sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Falling laptop and iPhone prices are making room for rising housing and food costs within the 2% inflation target

Economy / opinion
Falling laptop and iPhone prices are making room for rising housing and food costs within the 2% inflation target
Man at an ANZ ATM machine

If inflation has been on target for an entire year, why are New Zealanders still so frustrated by the high cost of living that they’re trying to churn their own block of $10 butter?

That question has been bugging me. Why does it still feel like a crisis?

Prices have stayed high for so long that Madeleine Chapman, editor of the Spinoff, argued we should start calling it the “cost of living reality” and admit it’s not going away.

Inflation is temporary; price levels are forever. But it’s not just that prices are high, many people feel their costs are still rising while their incomes fall further behind.

At first glance, the headline numbers don’t back this narrative. But take a closer look.

There are different ways to measure inflation. The Consumers Price Index (CPI) is the official basket of goods and services built to help the Reserve Bank (RBNZ) track and manage prices.

But the central bank itself focuses more on core inflation, which excludes volatile items and one-offs unlikely to create lasting pressure.

The RBNZ estimates core inflation to be about 2.8% and easing. Statistics NZ has headline inflation at 2.7% and rising. Both are within the target range, albeit at the top end.

Prices vs costs

Households care about a different set of prices. Stats NZ’s Household Living-costs Price Index (HLPI) includes interest payments and uses different weights for the categories.

When last updated in December, it showed household costs had risen 3% over 2024, compared to 2.2% in the CPI. That gap, if sustained, may help explain why costs still feel like they’re climbing too quickly.

This HLPI shows household costs rose more than 25% during the four years to December, while the CPI recorded a slightly lower 22.3% increase.

A 25% lift is a lot to absorb. But it doesn’t fully explain the crisis, because wages have broadly kept up. Median weekly earnings rose 26.8% over the same period, a 1.4% real gain after household costs.

That said, much of that wage growth came from people moving into higher-paying jobs. The Labour Cost Index, which tracks wages in a fixed role, rose only 16% over the same period.

Slower wage growth—even with career progression—and household costs rising faster than inflation help explain why people still feel hard done by.

Workers who’ve earned a pay rise through promotion or job changes may feel it should have lifted their spending power, not just kept them afloat.

But there’s another factor creating the crisis feeling: relative prices.

The RBNZ only targets generalised inflation. It doesn’t matter to the Bank which prices rise or fall, only that the overall change averages around 2%.

People, of course, care about relative prices. It matters if certain costs rise faster than wages or other goods. Such as with the treacherous surge in butter prices.

And it’s not the only example. The price of everyday basics and necessities has kept climbing, crowding out spending on other goods and services, even as headline inflation has stabilised. 

Necessities inflation

In the year to June: groceries rose 4.8%, dairy 9.9%, fruit and meat 5.6% each. Cooking oils jumped 25%, coffee and tea 10.4%. Rents rose 3.2%, adding to years of sharper increases. Council rates were up 12.2%, household energy 9.4%, home and contents insurance 10%, and pharmaceuticals 9.5%.

Other prices need to fall to offset these increases. Petrol dropped 8%, which does help the weekly budget. But many of the other declines were in one-off purchases.

Mobile phones were down 25%, computers 11.1%, and household appliances 8.8%. Other groceries, such as sauces and treats, fell 3.1%. New cars dropped 2.8%, and women’s shoes 3.9%.

Sharon Zollner, chief economist at ANZ, said “inflation in necessities” was crowding out discretionary spending and pushing down prices on those goods.

ANZ’s July consumer confidence survey found a net 21% felt worse off than a year ago, and 8% thought it was a bad time to make a major purchase.

With so much money going on basics, there’s less left for phones, computers, or kitchen espresso machines. Women are paying council rates and power bills instead of buying new shoes.

Future inflation expectations in the survey rose to a two-year high of 5.1%, which Zollner said was likely driven by these sharp increases in food, insurance, electricity, and council costs.

Inflation measured by a ‘Basic Stuff Price Index’ would still be running hot. Prices in a ‘Fun Stuff Index’ might be cooling, but they don’t show up in most weekly budgets.

People aren’t upset about the rising cost of consumption, they’re upset that the rising cost of staying alive is preventing them from buying things that improve their quality of life.

They say to themselves, I worked hard for that promotion and can’t even afford butter.

And that’s why it still feels like a cost crisis.

*This article was first published in our email for paying subscribers. See here for more details and how to subscribe.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

27 Comments

Also known as the "vibecession" that saw Trump reelected in the US ....the disconnect between the high level numbers and the lived reality for the majority.

Up
1

People like David Chaston were surprised at the 2nd Trump election, but that was because they laud a measure which does not measure. Economics as a discipline, and GDP as a measure, fail to account real stocks, real flows, real wastes - and entropy. 

