sign up log in
Want to go ad-free? Find out how, here.

Allan Barber wonders if the Government has learned its lesson over the 'farcical' Gulf States Agrihub venture

Rural News
Allan Barber wonders if the Government has learned its lesson over the 'farcical' Gulf States Agrihub venture

By Allan Barber

It’s hard to imagine what on earth the government was thinking when it agreed to buy off a Saudi Arabian businessman Hmood al-Ali al-Khalaf to the tune of $11 million because it hoped he would stop objecting to a Gulf States Free Trade Agreement.

The official excuse is that the Labour government’s ban on live sheep exports laid New Zealand open to being sued for damages under WTO rules which could have exceeded the amount outlaid.

There is no evidence this would have happened.

In fact if the government is remotely concerned about a near decade old ban on live sheep exports, we shouldn’t even be talking about participating in the Trans Pacific Partnership which has much greater potential to interfere with New Zealand’s sovereign right to determine its own commercial laws.

The purpose claimed for the ‘investment’ of $11 million was to establish an Agrihub for the promotion of New Zealand agriculture.

According to a press release put out by Brownrigg Agriculture, the Hawkes Bay farmer and exporter contracted to supply 900 pregnant ewes for the venture, the company offered assistance with the lambing by experienced New Zealand stockmen.

This was refused.

Surely this should have been a condition of the contract, if the government was truly concerned with setting up a successful Agrihub. It shows the enormous risk associated with giving a government department decision making responsibility for a complex (John Key’s new favourite word) practical and commercial arrangement.

I imagine everybody will now be diving for cover, but the Prime Minister’s attempts to attribute ultimate responsibility for this messy saga to the Labour government back in 2007 are quite frankly laughable.

The farcical nature of the attempt to buy off Hmood al Khalaf was underlined by the Minister of Agriculture’s broadcast explanation of the 75% lambing death rate as being caused by sandstorms, when Brownrigg’s media release the same day blamed heavy rain and the range of illness at peak lambing.

If ever there was a justification for the government to keep its sticky fingers out of real farming ventures, this is it.

I hope it has learned its lesson!

To subscribe to our weekly Rural email, enter your email address here.


Farms For Sale: the most up-to-date and comprehensive listing of working farms in New Zealand, here »


Here are some links for updated prices for

Y Lamb

Select chart tabs



Allan Barber is a commentator on agribusiness, especially the meat industry, and lives in the Matakana Wine Country. He is chairman of the Warkworth A&P Show Committee. You can contact him by email at or read his blog here »

We welcome your comments below. If you are not already registered, please register to comment.

Remember we welcome robust, respectful and insightful debate. We don't welcome abusive or defamatory comments and will de-register those repeatedly making such comments. Our current comment policy is here.


Payoff = corruption

What exactly are they thinking.


Good call Allan


The Saudi in question took a 3rd stake in Brownrigg agriculture, the company involved in sending the animals.
What did the government pay for the animals? Was there conflict of interest? Did his 3rd share go in front of the OIO for approval?
Was it the Saudi getting paid off, or was it Brownrigg Agriculture getting bailed out?