The Government has provided details on how the country will manage and conserve fuel if the situation worsens.
Finance Minister Nicola Willis and Associate Energy Minister Shane Jones made the announcement from Parliament on Friday. with Willis said the measures; “reflect the specific potential risks New Zealand could face as a result of major fuel disruption driven by the conflict in the Middle East”.
“New Zealand has sufficient fuel stocks, but we are planning for potential scenarios where obtaining future supply could become increasingly difficult," Jones said.
Phases
The phases can apply differently to petrol, diesel and jet fuel if needed.

The country is currently at phase one - deemed the ‘watchful’ level which entails monitoring and strengthening diplomatic ties for supply.
Phase two would have more “active coordination between government and industry to shore up fuel supply and support increased efforts in demand reduction”, and a stronger push for voluntary fuel conservation and a public sector reduction in fuel use.
“If disruption increases, the plan allows for stronger interventions at Phases 3 and 4 including prioritising fuel for emergency services, freight and food supply chains, and key industries that underpin New Zealand’s economy,” Willis said.
“We have the gift of time,” Willis said, so would be consulting for the next two weeks with industry, fuel users, and local government on phase three and four implementation.

Moving phases
The Government’s Fuel Security Ministerial Oversight Group will decide whether the country needs to move phases based on any changes to six of the following criteria:
- export restrictions, if any of New Zealand’s source refineries introduce or relax export restrictions
- changes to New Zealand’s fuel stock levels of plus or minus three days since the most recent published update
- a fuel company informs the government that they are unlikely or unable to fill future orders
- a breach, or a notification of an imminent breach, of the minimum storage obligations
- any significant policy changes in Australia or from the International Energy Agency
- a significant disruption to regional distribution.
Fuel saving
In phase one, the the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Authority will launch an information campaign about voluntary ways New Zealanders can conserve fuel and save money. Moving up phases, phase two would encourage fuel reduction, in the hope that more intensive measures in phase 3 can be avoided.
12 Comments
Moving phases step 2 suggests while should have already moved. And if not by Monday won’t we be 3 days shorter ?
They're still working out the framework.
If this is long term, whether we zig or zag on day 6 or 20 isn't changing the outcome.
"and get back to Phases 2/3 as soon as possible".
Yup.
That's all they're about.
Phase 1: Do nothing
Phase 2: Do nothing
Phase 3: Limits
Phase 4: Screwed (except PDK).
Stage 2 is clenching
‘We remain on track’: The Government isn’t considering putting a pause on its plans to build a LNG import terminal, Energy Minister Simon Watts says
https://www.interest.co.nz/public-policy/137809/%E2%80%98we-remain-trac…
I’m not necessarily a fan of the LNG option, but I don’t really think the current scenario changes anything. LNG is meant to be an emergency backup for dry years, not something we rely on day to day.
Dry year back up is not the driver for this....it is possibly the worst option for that purpose.
The best option for that purpose (alone) is the cheapest option, assuming it will work. I’m not across whether there are cheaper ones.
Just about anything else would be cheaper (and more secure).....I suspect they are using the dry year fear to enable maintaining a viable (and horrendously expensive) gas network into the future rather than seeking alternatives.
It needs to be something significant, not just a few solar panels. What are the other options that can reliably generate significant amounts of electricity for a billion?
Like I say I’m not a big fan or anything, but it seems like a much cheaper option to Lake Onslow
Yes I would like some cheaper examples to generate on demand electricity, that also have greater availability.
We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment
Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.