But those counts impact reality, real people needing real stuff. And those people are hurting more and more and entropy and depletion and overpopulation bite harder. This is a one-way trip; you can conjure up money, you cannot conjure up food or copper. Or low-entropy energy. 

Crisis is the wrong word too - permanent and worsening state of affairs would better sum it up. Child Poverty, as I wrote here a long, long time ago, is really Child lack of access the energy and resources. There is only one way to solve that, on a finite planet. 

Up
2

Bollux. Do you reckon the average Chinese kid is worse off financially today than say 50 years ago? Sure some western children might be, but that’s not because of a lack of energy, it’s because we’ve become lazy and produce f all. 

When my grandad was a kid in NZ, even things like toilet paper were hard to afford. These days a couple on min wage in NZ gets $1562 a week, that’s about $1k a week after rent. People aren’t poorer than the old days, they are just better at complaining. 

Up
10

I fear you miss PDKs point...the basis of that improved material wealth has been consumed and cannot occur again

Up
3

"cannot occur again" - I'm not convinced about that either. The sun is still outputting more energy than we could ever use. We just need the technology to harness and store it, and that technology is improving all the time. 

Up
3

I've given you homework to do in the past. Clearly not done. 

Please, before you make statements like your 'sun' one, learn about EROEI,. and learn about entropy. 

I've lived off-grid, mostly on solar, for over 20 years. I study global energy, have done for longer than 20 years. Yes, we will end up on real-time solar, after we have drawn-down existing stocks (fossil energy is merely old sunlight). But it lands at 1kw/sqm, retrieval rates are sub 30% (so 300 watts/sqm, and only ex night, ex cloud). You don't run this society on that collection-rate. 

Do some homework please. 

Up
2

Its hard to do homework on the future. We may invent a better battery and a better way to produce electricity - or we may not. I'd be surprised if we don't come up with something significant in the next 20-30 years though. 

Up
3

Can't believe you're still going on about entropy.

Up
2

Crisis is the wrong word too - permanent and worsening state of affairs would better sum it up. Child Poverty, as I wrote here a long, long time ago, is really Child lack of access the energy and resources. There is only one way to solve that, on a finite planet. 

You might have a point here Power. In Aotearoa, we complain about the cost of shelter and butter. 

Maybe if people accepted the reality of finite resources they would be happy they have the privilege in a cold, damp hovel without something to spread on their toast. The alternative would be a life not much different to being born and living in a Delhi slum or Rio favela (that we don't have our own equivalent yet). 

The Limits to Growth crowd are shy about discussing solutions. And I think I understand why. The majority of the human population would have to be wiped out. It's an uncomfortable discussion springboard. Al Gore might bring it up. Over dinner in his mansion with multiple toilets.  

Up
4

"without something to spread on their toast" - as with my above comment, a couple on min wage get $1.5k a week to spend. They can afford a block of butter every few weeks if that is their priority. 

You can buy a loaf of budget bread and some budget spread for bugger all, I imagine its never been cheaper relative to incomes. 

Up
2

"The Limits to Growth crowd are shy about discussing solutions. And I think I understand why. The majority of the human population would have to be wiped out."

Ultimately the population will decline....the projections are already showing substantial near term declines, however we could be redistributing how those declining resources are used in the meantime in preparation....no dinner parties in multi-bathroom mansions required.

Up
4

Ultimately the population will decline....the projections are already showing substantial near term declines,

Well I've seen recommendations of up to 80% of global population need to be culled to right the ship. Without major war, famine, pestilence, your near term will need to be 200-300 years.   

Up
3

Whats Chinas population projected to be in 2100?...or South Koreas?...or a multitude of others....and allwith no account of wars, famine or pestilence.

Up
1

ANZ hit it on the head. Nobody gets stressed when phones go up in price, we just make do. Can't do the same with food. I spend $12-15k pa on groceries (2.5 pax) and buy a new laptop every 4-5 years. If I am not able to afford a new laptop I will string my old one out another 1-2 years. 

Up
5

"Can't do the same with food" - that's a broad statement. For example, the CPI currently thinks tomatoes are expensive, but that doesn't affect me, as I don't buy them when they are out of season. 

Up
4

Woolworths butter is $8.49. For what it is it's actually quite good value compared to many other foods. Butter is very high in calories and has essential vitamins like A, D, E and K2, minerals like calcium and phosphorus. It's locally produced too and goes a long way.

Up
2

Unfortunately it is a core ingredient in bread, so pushes up the price of a staple to many people.

