sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Despite expectations of an environmental and biosecurity reset, Budget 2018 was a boring-as-usual effort offering little new direction for the rural community

Rural News
Despite expectations of an environmental and biosecurity reset, Budget 2018 was a boring-as-usual effort offering little new direction for the rural community

By Guy Trafford

It has been just as well that farmers have not had too high expectations from the budget. If they had they would have been disappointed.

Some additional funding for bio-security was seriously needed and has come with +$9.3 mln extra spread over the next four years. Not a lot but something.

Treasury’s risk analysis paper on general Risks to the economy doesn’t see bio-security as a major risk as “they usually occur infrequently and cannot be predicted” and “once they occur then choices arise about how to respond”. So, given this attitude behind the scenes it’s not surprising the preventative measures are not high on the schedule.

MPI has received a further +$38 mln to help with operational expenses over the next two years, no doubt as part of the “choices that arise about how to respond”.

Probably the best news for farmers for now is the absence of further taxes and levy’s being imposed upon the rural sector for environmental externalities such as nutrient outputs and greenhouse gases.

For farmer-initiated research a further +$15 mln for the Sustainable Farming Fund (SFF) will be welcomed as well +$5 mln for assisting with the further development of Overseer.

Given the government's focus on the environment and climate change only +$12 mln has been aimed at the Climate Change Law Reform and the setting up of the Independent Climate Change Commission - although there is the $100 mln Green Investment Fund over four years for encouraging new green technologies and initiatives may get some traction.

DoC has also received a welcomed and way overdue lift in their funding. However, given the number and range of issues currently afflicting New Zealand’s valuable natural resources it is still just playing around the fringes.

So some may think no news is good news, as at least it means no bad news.

But if New Zealand were looking forward to a new strategy forward, then I believe most will be disappointed and an opportunity to see a refreshingly new approach has gone begging and given the outline for the next three years not much in the offing there as well.

Leading up to the budget the rhetoric was for something “transformational”. The reality, which seems to be the case for most New Zealand budgets for the last decade or so is business (or boring) as usual. No doubt some sectors will welcome this.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.


Considering scare mongering view points expressed by some rural commentators about all the damage the new government was going to do to the rural sector a 'boring' budget was a great outcome. And instead of listening to farmers bitching about what is wrong with the world it might be time to enjoy the good times we are currently having..


Are you suggesting that MPI being revamped to Fisheries, Forestry, NZ Food Safety and not least Biosecurity is not a good idea? What was it - 157 incursions during the past 9 years. Of course that will be good for all these sectors. I am hoping that NZ Food Safety will kill importation of Organic food from China which is on the MPI site. It is about trust and as someone who eats organic and spray free food = China? No


No, its a very good idea and I stated that when it came out. I also said at the time that I hoped they would receive extra funding and staffing as otherwise it's just shifting chairs on the Titanic.