sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Inflation still has a long way to fall but a 'soft landing' remains possible

Economy / analysis
Inflation still has a long way to fall but a 'soft landing' remains possible
An airplane lands amid fireworks
Photo by Abhishek Singh on Unsplash

The world’s most important central bank announced this week that it no longer expects to see a recession in the world’s largest economy. 

Jerome Powell, chairman of the US Federal Reserve, made the pronouncement on Thursday after delivering an eleventh rate hike which took US benchmark rates to 5.25% to 5.50%.

It was similar to the message delivered by New Zealand’s own central bank during the May monetary policy statement. The Reserve Bank lifted its gross domestic product forecast to include only the shallowest of recessions in 2023.

In the accompanying press conference, Reserve Bank governor Adrian Orr said it should be read as a forecast of flat economic growth. The Treasury had a similar forecast in May which showed NZ missing a recession, again by the thinnest of margins. 

New Zealand has, of course, had two quarters of negative growth which means it is technically in recession. Some might argue this means the ‘soft landing’ target has already been missed. 

However, two quarters of marginally negative economic growth doesn’t mean the economy has experienced the sort of severe downturn we might associate with the R-word. 

While many in New Zealand have been experiencing economic pain, others have remained relatively immune. The net effect has not been a significant decrease in economic output.

Wages have almost kept pace with inflation and the labour market has yet to show any signs of weakness, although many expect those signals to show up in labour data next week. 

Inverted yield curve 

One long-watched harbinging of recession is the yield curve, which charts the difference in rates paid on government bonds over different time horizons. 

Investors typically expect to be paid more interest for lending over a longer term, and so rates are usually higher on those bonds than on shorter-term bonds — this creates an upward sloping yield curve. 

However, the yield curve on both NZ and US government bonds has been inverted for more than a year. Short-term bonds offer higher interest rates than longer-term ones, which creates a downward sloping curve. 

This means investors expect interest rates to fall, which usually only happens when the economy is struggling. And so, an inverted yield curve generally signals a coming recession. 

If the bond market is correct, someone should tell the stock market. The S&P 500 has climbed over 18% during 2023 and is only down 5% from its 2021 peak. 

The S&P NZX 50 has not performed as well, however. It is up just 3% this year and 12% below its peak. But it has been rallying and is up 13% from the lowest point of 2022. 

Traders and forecasters may be getting over confident. As New York Times correspondent Jeanna Smialek pointed out this week, US recessions in 1989, 2000, and 2007 were all preceded by declarations of a ‘soft landing’. 

Headline inflation has been falling without a corresponding rise in unemployment, this has given many hope that the 2% target can be achieved without a serious slowdown. 

However, economists warn that ‘sticky’ core inflation in New Zealand won’t budge without some slack appearing in the labour market. Other economies are also facing this challenge. 

Softish landings

The phrase ‘soft landing’ has been used in economics since the 1980s and was particularly prevalent when former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan successfully engineered one in 1994 and 1995. 

In a recent paper, Alan Blinder—Greenspan’s vice-chair at the Fed—argued soft landings are not hard to find, if you are willing to be a little loose with the definition.   

Any tightening cycle which resulted in less than a 1% decline in Gross Domestic Product, and didn’t get officially declared a recession by the National Bureau of Economic Research, could be considered a “softish landing”. 

The US Federal Reserve has tightened monetary policy to combat inflation 11 previous times since 1965 and has achieved a softish landing in about half of them. 

NZ’s current conditions definitely meet this definition of “softish”, although with inflation still at 6% the actual landing remains a long way off. 

Blinder said the likelihood of landing the economy softly depends on how high the “plane” was flying before it began to descend.

“Alan Greenspan’s perfect soft landing in 1994–1995 did not bring inflation down at all; it merely avoided what was thought to be a potential rise in the inflation rate. Paul Volcker, in stark contrast, inherited a double-digit inflation rate in 1979, which he brought down to about 4%. It was a long way down, and the landing was rough”.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

18 Comments

The US looks like it will get the soft landing. Not sure about NZ, personally I think a long slow landing would be best but maybe the RBNZ thinks differently 

Up
5

Ben Bernake Fed chairman also said Lehmann bros wouldn't go broke

Up
6

Can kicking quote - "Preventing liquidation of an unbalanced market will leave you in tears" - Ben Bernanke. 

We haven't yet seen the tears. Stock market valuations do not reflect reality at all. 

Up
7

But yet earnings are pretty good. Certainly better than expected. 

Up
5

So it doesn’t matter if more than half your pop is getting worse off. It only matters if for 6m you get no GDP growth. Er? Is this really what a good economy produces?

Up
5

Indeed:  

Banks have migrated away from lending to productive business enterprises because the risk weights can be as high as 150%. Thus around 60% of NZ bank lending is dedicated to residential property mortgages owed by one third of already wealthy households, at risk weights around 35%.

