to other sailings if the weather is adverse, and the risk of any other operating ferries with bluebridge or interislander having issues during this time. The costs are massive.



Nicky-no-boats won't last the election.

Up
9

Leaders are everything in politics, and when I saw Qiulae Wong for the first time maybe 6 months ago I knew they had a reasonable chance. Look at the other leaders she's up against; Luxon, Hipkins, Peters, Seymour, Swarbric. She could be the best of the lot!

I probably wont vote for her due to their tax policy, if it wasn't for that I think Opportunity would be a real contender. 

Up
1

Lipstick on a pig 

Up
6

Better than the other pigs without lipstick?

I also think the female vote is very underrated in NZ. If you're female and not extreme left (green), it's a sausage fest in terms of leaders. Most voters are somewhere near the centre, and Oppertunity are the only centre party with a female in charge. 

Up
8

Centre. You can't be serious. More left than Labour and depending on which policy you examine, more left than the Greens.

Up
2

Depends on which policy yes 

Up
1

Let’s face it they aren’t going to have enough vote to get the tax policy over the line. They have other policy, particularly environmental/conservation that is attractive. 

Up
8

Their bottom lines such as reigning in corporate lobbying are far far more likely than a wishful tax overhaul, and is an understandably very popular stance given how the current bunch have rolled

Up
11

What just happened, Anna? 

A whole lot of people who would tell you they are journalists, turned out to be not so. 

A storm in a very shallow teacup, blown out of all proportion. 

Here's an example of big-picture journalism: Honest Government Ad | Ai

 

Up
4

How is this a storm in a teacup? Two leadership challenges in 4 months for a current prime minster is unprecedented 

Up
5

Exactly Albert. The defenders of Luxon who are spreading the "blame the messenger (media)" narrative have some awkward wrinkles to explain.

In particular, why has Luxon required his caucus to gather in Wellington to do a special in person vote of confidence in his Prime Minster leadership twice in an election year? This is unprecedented.

And why did Luxon sack Chris Penk from Cabinet? A Minister who was widely seen as competent and on top of his posts. 

These facts don't support the narrative that the two leadership challenges were a made up media event. There clearly is concern within the National Party caucus about Luxons performance that have led to two leadership challenges in an election year and it is entirely legitimate for the media to report upon that. 

Up
6

Well if the media feel they are being blamed here for no reason they may as well go ahead and act blamefully. The next three months are likely to witness a Prime Minister under intense scrutiny and interrogation and one that is decidedly ill equipped to handle it. I wonder exactly what he might do if the moderators in the live debates are nominated as T. O’Brien and/or J.Campbell? Unfortunately for National instead of presenting a fresher and younger and more energetic line up they are now being led into an election with suspect characteristics and likely will lose quite a number of seats all due to one small man with an oversized ego.

Up
5

All true Foxglove. I feel sad for Chris Penk. Who was a competent and hardworking cabinet minister. He clearly was encouraged to be a good soldier by one or more of his senior colleagues by being the stalking horse for change. 

But the unity and trust he would have been promised to do the stalking horse job faded into nothing, because as Matthew Hooten has clearly laid out the senior Ministers - Bishop, Willis, Stanford, Brown, and Mitchell - anyone of them who would have done a better job than Luxon could not set aside their personal ambition for the top job to support a single challenger.

The end result is Penk was sacked by Luxon and he has now decided not to stand for re-election. 

 

Up
3

I am still happy to blame the messenger (media).

I listened to National Radio over lunchtime yesterday.  They were in a frenzy.  Guyon Espiner was beside himself, endless 'analysis' despite having no new information.  Ridiculous hype.

Up
3

Is that more of a reflection on Guyon and RNZ being hysterical rather than manipulative?

I don't see Mr Espiner or RNZ or the media in general having the heft to instigate a failed political coup. 

Up
0

Quite obviously Chris Penk didn’t act because some of the media told him to and that necessitated or at least gave reason for PM Luxon to call the caucus meeting in which he then took advantage of the old divide and rule strategy. Except it seems more likely in this case,  that it was his opposing protagonists who divided themselves without much need of input from him. Thanks to that vacillating, lack of a spine and self-interest, National have now made their already shaky ground even more so.

Up
3

Stuff has a story about Erica Stanford supporting PM Luxon after refusing to.  The refusing bit is a lie in my view.

What actually happened was they were sticking microphones in her face as she walked through the airport.

Very wise for her to say nothing, in the circumstance.  Because they would distort it.  Just have they did with no comment at all.

Up
2