sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.
Breaking news: Fonterra hikes milk price forecast to record-equalling $8.40. More soon.

Greens OK with Super Fund's overseas farm push, wouldn't direct it to only invest in NZ land; Say clear rules needed to keep NZ farms locally-owned

Rural News
Greens OK with Super Fund's overseas farm push, wouldn't direct it to only invest in NZ land; Say clear rules needed to keep NZ farms locally-owned

By Alex Tarrant

Directing the New Zealand Superannuation Fund to buy up rural New Zealand land instead of overseas farms would be an expensive way of making sure land here was locally owned, Green Party co-leader Russel Norman says.

Instead it would be better to have clear rules in place about overseas ownership of New Zealand land, Norman told

The Super Fund last week announced it had bought its first local dairy farm under its NZ$500 million rural land strategy, with NZ$250 million set to be invested in rural land overseas. It is currently seeking international managers to oversee its global farm-buying push. See more in Gareth Vaughan’s February 3 article here.

Each country had to make its own decisions about what assets it wanted to retain in national ownership and what assets it did not, Norman said.

“I’m sure there’d be important parts of the Chinese economy that the Chinese government would never let fall into overseas ownership, and they have a lot of rules around land in particular,” he said.

“So each country needs to decide for themselves what their rules should be.”

Asked whether the Greens would rather the Super Fund invested the entire NZ$500 million in New Zealand, Norman said the party’s view was that there should just be in place strong rules that maintained New Zealand ownership of farmland.

It would be “pretty expensive” to get the Super Fund to buy up available land to stop it going into overseas ownership, Norman said.

“A much cheaper way to do it is actually just to have a clear rule around it. We would actually prefer just to have a clear rule – that’s more our focus than where the Super Fund should spend its money,” he said.

“Also the Super Fund doesn’t have enough money. If there’s serious interest in buying up farmland in New Zealand, the super fund doesn’t have deep enough pockets to deal with that,” Norman said.

Here is a link to the Greens Party's overseas investment policy:

...we need a policy to ensure that New Zealand land remains in New Zealand ownership.

National began a review of foreign ownership laws in 2009 with the aim of weakening the laws. We ran a campaign in support of strong foreign ownership laws and forced a U-turn. When the review was released in September 2010 the government had given itself some powers to block overseas ownership of land in certain circumstances.

The Greens have a much simpler solution - keep the privilege of ownership of New Zealand land for New Zealand citizens, permanent residents and New Zealand owned companies.

The Green Party introduced a private members bill which rules out overseas ownership of farmland over 5 hectares. This simple measure will take some of the pressure off rural land prices, making it easier for New Zealand families to buy a farm. It will also take some pressure off the environment because high land prices and high mortgages are pushing farmers to utilise every square centimetre of their land for more and more production. It will also help our current account deficit, as fewer profits will flow overseas. And it will mean Fonterra won't be undercut by foreign competitors.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.


The NZ Super Fund should also take Government assets (such as energy companies etc) off  their hands to reduce Government debt but keeping the assets in NZ Govt control.

An easy solution to asset sales which would keep high dividend strategic companies under NZ control would cost nothing but would reduce debt and free up equity for critical infrastructure projects.

The other asset NZ asset that needs dealt with is Housing NZ which returns essentially 0% on its net asset value of $16b.  That could save over 3/4 of a billion a year in interest payments - probably too hot an issue to handle though.


Corporate dairy farming compared to family owned dairy farming is inevitably dog tucker.

The corporates always hopelessly overstock rather than trying to maximise production per cow.

And inevitably non owner operated farms are not as well looked after...If you are only a worker for some faceless owner,why would you bother.

As per usual,the masterplan for the first farm they have bought,is to pile more cows on.

Problem is,it is inevitable that whoever they put on to manage the farm,plus Farmright,have no hope of performing as well as the highly skilled present owner.

As for the price paid,it always amuses me when I read an article in a paper where a house or farm has sold,and the vendors/land agent refuse to release the price.

What a load of bollocks.

If you have the right contacts it is a simple matter to find out the price.

Best to spill the beans.

I have little confidence in Farmright...There are too many negative stories out there.

At present,it is a buyers market for farms.

Therefore it is a good time for the Super Fund to be buying.

Going forward,regrettably we are going to see more of rural NZ owned by corporates,and less by families.