sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

New crown company for big irrigation investment to be established; 'we have plenty of water - its about managing it better'

Rural News
New crown company for big irrigation investment to be established; 'we have plenty of water - its about managing it better'
Example of rural spray irrigation. Picture from David Carter's blog, Over The Fence

The Government is establishing a company to act as a bridging investor for regional water infrastructure development, Primary Industries Minister David Carter announced today.

In 2011 the Government signalled plans to invest up to $400 million in regional-scale schemes to encourage third-party capital investment.

Cabinet has now directed that $80 million for the initial stages of the company’s operation be set aside in Budget 2013.

“The development of well-designed storage and irrigation infrastructure has the potential to deliver significant economic growth for our primary industries and support new jobs, which will have a flow-on effect for all New Zealanders,” says Carter.

“New Zealand naturally has plenty of water – this is about managing the resource better for the economy and the environment.”

Carter says that because the opportunity to take a stake in developing regional-scale water infrastructure is new for private investors, it is appropriate for the Government to take a bridging investment role to ensure the right projects can get underway.

“The Crown-owned company will be a minority investor in any development project, and it will also plan to be a relatively short-term investor."

"Reliable irrigation represents a major step in unlocking economic potential for New Zealand, having our tradable sectors growing strongly and delivering on the Government’s economic growth goals. “It will also be better for the environment, as these schemes will lead to more efficient water use, and can provide for the replenishment of aquifers and the restoration of stream and river flows,” Carter says.

Here is the Q&A that came with the announcement:

What is the water infrastructure fund?

The water infrastructure development fund is a Government initiative to help get regional water storage and distribution schemes started. The Government signalled in May 2011 that it would establish Crown investment for irrigation infrastructure for this purpose. It has indicated that an overall amount of $400 million will be made available over a period of years. In December 2012, Cabinet directed that a Crown-owned company be established to run the fund and that $80 million funding for the first year of the company’s operation be set aside in the 2013 Budget. The Government is aware that a number of proposals for regional-level water storage and irrigation schemes are nearing the stage where they are ready to be presented to investors. These include establishing new schemes as well as developing existing ones. The principle behind the Government’s commitment is that it is acting as an enabler for other investors to participate in new water infrastructure development. The Government is interested in a number of benefits from well-run schemes. For example, increased water storage will take some pressure of lowland streams and aquifers. The Crown-owned company has yet to be named.

What does the Government expect to get in return for its equity investment?

There is significant opportunity to generate economic wealth for New Zealand and New Zealanders through more and better water storage and distribution infrastructure. New Zealand naturally has plenty of water – but it can be better managed. The capture and storage of rainfall could be used to make water available during dry summer periods in many regions – for a range of uses and needs. There are significant areas of land that could be more productive with more reliable access to water. The challenge is that the projects that are most needed now are larger, regional-level schemes which require capable governance and management to get the best outcomes, as well as quite large amounts of money. The Government believes that playing a bridging role will get the right projects underway.

What does the Government mean by the “right projects”?

The Government is committed to ensuring that environmental impacts are properly managed. It wants an appropriate balance struck between economic development and environmental management. The Government expects planning to include use of smart, best-practice technologies by the schemes themselves and also by those taking water from them. Another aspect that the Government wants to get right is the appropriate scale of project in relation to the long-term irrigation opportunity. This will result from good investigation and planning. The Government is also encouraging professionalism in all aspects of governance and management of regional water infrastructure. It is important that the right expertise is brought in for each stage. What checks and balances are in place to ensure that growth resulting from these schemes does not result in more pollution? The Government is committed to sustainable growth – to meet community and consumer expectations and fit within resource constraints. Economic analysis and experience show that irrigation development will provide opportunities for a range of land uses. In addition, the Government expects best, modern practices to be used for schemes and for any water use. There are environmental benefits from good water management and use of smart technology. For example there are a range of measures that farmers can use, such as fencing off waterways, riparian planting and making efficient use of water.

How does this announcement link with other aspects of water, such as managing water quality?

The Government’s Fresh Start for Fresh Water programme, which is addressing a wide range of aspects of the governance and management of freshwater in New Zealand, is making good progress. The establishment of this funding is in line with the direction of the Fresh Start for Fresh Water programme. A key aspect of the Fresh Start for Fresh Water programme has been the input of the Land and Water Forum (LAWF), which brought together representatives of a range of interests in freshwater. The Forum has provided three reports and a number of recommendations to the Government, which are being considered. An early outcome from the Forum’s work was the influence it had on the Government deciding in May 2011 to announce the increased role of the Irrigation Acceleration Fund and the establishment of the equity fund, along with a clean-up fund to address some historical matters. The Government also established a National Policy Statement on Freshwater, which requires regional councils to provide for improved freshwater management in their policies and plans. It includes direction on setting limits for water quality and quantity, and improving and maximising the efficient allocation and use of water.

How will the Government decide whether to commit funding to a particular project and how much to commit to each one?

The Crown-owned company that manages the water infrastructure fund will assess proposals that are presented to it against a list of criteria. These will include, that the proposed project: Is technically feasible Will be able to achieve resource consents Has a wide community of interest Will be affordable for potential water users Has potential to provide returns to investors over the long-term The company will be required to use good capital investment practices. People with appropriate expertise in areas such as investment banking and commercial legal knowledge will be used. The Government will be a minority investor in each project, and it will also plan to be a relatively short-term investor. In other words, the Government will take a bridging role to get projects underway.

