Reserve Bank to introduce new farm lending capital requirements from June

Reserve Bank to introduce new farm lending capital requirements from June

By Gareth Vaughan

The Reserve Bank plans to introduce new farm lending capital requirements in June in a move that's expected to see banks assign more equity to the funding of rural loans and probably lead to higher borrowing costs for farmers.

A Reserve Bank spokeswoman confirmed to interest.co.nz yesterday that the central bank plans to have new farm lending capital requirements in place from the June quarter this year. She said further details should be revealed in the Reserve Bank's next Financial Stability Report due on May 11.

The central bank has been looking to implement new capital adequacy rules for rural lending for some time.

Last year it delayed their introduction after banks expressed concerns it could significantly increase lending costs for farmers. At that point interest.co.nz was told the new criteria would have required banks to assume higher levels of defaults for rural loans and put aside more capital to back those loans. Bankers said the changes would have increased lending costs by between 30 to 50 basis points.

Richard Bowman, BNZ's head of agribusiness, told interest.co.nz that although he's not privy to the central bank's plans the assumption is for a tightening of rural lending criteria.

"What it does do for us, and all the banks, is it will mean that we have to apply more of our equity balance sheet to funding agriculture loans which in effect has the effect of making funding to the sector more expensive," said Bowman. "So that's the impact it'll have to farmers."

Philip York, a Federated Farmers national board member with responsibility for economics and commerce, said he too was unaware of the details of the Reserve Bank's plans.

"We know something's going to happen in the June quarter but we don't know anything about it," said York. "It may be onerous, it may be not so onerous. The last thing you want to do when agriculture at the moment is coming up with the goods is to stifle it.  We've got to be very careful about this."

Concerns over rural debt levels have rumbled around for the past couple of years. Farming comprises about 15% of new Zealand bank lending, according to the Reserve Bank. The latest Reserve Bank sector credit data shows agricultural debt down by NZ$52 million in February to NZ$47.75 billion from NZ$47.8 billion in January, but up NZ$385 million versus February 2010's NZ$47.36 billion.

A Reserve Bank paper from 2009 which discusses a particular focus from the central bank on housing and farm lending, gives an example of a farm loan worth NZ$1,000 having a minimum capital requirement of NZ$80.

The Reserve Bank flagged changes to rural lending criteria in its November 2009 Financial Stability Report.

In addition to concerns with the banks’ modelling of housing loans, the Reserve Bank also has concerns regarding the treatment of rural exposures under the banks’ models. The Reserve Bank is concerned that the current treatment is ‘procyclical’: the models tend to see farm lending as unrealistically safe during upswings, but during rural downturns like the current one they produce much higher risk weights that could overly constrain lending.

The Reserve Bank has proposed changes that should produce assessments of rural lending that are more ‘through the cycle’ in nature. The Reserve Bank has consulted industry on these changes and expects to implement the revised requirements in mid-2010, to allow for a reasonable transition period.

And in last November's Financial Stability Report the central bank had a warning for farmers, saying farm prices may need to continue falling to see “substantial” buying interest reemerge and this could see dairy farmers who took on debt to expand during the boom times wind up in negative equity.

Bowman said the BNZ's focus was on funding cash flow positive farms and focusing on cash flow as its primary source of repayment. The message he is giving to farmers is that there's an opportunity to make a lot of cash at the moment, with commodity prices at record highs, if farms are run well.

"Farmers need to be very careful about what they do with the cash," said Bowman. "We're certainly not encouraging the sector to rely on any potential capital gain in the near-term. Wealth creation comes from generating cash and using it very wisely. That's the message we're giving."

BNZ estimates its shares of the rural lending market has risen by 1.4% to about 19% over the past two years.

* This article was first published in our email for paid subscribers this morning. See here for more details and to subscribe.

We welcome your help to improve our coverage of this issue. Any examples or experiences to relate? Any links to other news, data or research to shed more light on this? Any insight or views on what might happen next or what should happen next? Any errors to correct?

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.

4 Comments

Comment Filter

Highlight new comments in the last hr(s).

Good try Iain...cut the fatcats...fat chance....Bolly's rural move looks like he has had a guts full...finally....wonder what jerked him into action....end of the rural property speculation is heading to a farm gate near you....oops...half the National party are deeply into this capital gains lark...will we see govt subsidies for indebted farmers....it is election year!

The article cited Reserve Bank Bulletin Vol 72 by Hosking and Irvine about bank lending and rural sector I have been poking it under peoples noses for the last 2 years.

Banks are already factoring in their increased risk with higher interest rates since 2008 and any excuse will do.Incentivised lending and the race to gain market share has pretty much bought the rural sector to its knees.

Bank managers were working with land agents, lawyers ,valuers and accountants to throw money at people and I know there will be people ready to attack those that borrowed. Budgets were done by Bank managers to ensure lending would get through credit. Incentivised lending has to stop.

What has inspired Bollard, probably the fact that NZ's engine room the rural economy was almost bought to its knees because of Bank behaviour.And the Banks way of dealing with rural debt is only making the economic viability of rural sector more perilous. Not all farmers are benefiting from the high commodity prices, a lot of sheep and beef guys had to unload in Dec because of drought and haven't been able to benefit from commodity prices and the high prices have no guarantees that they will continue going into the next season.

Land values have dropped significantly and despite some buyer interest Banks are not lending especially sheep and beef sector.

Bank Ombudsman on National Radio this morning, the office continues to get higher complaints than ever and increasingly more complaints around financial hardship.

Aside from the capital requirements that reserve Bank will implement there are many other changes that will continue going out to 2016 that will affect Bank lending. BNZ comments that lending is now focused on cash flow, beggars belief as they previously lent on future capital gain and encouraged farmers to borrow more on that belief that land values will increase further.

Fair weathered friends.

Regarding increased costs being passed on, two things, 1) new borrowing will end up less by volume, so total borrowing cost will be less, plus, 2) if RB start getting enthusiastic with the approaches they have described here:

http://www.interest.co.nz/news/52805/rbnz-says-likes-loan-value-restrictions-capital-buffers-are-possible-ways-help-cool-futur#comment-609846 

as well, then the OCR can stay lower for longer, or be reduced further, increasing cash returns to this sector and other foreign exchange earners. Is that a bad thing? Will it mean existing debt can be reduced faster along with total borrowing costs? I think so, why would that be bad?

Seems to me that RB have killed TINA at last and are filling in the grave. Some of us are not sorry to see TINA go, because the future can (will) be brighter for NZ's economy, as a whole, if RB can keep TINA dead and buried. 

Cheers, Les.

www.mea.org.nz

 

 

What farmers do with the cash returns,or lack of , is of vital concern to the Govt. The tax take to balance the books is under increasing pressure. The banks will play the game as long as they get their pound of flesh. Agriculture needs, and must have, the financial understanding of all sectors, if it is to help pull this country out of the double recession.There is too much hung on the effect of the RWC to drive the economy. Tourism is in trouble,and we now have once again,a rising dollar. 

 

Your access to our unique content is free - always has been. But ad revenues are diving so we need your direct support.

Become a supporter

Thanks, I'm already a supporter.