sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Guy Trafford looks ahead. He sees Russia (negatively) and China (positively) having big influences of farming prospects in 2023, but local changes being less important - except for the big unknown, the weather

Rural News / opinion
Guy Trafford looks ahead. He sees Russia (negatively) and China (positively) having big influences of farming prospects in 2023, but local changes being less important - except for the big unknown, the weather
Farmers and cows
Image sourced from Shutterstock.com

You don't know what you don't know, so assessing what is ahead for New Zealand farming is always fraught.

The current major influences we are seeing at the moment are climate extremes and Russians actions in the Ukraine and influences elsewhere. You could add in government policies although I’d like to think we have hit a hiatus there, perhaps October 17th might have something to do with this, although most policies are reasonably (if a little unsettled) in place.

Covid also can almost be relegated to a bad dream (at least until we find out otherwise) that has run its course.

Russia’s action last year and still continuing at the moment has had a greater impact upon global trade than anything I can recall seeing before. Even the impact of Covid-19 while far reaching didn’t impact as immediately and severely as what Putin unleashed with impacts upon energy and grain markets and we have been fortunate that his actions haven’t extended to nuclear fallout. Going into 2023 it certainly appears that Ukraine’s chances of defeating Russia are looking increasingly more likely. As one observer has said initially the West actions were to provide weapons etc to prevent Ukraine being defeated whereas now the West is beginning to supply weapons to actually defeat Russia. Whether this can be achieved before the end of 2023 is probably unlikely and so we are unlikely to see any great changes to the energy and grain markets for some time.

So high costs to fuel and fertiliser will continue as these will obviously keep food costs up and grain shortages will persist.

Meat and dairy on the local markets despite seeing international prices falling are still seeing high prices for consumers. Wholesale cheese prices (within New Zealand) from the major producers are still at record levels despite the GDT significantly back on the record level of nearly a year ago. No doubt the cost of logistics and labour are having a contributing affect however prices seem to indicate some gouging going on through the chains.

The consumer has been told to expect inflated prices and so accept that the price increases are inevitable but meat and cheese should start to rebalance on local markets soon if there are any ethics out there.

Counterbalancing this and positive signals for traditional producer/exporters, the reawakening of China and them re-joining global trade is likely to be the main game changer for these products and in-fact may provide an export driven lift to price before local processors feel a need to readjust local prices.

Chinese New Year (starting on Sunday, January 22) may be an early indicator whether such an uplift is occurring. There are rumours that restaurant bookings in the major Chinese cities are up to pre-Covid levels. The Chinese have also been building up their savings over the prolonged lock down periods. So, if they are anything like Kiwis, they will be looking forward to splashing out.

Nothing is ever certain especially now but producers in areas not affected by weather extremes may be in a position to see some positive movements.

Unfortunately, weather extremes are going to be with us for far longer than I can foresee and most farming systems are going to be put to the test as to how resilient they are. This is going to apply to all forms of land use. What no one can predict (as NIWA predicts them all at various times) is whether it will be floods, drought, fires, wind or combinations of all.

I can recall thinking in the early 90’s when prices were poor and the UK and other countries were afflicted with mad cow disease and foot and mouth who would want to be a farmer! However, out of those game changing diseases New Zealand found its feet and was able to capitalise on them and we have taken those gains right through to the present times.

So, impacts on farming looking forward are likely to be harsh but we need to keep things in perspective and if we are having hard times dealing with the climate and other issues from afar it is likely other producers will be having far worse times than us. We just have to look over the ‘ditch’ at Australia and the issues many farmers there have to face.

It pays to remember that adversity is a relative thing and while things here may not feel rosy, compared to many others around the globe, we are still in a good position to make positive gains. How the year ahead pans is going to be anyone’s guess and by the end of it we are likely to have a totally different view of it than what we think we see ahead now. However, through a lot of trials and tribulations we hopefully will find we are not in such a bad place.

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

16 Comments

 The Chinese have also been building up their savings over the prolonged lock down periods. So, if they are anything like Kiwis, they will be looking forward to splashing out.

Ahh no. This was written like a 'reckon' shared around the water cooler. Chinese people have not had their incomes supplemented by the govt during lockdowns like they have in NZ. Futhermore, Chinese peoples' savings behavior is fundamentally different to NZers. If anything, Chinese are being more cautious with their savings and income than ever before.   

From Nikkei last Oct, but a good analysis of the reality. 

https://asia.nikkei.com/Opinion/COVID-s-end-will-not-bring-back-China-s…

Up
5

Agree its the direct opposite from what our Chinese customers tell us - they have been locked in for so long they have exhausted reserves. They didn't have the support we all got(and moan about!!).