Who does the Government expect will be interested in investing in these water infrastructure development projects?

The Government expects that when these projects are ready for investors to consider they will attract a wide range of investors, including groups that can generate value from being involved, such as land owners (including iwi) and primary sector processors; and long-term investors, such as super funds. Why is the Government looking to invest in irrigation infrastructure? Offering private investors the opportunity to take a stake in developing regional-scale water infrastructure schemes is something new for many private investors and there is no benchmark as commercial investments. The Government is seeking to encourage private investment: firstly by assisting regional backers to do a good job of the investigation and planning phase to create good-quality proposals, and then by offering the possibility of co-funding if a proposal meets certain criteria.

What is the relationship between the new water infrastructure equity funding and the Irrigation Acceleration Fund?

The Irrigation Acceleration Irrigation Fund (IAF) was launched in May 2011 to provide grants for strategic regional water management studies and to assist in the development of regional-scale rural water infrastructure to the investment-ready prospectus stage. The Government allocated $35 million. The IAF took over from the Community Irrigation Fund, which carried out a similar but more limited function. Proposals for water infrastructure schemes that have been developed with IAF assistance may be suitable for presentation to the new water infrastructure equity fund to seek Government co-funding.

Crown investment in water storage and distribution infrastructure Facts & Figures

The Government has set a target (Business Growth Agenda) of raising the value to the economy of exports from 30 to 40 per cent of GDP by 2025.

The primary sector is an important contributor to export earnings, accounting for 72 percent of merchandise exports (September 2012 quarter).

Access to reliable water is critical for primary production.

A report by the New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (NZIER) in 2010 suggests the Government’s equity funding in regional water infrastructure could support the development of 340,000 hectares of new irrigation. This could boost exports by $1.4 billion a year by 2018 and $4 billion a year by 2026.

NZIER modelling assumed that the resulting land use change would see 42 per cent of the area go to dairying, 16 per cent to mixed livestock, 27 per cent to arable (cropping), 11 per cent to dairy support and four per cent to horticulture.

The Government estimates (Building Infrastructure report, from Business Growth Agenda, 2012) current infrastructure proposals could provide an additional 420,000 ha of irrigation, as well as improving the reliability of current irrigation.

Most of the new area involves storage.

Approximate figures quoted in the report:

Canterbury – 260,000 ha
Hawkes Bay – 40,000 ha
Wellington – 30,000 ha
Nelson/Tasman – 6000 ha

Water infrastructure development will create better environmental outcomes, for example:

Storage will make water available during periods of lower rainfall which can help reduce ecosystem stress

Water storage will take the stress off over-allocated groundwater aquifers and lowland rivers

Application of modern smart technologies that enable efficient use of water and less wastage

More efficient use of water will reduce leaching of nutrients from land to neighbouring waterways.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.


And here's what Fonterra has to say about this:


Fonterra Co-operative Group has welcomed today’s announcement by the Primary Industries Minister, David Carter confirming an $80m investment in this year’s Budget for irrigation and water storage infrastructure.


Managing Director Co-operative Affairs, Todd Muller, said the investment announcement, coupled with the establishment of a Crown vehicle to co-invest in water schemes, was an important step towards boosting agricultural productivity and exports.


“Water is fundamental to dairying and agricultural productivity. Enabling a mix of public and private funding will give investors the necessary confidence to push ahead with schemes at the regional level.


“We will see benefits flow through in increased production and export earnings and we will also see the environmental benefits which will come from improved water flows.


“This investment will not only benefit the agricultural sector, but the economy as a whole.”


Good of the people's government to lend our helping hand (money) to prepackage listing of our water resources for sale to foreigners.


Go into Google Earth and zoom in on Arundel in South Canterbury. What you see is out of date the real one is much, much bigger and on both sides of the road. This, as i understand it, is a private invester who will take the water from the river FREE of charge and then sell it to the farmers.

No wonder the government took over ECAN


Hmm, so David Carter thinks he can pick a winner. Somehow I think history is going to judge him poorly.

 I suspect you can buy dairy land in NZ at present for less than the cost of developing a dryland farm into dairy.  

  Politicans don't like reason and reality getting in the way of a idea thats getting them some press coverage and a photo op.

 Even his electorate couldn't pick a winner.


When Owen Glenn has his private study on NZ's appalling abuse statistics completed.....the Pollies might just find out it is coming from them down.


Now everyone get back to work as we all have to make a bit more dosh for the dark side that walks the halls of Parliament....come on it's only 80mil this year. 




BNZ Advisory quoted in HBRC's feasibility study into the Ruataniwha Water Supply Project:…



Full privatisation (even with perpetual private sector ownership) is not feasible as private sector investors will not take into account the considerable (approximately $10m p.a.) environmental benefits directly flowing from the Project, or the 4% increase in regional GDP. If the Project was funded with 100% private sector funding from the outset, the distribution price required to derive sufficient internal Project returns would be prohibitive to farmers.


That $10 million environmental benefit is because water in the scheme is now considered worth 25 cents per cubic metre. The 40 million cubic metres of water left as residual flows in the Makaroro River each year therefore has an environmental value to be paid by the public.


you have to be kidding, thats unbelievable, Im speechless.