Days to the General Election: 20
See Party Policies here. Party Lists here.

RBNZ defers regulatory initiatives to enable banks and insurers to focus on tackling COVID-19 challenges; Bank outsourcing policy and insurance review among work affected

RBNZ defers regulatory initiatives to enable banks and insurers to focus on tackling COVID-19 challenges; Bank outsourcing policy and insurance review among work affected
Adrian Orr

The Reserve Bank (RBNZ) is delaying or slowing down most of its regulatory initiatives for at least six months to free up its own resources, as well as those of banks and insurers, to tackle COVID-19 challenges.

It’s also extending the transition period for its revised outsourcing policy, which requires large banks to have the legal and practical ability to control and execute outsourced functions (like IT, accounting and call centres) themselves. Affected banks - ANZ, ASB, BNZ and Westpac - will now need to be fully compliant with the new requirements by October 1, 2023, instead of 2022. 

The move follows the RBNZ on Monday deferring the start date of new bank capital rules by 12 months to July 1, 2021. This is expected to enable banks to provide an additional $47 billion of credit.

The RBNZ was planning to publish draft policy documents around these new rules on April 1, 2020, but is postponing this for the “time being”.

The other work it’s deferring includes:

  • Review of the bank liquidity thematic review (and subsequent review of the liquidity policy (BS13);
  • Review of the Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act 2010;
  • Standard terms for Residential Mortgage Obligations;
  • Cyber resilience guidelines for all regulated entities;
  • Revisions to banks’ disclosure of regulatory breaches;
  • Review of the stress-testing framework and planned bank stress-tests;
  • Revising the process for approving banks’ internal capital adequacy models for credit risk; and
  • Future of cash – standards for banknote-processing machines.

RBNZ Deputy Governor Geoff Bascand said the RBNZ and other agencies are working closely to ensure the country's financial markets operate smoothly and effectively, and that credit is available to households and businesses.

“In such uncertain times, it is important that firms have as much capacity as possible to deal with critical problems as they arise,” he said.

“So it makes sense for regulators to free up financial institutions to focus on matters such as helping customers through financial or other stress, or increasing their degree of monitoring and managing their own most urgent risks.

“Some regulatory initiatives require regular industry-wide workshops and these are not feasible at the moment.”

The RBNZ’s move follows it meeting with the Council of Financial Regulators (the Financial Markets Authority, Commerce Commission, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment and Treasury) to discuss what can be done to allow financial institutions to focus on their businesses and customers at such a disruptive time.

A review of the Reserve Bank Act is still underway. The introduction of a deposit insurance scheme with a $50,000 limit is part of this review. 

Both Bascand and Finance Minister Grant Robertson this week told interest.co.nz there weren't plans to introduce a temporary regime in light of COVID-19. They stressed, banks are well capitalised. 

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

15 Comments

"A review of the Reserve Bank Act is still underway. The introduction of a deposit insurance scheme with a $50,000 limit is part of this review. " - fingers crossed this happens before sh** hits the fan.

They missed the boat on that one. It should have been announced and passed as part of yesterdays announcement.

They will probably wait until the budget, but I think it may be too late by then.

Physical gold maybe? Are things really that bad... I think maybe.

50k is nowhere near enough, as we don't have enough banks to spread the risk across for many people who have maybe sold shares or houses recently, and haven't repurchased yet. We have allowed some to merge reducing the number of banks too.

Agreed. Should have been in place already. Opportunity missed big time.

Gee, that's a lot of work to defer. The nervous side of me worries that RBNZ staff will instead be preparing for the management of any OBR events.

Must be quite a few of RBNZ resources going to Climate Change effect, unless of course that's all outside consultants. They should postpone that study for at least a year and direct internal resources to hone up on their OBR event process. I think it was 24h and the bank would be up and running again. More like 24 days.

Just watched some US TV (broadcaster on both sides of their political spectrum) and it's beginning to dawn on them that it's going to be worse than bad.
1 trillion 'stimulus' isn't going to be enough, to 2 or 3. It's becoming apparent that one way or another Depression is coming.

Despite the depression or recession someone somewhere will be making money and come out of it smelling of roses.

And you can bet it will be the banks again.

Should have fast-tracked the stress test framework

I thought the banks had already been stress tested and they had come flying through. Of course there's stress and more stress and I don't think the test criteria was ever published

Has it been suggested that we quarantine the RBNZ?

The situation is changing daily. Better to focus on containment and revival. Surely the regulator has other reporting systems available regularly to assess the health of the banks. Task the bank auditors with more rigorous checks and reporting, half the battle is won.

Who's going to audit, when the big four accounting consultants firms are part of the same rotten system.

Days to the General Election: 20
See Party Policies here. Party Lists here.