Up
0

I use a bread maker and have never used butter for bread. Fruit loaf yes. Sunflower oil for bread. The bread recipes I've seen don't involve butter. Bakeries need it for cake type products and probably specialist bread. There was a complaint in the last few weeks by some bakery association about the high price of butter. If that's the case import a few tons and see if it's any cheaper than getting from Fonterra or the like.

Up
0

You won't find butter on the ingredients list of any mass-produced loaf of bread. They haven't used it in decades. Instead, they use industrial seed oils, e.g. Canola oil.

Up
1

A few things! 

Firstly, the big inflation boom of 2021 was almost entirely driven by international airfares, fuel prices, and the price of getting a house built in NZ. While these are only a small part of the CPI basket, the contribution they make to measured CPI can still be very high if the prices go up a lot over a 12- month period. For example, the purchase of new housing is worth about 10% of the CPI basket, so if that price goes up by 20% in a year because demand is high and building materials get crazy expensive, that's 2% added to your annual inflation. Boom. 

Obviously, these big increases in isolated prices are avoidable for many. I wasn't paying to get a house built in 2021, I drive very little, and I decided not to travel overseas. So, we had record inflation, but it didn't affect me hardly at all. In the last couple of years, the price of things that many people cannot avoid have gone up a lot - insurance, local govt rates, mortgage payments, basic grocery food etc. Understandably, people feel worse off.

It is worth noting that wages have almost kept up with CPI/ HLCPI  measured inflation (LCI is not a good measure of wages at all). But, a lot of people have lost some of their part-time hours, and full timers are not picking up the overtime (40+ hours) they used to get.

Anyway, the beatings will continue until morale improves.

Up
5

Firstly, the big inflation boom of 2021 was almost entirely driven by international airfares, fuel prices, and the price of getting a house built in NZ.

I often find your takes on inflation to be very one-sided, but this is just plain dishonest. From 2021q1 to 2022q1 we had food up 7%, clothing up 3%, household contents up 6%, recreation up 5%, miscellaneous up 6%.

Up
0

Can't believe you made me and go check the numbers! Maybe you were getting confused between 2021 and 2023? Or perhaps you are mistaking % increase for asingle item with the weighted contribution of that item to overall CPI?

Anyway, backend of 2021 - look at nontradable inflation. Absolutely dominated by the price of getting a house built (beige) - adding 1.6% to total CPI on its own.

Now, look at tradable inflation at the end of 2021. Dominated by fuel (tellow) and international travel (pink). Food inflation picked up strongly in 2023.

Up
1

I explained exactly what my numbers are and if you checked then you should know I'm correct. For example the food index was 1057 in 2021q1 and 1128 in 2022q1, do the maths it's 7% growth. Yes this is the increase of each item (which I think is pretty obvious from the context) and it shouldn't be hard to verify. I don't have time to look up the contribution to total of these items to CPI but it will not be small, these items are large chunks of the CPI basket. Several of them are clearly visible in your charts.

Your tradable inflation chart backs me up, over that period fuel and airfares didn't exactly dominate tradables, they were major contributors but less than half of the total. Other items also had way above their normal inflation during that period, mostly in the groups I've mentioned previously.

You keep pushing this narrative that inflation was caused almost purely by overseas supply side shocks,  but the data indicates a much more complex mix of causes - of which I don't dispute supply side shocks were one significant part, alongside demand expansion and demand shifts.

By the way, you also have an infuriating habit of baselessly and incorrectly implying people who disagree with you somehow don't understand the data they are looking at. You've done this enough times now that I'm inclined to believe it's a deliberate strategy to undermine the credibility of anyone who disagrees with you. Please stop this and start engaging in better faith. If you genuinely can't see what someone else is seeing in the data, then ask for an explanation rather than assuming or implying that they are wrong.

Up
1

Do you want me to send you the tables so that you can add things up? For the avoidance of doubt..

  • CPI for the year of 2021 was 7.2% (unadjusted)
  • International airfares, private transport supplies (fuel) and the price of building a house made up 4.15% of that total
  • Property rates and rent added another 0.68%
  • Grocery food, meats, and fruit and veg added a whopping 0.49%
Up
0

It is worth noting that wages have almost kept up with CPI/ HLCPI  measured inflation (LCI is not a good measure of wages at all). But, a lot of people have lost some of their part-time hours, and full timers are not picking up the overtime (40+ hours) they used to get.

Bit disingenuous Jfoe. While I'm not challenging the accuracy of what you say, income growth does not match that of house price growth over the medium to long term. And considering that house price growth is largely an expansion of the money supply, that suggests income growth does not track inflation positively.  

Up
1

As Dan has noted wages in aggregate have almost recovered...wages for many , who are still fortunate enough to be employed have not nearly improved enough to offset the 'inflation' (living costs)....that is the point that all those that were observing  the 'strength' of the US economy also missed.

Up
1