Up
4

Past time to eliminate overhead costs of rent extraction from national GDP accounting.

Whereas formal economic models explicitly state their assumptions (whether realistic or not), national accounting frameworks feature various implicit boundaries, which are not shown along with the data but are rather buried in technical notes on ‘methodology’. For example, the interest- based financial services mentioned above were originally considered mere transfers and thus outside the production boundary before 1968 (Christophers 2011). The 1968 System of National Accounts (1968 SNA) moved the production boundary by representing these services as inputs to an imaginary sector (thus making the assumption that they were ‘implicitly’ productive), whereas the 1993 SNA moved it further by considering such services to be the final consumption of households (and thus explicitly productive). The 2008 SNA went even further by stipulating that even the lending of banks’ own funds was a productive activity (dropping the pretense of ‘intermediation’ between savers and borrowers originally used to portray banking as a productive activity). In each of these cases the assumption of the level of productiveness of interest-based financial services was not explicit in the data, but rather implicit in the location of the boundary. Similarly, R&D expenditures by firms, governments and non-profit organizations were previously assumed to be intermediate inputs (or costs) of these entities, and thus deducted from GDP, but have been reclassified by SNA 2008 as investments in fixed assets, and are thus now counted in GDP. This adjustment added around $560 billion to US GDP in 2013 (when the country adopted SNA 2008) - more than Sweden’s entire output that year - and conveniently reinforced “America’s status as the world’s largest economy and [opened] up a bit more breathing space over fast-closing China” (EIU 2013). Different boundaries in the national accounts are thus based on different assumptions and lead to different results, but less explicitly than formal economic models. This contrast with explicit models is thus the second reason why MMT had not yet affected national accounting. Most economists do not even learn the details of national accounting in their professional training, and the measurement (or rather construction) of macroeconomic aggregates such as GDP is outsourced to official statisticians. It is simply not considered part of the conversation, neither in mainstream nor in heterodox circles. Link/GDP overhead

Up
3

Consensus in the US in August 2008 was that the banking crisis ended with Bear Sterns in March, and there was not going to be a recession. Turns out they had been in mild recession for 9 months and a global financial crisis was about to erupt......

Up
9

Nothing to see here, sir 👀

Up
2

soft landing for supermarket and airline owners maybe,but their customers should be advised to assume a brace position to minimise damage.

Up
3

Soft landing. Yeah nah... brace brace brace.

Up
4

The 'soft landing' propaganda blitz from MSM heavyweights. All published on same day. 

1. How the U.S. Economy Is Sticking the Soft Landing (WSJ)

https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-the-u-s-economy-is-sticking-the-soft-l…

2. Confidence grows that Federal Reserve can deliver a soft landing for US economy (FT)

https://www.ft.com/content/078cc92a-015d-4cc3-9c5a-46849f359000

3. Economic Data Bolster Soft Landing Hopes (NYT)

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/28/business/inflation-consumer-fed.html

Up
8

All we need is Cramer to go full blown soft landing, that will be the signal to "BRACE - BRACE - BRACE!"

.... too late Cramer: Fed on the cusp of a 'soft, safe landing' in inflation fight (cnbc.com)

Brace for impact!

Up
1

I called a long deleveraging after the next boom a decade ago. The governments bailed out the banks, there's no one to bail out the governments.

Up
3

If you believe RBNZs forecasting we're going to go from a stable 3.4% unemployment to 4.6% unemployment within six months. This would be one of the most severe employment recessions in New Zealands history, much akin to the financial crisis in severity.

Would I call that scenario a "smooth landing"? No, I would call that a suicidal nosedive straight into a mountain.

Up
7

Wages have nearly kept up inflation says Dan. How come 34% of workers did not get a pay rise over the last year. Statistics, statistics and dammed lies.

Up
5

Wages have nearly kept up inflation says Dan. How come 34% of workers did not get a pay rise over the last year. Statistics, statistics and dammed lies.

Using official data, one usually finds that income (wage) growth does not lag the CPI by that much. Sometimes par, somethings higher. Over the medium / long term lower. 

But the CPI is watered down inflation. For ex, it doesn't necessarily represent money supply growth. Pvte banks are responsible for much of the money supply that impacts the hoi polloi. That feeds the bubble.  

Up
2

The US will obviously get a soft landing, tightened monetary policy is just squeezing specific sectors (construction, finance) and households are largely unaffected. At the same time, US Govt is injecting massive fiscal stimulus.

In NZ, we have gone from roughly $65m a day of net bank credit stimulus + $15m day of net govt spending ($80m / day total) to about $20m a day bank credit and about $5m of net Govt spending ($25m / day total).

This stimulus is being more than removed by growing overseas savings (due to current account deficit), so NZ bank accounts are starting to empty and have been in real terms for a while.

This is not a recipe for a soft landing in NZ! I had money on the technical recession a year ago, and with migrant numbers exceeding job growth, things are not looking pretty for the rest of the year.

Up
3