It will come back but will take a bit of time and be different with the harsh experience many have had.

Up
2

It will come back but will take a bit of time and be different with the harsh experience many have had.

Agree it will come back but not like before as Fitch says. Another report from McKinsey. This one is more rainbows and lollipops. 

https://www.mckinsey.com/cn/our-insights/our-insights/2023-mckinsey-chi…

Up
0

Going into 2023 it certainly appears that Ukraine’s chances of defeating Russia are looking increasingly more likely. ...

Getting a little off topic here but are we to assume that when columnists write stuff like this they have the same expertise on this topic as to what they normally write on (and vice versa) or do they just feel obligated to comment on the war because they are talking about its effects (on trade).

I'm not wanting to attack GT a lot of writers do this are we just meant to ignore it? I trust GT on farming but I think he's completely off track here. If commentators want to turn this into a Ukraine thread, he did bring it up.

Up
4

What's your take?

Up
0

Russia are currently grinding Ukraine down with a fraction of their potential military force and have the ability to out escalate (with conventional means) anything the Ukraine Armed Forces can possibly muster with NATO help. Everyone who's important knows this but wont say it out loud and the only way Russia loses is if this escalates to WW3 and then everyone does.

Remember this is an article about farming.

Up
3

You still haven't caught up with reality.

 

If Russia would be fighting with one or two hands tied to their back and winning, they would've taken the country shortly after March, when their troops were in Kiev.

It's true, the Ukrainian counteroffensive has slowed down and there were some gains by RU (Soledar) but the costs in lives and materials are staggering.

UA are fighting smart, which means they will retreat if necessary but at very high costs to the attacker.

UA will make their next move sooner or later and it will be another defeat of the fascist Russian regime.

 

Up
0

So much insight. Where did you get gains by RU in Soledar costed a staggering lives and materials from? It was not the MSM. It's only a PMC with old equipment that could have taken losses.

The real question is why is Ukrainian propaganda any more trustworthy than Russian?

Up
0

Agreed. Lane departure warning failed with this aspect of Guy's article. For real discussions and occasionally hilarious comment threads, try Larry Johnston (sonar21), Andrei Martyanov (smoothiex12) or Bernhardt (Moon of Alabama). Parroting the Current Thing, OTOH, just devalues the rest of the opinion piece.

Up
0

LOL discounting the author because his opinion does not fit yer own world view.

Guy has hit the nail on the head (as per usual).

Up
0

I hope the farmers have a great year. They've been demonised for years now & yet they fundamentally underwrite this country, its citizens & their lifestyles. Hang in their lads (& lasses) the light has appeared at the end of the tunnel.

Up
11

Wrong John,

I agree. I have no farming connections, but think they have been treated badly. Of course there are poor farmers, but overall I think they do a great job for this country.

I have actually spent some time on the subject of farms emissions and when you step back and look at the bigger picture, their emissions are miniscule. NZ's total gross emissions represent some 0.17% of global emissions. If all farming emissions stopped tomorrow, the world would not notice. With energy security now a major issue, China alone will be increasing its coal related emissions by much more than NZ's total. 

Government should be putting all its efforts to support farmers in developing and using technology to drive down methane emissions in particular.

Up
7

Has it not already done so? Plus all the levies proposed are ringfenced to pay for research as well.how much capacity is there to undertake more research, or will more money just go to flakey startups and consultants?

Up
1

There's been some back and forth on whether they're ring-fenced, but farmers concern is that even if they are much of the revenue will be lost to administration.

Keith's suggestion was a simple processor levy only at the level required to get the necessary funds so there would be minimal losses.

If we did come up with a new technology the intellectual property would generate billions.

Up
0

There will be admin costs, wether public or private. Thing is, the initial levy is very small, about the same as a nait tag, or other various levies in place.

Up
2

The argument that our emissions or their lack of, makes no difference is a very false one.

We hear the same in the UK, EU and the developing countries emphasize their right to economic growth & development as their excuse not to do anything.

As soon as we add the reductions of emissions in the UK, NZ, EU and other countries together we'll see an impact indeed.

A collectively caused problem can only be solved by collective action. We have no moral ground to tell someone to do something if we're not doing anything ourselves. It's called leadership!

Big trade blocks like the EU and US can and will impose emission tariffs for countries that don't reduce emissions. NZ is in the pole position and very competitive.

 

Up
3