sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Allan Barber reports on work within some key innovative partnerships chasing industry-changing improvements in feed conversion for both the dairy and beef industries

Rural News / opinion
Allan Barber reports on work within some key innovative partnerships chasing industry-changing improvements in feed conversion for both the dairy and beef industries
beef cattle

Feed represents over 70% of the cost of beef production which makes feed conversion efficiency an essential component of farm profitability. But there is substantial performance variability across the herd which can be significantly improved by measuring it and the use of genomic testing to sort out the relative efficiency of the cattle. American precision livestock company Vytelle has conducted a study of 49,910 animals that demonstrates the opportunity to improve residual feed intake (RFI) which is a moderately heritable trait.

The study shows a mean of 7.3kg of feed (dry matter) intake for each 1kg of weight gain, but 11% of the population required less than 5kg, while a 10% improvement in RFI produced 43% higher profit. In contrast 10% higher average daily weight gain only improved profit by 18%.

As the traditional production of beef cattle comes under threat from land use change, consumer desire for smaller and less costly cuts, and environmental pressures, it will be necessary to look at more efficient use of resources. This will mean lifting the overall average performance of the beef herd through better selection, culminating in faster weight gain and an earlier slaughter age.

The dairy industry has long been a source of prime and bull calves entering the beef industry, but the quality of dairy beef from a meat and feed conversion perspective has been variable. Dairy farmers want to get non-replacement and bull calves off the farm as quickly as possible, while calf rearers have found the market very unpredictable with no guarantee they will be able to make their desired margin when they come to the point of selling them to a finisher. But there are signs this may be about to change.

Fifth generation Hawkes Bay based beef breeders, Rissington Cattle Company, are convinced a coincidence of regulatory and market dynamics, combined with new and improved technologies will drive unprecedented growth in the dairy beef industry. Rissington is also the only Vytelle system to measure feed efficiency in NZ.

They see seven factors that will accelerate the pace of change: a slow decline in the national dairy herd; sexed semen which will reduce the number of dairy cows needed to generate replacements and produce genetic gains; the ban on live exports of dairy and beef heifers; animal welfare concerns; new DNA tools to identify more efficient beef sires for use with non-replacement dairy cows; reduction of environmental footprint by replacing low performance beef cows or sheep and achieving earlier finishing; and minimising disposal costs of non-replacement calves.

There is no reason prime beef farmers cannot take advantage of the newest and best genetics to improve the quality of traditional beef herds, although they may be able to generate the best returns from using their best bulls to improve the beef producing characteristics of dairy cows. But Jeremy Absolom, Executive Director of Rissington, maintains the dairy industry will largely drive the future beef industry, both out of necessity – what to do with the surplus non-replacement cows – and from dairy’s greater willingness to leverage new technology.

There is of course the small problem of dairy cows’ unsuitability for beef production. Dairy cattle have been selected over generations for their ability to convert grass into milk rather than muscle, meat yield and the correct feed conversion for prime beef production, although Jerseys rank well for marbling and some Holstein Friesian genetics exhibit meat quality.

At this point the main weaknesses of non-replacement dairy cows for prime beef are carcase yield, muscle shape, and feed efficiency. These can be improved by careful selection of appropriate beef genetics, while retaining the desired characteristics of easy calving, high days in milk and short gestation, no dehorning requirement, and marbling.

In response to the obvious question about the current volatility of the calf rearing link in the chain, Absolom is adamant the dairy beef industry is poised to make a comeback and this will be the responsibility of the dairy farmer in the first instance, not the beef breeder.

Dairy farming company Southern Pastures recognises the importance of managing its business with careful consideration for animal welfare, environmental footprint, and productivity. The company is working closely with LIC and Rissington to identify the right beef genetics in combination with technologies such as sexed semen and whole herd mating to AI. This will result in fewer bulls needed for natural service on farm with gains in animal welfare, GHGs and human safety.

In the past 5-10% of calves have been targeted for beef production, but the intention is to increase this proportion to 50% or more, focusing on the animals which exhibit the best traits for marbling, pH, muscle development and fast growth. The objective is to achieve greater efficiencies, reduce GHGs, and channel all calves born towards the outcome best suited for a productive life. Ideally the end result will be an improvement in feed conversion for both the dairy and beef industries.

Southern Pastures applies a strong partnership approach to its business which will be an essential feature of its dairy beef raising ambitions. Rissington’s Profit Maker bull semen and service bulls will produce 750 beef calves over non-dairy replacements in the spring, of which the company will put half with calf rearers and keep half to rear and finish on its farms, so it can measure the herd performance in combination with Rissington and LIC. This is likely to be the case for at least two breeding seasons, while a viable pathway for the dairy beef business is established.

This initiative is still in its early stages and there are several moving parts which must be coordinated – beef trait heritability, feed conversion efficiency, an effective supply chain from rearing to finishing, integrating a beef breeding operation into a dairy business, and no doubt others. But credit must go to the partners in this venture for tackling a difficult intersection of the beef and dairy sectors where each side has much to gain from a constructive outcome.


Current schedule and saleyard prices are available in the right-hand menu of the Rural section of this website.

P2 Steer

Select chart tabs

cents/kg
cents/kg
cents/kg

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

7 Comments

Interesting article 

Have the writer & promoter considered the “National Policy Statement” that does NOT allow any intensification on any land ?
Short version is no farmer can increase the number of animals grazed on any particularly piece of land over and above what was farmed in September 2020. 

So where is these extra animals going to raised ? 

Up
0

It says in the article - by replacing low productivity beef cattle and sheep and earlier finishing due to better growth rates - so no extra land is needed, just more efficient production. Another advantage is dairy beef has a significantly lower carbon footprint than purebred beef.

Up
2

Understood but, replacing low productivity beef and sheep into earlier finishing dairy beef. How does that happen ? Especially on low value land 

Up
0

The producing cows have to get pregnant anyway, so how does sexed semen reduce the number of calves

Up
0

Good question. Maybe the number of calves that get bobbied?

I think the idea is that cow-calf beef operations could move to finishing dairy sourced dairyXbeef calves. Dairy farmers would, during the first half of mating, breed their best cows the female sexed dairy semen, then the rest to beef semen (even male sexed). They would then finish up with naturally mating beef bulls. So you might be able to get rid of all those beef cows and beef calves.  

I think a beef finisher wants early born friesianXbeef if anything. But these calves still struggle to reach finishing weights as well as a 100% beef calf that has been on it's mum well past the 100kg a dairy sourced calf would likely be weaned at. Beef cows are seen as having a place managing rough pasture as well.

I feel that, as a dairy farmer, there is plenty of dairyXbeef calves getting brought to market for the demand. We can generate more but they just end up getting bobbied anyway as the rearers cut you off earlier and earlier. The issue of bobby calves is the dairy industries to solve. It's not the job of the beef industry to come to our rescue.

Up
2

We lose about 28000 ha a year to housing, roads. And emissions restrictions will limit growth. 

Up
0

Your figure of 28,000 ha per year does not look correct. Perhaps you have added an extra zero?
KeithW

 

Up
0